Abstract
The article proposes a socio-semiotic, critical, situated and peripheral reflection on the (neo) constitutional discourse that provides and sustains the activity of the constitutional court in Colombia, which has effects on the relationship that denied lives and subjectivities (historical victims of patriarchy , racism and capitalism) argue with statehood, and the way in which the law works as a device for the support of the established social order, to the detriment of the popular, rooted and liberation instituting powers.
Keywords:
Legal discourse; Socio-semiotics; Instituting power; Instituting imagination; Legal criticism; Intercultural translation