Impacto da pandemia nas produções científicas em audiologia: um protocolo de revisão de escopo

Ribeiro, Georgea Espindola; Pereira, Elora Bion; Silva, Daniela Polo Camargo da

doi:10.1590/1982-0216/20242632224s

Georgea Espindola Ribeiro

Conceitualização

Análise de dados

Redação do manuscrito original

Universidade de São Paulo - USP, Faculdade de Medicina, Hospital das Clínicas, São Paulo, Brasil.

https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3969-5252

Elora Bion Pereira

Metodologia

Redação - Revisão e edição

Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina - UFSC, Departamento de Fonoaudiologia, Florianópolis, Santa Catarina, Brasil.

https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8531-8207

Daniela Polo Camargo da Silva

Administração do projeto

Disponibilização de ferramentas

Supervisão, Redação - Revisão e edição

Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina - UFSC, Departamento de Fonoaudiologia, Florianópolis, Santa Catarina, Brasil.

https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2092-9361

Endereço para correspondência: Daniela Polo Camargo da Silva, Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina, Departamento de Fonoaudiologia, Rua Engenheiro Agronômico Andrei Cristian Ferreira, s/n - Trindade, CEP: 88040-900 - Santa Catarina, Florianópolis, Brasil, E-mail: daniela-polo@uol.com.br

Conflito de interesses: Inexistente

Tabelas (4)

Thumbnail

SECTION ITEM PRISMA-ScR CHECKLIST ITEM REPORTED ON PAGE # TITLE Title 1 Identify the report as a scoping review. 1 ABSTRACT Structured summary 2 Provide a structured summary that includes (as applicable): background, objectives, eligibility criteria, sources of evidence, charting methods, results, and conclusions that relate to the review questions and objectives. 1 INTRODUCTION Rationale 3 Describe the rationale for the review in the context of what is already known. Explain why the review questions/objectives lend themselves to a scoping review approach. 2-3 Objectives 4 Provide an explicit statement of the questions and objectives being addressed with reference to their key elements (e.g., population or participants, concepts, and context) or other relevant key elements used to conceptualize the review questions and/or objectives. 3 METHODS Protocol and registration 5 Indicate whether a review protocol exists; state if and where it can be accessed (e.g., a Web address); and if available, provide registration information, including the registration number. 3 Eligibility criteria 6 Specify characteristics of the sources of evidence used as eligibility criteria (e.g., years considered, language, and publication status), and provide a rationale. 4 Information sources* 7 Describe all information sources in the search (e.g., databases with dates of coverage and contact with authors to identify additional sources), as well as the date the most recent search was executed. 4 Search 8 Present the full electronic search strategy for at least 1 database, including any limits used, such that it could be repeated. 4 Selection of sources of evidence† 9 State the process for selecting sources of evidence (i.e., screening and eligibility) included in the scoping review. 4 Data charting process‡ 10 Describe the methods of charting data from the included sources of evidence (e.g., calibrated forms or forms that have been tested by the team before their use, and whether data charting was done independently or in duplicate) and any processes for obtaining and confirming data from investigators. 4 Data items 11 List and define all variables for which data were sought and any assumptions and simplifications made. Click here to enter text. Critical appraisal of individual sources of evidence§ 12 If done, provide a rationale for conducting a critical appraisal of included sources of evidence; describe the methods used and how this information was used in any data synthesis (if appropriate). Click here to enter text. Synthesis of results 13 Describe the methods of handling and summarizing the data that were charted. 5 RESULTS Selection of sources of evidence 14 Give numbers of sources of evidence screened, assessed for eligibility, and included in the review, with reasons for exclusions at each stage, ideally using a flow diagram. Click here to enter text. Characteristics of sources of evidence 15 For each source of evidence, present characteristics for which data were charted and provide the citations. Click here to enter text. Critical appraisal within sources of evidence 16 If done, present data on critical appraisal of included sources of evidence (see item 12). Click here to enter text. Results of individual sources of evidence 17 For each included source of evidence, present the relevant data that were charted that relate to the review questions and objectives. Click here to enter text. Synthesis of results 18 Summarize and/or present the charting results as they relate to the review questions and objectives. Click here to enter text. DISCUSSION Summary of evidence 19 Summarize the main results (including an overview of concepts, themes, and types of evidence available), link to the review questions and objectives, and consider the relevance to key groups. Click here to enter text. Limitations 20 Discuss the limitations of the scoping review process. Click here to enter text. Conclusions 21 Provide a general interpretation of the results with respect to the review questions and objectives, as well as potential implications and/or next steps. Click here to enter text. FUNDING Funding 22 Describe sources of funding for the included sources of evidence, as well as sources of funding for the scoping review. Describe the role of the funders of the scoping review. Click here to enter text.

