Diagnostic criteria and outcome measures in randomized clinical trials on carpal tunnel syndrome: a systematic review

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

The diagnostic criteria for carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) lack uniformity. Moreover, because CTS is a syndrome, there is no consensus as to which signs, symptoms, clinical and complementary tests are more reproducible and accurate for use in clinical research. This heterogeneity is reflected in clinical practice. Thus, establishing effective and comparable care protocols is difficult.

OBJECTIVE:

To identify the diagnostic criteria and outcome measures used in randomized clinical trials (RCTs) on CTS.

DESING AND SETTING:

Systematic review of randomized clinical trials carried out at the Federal University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.

METHODS:

We searched the Cochrane Library, PubMed, and Embase databases for RCTs with surgical intervention for CTS published between 2006 and 2019. Two investigators independently extracted relevant data on diagnosis and outcomes used in these studies.

RESULTS:

We identified 582 studies and 35 were systematically reviewed. The symptoms, paresthesia in the median nerve territory, nocturnal paresthesia, and special tests were the most widely used clinical diagnostic criteria. The most frequently assessed outcomes were symptoms of paresthesia in the median nerve territory and nocturnal paresthesia.

CONCLUSION:

The diagnostic criteria and outcome measures used in RCTs about CTS are heterogeneous, rendering comparison of studies difficult. Most studies use unstructured clinical criteria associated with ENMG for diagnosis. The Boston Questionnaire is the most frequently used main instrument to measure outcomes.

REGISTRATION:

PROSPERO (CRD42020150965- https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?RecordID=150965).

KEYWORDS (MeSH terms):
Diagnosis; Carpal tunnel syndrome; Randomized clinical trials [publication type]; Systematic Review [publication type]

AUTHORS’ KEYWORDS:
Diagnostic; Outcome; Carpal tunnel; Surgery