INTRODUCTION
Hirsutism is the most frequent complaint of women during their reproductive lifetime. It negatively impacts their perception of femininity, wellness, and quality of life. Therefore, antiandrogen therapy is important to mitigate the consequences of such a condition1–3.
Chronic use of antiandrogens, for example, cyproterone, spironolactone, and flutamide, may cause, however, several side effects like hepatotoxicity, depression, anxiety, gastrointestinal dysfunction, and menstrual disorders. These affections may require the discontinuance of long-term treatments4. There are, nevertheless, some authors who have suggested that one of the antiandrogen drugs, i.e., finasteride, exerts a milder effect, making it a promising medication for long-term use2.
Finasteride inhibits 5α-reductase type 2, the action of which competitively inhibits testosterone conversion into dihydrotestosterone (DHT), a potent stimulator of loss of hair from scalp skin follicles but of growth of body hair. Thus, the action of the drug may reduce hirsutism5. Nevertheless, it is necessary to compare the literature data to assess the true effectiveness and safety of finasteride use in the treatment of women with idiopathic hirsutism and polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS).
METHODS
A systematic review of computer-collected research data was carried out using the Medline and PubMed databases. The keywords used in the search were hirsutism and finasteride.
The review included only randomized clinical trials in which finasteride was used in the treatment of women with hirsutism, idiopathic hirsutism, or related to PCOS scored with the modified Ferriman–Gallwey (F–G) scale6,7. In addition, finasteride action had to be set against that of other antiandrogen medications and/or placebo treatment.
All studies were excluded which were not randomized clinical trials (e.g., nonrandomized clinical trials, case series, case controls, literature review, etc.), which involved women whose hirsutism was brought on by other causes (e.g., steroid-producing tumors, hyperprolactinemia, enzyme deficiency of the adrenal glands, Cushing’s syndrome, and thyroid dysfunction), which compared finasteride with treatments other than oral antiandrogen medications (e.g., cosmetic treatments and GnRH analogs), and which were not in Portuguese, English, or Spanish. This initial screening was followed by reassessment of the remaining studies leading to the exclusion of those with an F–G score lower than 8 and those with unstated causes of hirsutism. Adverse effects resulting from finasteride use were deemed secondary outcomes.
Research was limited to women and covered the years from 1990–2015.
The studies that were selected fell into three categories:
-
comparison of finasteride and placebo and of different finasteride regimens,
-
comparison of finasteride and other medications [i.e., spironolactone, flutamide, and cyproterone acetate (CPA) with ethynyl estradiol (EE)], and
-
comparison of finasteride associations and finasteride was associated with in isolation (i.e., spironolactone and CPA with EE).
A total of 75 papers were retrieved from the Medline and PubMed databases. No studies were found before 1990 using the aforementioned descriptors. Figure 1 shows the study flowchart. The initial screening left out 55 studies for two main reasons: they were observational studies or literature reviews. A second screening excluded three articles: one for not meeting the hirsutism criteria adopted in this review and the other two for not stating the causes of hirsutism. Our analysis followed the PRISMA Statement for systematic reviews.
RESULTS
The results were classified into three categories:
-
comparison of finasteride and placebo and different finasteride regimens (n=4),
-
comparison of finasteride and other medications (i.e., spironolactone, flutamide, and CPA with EE; n=9), and
-
comparison of finasteride associations and finasteride was associated with in isolation (i.e., spironolactone and CPA with EE; n=4).
The two studies in which finasteride was compared with placebo showed that hirsutism improved with finasteride8,9, especially after six months of treatment. No improvement was observed in the placebo groups, and no changes in libido were observed in either group. Ciotta et al.6 reported side effects in both the study group and the placebo group. In the study by Lakryc et al.9, there were no reports of severe side effects, but four patients dropped out owing to diarrhea and nausea (n=3) and allergic symptoms (n=1). After the third month of treatment, 17% of the total patients from both groups complained about dizziness, and most of them were from the finasteride group.
The comparison of different finasteride dosages is included in Table 1. Bayram et al. found no differences in the final F–G score up to six months of treatment. Thereafter, the larger dose of 5 mg/day produced better results than the smaller dose of 2.5 mg/day. The quantity and intensity of side effects were greater with the dose of 5 mg; the main sequelae were dry skin, reduction in libido, headache, and gastrointestinal dysfunction10. It appears that, in a 10-month period, intermittent use of 2.5 mg of finasteride has the same effect as continuous administration of the same dose of the drug on the F–G score but with smaller adverse effects11.
