Abstract
This paper analyzes the execution of alternative sentences, under managerial and criminological approaches, based on the criteria of efficiency and efficacy. To do so, we had as a basis documentary research of lawsuits filed between 2015 and 2016 that covered the judicial units of the State of Tocantins, Brazil, as well as systematic reviews of literature and jurisprudence. The critical analysis of the data follows theorical assumptions of models of managerial public administration and third generation criminology of social interrelations, especially the theorization of clinical criminology of social inclusion. In the end, it is possible to extract concrete evidence about the managerial and criminological inefficiency and inefficacy of the execution of alternative sentences. This puts the open-ended criminal accountability model in crisis, due to the use of methods and instruments that are not able to break with the current punitive rationality.
Keywords
Alternative penalties; penal execution; efficiency; efficacy; social inclusion