| 2006.1 |
Shelbourn, M.,
Bouchlaghem,
D., Anumba, C.,
Carillo, P.,
Khalfan, M. and Glass, J.
(2006) |
Managing knowledge in the context of sustainable
construction
|
It describes tools that enable the development of practices to promote knowledge creation in the construction sector. The C-SanD project mapped the sustainability theme, identifying actions to meet sustainable goals. Through this mapping, the SMAZ (Sustainability Management Activity Zone) tool was developed, something that can help direct sustainable construction practices. |
| 2007.1 |
Walker, D., Pitt, M. and Jha Thakur, U.
(2007) |
Environmental management systems:
Information management and corporate responsibility
|
Based on a literature review of works published between 1994 and 2004, they present the actions of environmental management (EM) systems to achieve sustainability, which occur through the crucial link in the development of knowledge and information management systems, which are necessary to achieve success and sustainability. |
| 2007.2 |
Godfrey, L.
(2007) |
Facilitating the improved management of waste in
South Africa through a national waste information
system
|
Development of an information system to assist the South African government in waste management and the promotion of sustainability. Waste management and information can be used in the public manager's decision-making process, with a view to sustainability. The idea is to have a Waste Information System that collects and stores data to help with the challenges of waste management. |
| 2011.1 |
Kraines, S. and Guo, W.
(2011) |
A system for ontologybased sharing of expert
knowledge in sustainability
science
|
It creates a comprehensive network of specialized knowledge related to sustainability science, accessible to all users, from researchers to individuals in society without specific scientific training. To this end, four components were developed: ontologies; a repository; an algorithm and software to analyze the knowledge network. Both were integrated into a platform called EKOSS, which allows knowledge to be shared and created. |
| 2011.2 |
Zhu, Q., Sarkis,
J. and Lai, K.-H.
(2011) |
Internationalization and environmentally-related
organizational learning among Chinese manufacturers
|
It discusses the need to examine the relationship between internationalization and environmentally-oriented Organizational Learning through environmentalist pressures to alleviate ecological modernization concerns. The results provide information for the Chinese government on how to balance economic growth and environmental protection from the perspective of internationalization. |
| 2012.1 |
Muñoz, E.,
Capón-García,
E., Laínez, J.,
Espuña, A. and Puigjaner, L.
(2012) |
Considering environmental assessment in an
ontological framework for enterprise sustainability
|
It makes an environmental and sustainable assessment based on the ontological framework of IM and KM. It proposes a semantic model to represent an integrated business structure that considers the environmental system at the various decision-making levels. Through a case study, the usability of the ontology for environmental decision-making is demonstrated. The ontology serves as a tool that supports decision-making by evaluating organizational environmental performance. |
| 2015.1 |
Kruckenberg, L.
(2015) |
North-South partnerships for sustainable energy:
Knowledge-power relations in development assistance for renewable energy
|
It reports on the power issues between the North-South knowledge-power cooperation relationship. The results are from a case study of a partnership between a renewable energy NGO in the North and one in the South. The study presents a tool that can be used by professionals and researchers involved in sustainable energy partnerships. |
| 2016.1 |
Goddard, J.,
Glass, J., Dainty,
A. and Nicholson, I.
(2016) |
Implementing sustainability in small and
medium-sized construction
firms the role of absorptive
capacity
|
It investigates the gap between sustainability certifications and Organizational Learning. The study points out that Sustainability is seen as a key point in generating business, but is not responsible for creating and sharing knowledge between company sectors. To solve this problem of adapting employees to certifications, it would be interesting to invest in training programs to share knowledge. And also in strengthening communication and information channels. |
| 2016.2 |
Sánchez, L. and Mitchell, R.
(2016) |
Conceptualizing impact assessment as a learning
process
|
It seeks to find out how project developers and their consultants, government regulators and stakeholders can learn throughout the Impact Assessment (IA) process, potentially improving its effectiveness, with arguably more sustainable results. The research argues that to achieve the necessary conditions for sustainable projects, learning must be treated as an intentional action, with clear learning outcomes and goals linked to stakeholders. |
| 2016.3 |
Schröpfer, V., Tah, J. and Kurul, E.
(2016) |
Mapping the knowledge flow in sustainable
construction project teams using social network analysis
|
It understands how knowledge about sustainable construction is transferred and adopted by project teams delivering new buildings to sustainable construction standards in Germany and the UK. The networks in the two countries are all relatively low and are spread out in relation to Knowledge Transfer (TC). Tacit knowledge is transferred through strong ties spread throughout the network. The most cited source of information and knowledge is 'a colleague', confirming that the main form of KT is tacit. |
| 2017.1 |
Bruyn, L.,
Jenkins, A. and
Samson-Liebig,
S.
