Lund and Douglas 2323. Lund E, Douglas M. Teaching vocabulary to preschool children with hearing loss. Except child. 2016;83(1):26-41. Doi: 10.1177/0014402916651848 https://doi.org/10.1177/0014402916651848...
|
Expressive Vocabulary |
Word contextualizing (describing things), imitation, auditory-visual MTS, naming. |
Nine. Between 4 and 5 years old. Six using CI. |
Experimental group learned a mean of 5 words per week. In contrast, 0.5 words were learned by incidental teaching per week. |
Richels et al. 1818. Richels CG, Schwartz KS, Bobzien JL, Raver SA. Structured instruction with modified storybooks to teach morphosyntax and vocabulary to preschoolers who are deaf/hard of hearing. J Deaf Stud Deaf Educ. 2016;21(4):352-61. Doi: 10.1093/deafed/enw049. https://doi.org/10.1093/deafed/enw049...
|
Expressive Vocabulary |
Response shaping and modeling technics through hearing peers that described actions. |
Three. Between 3 and 4 years old. One CI user. |
P1 and P3 achieved criteria after six sessions, while P2 needed 20 sessions (and did not show maintenance of performance after a few weeks) |
Messier and Wood 2525. Messier J, Wood C. Facilitating vocabulary acquisition of children with cochlear implants using electronic storybooks. J Deaf Stud Deaf Educ. 2015;20(4):356-73. Doi:10.1093/deafed/env031. https://doi.org/10.1093/deafed/env031...
|
Expressive Vocabulary |
Digital book reading with parents. Programmed activities (context and phonetic focused). Control: just reading. |
18 children between 4 and 9 years old. All CI users. |
Experimental group showed better word definition, expressive and receptive vocabulary than control group. |
Anastacio-Pessan et al. 2020. Anastácio-Pessan FL, Almeida-Verdu ACM, Bevilacqua MC, de Souza DG. Usando o paradigma de equivalência para aumentar a correspondência na fala de crianças com implante coclear na nomeação de figuras e na leitura. Psicol Reflex Crít. 2015;28(2):365-77.
|
Expressive Vocabulary |
Auditory-visual MTS programmed trials using pictures, words and syllables. |
Six. Between 11 and 14 years old. All CI users. |
All children learned the taught relations. Four participants showed improved naming performance. 3 presented generalization to new pictures. |
Lucchesi et al. 2121. Lucchesi FD, Almeida-Verdu ACM, Buffa MJMB, Bevilacqua MC. Efeitos de um programa de ensino de leitura sobre a inteligibilidade da fala de crianças usuárias de implante coclear. Psicol Reflex Crít. 2015;28(3):500-10.
|
Expressive Vocabulary |
Auditory-visual MTS programmed trials using pictures, words and syllables. |
Two. Between 7 and 8 years old. Both CI users. |
Both children presented improvements during picture naming tasks. |
Nakeva von Mentzer et al. 3232. Nakeva von Mentzer C, Lyxell B, Sahlén B, Dahlström O, Lindgren M, Ors M et al. Computer-assisted reading intervention with a phonics approach for children using cochlear implants or hearing aids. Scand J Psychol. 2014;55(5):448-55. Doi: 10.1111/sjop.12149. https://doi.org/10.1111/sjop.12149...
|
Reading |
Auditory-visual MTS programmed trials with letters, syllables and words. Difficulty progression. |
DHH group- 32 (4 to 7 years, 17 CI). Hearing group- 16 (5 to 8 years). |
Both groups improved. DHH had lower baseline performances. Hearing group was better at sentence comprehension and word decoding. |
Lew et al. 2222. Lew J, Purcell AA, Doble M, Lim LH. Hear here: children with hearing loss learn words by listening. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2014;78(10):1716-25.
|
Auditory Discrimination |
Auditory-visual MTS trials. 10 difficulty levels of auditory discrimination. |
Three. Between 2 and 3 years old. One CI user. |
All showed improvements at least in two points (0-10) accordingly to their tests. Only one participant showed improvement by standardized tests. |
Lund and Schuele 1717. Lund E, Schuele CM. Effects of a word-learning training on children with cochlear implants. J Deaf Stud Deaf Educ. 2014;19(1):68-84.
|
Expressive Vocabulary |
Vocal imitation and picture contextualization tasks. |
Five. Between 3 and 5 years old. All CI users. |
Regarding auditory discrimination, participants showed improvements. However little improvement in expressive vocabulary was observed. |
Stacey et al. 2626. Stacey PC, Raine CH, O'Donoghue GM, Tapper L, Twomey T, Summerfield AQ. Effectiveness of computer-based auditory training for adult users of cochlear implants. Int J Audiol. 2010;49(5):347-56.
|
Auditory Discrimination |
Discrimination tasks of isolated words and words within sentences (computerized and self-administered) |
11. Between 23 and 71 years old. CI users. |
8 participants completed the entire program. Improvements in consonants discrimination, but not with vowels and sentences. |
Schopmeyer et al. 1212. Schopmeyer B, Mellon N, Dobaj H, Grant G, Niparko JK. Use of Fast ForWord to enhance language development in children with cochlear implants. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. Suppl. 2000;185:95-8.
|
Auditory Discrimination |
Fast ForWord program. Many programmed tasks. In general, auditory discrimination tasks with difficulty progression. |
11. Mean age of seven years old. All CI users. |
All children showed improvements on 5 standardized tests of receptive and expressive language. |