Three studies compared finasteride with spironolactone (Table 1). In all these studies, hirsutism decreased with both drugs from baseline measurements. Wong et al.12 and Moghetti et al.13 reported that finasteride was not superior to spironolactone. However, Erenus et al.14 observed that the change in the percentage in the hirsutism score with spironolactone treatment was significantly higher than that with the finasteride treatment (at six and nine months). Despite the significant results, after the sixth month, 19 out of the 40 women in the study comprised initially dropped out because of inadequate responses. Additionally, five patients from the spironolactone group could not be included in the final analysis at nine months owing to irregular uterine bleeding and the need for hormonal contraceptive use.
Neither Wong et al.12 nor Erenus et al.14 reported adverse effects of finasteride use. Moghetti et al.13 reported one patient with a transient sensation of overall bloating. Adverse effects, particularly nausea and abnormal uterine bleeding, were reported with the use of spironolactone12–14, but Wong et al.12 did not report any side effects with its use.
Two of the studies comparing finasteride with CPA associated with EE; Table 1) found no significant differences between the groups15,16. Sahin et al.17 showed the CPA+EE association was more effective than finasteride after six months of treatment. No adverse effects were reported during the studies15–17.
Five studies were reviewed comparing finasteride with flutamide (Table 1). All of them showed a significant reduction in the F–G score with both medications13,15,18–20. In three of them, Falsetti et al.18, Fruzetti et al.15, and Moghetti et al.13 did not find any differences between the two treatments. Falsetti et al.19,20 suggested the superiority of flutamide after 12 months of treatment.
There were more reports of side effects with flutamide, and these were more severe, namely, nausea, vomiting, dry skin, and reduction in libido in three studies18–20, hyporexia in one13, and acute hepatitis in another as evidenced by a pronounced increase in transaminases19. Two studies reported dropouts because of such effects19,20. There was no loss of patients with finasteride, but there were complaints about the reduction in libido (8.7–13.6%), headache (9.1–13%), dry skin (21.7–27.3%)18,20, and bloating (10%)13.
Table 2 shows a summary of the studies in which finasteride associated with spironolactone or with CPA and EE is compared with these drugs in isolation. In general, the finasteride association achieved a better score on the F–G scale21,22. Tartagni et al.23 showed that the combination of the three drugs (i.e., finasteride+CPA+EE) produced an earlier and more effective result. However, Sahin et al.24 found that the superior efficacy of the triple association did not manifest so early, not before 12 months. In the study by Tartagni et al., the side effects of the finasteride association (20%) were greater than those of the association without it (10%), and the main complaint was a reduction in libido23. The other study did not report any significant effects24.
Table 2 also shows two more studies of finasteride administered together with spironolactone set against spironolactone alone. Keleştimur et al.21 compared the F–G scores at baseline and at 12 months, whereas Unlühizarci et al.22 contrasted the basal scores to those at six months. In both studies, the association was found to achieve a significantly larger reduction than spironolactone alone. The main side effect was abnormal uterine bleeding, which occurred more frequently with spironolactone used in isolation (50–60.7%) than in association with finasteride (20–47.3%)21,22.
DISCUSSION
Hirsutism impacts significantly the quality of life of a woman lowering the perception she has of her femininity. It is a long-term treatment and the drugs required for it have important side effects that may interfere with her sexuality because they reduce her libido1–3. One such drug is finasteride; it is effective and safe, its side effects are not as marked as those of two other drugs, namely, spironolactone and flutamide, and its interference in sexuality is less12–14,18–20.
In the studies contrasting finasteride to placebo only, many of the adverse effects (i.e., anxiety, depression, and migraine) that were reported might have been due to the psychic influence of the placebo8,9 or due to the lack of results with respect to cutaneous hyperandrogenism, which decreases women’s femininity and self-esteem25.
