Acessibilidade / Reportar erro

Evidence of Helicobacter spp. in domestic cats from central Rio Grande do Sul State - pre-study

[Evidências de Helicobacter spp. em gatos domésticos na região central do Rio Grande do Sul - pré-estudo]

ABSTRACT

Non-Helicobacter pylori Helicobacters(NHPH) account for causing moderate and severe gastritis in humans. Moreover, they have already been documented in the oral cavity of feline animals. The current study aims to investigate Helicobacter spp. incidence in necropsied domestic cats from central Rio Grande do Sul. Stomach, liver, and bile samples derived from 30 cats’ cadavers were subjected to rapid urease test (RUT), histopathological analysis, PCR, and nucleotide sequencing to investigate the genetic material presence and to identify the main phylogenetic group. Based on RUT results, 64.2% and 53.5% of patients were positive for gastric body and pyloric antrum, respectively. Ten out of these 15 patients were male (70%) and the positive result observed for the pyloric antrum was associated with males. Mild histopathological changes were observed in most gastric and liver samples. Gastric samples subjected to PCR presented positive results in 60.7%, whereas liver samples accounted for positive results in 17.8% and bile samples, in 3.5% of cases. There was high nucleotide identity with NHPH species. This study has found evidence that NHPH can be found in the gastric and hepatic regions, as in the bile of domestic cats, besides emphasizing the zoonotic potential of this disease

Keywords:
phylogenetics; cats; liver; bile; Non-Helicobacter pylori Helicobacters

RESUMO

As Helicobacter não Helicobacter pylori (HNHP) são responsáveis por causar gastrite moderada e severa em seres humanos; além disso, são espécies que já são documentadas na cavidade oral de felinos. O objetivo deste estudo é investigar a evidência de Helicobacter spp. em gatos domésticos necropsiados, na região central do Rio Grande do Sul. Para tanto, utilizaram-se 30 cadáveres de gatos, cujas amostras de estômago, fígado e bile foram submetidas ao teste rápido de urease (TRU), à análise histopatológica, ao PCR e ao sequenciamento de nucleotídeos, para demonstrar a presença de material genético e identificar o principal grupo filogenético. No TRU, 64,2% dos pacientes foram positivos no corpo gástrico e 53,5% foram positivos no antro pilórico. Destes 15 pacientes, 10 eram machos (70%), sendo o resultado positivo no antro pilórico associado ao sexo masculino. Foram observadas alterações histopatológicas discretas na maioria das amostras gástricas e hepáticas. As amostras gástricas submetidas ao PCR foram positivas em 60,7%; já as hepáticas, em 17,8%; e em 3,5% das amostras de bile. Houve alta identidade de nucleotídeo com as espécies de HNHP. Conclui-se que existem evidências de que as HNHP podem ser encontradas nas regiões gástrica e hepática, incluindo a bile de gatos domésticos, destacando-se o potencial zoonótico da enfermidade.

Palavras-chave:
filogenética; gatos; fígado; bile; Helicobacter não Helicobacter pylori

INTRODUCTION

Helicobacter spp. are spiral-shaped, gram-negative and microaerophilic bacteria accounting for colonizing both the stomach and small intestine of several animal species, such as dogs, cats, ferrets, pigs, cheetahs and monkeys (Sousa et al., 2019SOUSA, D.A.; SILVA, K.V.G.C.; CASCON, C.M. et al. Epidermal growth factor receptor 2 immunoexpression in gastric cells of domestic cats with H. heilmannii infection. Acta Histochem., v.121, p.413-418, 2019.; Hong et al., 2016HONG, S.; CHUNG, Y.; KANG, W.G.; KIM, O et al. Detection of Helicobacter felis in a cat with gastric disease in laboratory animal facility. Lab. Anim. Res., v.32, p.122, 2016.; Rossi et al., 2014ROSSI, G.; GAMBI, R.; UNCINI, R. et al. Severe gastritis with double helicobacter spp. Infection associated with Barrett’s esophagus in a cheetah. Helicobacter, v.19, p.462-464, 2014.). Bacterial species Helicobacter pylori prevails in humans and accounts for disorders in their upper intestinal and hepatobiliary tracts (Kubota-Aizawa et al., 2017; Kusters et al., 2006KUSTERS, J.G.; VLIET, A.H.M. VAN KUIPERS, E.J. Pathogenesis of helicobacter pylori infection. Clin. Microbiol. Rev., v.19, p.449-490, 2006.). It was the first species both identified and named after bacterial culture obtained from biopsies applied to samples collected from humans affected by peptic ulcers, who underwent endoscopic procedure (Marshall et al., 1984MARSHALL, B.; WARREN, J.R. Unidentified curved bacilli in the stomach of patients with gastritis and peptic ulceration. Lancet, v.323, p.1311-1315, 1984.). Then, bacterial species Gastrospirillum hominis was discovered and it presented features different from those observed for H. pylori (Dent et al., 1987DENT, J.C.; MCNULTY, C.A.; UFF, J.C.; WILKINSON, S.P.; GEAR, M.W. Spiral organisms in the gastric antrum. Lancet, v.2, p.96, 1987.; McNulty et al., 1989), therefore, it was renamed as Helicobacter heilmanni (Solnick et al., 1993SOLNICK, J.V.; GAMBI, R.; UNCINI, R. et al. An uncultured gastric spiral organism is a newly identified helicobacter in humans. J. Infect. Dis., v.168, p.379-385, 1993.).

