Study 1 Organizational climate, staffing, and safety equipment as predictors of needlestick injuries and near-misses in hospital nurses (26)
|
2002 USA |
As security device active as passive protection |
Quantitative, Exploratory |
The use of 3 of the 4 types of protective devices examined was associated with a decrease in the probability of incident occurrences with needlesticks and near misses. |
4 |
Study 2 Using an intravenous catheter system to prevent needlestick injury (31)
|
2010 Italy |
Passive protection safety device |
Quantitative, Descriptive |
After the campaign and use of the safety catheters the reported incidents of injuries involving catheters were 19 to 2. And in these two cases no devices were used for prevention. |
2 |
Study 3 Safety Syringes and Anti-Needlestick Devices in Orthopaedic Surgery (23)
|
2011 USA |
As security device active as passive protection |
Quantitative, Quasi - Experimental |
Passive devices are most effective, followed by automatic retractable syringes, armored needlesticks, armored syringes and manually retractable syringes. |
3 |
Study 4 Percutaneous injuries from hollow bore safety-engineered sharps devices (25)
|
2013 USA |
Passive protection safety device |
Quantitative, Exploratory |
42.9% of accidents with the safety device occurred after device use and are probably avoidable through effective use of safety technology and 45.8% of injuries occurred with phlebotomists when the device was not properly activated. |
5 |
Study 5 Needlestick Injury Rates According to Different Types of Safety Engineered Devices: Results of a French Multicenter Study (30)
|
2014 France |
As security device active as passive protection |
Quantitative, Exploratory |
Passive devices are associated with lower incidence rates. In particular, the automatic retraction lancets presented the lowest incidence rate of injuries of all safety devices. And the use of needlesticks without safety has been associated with very high injury rates. |
4 |
Study 6 Effect of the introduction of a engineered sharps injury prevent device on the percutaneous injury rate in healthcare workers (27)
|
2014 USA |
Passive protection safety device |
Quantitative, Quasi - Experimental |
The rate of percutaneous injuries of the IV catheter with the safety device decreased over each consecutive month, while the rate of injuries suffered by suture needlesticks without a safety device increased significantly. |
3 |
Study 7 Impact of a single safety-engineered device on the occurrence of percutaneous injuries in a general hospital in Brazil (29)
|
2014 Brazil |
Passive protection safety device |
Quantitative, Descriptive |
A significant decrease in the rate of percutaneous injuries was observed while the introduction of safety lancet reduced the number of small and hollow needlesticks purchased by the hospital. |
3 |
Study 8 Cost-effectiveness of needle and catheter over needle with active protection devices in the hospital setting (28)
|
2015 Brazil |
Active protection safety device |
Quantitative, Descriptive |
Even with the device there was a 30% increase in accidents. The cost increased by 211.08%. |
4 |