Thumbnail

Quadro 1
Estratégia de busca

Thumbnail

Quadro 2
Guia de extração dos dados

Thumbnail

SECTION ITEM PRISMA-ScR CHECKLIST ITEM REPORTED ON PAGE # TITLE Title 1 Identify the report as a scoping review. 1 ABSTRACT Structured summary 2 Provide a structured summary that includes (as applicable): background, objectives, eligibility criteria, sources of evidence, charting methods, results, and conclusions that relate to the review questions and objectives. 1 INTRODUCTION Rationale 3 Describe the rationale for the review in the context of what is already known. Explain why the review questions/objectives lend themselves to a scoping review approach. 2-3 Objectives 4 Provide an explicit statement of the questions and objectives being addressed with reference to their key elements (e.g., population or participants, concepts, and context) or other relevant key elements used to conceptualize the review questions and/or objectives. 3 METHODS Protocol and registration 5 Indicate whether a review protocol exists; state if and where it can be accessed (e.g., a Web address); and if available, provide registration information, including the registration number. 3 Eligibility criteria 6 Specify characteristics of the sources of evidence used as eligibility criteria (e.g., years considered, language, and publication status), and provide a rationale. 4 Information sources* 7 Describe all information sources in the search (e.g., databases with dates of coverage and contact with authors to identify additional sources), as well as the date the most recent search was executed. 4 Search 8 Present the full electronic search strategy for at least 1 database, including any limits used, such that it could be repeated. 4 Selection of sources of evidence† 9 State the process for selecting sources of evidence (i.e., screening and eligibility) included in the scoping review. 4 Data charting process‡ 10 Describe the methods of charting data from the included sources of evidence (e.g., calibrated forms or forms that have been tested by the team before their use, and whether data charting was done independently or in duplicate) and any processes for obtaining and confirming data from investigators. 4 Data items 11 List and define all variables for which data were sought and any assumptions and simplifications made. Click here to enter text. Critical appraisal of individual sources of evidence§ 12 If done, provide a rationale for conducting a critical appraisal of included sources of evidence; describe the methods used and how this information was used in any data synthesis (if appropriate). Click here to enter text. Synthesis of results 13 Describe the methods of handling and summarizing the data that were charted. 5 RESULTS Selection of sources of evidence 14 Give numbers of sources of evidence screened, assessed for eligibility, and included in the review, with reasons for exclusions at each stage, ideally using a flow diagram. Click here to enter text. Characteristics of sources of evidence 15 For each source of evidence, present characteristics for which data were charted and provide the citations. Click here to enter text. Critical appraisal within sources of evidence 16 If done, present data on critical appraisal of included sources of evidence (see item 12). Click here to enter text. Results of individual sources of evidence 17 For each included source of evidence, present the relevant data that were charted that relate to the review questions and objectives. Click here to enter text. Synthesis of results 18 Summarize and/or present the charting results as they relate to the review questions and objectives. Click here to enter text. DISCUSSION Summary of evidence 19 Summarize the main results (including an overview of concepts, themes, and types of evidence available), link to the review questions and objectives, and consider the relevance to key groups. Click here to enter text. Limitations 20 Discuss the limitations of the scoping review process. Click here to enter text. Conclusions 21 Provide a general interpretation of the results with respect to the review questions and objectives, as well as potential implications and/or next steps. Click here to enter text. FUNDING Funding 22 Describe sources of funding for the included sources of evidence, as well as sources of funding for the scoping review. Describe the role of the funders of the scoping review. Click here to enter text.