Based on sequencing studies applied to the 16s ribosomal RNA (rRNA) gene, Helicobacter heilmanni belongs to a wide variety of bacteria, such as H. salomonis, H. bizzozeronii, H. felis, H. heilmanni s.s. (strictu sensu), H. baculiformis and H. cynogastricus, which are isolated from both domestic and wild animals (Haesebrouck et al., 2009HAESEBROUCK, F.; PASMANS, F.; FLAHOU, B et al. Gastric helicobacters in domestic animals and nonhuman primates and their significance for human health. Clin. Microbiol. Rev., v.22, p.202-223, 2009.; O’Rourke et al., 2004). Later on, these bacteria were referred to as Non-Helicobacter pylori Helicobacter or NHPH (Haesebrouck et al., 2009). NHPHs, in their turn, account for causing moderate gastritis in humans, although it can progress to its severe forms, such as gastric ulcers, gastric adenocarcinomas and low-grade lymphoma of mucosa-associated lymphoid tissue (Sousa et al., 2019SOUSA, D.A.; SILVA, K.V.G.C.; CASCON, C.M. et al. Epidermal growth factor receptor 2 immunoexpression in gastric cells of domestic cats with H. heilmannii infection. Acta Histochem., v.121, p.413-418, 2019.; Tabrizi et al., 2010TABRIZI, A.S.; JAMSHIDI, S.H.; OGHALAEI, A. et al. Identification of helicobacter spp. in oral secretions vs. gastric mucosa of stray cats. Vet. Microbiol., v.140, p.142-146, 2010.). On the other hand, Helicobacter heilmanni is the most prevalent bacteria found in felines. Although this bacterial species was previously identified in felines’ stomach, liver, bile duct (Greiter-Wilke et al., 2006), pancreas, duodenum (Sjödin et al., 2011SJÖDIN, S.; TROWALD-WIGH, G.; FREDRIKSSON, M. Identification of Helicobacter DNA in feline pancreas, liver, stomach, and duodenum: comparison between findings in fresh and formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tissue samples. Res. Vet. Sci., v.91, p.e28-e30, 2011.), feces (Hong et al., 2016HONG, S.; CHUNG, Y.; KANG, W.G.; KIM, O et al. Detection of Helicobacter felis in a cat with gastric disease in laboratory animal facility. Lab. Anim. Res., v.32, p.122, 2016.) and oral cavity (Tabrizi et al., 2010), and even in biliary samples (Boomkens et al., 2004BOOMKENS, S. Detection of Helicobacter pylori in bile of cats. FEMS Immunol. Med. Microbiol., v.42, p.307-311, 2004.), it causes little, or no harm at all, to these hosts (Ménard and Smet., 2019MÉNARD, A.; SMET, A. Review: other helicobacter species. Helicobacter, v.24, p.1-8, 2019.; Sousa et al., 2019).

Cats licking humans is a social interaction form, be it to show affection or for grooming purposes (Rodan, 2012RODAN, I. Understanding the cat and feline-friendly handling. In: LITTLE, S.E. Cat: clinical medicine and management. Saint Louis: Elsevier Saunders, 2012. chap.1, p.2-19.). However, Helicobacter spp. presence was already reported in cats and dogs’ saliva (Tabrizi et al., 2010TABRIZI, A.S.; JAMSHIDI, S.H.; OGHALAEI, A. et al. Identification of helicobacter spp. in oral secretions vs. gastric mucosa of stray cats. Vet. Microbiol., v.140, p.142-146, 2010.; Recordati et al., 2007RECORDATI, C.; GUALDI, V.; TOSI, S. et al. Detection of helicobacter spp. DNA in the oral cavity of dogs. Vet. Microbiol,. v.119, p.346-351, 2007.) and it is well known that direct contact with their saliva is a risk factor for infections, regardless of whether it has bile, or not (Tabrizi et al., 2015; Kusters et al., 2006KUSTERS, J.G.; VLIET, A.H.M. VAN KUIPERS, E.J. Pathogenesis of helicobacter pylori infection. Clin. Microbiol. Rev., v.19, p.449-490, 2006.). Therefore, this succession of factors enables a progressively favorable scenario for the zoonotic aspect of this disease to manifest itself.

The aims of the current study were to investigate Helicobacter spp. incidence in domestic cats subjected to necropsy in central Rio Grande do Sul State, based on rapid urease tests, histopathology and on molecular analyses conducted in stomach, liver tissue and bile samples, as well as to identify the main phylogenetic groups found in them.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Twenty-eight dead cats of different ages, sexes, and breeds were used in the current study. They were provided by the routine clinical care service of the University Veterinary Hospital of a higher education institution, and private clinics in central Rio Grande do Sul State. They were either euthanized or died of different causes during hospitalization and were sent to the Pathology Laboratory of the University Veterinary Hospital at the request of the veterinarian in charge, in agreement with the owners. This hospital is a reference for necropsy procedures. The animals were classified into age groups, namely: pups (up to 12 months), juveniles (1 to 5 years), adults (5 to 7 years), and seniors (7 years and older).

