Hurzeler et al. [1313 Troiano M, Benincasa M, Sánchez P, Guirado JLC. Bundle bone preservation with Root-T-Belt: Case study. Ann Oral Maxillofac Surg 2014;2(1):7.] |
1 pacient |
contact |
immediate |
None |
6 months |
1 implant |
immediate |
Baumer et al. [55 Bäumer D, Zuhr O, Rebele S, Schneider D, Schupbach P, Hürzeler M. The socket-shield technique: first histological, clinical, and volumetrical observations after separation of the buccal tooth segment - a pilot study. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2015;17(1):71-82. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/cid.12076 https://doi.org/10.1111/cid.12076...
] |
1 pacient |
proximity |
immediate |
None |
6 months |
1 implant |
6 months after the procedure |
Abadzhiev et al. [2424 Gluckman H, Salama M, Du Toit J. A retrospective evaluation of 128 socket-shield cases in the esthetic zone and posterior sites: Partial extraction therapy with up to 4 years follow-up. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2018;20(2):122-129. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/cid.12554 https://doi.org/10.1111/cid.12554...
] |
25 pacients |
Not specified |
immediate |
0.8mm (2%) bone loss |
24 months |
26 implants |
immediate |
Roe et al. [2323 Abadzhiev M, Nenkov P, Velcheva P. Conventional immediate implant placement and immediate placement with socket-shield technique- Which is better. Int J Clin Med. 2014;1(5):176-180.] |
1 pacient |
contact |
immediate |
None |
12 months |
1 implant |
immediate |
Chen et al. [88 Gharpure AS, Bhatavadekar NB. Current Evidence on the Socket-Shield Technique: A Systematic Review. J Oral Implantol. 2017;43(5):395-403. http://dx.doi.org/10.1563/aaid-joi-D-17-00118 https://doi.org/10.1563/aaid-joi-D-17-00...
] |
1 pacient |
proximity |
immediate |
0.72mm vestibular horizontal bone loss |
12 months |
1 implant |
4 months after the procedure |
Cherel and Etienne [1212 Schroeder HE. The periodontium. In: Oksche A, Vollrath L. (eds). Handbook of Microscopic Anatomy.1986; 5:233-246.] |
1 pacient |
Not specified |
immediate |
Small portion of the visible root fragment after removal of the temporary crowns |
11 months |
2 implants |
immediate |
Siormas et al. [1717 Siormpas KD, Mitsias ME, Kontsiotou-Siormpa E, Garber D, Kotsakis GA. Immediate implant placement in the esthetic zone utilizing the “root-membrane” technique: clinical results up to 5 years postloading. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2014;29(6):1397-405. http://dx.doi.org/10.11607/jomi.3707 https://doi.org/10.11607/jomi.3707...
] |
46 pacients |
proximity |
immediate |
Average alveolar bone loss from 0.18 to 0.09 in the mesial and 0.21 to 0.09 in the palate |
24 a 60 months |
46 implants |
immediate |
1 case of resorption of the root remnant |
Glocker et al. [2525 Gluckman H, Du Toit J, Salama M. Guided bone regeneration of a fenestration complication at immediate implant placement simultaneous to the socket-shield technique. Int Dent. 2015;5:58-66.] |
3 pacients |
proximity |
6 months after the procedure |
None |
6 months |
3 implants |
Not specified |
Troiano et al. [1111 Iasella JM, Greenwell H, Miller RL, Hill M, Drisko C, Bohra AA, et al. Ridge preservation with freeze-dried bone allograft and a collagen membrane compared to extraction alone for implant site development: a clinical and histologic study in humans. J Periodontol. 2003;74(7):990-9. http://dx.doi.org/10.1902/jop.2003.74.7.990 https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.2003.74.7.99...
] |
7 pacients |
contact |
immediate |
1.3 to 0.2 bone loss |
6 months |
10 implants |
3 months after the procedure |
Gluckman et al. [2626 Wadhwani P, Goel S, Tiwari S, Syed S, Paul T, Komal A. Socket shield technique: A new concept of ridge preservation. Asian Journal of Oral Health & Allied Sciences. 2015; 5:55-58.] |
1 pacient |
contact |
immediate |
None |
12 months |
1 implant |
immediate |
Al Dary e Al Hadadi [1010 Hürzeler MB, Zuhr O, Schupbach P, Rebele SF, Emmanouilidis N, Fickl S. The socket-shield technique: a proof-of-principle report. J Clin Periodontol. 2010;37(9):855-62. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-051X.2010.01595.x https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-051X.2010...
] |
1 pacient |
Not specified |
immediate |
None |
5 months |
1 implant |
immediate |
Wadhwani et al. [2727 Mitsias ME, Siormpas KD, Kontsiotou-Siormpa E, Prasad H, Garber D, Kotsakis GA. A step-by-step description of pdl-mediated ridge preservation for immediate implant rehabilitation in the esthetic region. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2015;35(6):835-41.] |
1 paciente |
Not specified |
immediate |
None |
4 months |
1 implante |
4 months after the procedure |
Legas et al. [1919 Mitsias ME, Mahajan T, Massey NS, Bajwa W, Sinha A, Banerjea A, et al. Socket shield technique. Ind Dent J. 2015;7:31-34.] |
16 pacients |
proximity |
10/16 Immediate |
1 failure due to infection |
0.5 to 2.85 years |
16 implants |
1 case showed deficiency of the alveolar contour |
Mitsias et al. [2827 Mitsias ME, Siormpas KD, Kontsiotou-Siormpa E, Prasad H, Garber D, Kotsakis GA. A step-by-step description of pdl-mediated ridge preservation for immediate implant rehabilitation in the esthetic region. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2015;35(6):835-41.] |
1 pacient |
contact |
immediate |
4mm depth of probe around the implant, after 3 months |
36 months |
1 implant |
immediate |
Holbrook 2016 |
1 pacient |
contact |
immediate |
None, confirmed by RCB after 1 year. |
12 months |
1 implant |
immediate |