Busca	Palavra-chave	Registros encontrados
# 1	((«Audiology»[Mesh] OR «Audiology») OR («Hearing Loss» [Mesh] OR «Hearing Loss» OR «Hypoacusis» OR «Hearing Impairment» OR «Transitory Deafness» OR «Transitory Hearing Loss»)) OR («Hearing»[Mesh] OR «Hearing»)) OR («Hearing Tests»[Mesh] OR «Hearing Tests»))
# 2	(«Systematic Review» [Publication Type] OR «Systematic Review»)
# 1 AND # 2	((((“Audiology”[Mesh] OR “Audiology”) OR (“Hearing Loss” [Mesh] OR “Hearing Loss” OR “Hypoacusis” OR “Hearing Impairment” OR “Transitory Deafness” OR “Transitory Hearing Loss”)) OR (“Hearing”[Mesh] OR “Hearing”)) OR (“Hearing Tests”[Mesh] OR “Hearing Tests”)) AND (“Systematic Review” [Publication Type] OR “Systematic Review”)))) Filters: from 2019 - 2021

SECTION	ITEM	PRISMA-ScR CHECKLIST ITEM	REPORTED ON PAGE #
TITLE
Title	1	Identify the report as a scoping review.	REPORTED ON PAGE #	1
ABSTRACT				1
Structured summary	2	Provide a structured summary that includes (as applicable): background, objectives, eligibility criteria, sources of evidence, charting methods, results, and conclusions that relate to the review questions and objectives.	1
INTRODUCTION
Rationale	3	Describe the rationale for the review in the context of what is already known. Explain why the review questions/objectives lend themselves to a scoping review approach.	1	2-3
Objectives	4	Provide an explicit statement of the questions and objectives being addressed with reference to their key elements (e.g., population or participants, concepts, and context) or other relevant key elements used to conceptualize the review questions and/or objectives.	3
METHODS
Protocol and registration	5	Indicate whether a review protocol exists; state if and where it can be accessed (e.g., a Web address); and if available, provide registration information, including the registration number.	3	3
Eligibility criteria	6	Specify characteristics of the sources of evidence used as eligibility criteria (e.g., years considered, language, and publication status), and provide a rationale.	4
Information sources*	7	Describe all information sources in the search (e.g., databases with dates of coverage and contact with authors to identify additional sources), as well as the date the most recent search was executed.	4
Search	8	Present the full electronic search strategy for at least 1 database, including any limits used, such that it could be repeated.	4
Selection of sources of evidence†	9	State the process for selecting sources of evidence (i.e., screening and eligibility) included in the scoping review.	4
Data charting process‡	10	Describe the methods of charting data from the included sources of evidence (e.g., calibrated forms or forms that have been tested by the team before their use, and whether data charting was done independently or in duplicate) and any processes for obtaining and confirming data from investigators.	4
Data items	11	List and define all variables for which data were sought and any assumptions and simplifications made.	Click here to enter text.
Critical appraisal of individual sources of evidence§	12	If done, provide a rationale for conducting a critical appraisal of included sources of evidence; describe the methods used and how this information was used in any data synthesis (if appropriate).	Click here to enter text.
Synthesis of results	13	Describe the methods of handling and summarizing the data that were charted.	5
RESULTS
Selection of sources of evidence	14	Give numbers of sources of evidence screened, assessed for eligibility, and included in the review, with reasons for exclusions at each stage, ideally using a flow diagram.	5	Click here to enter text.
Characteristics of sources of evidence	15	For each source of evidence, present characteristics for which data were charted and provide the citations.	Click here to enter text.
Critical appraisal within sources of evidence	16	If done, present data on critical appraisal of included sources of evidence (see item 12).	Click here to enter text.
Results of individual sources of evidence	17	For each included source of evidence, present the relevant data that were charted that relate to the review questions and objectives.	Click here to enter text.
Synthesis of results	18	Summarize and/or present the charting results as they relate to the review questions and objectives.	Click here to enter text.
DISCUSSION
Summary of evidence	19	Summarize the main results (including an overview of concepts, themes, and types of evidence available), link to the review questions and objectives, and consider the relevance to key groups.	Click here to enter text.	Click here to enter text.
Limitations	20	Discuss the limitations of the scoping review process.	Click here to enter text.
Conclusions	21	Provide a general interpretation of the results with respect to the review questions and objectives, as well as potential implications and/or next steps.	Click here to enter text.
FUNDING
Funding	22	Describe sources of funding for the included sources of evidence, as well as sources of funding for the scoping review. Describe the role of the funders of the scoping review.	Click here to enter text.	Click here to enter text.

