Consumption of critical nutrients and sweeteners related to the risk of chronic diseases in the population of Antioquia, according to the degree of food processing

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE

To analyze the consumption of critical nutrients and other sweeteners, according to the degree of food processing in the population of Antioquia.

METHODS

Cross-Sectional Study. The dietary intake of 4,382 participants of the Perfil Alimentario y Nutricional de Antioquia 2019 (Antioquia Food and Nutrition Profile 2019) was evaluated. Processed foods (PF) and ultra-processed products (UPP) reported by 24-hour recall were classified according to the Nova system. The Nutrient Profile Model (NPM) of the Pan American Health Organization (PAHO) was used. The amount of PF and UPP consumed with excess of critical nutrients related to chronic diseases (CD) was measured. The difference in average intake, the prevalence of excess intake, and the likelihood of inadequacy between groups with and without excess dietary content were assessed.

RESULTS

Nearly 50% of the PF and UPP consumed had excess in at least one critical nutrient. The population consumed daily one or more products with excess in free sugar (73.3%), total fat (75.2%), saturated fat (77.0%), sodium (83.9%), and/or sweeteners (36.8%). Those who consumed products with excessive amounts had a higher intake of total fat (> 5.8%); saturated fat (> 3.8%); and sodium (> 698.7 mg) in adults and adolescents, in children 5–10 years (> 659.2 mg), and in children under 5 years (> 498 mg). Those who consumed products with excessive amounts presented the greatest possibilities of dietary inadequacy.

CONCLUSION

The population of Antioquia that consumes PF and UPP with excessive amounts of free sugars, total fat, saturated fat, sodium, and/or sweeteners presents an unbalanced diet. Reducing the consumption of these products and returning to a natural and/or minimally processed diet may be an effective strategy to achieve the nutrient intake recommendations prioritized by PAHO in the population of Antioquia.

Processed Foods; Ultra-processed Products; Food Processing; Nova; Nutrient Profile

RESUMEN

OBJETIVO

Analizar el consumo de nutrientes críticos y otros edulcorantes, según el grado de procesamiento de los alimentos en la población Antioqueña.

MÉTODOS

En este estudio transversal, se evaluó el consumo alimentario de 4,382 participantes del Perfil Alimentario y Nutricional de Antioquia 2019. Los alimentos procesados (AP) y productos ultraprocesados (PUP) informados por recordatorio de 24 horas se clasificaron según sistema Nova. Se usó el Modelo de Perfil de Nutrientes (MPN) de la Organización Panamericana de la Salud (OPS). Se midió la cantidad de AP y PUP consumidos con exceso en nutrientes críticos, relacionados con las enfermedades crónicas (EC). Se evaluó la diferencia en el consumo promedio, la prevalencia del consumo excesivo, y las posibilidades de inadecuación entre los grupos que tenían una dieta con y sin contenido excesivo.

RESULTADOS

Cerca del 50% de los AP y PUP consumidos presentaba exceso en al menos un nutriente crítico. La población consumió diariamente uno o más productos con exceso en azúcar libre (73.3%), grasa total (75.2%), grasa saturada (77.0%), sodio (83.9%) y/o edulcorantes (36.8%). Quienes consumían productos con cantidades excesivas tenían una mayor ingesta de grasas totales (> 5.8%); grasas saturadas (> 3.8%); y sodio (> 698.7 mg) en adultos y adolescentes, en niños de 5–10 años (> 659.2 mg), y en menores de 5 años (> 498 mg). Quienes consumieron productos con cantidades excesivas presentaron las mayores posibilidades de inadecuación en la dieta.

CONCLUSIÓN

La población antioqueña que consume AP y PUP con cantidades excesivas de azúcares libres, grasas totales, grasas saturadas, sodio y/o edulcorantes, presenta una dieta desbalanceada. Reducir el consumo de estos productos y volver a una dieta natural y/o mínimamente procesada puede ser una estrategia efectiva para alcanzar las recomendaciones de ingesta de nutrientes priorizados por OPS en la población antioqueña.

Alimentos Procesados; Productos Ultraprocesados; Procesamiento de Alimentos; Nova; Perfil de Nutrientes

INTRODUCTION

The traditional dietary pattern associated with healthy eating is being displaced by the increase in the supply of processed foods (FF) and ultra-processed products (UPP)¹. In recent decades, obesity and other diet-related chronic diseases (CD) have increased in different age groups, becoming the leading cause of death and disability in the Americas region²,³.

Studies indicate that the consumption of UPPs favors the onset of obesity⁴,⁵, CD⁶,⁷, and the risk of all-cause mortality⁸-¹¹. The Pan American Health Organization (PAHO) indicates that sales of UPPs have increased in Latin America, with an increase of 7.7% in Colombia¹². Studies carried out in various countries have found that UPP consumption represents 5.9% of total energy intake in Colombia¹³, 20.4% in Brazil¹⁴, 28.6% in Chile¹⁵, and 58.5% in the United States¹⁶. In Antioquia, in the Food and Nutrition Profile (PANA 2019), it was found that 57.0% of the total average energy consumed by individuals comes from natural or minimally processed foods, 19.0% from culinary ingredients, and, between 9.0% to 15.0% comes from PF or UPPs¹⁷.

The PAHO Nutrient Profile Model (NPM) indicates the nutrients that should be analyzed, and indicates the maximum acceptable levels of consumption, establishing its application to industrially processed products that have been related to CD (PF, UPP). The nutrients it proposes to evaluate are: sodium, total fat, saturated fat, trans fat, and free sugars¹⁸. It also includes “other sweeteners” as food additives, which may be present in sweet-tasting foods, with or without added sugar, that are commonly consumed and promote the intake of more sweet foods and beverages, including those with sugar¹⁸.

