Abstract
The digitization of social interactions has created means and opportunities for data and evidence collections, representing challenges to due process, reversing the burden of proof and fundamental rights. As money laundering is associated with digital information and compliance becomes ubiquitous, the Supreme Federal Court’s judgments regarding the obtaining of evidence by state agencies, as well as their sharing, will be analyzed. The results show that such mechanisms fall short of protecting individual rights and to avoid unnecessary nullities. This article uses the deductive and exploratory research method, based on articles, decisions and bibliographic studies.
Keywords:
Digitization; Due process; Compliance; Money laundering