SECTION	ITEM	PRISMA-ScR CHECKLIST ITEM	REPORTED ON PAGE #
TITLE
Title	1	Identify the report as a scoping review.	REPORTED ON PAGE #	1
ABSTRACT				1
Structured summary	2	Provide a structured summary that includes (as applicable): background, objectives, eligibility criteria, sources of evidence, charting methods, results, and conclusions that relate to the review questions and objectives.	1
INTRODUCTION
Rationale	3	Describe the rationale for the review in the context of what is already known. Explain why the review questions/objectives lend themselves to a scoping review approach.	1	2-3
Objectives	4	Provide an explicit statement of the questions and objectives being addressed with reference to their key elements (e.g., population or participants, concepts, and context) or other relevant key elements used to conceptualize the review questions and/or objectives.	3
METHODS
Protocol and registration	5	Indicate whether a review protocol exists; state if and where it can be accessed (e.g., a Web address); and if available, provide registration information, including the registration number.	3	3
Eligibility criteria	6	Specify characteristics of the sources of evidence used as eligibility criteria (e.g., years considered, language, and publication status), and provide a rationale.	4
Information sources*	7	Describe all information sources in the search (e.g., databases with dates of coverage and contact with authors to identify additional sources), as well as the date the most recent search was executed.	4
Search	8	Present the full electronic search strategy for at least 1 database, including any limits used, such that it could be repeated.	4
Selection of sources of evidence†	9	State the process for selecting sources of evidence (i.e., screening and eligibility) included in the scoping review.	4
Data charting process‡	10	Describe the methods of charting data from the included sources of evidence (e.g., calibrated forms or forms that have been tested by the team before their use, and whether data charting was done independently or in duplicate) and any processes for obtaining and confirming data from investigators.	4
Data items	11	List and define all variables for which data were sought and any assumptions and simplifications made.	Click here to enter text.
Critical appraisal of individual sources of evidence§	12	If done, provide a rationale for conducting a critical appraisal of included sources of evidence; describe the methods used and how this information was used in any data synthesis (if appropriate).	Click here to enter text.
Synthesis of results	13	Describe the methods of handling and summarizing the data that were charted.	5
RESULTS
Selection of sources of evidence	14	Give numbers of sources of evidence screened, assessed for eligibility, and included in the review, with reasons for exclusions at each stage, ideally using a flow diagram.	5	Click here to enter text.
Characteristics of sources of evidence	15	For each source of evidence, present characteristics for which data were charted and provide the citations.	Click here to enter text.
Critical appraisal within sources of evidence	16	If done, present data on critical appraisal of included sources of evidence (see item 12).	Click here to enter text.
Results of individual sources of evidence	17	For each included source of evidence, present the relevant data that were charted that relate to the review questions and objectives.	Click here to enter text.
Synthesis of results	18	Summarize and/or present the charting results as they relate to the review questions and objectives.	Click here to enter text.
DISCUSSION
Summary of evidence	19	Summarize the main results (including an overview of concepts, themes, and types of evidence available), link to the review questions and objectives, and consider the relevance to key groups.	Click here to enter text.	Click here to enter text.
Limitations	20	Discuss the limitations of the scoping review process.	Click here to enter text.
Conclusions	21	Provide a general interpretation of the results with respect to the review questions and objectives, as well as potential implications and/or next steps.	Click here to enter text.
FUNDING
Funding	22	Describe sources of funding for the included sources of evidence, as well as sources of funding for the scoping review. Describe the role of the funders of the scoping review.	Click here to enter text.	Click here to enter text.

[1] Endereço para correspondência: Daniela Polo Camargo da Silva, Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina, Departamento de Fonoaudiologia, Rua Engenheiro Agronômico Andrei Cristian Ferreira, s/n - Trindade, CEP: 88040-900 - Santa Catarina, Florianópolis, Brasil, E-mail: daniela-polo@uol.com.br

Título do artigo:
Autor:
Ano de publicação:
País de origem:
Revista:
População:	Revisões sistemáticas com ou sem metanálise
Conceito:	Atendimento aos itens do checklist do PRISMA
Contexto:	Temática principal da revisão sistemática na especialidade da Audiologia

Brasil

Brasil

Impacto da pandemia nas produções científicas em audiologia: um protocolo de revisão de escopo

RESUMO

Objetivo:

Métodos:

Considerações Finais: