This paper discusses a case in which a man under security measures – due to attempted murder – was referred to assessment of dangerousness by expert psychiatrists. The conclusion was that his dangerousness had not ceased, diverging from the opinion of his health care team. Relevant factors were identified that implied greater risk of violence and criminal recidivism, both stated in the report. The result shows that careful and independent assessment is crucial to a good psychiatric report.
Forensic psychiatry; commitment of mentally ill; mental disorders; violence