The above suggests the need to study in the population of Antioquia: the profile of critical nutrients and the presence of other sweeteners in the PF and UPP consumed; the consumption of critical nutrients, according to the degree of food processing; and the contribution of PF and UPP to the excessive consumption of critical nutrients and other sweeteners using the PAHO Nutrient Profile Model.

METHODS

In this cross-sectional study, the food consumption database, compiled as part of the Antioquia Food and Nutrition Profile (PANA 2019), conducted by the School of Nutrition and Dietetics of the University of Antioquia, was considered as a secondary source of information. The primary source of information was the nutritional labels of the PFs and UPPs described in the PANA 2019.

Food consumption data were collected on the basis of two 24-hour dietary reminders administered by interviewers (dietitian nutritionists) trained and standardized in the technique, who recorded the type of food, the name of the preparation, the ingredients and the amount of food consumed by the interviewee; whenever possible, the person responsible for food preparation was present. Food models were used to help participants better estimate the amount and weight of food consumed. The food models have been previously designed, validated, adjusted, and used in different studies. Data monitoring and critique was performed on 100% of the forms to verify that the data collection technique was carried out properly and that the quality of the data met the established standards¹⁷.

The first reminder was applied to 4,382 people, while the second reminder was applied to 1,215 people distributed in age groups, carried out on non-consecutive days and with an intermediate space of no more than seven days to adjust for intra-individual variability¹⁷. In the case of our study, only the information from the first recall was used, because the average consumption of the population was estimated for the critical nutrients (sodium, total fat, saturated fat, trans fat, free sugars, and sweeteners), and not the usual consumption, which requires at least two 24-hour recalls. The foods, products and preparations reported were classified in one of the four groups of the Nova food classification system. The aspects of the classification for Colombia are described in detail at¹⁹. Then, the sociodemographic information (age, age group, sex, educational level, and area of residence) and the consumption information of the individuals was extracted from the original database and reviewed in detail.

To obtain the information on critical nutrients, we proceeded as follows: 1) we took the data contained in the Colombian Food Composition Tables (TCA), such as the one from the Instituto Colombiano de Bienestar Familiar (ICBF). In the case of culinary ingredients, PF and UPP (as described in the PANA 2019), if there was a specific brand, we tried to obtain the information directly from the nutritional label or the web and, if necessary, we purchased the product; 2) in case of not finding the required data in the TCA and/or labels, homologation of the data not found was performed, taking the data of the required nutrient of the same food from other sources; and 3) when the previous option was not possible, imputation of the missing data with nutritionally similar food items was performed.

For the case of artificial non-caloric sweeteners (aspartame, sucralose, saccharin, and acesulfame potassium), natural non-caloric sweeteners (stevia), and/or caloric sweeteners (sorbitol, mannitol, lactitol, and isomalt), we proceeded as follows: the PFs and UPPs were taken (as they were described in the PANA 2019); if a specific brand was available, we tried to obtain the label or packaging on the web and in the necessary cases we made the purchase of the product. Then, the list of ingredients of the different PFs and UPPs was checked on the labels or packaging for the presence or absence of sweeteners.

Following the indications of the PAHO NPM, the amount of each nutrient per 100 grams or milliliters of edible or drinkable portion was estimated in the PF and UPP, in order to determine the excess of critical nutrients in each product, as follows:

• Excessive amount of sodium: if the ratio between the amount of sodium (mg) in any given amount of the product and the energy (kcal) is equal to or greater than 1:1 or greater than or equal to 1mg of sodium per 1kcal.

• Excessive amount of free sugars: if in any given quantity of the product, the amount of energy (kcal) from free sugars (grams of free sugars per 4kcal) is equal to or greater than 10.0% of the total energy (kcal).

• Excessive amount of total fat: if in any given quantity of the product, the amount of energy (kcal) from total fat (grams of total fat per 9kcal) is equal to or greater than 30.0% of the total energy (kcal).

• Excessive amount of saturated fat: if in any given quantity of the product, the amount of energy (kcal) from saturated fat (grams of saturated fat per 9kcal) is equal to or greater than 10.0% of the total energy (kcal).

• Excessive amount of trans fat: if in any given quantity of the product, the amount of energy (kcal) from trans fat (grams of trans fat per 9kcal) is equal to or greater than 1.0% of the total energy (kcal).

• Sweeteners: if the list of ingredients includes artificial or natural non-caloric sweeteners or caloric sweeteners (polyols)¹⁸.

Statistical Analysis

The proportion of PF and UPP consumed by the population of Antioquia was calculated then, it was identified which proportion of products of each of these groups was excessive in the critical nutrients according to the PAHO NPM. Subsequently, the proportion of the population that presented consumption of 0, 1, 2, 3, and 4 or more PF and/or UPP, which contained at least one critical nutrient in excess, was determined.

At the same time, the average energy intake content of each critical nutrient was calculated, as well as the sodium intake in mg in the total population and in two fractions of the population: fraction of the population that consumed products with excessive content of critical nutrients and population that consumed products without excessive content of critical nutrients, according to PAHO NPM. Also, the prevalence of intake of critical nutrients was estimated, according to the WHO intake targets with their respective 95% confidence intervals, for the total population and the two fractions of the population.

For the univariate and bivariate descriptive analysis of the products consumed and the sociodemographic variables, absolute and relative distributions were used (categorical variables), and summary measures such as mean, median, standard deviation, quartiles, and minimum and maximum values (quantitative variables). The homoscedasticity assumption was tested for between-group variance. The Hosmer-Lemeshow criterion (p < 0.25) was applied to identify candidate variables to enter the explanatory models. Next, simple linear regression models were constructed with each of the independent variables. Then, multiple linear regression models were constructed, evaluating the significance of each independent variable (age group, area of residence, educational level, and sex) and the goodness of fit of the general model.

Subsequently, prevalence ratios were estimated by comparing the proportions of the population and groups that did not meet the WHO nutrient intake target, using logistic regression models adjusted for sociodemographic variables, in order to evaluate: the contribution to the consumption of products with excess of critical nutrients (according to the PAHO NPM); the inadequacy in the consumption of these nutrients; and the probability of intake of critical nutrients above the targets recommended by the WHO.

Analyses were performed in the statistical program Stata V.15. The project was approved by the Research Ethics Committee of the Facultad Nacional de Salud Pública of the Universidad de Antioquia (Act: 21030002-0066-2022 of 2022).

RESULTS

The mean age of the population was 34.1 years (SD = 25.3). Of those surveyed, 56.5% were female, 62.3% were over 18 years, 34.4% had primary school education, and 27.8% had no education at all. 65.0% resided in urban areas (Table 1).

Table 1
Demographic characteristics of the population of Antioquia 2019.

Indicator	Distribution
	n	%
Age, mean (SD)	34.1 (25.3)
Sex
Male	1,905	43.5
Female	2,477	56.5
Age groups
Early childhood: 0 to 5 years	409	9.3
Childhood: 6 to 11 years old	570	13.0
Adolescence: 12 to 17 years old	674	15.4
Youth: 18 to 26 years old	536	12.2
Adulthood: 27 to 59 years old	1,246	28.4
Old age: 60 years and older	947	21.6
Educational level
Nursery, preschool	527	12.1
Completed elementary school (1st through 5th grade)	1,497	34.4
Secondary (grades 6 to 11)	744	17.1
Technical and/or technological (2 to 3 years)	275	6.3
University and/or postgraduate degree	104	2.4
None	1,211	27.8
Area of residence
Urbana	2,847	65.0
Rural	1,535	35.0

• SD: standard deviation

Of the total food and products consumed by the Antioquian population in 2019 (n = 1002) 47.3% were natural foods, minimally processed, or culinary ingredients, 13.9% of the products were processed, and 38.8% ultra-processed (data not shown). When the analysis was performed on 100 grams/milliliters of each product, it was identified that 50.0% of the PFs had a free sugar content of 5.0 gr or less, while for the UPPs it was 9.6 gr or less. In the case of total fat, saturated fat, and trans fat, 50.0% of the PF had a content of 5.7 gr, 2.6 gr, and 0.0 gr, respectively, while in the UPPs these values were 9.4 gr, 3.3 gr, and 0.0 gr, respectively (Table 2).

Table 2
Amount of critical nutrients in 100 grams of product, according to Nova classification.

Nova Classiffication	Free sugar (gr)	Total fat (gr)	Saturated fat (gr)	Trans fat (gr)	Sodium (mg)	Sweetener (quantity)
Processed foods
Media	11.9	10.9	5.1	0.1	436.3	0.0
SD	15.3	11.8	6.2	0.4	594.6	0.2
Min	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0
Q1	0.2	2.0	0.0	0.0	37.5	0.0
Median	5.0	5.7	2.6	0.0	359.4	0.0
Q3	18.8	20.6	8.8	0.0	500.0	0.0
Max	66.7	52.5	23.3	3.3	4,333.3	1.0
IR	18.6	18.6	8.8	0.0	462.5	0.0
Ultra-processed products
Media	19.6	12.6	5.8	0.0	581.4	0.3
SD	22.6	15.4	7.7	0.1	1,576.7	0.8
Min	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0
Q1	1.6	0.0	0.0	0.0	50.0	0.0
Median	9.6	9.4	3.3	0.0	300.0	0.0
Q3	31.3	18.3	8.3	0.0	650.0	0.0
Max	100.0	100.0	50.0	1.2	19,272.7	3.0
IR	29.6	18.3	8.3	0.0	600.0	0.0

• gr: grams; mg: milligrams; SD: standard deviation; IR: interquartile range.

When analyzing the sodium content, it was found that the PFs had a median of 359.4 mg in 100 grams of product, while the UPPs had a median of 300.0 mg. As for the amount of sweeteners in these products, it was found that the average in the PFs was 0.03 (min 0, maxx1) and in the UPPs 0.3 (min 0, max 3) (Table 2).

Following the PAHO NPM criteria, it was found that of the total PF and UPPs, 62.8% presented an excessive amount of free sugar; 51.8% of total fat; 57.8% of saturated fat; 5.1% of trans fat; 45.3% of sodium; and 14.2% had sweeteners. Likewise, when analyzing the excess of each of these nutrients according to the Nova classification, it was found that 65.8% of the UPPs had an excess of free sugar, 53.4% of total fat, 59.0% of saturated fat, 5.1% of trans fat, 43.7% of sodium, and 18.6% contained sweeteners (data not shown).

The majority of the population consumed daily at least one PF and/or UPP, identified as excessive in some critical nutrient related to CD (according to the PAHO NPM), as follows: 73.3% with excessive content in free sugar, 75.2% in total fat, 77.0% in saturated fat, 8.4% in trans fat, 83.9% in sodium, and 36.8% contained sweeteners (Table 3).

Table 3
Prevalence of consumption of products defined as excessive in nutrients prioritized by PAHO according to NPMa.

Type of products and food	Free Sugar		Total Fat		Saturated Fats		Trans Fats		Sodium		Sweeteners
	n	% (95% CI)	n	% (95% CI)	n	% (95% CI)	n	% (95% CI)	n	% (95% CI)	n	% (95% CI)
Only foods that do not apply to the PAHO NPMb	330	7.5 (6.8–8.4)	330	7.5 (6.8–8.4)	330	7.5 (6.8–8.4)	330	7.5 (6.8–8.4)	330	7.5 (6.8–8.4)	330	7.5 (6.8–8.4)
Products defined as not excessive in critical nutrients related to NCDs according to the PAHO NPMc	839	19.2 (18.0–20.3)	759	17.3 (16.2–18.5)	679	15.5 (14.5–16.6)	3,68	84.0 (82.9–85.1)	376	8.6 (7.8–9.5)	2,442	55.7 (54.3–57.2)
Products defined as excessive in critical nutrients related to NCDs according to the PAHO NPMd
1 product	1,020	23.3 (22.1–24.6)	1,102	25.2 (23.9–26.5)	1,008	23.0 (21.8–24.3)	311	7.1 (6.4–7.9)	1,113	25.4 (24.1–26.7)	461	10.5 (9.7–11.5)
2 products	796	18.2 (17.1–19.3)	841	19.2 (18.1–20.4)	864	19.7 (18.6–20.9)	51	1.2 (0.1–1.5)	965	22.0 (20.8–23.3)	467	10.7 (9.8–11.6)
3 products	559	12.8 (11.8–13.8)	606	13.8 (12.8–14.9)	621	14.2 (13.2–15.2)	7	0.2 (0.1–0.3)	661	15.1 (14.1–16.2)	328	7.5 (6.7–8.3)
≥ 4 products	838	19.1 (18.0–20.3)	744	17.0 (15.9–18.1)	880	20.1 (18.9–21.3)	1	0.0 (0.0–0.2)	937	21.4 (20.2–22.6)	354	8.1 (7.3–8.9)

• 95% CI: 95% confidence interval; CD: chronic diet-associated diseases; NPM-PAHO: Pan American Health Organization Nutrient Profile Model.
• ^a Food consumption. Perfil Alimentario y Nutricional de Antioquia 2019. n = 4,382 people.
• ^b Foods that do not apply to the PAHO NPM: Natural or minimally processed foods and processed culinary ingredients.
• ^c Foods that apply to the PAHO NPM, but without high content of CD-related nutrients according to the PAHO NPM (for free sugars < 10% of total energy, for total fat < 30% of total energy, for saturated fat < 10% of total energy, for trans fat < 1% of total energy, for sodium < 1 mg per kcal).
• ^d Products with excessive NCD-related nutrient content according to PAHO NPM (for free sugars ≥ 10% of total energy, for total fats ≥ 30% of total energy, for saturated fats ≥ 10% of total energy, for trans fats ≥ 1% of total energy, for sodium ≥ 1 mg per kcal).

Regarding the consumption of PF and/or UPP without excessive content of critical nutrients, it was found that 19.2%, 17.3%, and 15.5% of people consumed products without excessive content of free sugars, total fat, and saturated fat, respectively. In the case of trans fat and sodium, the proportion of people who consumed products without excess was 84.0% and 8.6%, respectively. On the other hand, an even smaller proportion of Antioquians (7.5%) consumed only unprocessed and minimally processed foods and culinary ingredients (Table 3).

When analyzing the caloric intake from critical nutrients, it was found that in the diet of the total population of Antioquia, 16.7% of the total calories came from free sugars, 27.1% from total fats, 11.5% from saturated fats, 0.21% from trans fats. The average sodium content in the total diet (without taking into account table salt consumption) was 897.6 mg in adults and adolescents, 983.2 mg in children 5–10 years old, and 840.5 mg in children under 5 years old. As for the amount of sweeteners, the average daily consumption was 0.98, being in all cases higher in the group consuming products with excessive content in critical nutrients, compared to those consuming products without excessive content (Table 4).

Table 4
Average content of nutrients prioritized by PAHO according to the NPM in the total daily diet of the population and in two fractions of the populationa

Nutrient content of the diet	The entire population	Fractions of the population with a diet composed of products		Coef. (95% CI) unadjustedd	Coef. (95% CI) adjustede
		Excessive content of nutrients prioritized by PAHOb	No excessive content of nutrients prioritized by PAHOc
Dietary nutrient content	Mean (95% CI)	Mean (95% CI)	Mean (95% CI)
Free sugar (% of total energy intake)	16.7 (16.3–17.0)	16.8 (16.4–17.1)	16.4 (15.6–17.1)	0.4 (-0.3–1.3)	0.8 (0.1–1.5)
Total fat (% of total energy intake)	27.1 (26.9–27.4)	28.7 (28.4–29.0)	22.45 (21.9–23.0)	6.2 (5.6–6.8)	5.8 (5.3–6.4)
Saturated fat (% of total energy intake)	11.5 (11.3–11.6)	12.4 (12.2–12.5)	8.42 (8.2–8.7)	3.9 (3.65–4.21)	3.8 (3.5–4.1)
Trans fat (% of total energy intake)	0.2 (0.2–0.2)	0.4 (0.3–0.4)	0.2 (0.2–0.2)	0.2 (0.2–0.2)	0.2 (0.2–0.2)
Sodium (mg) Adults and adolescents	897.6 (866.3–928.9)	1,029.7 (996.7–1,062.6)	290.2 (219.4–360.9)	739.5 (661.5–817.5)	698.7 (620.8–776.6)
Sodium (mg) Children between 5 and 10 years old	983.2 (922.1–1,044.3)	1,044.2 (983.2–1,105.3)	361.1 (166.3–555.9)	683.1 (479.0–887.3)	659.2 (452.4–865.9)
Sodium (mg) Children < 5 years	840.5 (788.5–892.6)	872.2 (820.2–924.1)	353.6 (149.7–557.4)	518.6 (308.3–728.9)	498.0 (289.0–707.0)
Sweeteners (quantity/day)	0.98 (0.93–1.03)	2.68 (2.59–2.77)	0	2.68 (2.61–2.75)	2.67 (2.60–2.74)

• 95% CI: 95% confidence interval; CD: chronic diet-associated diseases; NPM-PAHO: Pan American Health Organization Nutrient Profile Model.
• ^a Food consumption. Perfil Alimentario y Nutricional de Antioquia 2019. n = 4,382 people.
• ^b Products with excessive content of CD-related nutrients according to PAHO NPM (for free sugars ≥ 10% of total energy, for total fats ≥ 30% of total energy, for saturated fats ≥ 10% of total energy, for trans fats ≥ 1% of total energy, for sodium ≥ 1 mg per kcal).
• ^c Foods that do not apply to the PAHO NPM (natural or minimally processed foods and processed culinary ingredients) and foods to which the PAHO NPM applies, but which do not have excessive CD-related nutrient content (for free sugars < 10% of total energy, for total fat < 30% of total energy, for saturated fat < 10% of total energy, for trans fat < 1% of total energy, for sodium < 1 mg per kcal).
• ^d Unadjusted linear regression models.
• ^e Linear regression models adjusted for age group, sex, educational level, and area of residence.

When analyzing the crude and adjusted models (by sociodemographic variables) for each critical nutrient, it was found that there were significant differences in all of them, given that the coefficient of the average percentage (free sugar, total fat, saturated fat, and trans fat), amount consumed in mg (sodium), and amount/day (sweeteners) was higher in the group that consumed products with excess in critical nutrients (Table 4).

Table 5 shows the fractions of the population according to the composition of the diet, as follows: population with a diet with products with excessive content in critical nutrients, versus those who did not consume these products. In the case of the population that consumed products with an excessive content of free sugar, saturated fat, total fat, sodium, and trans fat, it was found that 75.5%, 71.3%, 42.6%, 10.9%, and 3.5%, respectively, exceeded the recommended upper limit for these nutrients, while in the population with a diet without products with excessive content in critical nutrients the percentage of the population that did not meet the recommended intake was lower, with 63.7% for free sugar, 29.8% for saturated fat, and 19.4% for total fat.

Table 5
Prevalence of non-recommended intake levels of nutrients prioritized by PAHOa in the total population and by fractions of the population with a diet with and without products with excessive content of these critical nutrients according to PAHOb nutrient profiling model.

Critical nutrient related to CD	The entire population	Fractions of the population with a diet composed of products		PR (95% CI)e
		With excessive content of nutrients prioritized by PAHOc	Without excessive content of nutrients prioritized by PAHOd
	Percentage of individuals that exceeded the intake targets recommended by the WHO (%)			Raw	Adjustedf
	Mean (95% CI)	Mean (95% CI)	Mean (95% CI)
Free sugar	72.3 (71.0–73.7)	75.5 (74.0–77.0)	63.7 (60.8–66.4)	1.2 (1.1–1.2)	1.15 (1.1–1.2)
Total fat	36.9 (35.4–38.3)	42.6 (41.0–44.3)	19.4 (17.1–21.8)	2.2 (1.9–2.5)	2.0 (1.7–2.2)
Saturated fats	61.7 (60.3–63.7)	71.3 (69.7–72.8)	29.8 (27.1–32.7)	2.4 (2.2–2.6)	2.2 (2.0–2.5)
Trans fats	0.7 (0.5–1.0)	3.6 (2.1–6.0)	0.4 (0.2–0.7)	8.8 (4.3–18.2)	8.2 (3.9–17.2)
Sodium	9.2 (8.4–10.1)	10.9 (9.9–11.9)	0.6 (0.2–1.5)	19.2 (7.2–51.3)	15.3 (5.7–40.9)
Sweeteners	36.7 (35.3–38.2)	.	.	1.6 (1.6–1.7)	1.6 (1.6–1.7)

• 95% CI: 95% confidence interval; CD: chronic diet-associated diseases; NPM-PAHO: Pan American Health Organization Nutrient Profile Model.
• ^a Critical nutrient content related to NCDs: free sugars, total fat, saturated fat, and trans fat (% of total energy intake). Sodium content: total sodium (mg) minus the recommended value per age group [2000 mg (for adults and adolescents); 1640mg (for children 5-10 years); and 1122 mg (for children under 5 years)]. Guideline: sodium intake for adults and children. World Health Organization; 2012; Human energy requirements. FAO/WHO/UN; 2004
• ^b Food consumption. Perfil Alimentario y Nutricional de Antioquia 2019. n = 4,382 people.
• ^c Products with excessive content of CD-related nutrients according to PAHO NPM (for free sugars ≥ 10% of total energy, for total fats ≥ 30% of total energy, for saturated fats ≥ 10% of total energy, for trans fats ≥ 1% of total energy, for sodium ≥ 1 mg per kcal).
• ^d Foods that do not apply to the PAHO NPM (natural or minimally processed foods and processed culinary ingredients) and foods to which the PAHO NPM applies, but which do not have excessive CD-related nutrient content (for free sugars < 10% of total energy, for total fat < 30% of total energy, for saturated fat < 10% of total energy, for trans fat < 1% of total energy, for sodium < 1 mg per kcal).
• ^e Coefficients of logistic regression models.
• ^f Adjusted for age groups, sex, educational level, and area of residence.

Likewise, Table 5 shows the adjusted prevalence ratios, indicating that the fraction of the population that consumed products with an excessive content of critical nutrients has a significant increase in the possibility of inadequacy in the consumption of free sugars, total fat, saturated fat, trans fat, sodium, and sweeteners when compared to the fraction of the population that did not consume products with an excessive content of critical nutrients (the prevalence ratio varies between 1.15 (95% CI 1.1–1.2) for free sugar and 15.3 (95% CI 5.7–40.9) for sodium.

DISCUSSION

This research shows that nearly half of the PF and UPP consumed by the population of Antioquia had an excess of at least one critical nutrient. The results are similar to studies conducted in Colombia, Mexico, and Honduras²⁰. Most of the subjects consumed one or more of these products daily. In addition, it should be noted that those who consumed PF and/or UPPs with excessive amounts of some critical nutrient had a diet with poorer nutritional quality and the greatest possibility of inadequacy in the consumption of critical nutrients and sweeteners related to CD (non-compliance with WHO intake recommendations).

On the other hand, a smaller proportion of individuals consumed products with excess trans fat, a situation that can be partly explained by the Colombian regulations for this component, such as: article 8 of law 1355 of 2009²³, resolution 2508 of 2012²⁴, and resolution 2154 of 2012, issued by the Ministry of Health and Social Protection²⁵.

In line with the evidence, with the implementation of front-of-package warning labeling (based on the PAHO nutrient profile), most PFs and UPPs will be candidates to carry at least one label and/or be taxed with a health tax, in order to reduce their consumption and health consequences²⁶.

The diets of people who consumed products with an excessive content of critical nutrients contained significantly more total fat (> 5.8%), more saturated fat (> 3.8%), and a higher amount of sodium (> 498 mg), compared to the diets of people who did not consume these products. The results agree with the research of Machado and collaborators²⁶. In the case of free sugar, there were smaller differences, possibly because Antioquians have a high consumption of natural and/or minimally processed foods with high free sugar content such as: panela, honey, and natural juices with added sugar, which could indicate that the contribution of free sugar in the diet comes from different sources.

On the other hand, it is important to mention that the PAHO CPF also recommends warning when PF and UPPs contain any amount of sweeteners (artificial, natural, caloric, and non-caloric). Although the higher proportion of sweeteners consumed by individuals with PF and UPP intake was identified (2.7 sweeteners more), the exact amount of sweeteners consumed by the Antioquian population in their diet (grams or milligrams) is unknown, because the industry is not required to declare the amount (they only report their presence in the list of ingredients); likewise, the available evidence is not conclusive about their beneficial or harmful effects on health²⁹.

This study showed that the intake of products with excessive content of critical nutrients explains the inadequacy in the diet of the population, according to WHO recommendations. This result is similar to those found in studies conducted in Australia²⁶ and Uruguay²⁷,²⁸.

The present research supports the public policy measures established in the department of Antioquia, through the Plan Docenal de Seguridad Alimentaria y Nutricional (Docennial Plan for Food and Nutritional Security), in terms of reducing UPP consumption to less than 10.0% of total energy consumed by 2031³⁰, as well as national policies and proposals to implement black octagonal front warning labeling (with the word excess), according to PAHO nutrient profiling recommendations¹⁸; it also gives solid bases to the implementation of healthy taxes on UPPs.

The strengths of this study include: The quality of the database and the significant number of records collected through the 24-hour recall, which was performed by dietitian nutritionists standardized in the technique; the representativeness of the sample (departmental level), by age groups, sex, educational level, and area of residence; the modeling of the differential possibilities of dietary inadequacy. This is the first study in Antioquia that evaluates the consumption of nutrients prioritized by PAHO, as well as the content of sweeteners in the diet, these results being the baseline for local and national public policy measures (regulation of PF and UPP).

Regarding limitations, our study was based on only a 24-hour recall, so it is possible that in some cases it does not represent the usual intake¹⁷. As for sodium intake, it is likely to be underestimated because the PANA did not include discretionary salt, added by individuals in foods prepared at home or in restaurants. On the other hand, the 24-hour reminder instrument used in the PANA does not inquire about the brand of PF and UPP consumed by each individual, which makes it difficult to know with full certainty the content of some of the critical nutrients (mainly free sugars, trans fats, and sweeteners, the latter in the list of ingredients) that are not included in the food composition tables; even so, this limitation was addressed, in the case of free sugars by applying panel D of the PAHO nutrient profiling model, and in the case of trans fats and sweeteners by tracing the information directly on the labels of products similar to those reported in the database and/or by consulting the USDA database.

CONCLUSION

The population of Antioquia that consumes PF and UPPs with excessive amounts of free sugars, total fat, saturated fat, sodium, and/or sweeteners has an unbalanced diet. Reducing the consumption of these products and returning to a natural and/or minimally processed diet may be an effective strategy to achieve the nutrient intake recommendations prioritized by PAHO in the population of Antioquia.

REFERENCIAS

• ¹
  Organización de las Naciones Unidas para la Agricultura y la Alimentación, Organización Panamericana de la Salud, Programa Mundial de Alimentos, Fondo de las Naciones Unidas para la Infancia (UNICEF). 2018 Panorama de la seguridad alimentaria y nutricional en América Latina y el Caribe: Desigualdad Y Sistemas Alimentarios. Santiago: FAO, OPAS, WFP, Unicef; 2018 [cited 2020 Oct 10]. Available from: https://iris.paho.org/bitstream/handle/10665.2/49616/9789251310595_spa.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y
  » https://iris.paho.org/bitstream/handle/10665.2/49616/9789251310595_spa.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y
• ²
  Organización Panamericana de la Salud, Organización Mundial de la Salud. Alimentos y bebidas ultraprocesados en América Latina: tendencias, efecto sobre la obesidad e implicaciones para las políticas públicas. Washington: Organización Panamericana de la Salud; 2015 [cited 2021 Jan 7]. Available from: https://iris.paho.org/bitstream/handle/10665.2/7698/9789275318645_esp.pdf
  » https://iris.paho.org/bitstream/handle/10665.2/7698/9789275318645_esp.pdf
• ³
  Organización Panamericana de la Salud, Organización Mundial de la Salud. Mortalidad en la Región de las Américas. 2017 [cited 2021 Apr 26]. Available from: https://www.paho.org/salud-en-las-americas-2017/?post_t_es=mortalidad-en-la-region-de-las-americas⟨=es
  » https://www.paho.org/salud-en-las-americas-2017/?post_t_es=mortalidad-en-la-region-de-las-americas⟨=es
• ⁴
  Mendonça RD, Pimenta AM, Gea A, Fuente-Arrillaga C, Martinez-Gonzalez MA, Lopes AC, et al. Ultraprocessed food consumption and risk of overweight and obesity: the University of Navarra Follow-Up (SUN) cohort study. Am J Clin Nutr. 2016 Nov;104(5):1433-40. https://doi.org/10.3945/ajcn.116.135004
  » https://doi.org/10.3945/ajcn.116.135004
• ⁵
  Canhada SL, Luft VC, Giatti L, Duncan BB, Chor D, Fonseca MJ, et al. Ultra-processed foods, incident overweight and obesity, and longitudinal changes in weight and waist circumference: the Brazilian Longitudinal Study of Adult Health (ELSA-Brasil). Public Health Nutr. 2020 Apr;23(6):1076-86. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1368980019002854
  » https://doi.org/10.1017/S1368980019002854
• ⁶
  Srour B, Fezeu LK, Kesse-Guyot E, Allès B, Méjean C, Andrianasolo RM, et al. Ultra-processed food intake and risk of cardiovascular disease: prospective cohort study (NutriNet-Santé). BMJ. 2019 May;365:l1451. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.l1451
  » https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.l1451
• ⁷
  Silva Meneguelli T, Viana Hinkelmann J, Hermsdorff HH, Zulet MÁ, Martínez JA, Bressan J. Food consumption by degree of processing and cardiometabolic risk: a systematic review. Int J Food Sci Nutr. 2020 Sep;71(6):678-92. https://doi.org/10.1080/09637486.2020.1725961
  » https://doi.org/10.1080/09637486.2020.1725961
• ⁸
  Blanco-Rojo R, Sandoval-Insausti H, López-Garcia E, Graciani A, Ordovás JM, Banegas JR, et al. Consumption of ultra-processed foods and mortality: a national prospective cohort in Spain. Mayo Clin Proc. 2019 Nov;94(11):2178-88. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mayocp.2019.03.035
  » https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mayocp.2019.03.035
• ⁹
  Rico-Campà A, Martínez-González MA, Alvarez-Alvarez I, Mendonça RD, Fuente-Arrillaga C, Gómez-Donoso C, et al. Association between consumption of ultra-processed foods and all cause mortality: SUN prospective cohort study. BMJ. 2019 May;365:l1949. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.l1949
  » https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.l1949
• ¹⁰
  Schnabel L, Kesse-Guyot E, Allès B, Touvier M, Srour B, Hercberg S, et al. Association between ultraprocessed food consumption and risk of mortality among middle-aged adults in France. JAMA Intern Med. 2019 Apr;179(4):490-8. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamainternmed.2018.7289
  » https://doi.org/10.1001/jamainternmed.2018.7289
• ¹¹
  Kim H, Hu EA, Rebholz CM. Ultra-processed food intake and mortality in the USA: results from the Third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES III, 1988-1994). Public Health Nutr. 2019;22(10):1777-85. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1368980018003890
  » https://doi.org/10.1017/S1368980018003890
• ¹²
  Organización Panamericana de la Salud, Organización Mundial de la Salud. Alimentos y bebidas ultraprocesados en América Latina: ventas, fuentes, perfiles de nutrientes e implicaciones normativas. [cited 2021 Sep 15] Available from: https://iris.paho.org/bitstream/handle/10665.2/51523/9789275320327_spa.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y
  » https://iris.paho.org/bitstream/handle/10665.2/51523/9789275320327_spa.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y
• ¹³
  Parra DC, Costa-Louzada ML, Moubarac JC, Bertazzi-Levy R, Khandpur N, Cediel G, et al. Association between ultra-processed food consumption and the nutrient profile of the Colombian diet in 2005. Salud Publica Mex. 2019;61(2):147-54. https://doi.org/10.21149/9038
  » https://doi.org/10.21149/9038
• ¹⁴
  Louzada ML, Ricardo CZ, Steele EM, Levy RB, Cannon G, Monteiro CA. The share of ultra-processed foods determines the overall nutritional quality of diets in Brazil. Public Health Nutr. 2018 Jan;21(1):94-102. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1368980017001434
  » https://doi.org/10.1017/S1368980017001434
• ¹⁵
  Cediel G, Reyes M, da Costa Louzada ML, Martinez Steele E, Monteiro CA, Corvalán C, et al. Ultra-processed foods and added sugars in the Chilean diet (2010). Public Health Nutr. 2018 Jan;21(1):125-33. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1368980017001161
  » https://doi.org/10.1017/S1368980017001161
• ¹⁶
  Baraldi LG, Martinez Steele E, Canella DS, Monteiro CA. Consumption of ultra-processed foods and associated sociodemographic factors in the USA between 2007 and 2012: evidence from a nationally representative cross-sectional study. BMJ Open. 2018 Mar;8(3):e020574. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2017-020574
  » https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2017-020574
• ¹⁷
  Universidad de Antioquia. MANÁ Gerencia de Seguridad Alimentaria y Nutricional, Gobernación de Antioquia. Perfil alimentario y nutricional de Antioquia 2019: resumen ejecutivo. Antioquia: Uniersidad de Antioquia; 2019.
• ¹⁸
  Organización Panamericana de la Salud, Organización Mundial de la Salud. Modelo de perfil de nutrientes de la Organización Panamericana de la Salud. Washington, DC: Organización Panamericana de la Salud; 2016 [cited 2021 Nov 3] Available from: https://iris.paho.org/handle/10665.2/18622
  » https://iris.paho.org/handle/10665.2/18622
• ¹⁹
  Cediel G. Hacia una alimentación saludable, socialmente justa y ecológicamente sustentable en Colombia: sistema de clasificación Nova de los alimentos. Rev Fac Med (Caracas). 2022;71(1):e92456. https://doi.org/10.15446/revfacmed.v71n1.94256
  » https://doi.org/10.15446/revfacmed.v71n1.94256
• ²⁰
  Mora-Plazas M, Gómez LF, Miles DR, Parra DC, Taillie LS. Nutrition quality of packaged foods in Bogotá, Colombia: a comparison of two nutrient profile models. Nutrients. 2019 May;11(5):1011. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu11051011
  » https://doi.org/10.3390/nu11051011
• ²¹
  Contreras-Manzano A, Jáuregui A, Velasco-Bernal A, Vargas-Meza J, Rivera JA, Tolentino-Mayo L, et al. Comparative analysis of the classification of food products in the Mexican market according to seven different nutrient profiling systems. Nutrients. 2018 Jun;10(6):737. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu10060737
  » https://doi.org/10.3390/nu10060737
• ²²
  Hernández A, Di Iorio AB, Tejada OA. Contenido de azúcar, grasa y sodio en alimentos comercializados en Honduras, según el etiquetado nutricional: prueba para la regulación de alimentos procesados y ultraprocesados. Rev Española Nutr Humana y Dietética. 2018;22(2):108-16. https://doi.org/10.14306/renhyd.22.2.413
  » https://doi.org/10.14306/renhyd.22.2.413
• ²³
  Colombia. Congreso de Colombia. Ley 1355 de 2009 por medio de la cual se define la obesidad y las enfermedades crónicas no transmisibles asociadas a esta como una prioridad de salud pública y se adoptan medidas para su control, atención y prevención. Bogotá: El Congreso; 2009.
• ²⁴
  Ministerio de Salud y Protección Social (CO). Resolución 2508 de 2012 Por la cual se establece el Reglamento Técnico sobre los requisitos que deben cumplir los alimentos envasados que contengan grasas trans y/o grasas saturadas. Bogotá: El Ministerio; 2012.
• ²⁵
  Ministerio de Salud y Protección Social (CO). Resolución 2154 de 2012 por la cual se establece el reglamento técnico sobre los requisitos sanitarios que deben cumplir los aceites y grasas de origen vegetal o animal que se procesen, envasen, almacenen, transporten, exporten, importen y/o comercialicen en el país, destinados para el consumo humano y se dictan otras disposiciones. Bogotá: El Ministerio; 2012.
• ²⁶
  Machado P, Cediel G, Woods J, Baker P, Dickie S, Gomes FS, et al. Evaluating intake levels of nutrients linked to non-communicable diseases in Australia using the novel combination of food processing and nutrient profiling metrics of the PAHO Nutrient Profile Model. Eur J Nutr. 2022 Jun;61(4):1801-12. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00394-021-02740-8
  » https://doi.org/10.1007/s00394-021-02740-8
• ²⁷
  Köncke F, Toledo C, Berón C, Klaczko I, Carriquiry A, Cediel G, et al. Estimation of intake of critical nutrients associated with noncommunicable diseases according to the PAHO/WHO Criteria in the Diet of School-Age Children in Montevideo, Uruguay. Nutrients. 2022 Jan;14(3):528. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu14030528
  » https://doi.org/10.3390/nu14030528
• ²⁸
  Berón C, Toledo C, Köncke F, Klaczko I, Carriquiry A, Cediel G, et al. Productos procesados y ultraprocesados y su relación con la calidad de la dieta en niños. Rev Panam Salud Publica. 2022 Jul;46:e67. https://doi.org/10.26633/RPSP.2022.67
  » https://doi.org/10.26633/RPSP.2022.67
• ²⁹
  Lohner S, Toews I, Meerpohl JJ. Health outcomes of non-nutritive sweeteners: analysis of the research landscape. Nutr J. 2017 Sep;16(1):55. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12937-017-0278-x
  » https://doi.org/10.1186/s12937-017-0278-x
• ³⁰
  Gobernación de Antioquia, Universidad de Antioquia. Plan docenal de seguridad alimentaria y nutricional de Antioquia 2020-2031. Medellín; 2020.

• Funding: Universidad de Antioquia (UdeA - financing of the publication).

Publication Dates

• Publication in this collection
  09 Aug 2024
• Date of issue
  2024

History

• Received
  6 Mar 2023
• Accepted
  22 Jan 2024