VALIDATION OF A METHODOLOGICAL RESEARCH MODEL FOR THE DEVELOPMENT OF NURSING TECHNOLOGIES

Salbego, Cléton; Nietsche, Elisabeta Albertina; Cogo, Silvana Bastos; Girardon-Perlini, Nara Marilene Oliveira; Ramos, Tierle Kosloski; Greco, Patricia Bitencourt Toscani; Sehnem, Graciela Dutra

doi:10.1590/1980-265X-TCE-2023-0370en

Acessibilidade / Reportar erro

Brasil

Texto & Contexto - Enfermagem

Español English

Brasil

Español English

sumário « anterior atual seguinte »

Sumário

Original Article • Texto contexto - enferm. 33 • 2024 • https://doi.org/10.1590/1980-265X-TCE-2023-0370en copy

VALIDATION OF A METHODOLOGICAL RESEARCH MODEL FOR THE DEVELOPMENT OF NURSING TECHNOLOGIES

VALIDACIÓN DE MODELO METODOLÓGICO DE INVESTIGACIÓN PARA EL DESARROLLO TECNOLÓGICO EN ENFERMERÍA

Authorship SCIMAGO INSTITUTIONS RANKINGS

ABSTRACT

Objective:

to verify validity evidence for the Praxis Model for Technology Development^® in nursing.

Method:

a methodological study, guided by the human praxis framework. The operational model content was built by a documentary study of theses and dissertations available in the Catalog of Theses and Dissertations of the Coordination for the Improvement of Higher Education Personnel, and theoretical/epistemological content derived from the philosophical framework of Adolfo Sanchez Vázquez. The content and appearance were validated using the Instrument for Evaluating Methodological Models for Technology Development. Content analysis and the Content Validity Index with binomial test were used to analyze the data, while Cronbach's alpha was used for reliability.

Results:

the model was structured into four phases (pragmatic, creative/artistic, experimental and revolutionary). Validation was carried out by 26 nurse judges, selected according to the established criteria. The model was assessed as relevant by the judges, obtaining a mean index of 0.950 for the content domain and 0.825 for the appearance domain, with an overall Cronbach's alpha of 0.941. Changes were suggested to the model's figures/diagrams regarding color, the model's sequential numbering and the representation of collective participation.

Conclusion:

the model was found to be clear and applicable for developing technological products and processes through a creative and participatory process, which will enable resolving problems in professional practice. It allows you to identify, plan, execute, test, report and synthesize solutions for nursing practice.

DESCRIPTORS:
Research in Nursing; Methods; Technological Development; Inventions; Nursing; Validation Study

Domains/Items	C* and CT^† (%)	I-CVI^‡	Cronbach’s Alpha
Domain 1 - Content validation
1. Does the title represent your goals?	88.5	0.9	0.936
2. Is the theoretical framework used relevant and applicable to the proposal?	100	1.0	0.930
3. Do the concepts express and represent the assumptions of the model/method?	88.5	0.9	0.930
4. Does it systematically present its stages/phases?	100	1.0	0.931
5. Is the description of the stages/phases clear?	96.2	1.0	0.932
6. Does the name of each stage/phase match the content presented?	96.2	1.0	0.929
7. Does it present well-described operational steps for the execution of its stages/phases?	92.3	0.9	0.930
8. Are the phases/stages (inter)related in the search for a representation of the phenomenon?	92.3	0.9	0.928
9. Is the model/method suitable for interpreting practical reality?	96.2	1.0	0.930
10. Does it contribute to building knowledge in the area?	96.2	1.0	0.928
11. Does it encourage the active participation of the researcher(s) in the research context?	96.2	1.0	0.932
12. Does it allow for an (inter)researcher-researched-context relationship?	100	1.0	0.931
13. Does it help the researcher to build hypotheses?	92.3	0.9	0.929
14. Does it provide methodological and representational support for technological development?	96.2	1.0	0.928
15. Do you suggest techniques for establishing communication and cooperation to interpret reality, raise and prioritize problems and formulate hypotheses?	88.5	0.9	0.930
16. Does it encourage collective participation in the search for solutions?	96.2	1.0	0.931
17. Does the technique(s) of approaching the research scenario encourage participatory action among those involved?	96.2	1.0	0.930
18. Do you establish partners for technological creation in terms of your area of activity and objectives?	100	1.0	0.931
19. Does it represent the way to produce technical-scientific knowledge?	100	1.0	0.930
20. Does it present a logical sequence of ideas and their stages/phases?	92.3	0.9	0.928
21. Is the information clear, objective and representative of the proposal?	88.5	0.9	0.926
22. Does it encourage an understanding of reality in order to contribute to its transformation?	100	1.0	0.929
23. Does its interactive language allow for participatory involvement between researcher(s) and researched?	96.2	1.0	0.928
24. Is the language of the model/method suitable for researchers?	100	1.0	0.931
25. Does it provide elements for the researcher to carry out analysis and synthesis on the object?	96.2	1.0	0.928
26. Does it allow the discovery, description, explanation, reproduction and control of phenomena for the development of new products and processes?	96.2	1.0	0.927
Means	-	0.950	0.930
Domain 2 - Appearance validation
27. Are the illustrations clear and understandable (if there are any)?	73.1	0.7	0.935
28. Do the illustrations (if any) represent the content and operation of the phases/stages?	80.8	0.8	0.934
29. Are the shapes of the illustrations (if any) appropriate to the proposal?	88.5	0.9	0.930
30. Are the pictures consistent with the text?	92.3	0.9	0.929
Means	-	0.825	0.932

Judge	DT^§	D^\|\|	C*	CT^†	Estimate	P-value^‡‡	95%CI^¶	S-CVI/AVE**
1	0	0	2	22	0.9	0.001	0.83	0.8
2	0	0	2	27	1.0	0.001	1.00	1.0
3	0	4	17	2	0.9	0.001	0.63	0.6
4	0	0	9	20	1.0	0.001	1.00	1.0
5	0	0	7	22	1.0	0.001	1.00	1.0
6	0	0	12	15	1.0	0.001	0.93	0.9
7	0	0	0	29	0.9	0.001	1.00	1.0
8	0	0	14	11	0.9	0.001	1.00	0.8
9	0	0	8	20	1.0	0.001	0.87	0.9
10	0	1	16	6	1.0	0.001	0.97	0.7
11	0	0	12	17	1.0	0.001	0.77	1.0
12	0	0	6	20	1.0	0.001	0.97	0.9
13	0	0	28	2	0.9	0.001	0.90	1.0
14	0	0	10	19	1.0	0.001	1.00	1.0
15	0	0	0	29	0.9	0.001	1.00	1.0
16	0	0	0	29	1.0	0.001	1.00	1.0
17	0	0	19	10	1.0	0.001	1.00	1.0
18	0	0	21	8	1.0	0.001	1.00	1.0
19	0	0	0	29	1.0	0.001	1.00	1.0
20	0	0	4	25	0.9	0.001	1.00	1.0
21	0	0	13	10	0.9	0.001	0.80	0.8
22	0	0	0	29	1.0	0.001	1.00	1.0
23	1	1	2	24	1.0	0.001	0.87	0.9
24	0	0	6	22	1.0	0.001	0.97	0.9
25	0	0	9	20	1.0	0.001	1.00	1.0
26	0	1	19	7	1.0	0.001	0.90	0.9
S-CVI^††	0.9

Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina, Programa de Pós Graduação em Enfermagem Campus Universitário Trindade, 88040-970 Florianópolis - Santa Catarina - Brasil, Tel.: (55 48) 3721-4915 / (55 48) 3721-9043 - Florianópolis - SC - Brazil
E-mail: textoecontexto@contato.ufsc.br

Acompanhe os números deste periódico no seu leitor de RSS

[1] CORRESPONDING AUTHOR
Cléton Salbego. cletonsalbego@hotmail.com