In one study, finasteride was inferior to spironolactone, but the study was short-term (9 months) and had few participants14. In some cases, long-term treatments (over two years) are necessary to produce important cosmetic results in women with hirsutism. Nevertheless, the side effects of finasteride were less frequent than those of spironolactone. This drug may act directly on ovarian function, determining menstrual irregularities, which some women find unbearable. Hence, finasteride would have the advantage of not unduly influencing women’s menstrual cycle9–12,14,18–20.
Although the administration of intermittent or smaller doses of finasteride results in fewer side effects, it cannot be concluded that such doses are just as effective as the customary dosage, given the scarce number of participants and the duration of the study, which is not long-term (over two years)10,11. Thus, these facts hinder the assessment of the best dosage.
Therefore, our review shows the potential benefit of finasteride in the treatment of hirsutism, but further randomized double-blind studies should be conducted not only to overcome the aforementioned limitations but also to assess the influence of finasteride in steroidogenesis.
REFERENCES
-
1 Khoury MY, Baracat EC, Pardini DP, Haidar MA, da Motta EL, de Lima GR. Polycystic ovary syndrome: clinical and laboratory evaluation. Sao Paulo Med J. 1996;114(4):1222-5. https://doi.org/10.1590/s1516-31801996000400006
» https://doi.org/10.1590/s1516-31801996000400006 -
2 Khoury MY, Baracat EC, Pardini DP, Vieira JG, de Lima GR. Serum levels of androstanediol glucuronide, total testosterone, and free testosterone in hirsute women. Fertil Steril. 1994;62(1):76-80. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0015-0282(16)56819-8
» https://doi.org/10.1016/s0015-0282(16)56819-8 -
3 Lumachi F, Basso SM. Medical treatment of hirsutism in women. Curr Med Chem. 2010;17(23):2530-8. https://doi.org/10.2174/092986710791556005
» https://doi.org/10.2174/092986710791556005 - 4 Bode D, Seehusen DA, Baird D. Hirsutism in women. Am Fam Physician. 2012;85(4):373-80. PMID: 22335316.
-
5 Stoner E. The clinical development of a 5 alpha-reductase inhibitor, finasteride. J Steroid Biochem Mol Biol. 1990;37(3):375-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/0960-0760(90)90487-6
» https://doi.org/10.1016/0960-0760(90)90487-6 -
6 Hatch R, Rosenfield RL, Kim MH, Tredway D. Hirsutism: implications, etiology, and management. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1981;140(7):815-30. https://doi.org/10.1016/0002-9378(81)90746-8
» https://doi.org/10.1016/0002-9378(81)90746-8 -
7 Ferriman D, Gallwey JD. Clinical assessment of body hair growth in women. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1961;21:1440-7. https://doi.org/10.1210/jcem-21-11-1440
» https://doi.org/10.1210/jcem-21-11-1440 -
8 Ciotta L, Cianci A, Calogero AE, Palumbo MA, Marletta E, Sciuto A, et al. Clinical and endocrine ffects of finasteride, a 5 alpha-reductase inhibitor, in women with idiopathic hirsutism. Fertil Steril. 1995;64(2):299-306. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0015-0282(16)57727-9
» https://doi.org/10.1016/s0015-0282(16)57727-9 - 9 Lakryc EM, Motta EL, Soares Junior JM, Haidar MA, Lima GR, Baracat EC. The benefits of finasteride for hirsute women with polycystic ovary syndrome or idiopathic hirsutism. Gynecol Endocrinol. 2003;17(1):57-63. PMID: 12724020
-
10 Bayram F, Müderris II, Güven M, Keles¸timur F. Comparison of high-dose finasteride (5 mg/day) versus low-dose finasteride (2.5 mg/day) in the treatment of hirsutism. Eur J Endocrinol. 2002;147(4):467-71. https://doi.org/10.1530/eje.0.1470467
» https://doi.org/10.1530/eje.0.1470467 -
11 Tartagni M, Schonauer MM, Cicinelli E, Petruzzelli F, Pergola G, Salvia MA, Loverro G. Intermittent low-dose finasteride is as effective as daily administration for the treatment of hirsute women. Fertil Steril. 2004;82(3):752-5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2004.02.118
» https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2004.02.118 -
12 Wong IL, Morris RS, Chang L, Spahn MA, Stanczyk FZ, Lobo RA. A prospective randomized trial comparing finasteride to spironolactone in the treatment of hirsute women. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1995;80(1):233-8. https://doi.org/10.1210/jcem.80.1.7829618
» https://doi.org/10.1210/jcem.80.1.7829618 -
13 Moghetti P, Tosi F, Tosti A, Negri C, Misciali C, Perrone F, et al. Comparison of spironolactone, flutamide, and finasteride efficacy in the treatment of hirsutism: a randomized, double blind, placebo-controlled trial. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2000;85(1):89-94. https://doi.org/10.1210/jcem.85.1.6245
» https://doi.org/10.1210/jcem.85.1.6245 -
14 Erenus M, Yücelten D, Durmus¸og˘lu F, Gürbüz O. Comparison of finasteride versus spironolactone in the treatment of idiopathic hirsutism. Fertil Steril. 1997;68(6):1000-3. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0015-0282(97)00371-3
» https://doi.org/10.1016/s0015-0282(97)00371-3 -
15 Fruzzetti F, Bersi C, Parrini D, Ricci C, Genazzani AR. Treatment of hirsutism: comparisons between different antiandrogens with central and peripheral effects. Fertil Steril. 1999;71(3):445-51. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0015-0282(98)00486-5
» https://doi.org/10.1016/s0015-0282(98)00486-5 -
16 Beigi A, Sobhi A, Zarrinkoub F. Finasteride versus cyproterone acetate-estrogen regimens in the treatment of hirsutism. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2004;87(1):29-33. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijgo.2004.06.003
» https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijgo.2004.06.003 -
17 Sahin Y, Bayram F, Keles¸timur F, Müderris I. Comparison of cyproterone acetate plus ethinyl estradiol and finasteride in the treatment of hirsutism. J Endocrinol Invest. 1998;21(6):348-52. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03350769
» https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03350769 -
18 Falsetti L, Fusco D, Eleftheriou G, Rosina B. Treatment of hirsutism by finasteride and flutamide in women with polycystic ovary syndrome. Gynecol Endocrinol. 1997;11(4):251-7. https://doi.org/10.3109/09513599709152542
» https://doi.org/10.3109/09513599709152542 -
19 Falsetti L, Gambera A, Legrenzi L, Iacobello C, Bugari G. Comparison of finasteride versus flutamide in the treatment of hirsutism. Eur J Endocrinol. 1999;141(4):361-7. https://doi.org/10.1530/eje.0.1410361
» https://doi.org/10.1530/eje.0.1410361 -
20 Falsetti L, Gambera A. Comparison of finasteride and flutamide in the treatment of idiopathic hirsutism. Fertil Steril. 1999;72(1):41-6. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0015-0282(99)00183-1
» https://doi.org/10.1016/s0015-0282(99)00183-1 -
21 Keles¸timur F, Everest H, Unlühizarci K, Bayram F, Sahin Y. A comparison between spironolactone and spironolactone plus finasteride in the treatment of hirsutism. Eur J Endocrinol. 2004;150(3):351-4. https://doi.org/10.1530/eje.0.1500351
» https://doi.org/10.1530/eje.0.1500351 -
22 Unlühizarci KK, Everest H, Bayram F, Keles¸timur F. Comparison of spironolactone and spironolactone plus finasteride in the treatment of hirsutism. Fertil Steril. 2002;78(6):1331-3. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0015-0282(02)04294-2
» https://doi.org/10.1016/s0015-0282(02)04294-2 -
23 Tartagni M, Schonauer LM, Salvia MA, Cicinelli E, Pergola G, D’Addario V. Comparison of Diane 35 and Diane 35 plus finasteride in the treatment of hirsutism. Fertil Steril. 2000;73(4):718-23. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0015-0282(99)00633-0
» https://doi.org/10.1016/s0015-0282(99)00633-0 -
24 Sahin Y, Dilber S, Keles¸timur F. Comparison of diane 35 and diane 35 plus finasteride in the treatment of hirsutism. Fertil Steril. 2001;75(3):496-500. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0015-0282(00)01764-7
» https://doi.org/10.1016/s0015-0282(00)01764-7 -
25 Brechan I, Kvalem IL. Relationship between body dissatisfaction and disordered eating: Mediating role of self-esteem and depression. Eat Behav. 2015;17:49-58. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eatbeh.2014.12.008
» https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eatbeh.2014.12.008


