ABSTRACT
The paper analyses a question that is very frequent in the academic debate among different schools of thought: the relevance of the liquidity preference theory under the new international and national financial arrangements. The main issue here is to point out that those new arrangements gave too much liquidity to non-monetary financial assets that made irrelevant the liquidity attribute of money; therefore, liquidity preference loses its meaning. The paper demonstrates that under Keynes assumptions, which support liquidity preference theory, this new arrangement emphasizes and strengthens several motives for demanding money and not the contrary, reinforcing in this way the validity of the theory.
KEYWORDS:
Globalization; liquidity preference; Keynes