(2017) |
Lessons learnt: Sharing soil knowledge to improve land management and
sustainable soil use
|
It reports on the sharing of soil knowledge in the 21st century based on KM and KM for soil sustainability. The article argues for the need to invest in communication channels for sharing knowledge (both scientific and tacit), involving different audiences and providing a dynamic, virtual learning environment. In this way, users can be encouraged to find sustainable solutions. |
| 2017.2 |
Cavicchi, C. and Vagnoni, E.
(2017) |
Does intellectual capital promote the shift of
healthcare organizations towards sustainable
development? Evidence
from Italy
|
It investigates sustainability planning in the Italian public health system. Intellectual capital contributes to the implementation of sustainability projects. The study also revealed higher relevance values for the implementation of sustainability projects through ICTs (Information and Communication Technologies), since information technology is claimed to promote changes towards sustainability. |
| 2017.3 |
Xu, Y., Boh, W., Luo, C. and Zheng, H.
(2017) |
Leveraging industry standards to improve the environmental
sustainability of a supply
chain
|
It focuses on environmental sustainability in the context of the supply chain. The study took place at a RosettaNet standards consortium in China. From Vertical Information Systems and based on a technological innovation. It found that the use of industry standards is related to interorganizational knowledge sharing and process integration, something that also interferes with environmental collaboration.
Vertical information can support environmental sustainability in supply chain management processes. |
| 2020.1 |
Mangla, S., Raut,
R., Narwane, V.,
Zhang, Z. and
Priyadarshinee, P.
(2020) |
Mediating effect of big data analytics on project
performance of small and medium enterprises
|
It deals with the analysis of "Big Data Analytics" BDA for the procurement of sustainable inputs from small and mediumsized enterprises. Organizations in developing countries must focus on uniform planning and information systems, making BDA responsible for improving the overall system. Since it is able to collect and store information, it helps to achieve short- and long-term goals for manufacturers in a context of sustainability and project management.
|
| 2020.2 |
Nazam, M.,
Hashim, M.,
Baig, S., Abrar,
M. and Shabbir,
R.
(2020) |
Modeling the key barriers of knowledge management adoption in sustainable supply chain
|
GC adoption for a more sustainable supply chain in Pakistan's food sector, investigating the types of barriers linked to GC implementation and how they are analyzed in the production chain. The analysis identified that the barriers are: managerial, governmental and organizational, innovation and technological, socio-economic and soft skills. According to the importance of knowledge-based production chains for the dissemination of information. It is easy to increase the success rate of adopting KM in sustainable supply chains. |
| 2021.1 |
Law, K., Breznik, K. and Ip, A. |
Using Publicized
Information to Determine the Sustainable
|
It investigates the management of public information for decision-making aimed at sustainable actions and investigates how third-party logistics companies are concerned about sustainability and what |
| |
(2021) |
Development of 3-PL Companies
|
dimensions of sustainability are included in their mission statements. The data collected was taken from the mission statements of the 50 largest logistics companies. Sustainability is not just a concern for companies, but a goal that most of them are striving to achieve. These actions have generated results for IM, since communication and information sharing within an organization generate innovation and the construction of a sustainable culture. |
| 2021.2 |
Uniyal, S.,
Mangla, S.,
Sarma, P.,
Tseng, M. and
Patil, P.
(2021) |
ICT as "Knowledge
Management" for
Assessing Sustainable
Consumption and
Production in Supply Chains
|
It lists and evaluates factors based on
Information and Communication
Technologies (ICTs), which are responsible for the implementation of Sustainable Consumption and Production in the industrial context, since they have a notable effect on the environment, the economy and society. With clear guidelines from the government, producers and consumers could understand the importance of ICTs in the adoption of Sustainable Consumption and Production. Technological advances are a way forward for the implementation of ICTs, as it is through up-to-date innovative technology that the consumption of sustainable products can be achieved. |
| 2022.1 |
Huang, W.,
Chau, K., Kit, I.,
Nureen, N., Irfan, M. and Dilanchiev, A.
(2022) |
Relating Sustainable
Business Development
Practices and Information
Management in Promoting Digital Green Innovation:
Evidence From China
|
It assesses the uncertainties surrounding the IM process and the application of sustainable development practices. The research sought to evaluate the acquisition of information; the dissemination of information; and the application of information, within the processes of IM. Sustainability was assessed from its social, economic and environmental dimensions. Corporate green innovation is gaining strength as an instrument for applying sustainable development practices. However, this practice can be a problematic and information-intensive undertaking, full of complications. Because information is considered a critical component in the development of sustainable products through new technologies. |
Thumbnail
Thumbnail
Thumbnail
Thumbnail
Thumbnail
Thumbnail
Thumbnail
Thumbnail
Source: Research data (2023).
Source: Research data (2023).
Source: Research data (2023).
Source: Research data (2023).
Source: Research data (2023).
Source: Research data (2023).