A rapid Urease Test (RUT) was conducted with the aid of the Uretest® kit (Renylab, Barbacena City, Brazil). Two gastric samples were collected (one from the gastric body and one from the pyloric antrum, each one with dimensions of 0.5 x 0.5 centimeters) and aseptically deposited in a test tube in order to have their indicator’s color change time assessed. According to the manufacturer’s instructions, samples are positive if the kit’s yellow color turns pink, at any shade, within 60 minutes. On the other hand, samples are negative when their color change does not occur after 60 minutes.

Right after sample collection was over, gastric (gastric body and pyloric antrum) and liver fragments were placed in 5ml syringes filled with 10% formaldehyde solution, subjected to histopathological analysis, and processed based on techniques described by Esteves et al. (2000ESTEVES, M.I.; SCHRENZEL, M.D.; MARINI, R.P et al. Helicobacter pylory Gastritis in cats with long-term natural infection as a model of human disease. Am. J. Path., v. 156, n. 2, 2000), Prachsilpchai et al. (2007PRACHSILPCHAI, W.; NUANUALSUWAN, S.; CHATSUWAN, T et al. Diagnosis of Helicobacter spp. infection in canine stomach. J. Vet. Sci., 8(2), 139-145, 2007.) and Robic et al. (2007ROBIC, M.; ARTUKOVIC, B.; BECK, A. et al. Histopathological changes in stomachs of dogs with naturally acquired Helicobacter infection. Veterinarski Arhiv, v.77, p.103-111, 2007.).

Scores inherent to the degree of structural impairment and inflammatory infiltration of both the epithelium and the lamina propria, in the gastric mucosa of the gastric body and pyloric antrum regions, were set to assess inflammation intensity in the gastric mucosa of each sample, according to consensus elaborated by Day et al. (2008DAY, J.M.; BILZER, T.; MANSELL, J et al. Histopathological standards for the diagnosis of gastrointestinal inflammation in endoscopic biopsy samples from the dog and cat: a report from the world small animal veterinary association gastrointestinal standardization group. J. Comp. Path., v. 138, S1-S43, 2008.).

Similarly, scores were set for liver structural changes by taking into consideration portal infiltrate type and degree, as well as bile duct proliferation and fibrosis degrees, based on studies by Gagne et al. (1996GAGNE, J.M.; WEISS, D.J.; ARMSTRONG, P.J. Histopathologic evaluation of feline inflammatory liver disease. Vet. Pathol., v.33 p.521-526, 1996).

Samples from the gastric body, pyloric antrum, hepatic and biliary regions were collected and stored - right away - in 3ml Eppendorf tubes filled with 0.9% physiological solution, at -28ºC. DNA extraction from collected samples was carried out based on using the DNeasy Blood and Tissue Kit (Qiagen, Germany); extraction procedure stages followed the methodology by Germani et al. (1997GERMANI, Y.; DAUGA, C.; DUVAL, P et al. Strategy for the detection of Helicobacter species by amplification of 16S rRNA genes and identification of H. felis in a human gastric biopsy. Res. Microbiol., v.148, p.315-326, 1997.). The size of the amplified fragment was 399 base pairs (399 base pairs (bp) for the 16S rRNA gene of the Helicobacter spp.).

DNA material was extracted from each sample and subjected to PCR test. Positive control was obtained from gastric, hepatic, and biliary samples collected from a cat known to be positive for Helicobacter sp., whereas negative controls comprised ultrapure water, in all amplifications.

PCR amplification products were subjected to nucleotide sequencing in Prism 3500 Genetic Analyzer (Life Technologies, California, USA), in duplicates, based on the Sanger method. The consensus order of Staden Package software was used to start the nucleotide sequencing (Staden, 1996STADEN, R. The staden sequence analysis package. Mol. Biotechnol., v.5, p.233-241, 1996.). Phylogenetic analyses used the consensus order in each amplified sample and Helicobacter sp. nucleotide sequence obtained in the Genbank database. Sequences were both edited and aligned in BioEdit Alignment Editor Software, version 7.0.5.3 (Hall, 1999HALL, T.A. BioEdit: a user-friendly biological sequence alignment editor and analysis program for windows 95/98/NT. Nucl. Acids Symp. Ser., v.41, p.95-99, 1999.). The phylogenetic tree was built in MEGA X software (Kumar et al., 2018KUMAR, S.; STECHER, G.; LI, M et al. MEGA X: molecular evolutionary genetics analysis across computing platforms. Mol. Biol. Evol., v.35, p.1547-1549, 2018.). The obtained sequences have been deposited in GenBank under the codes/IDs:

OK614040.1, OK614007.1, OK613988.1, OK606115.1, OK606114.1, OK606113.1, OK606112.1, OK606111.1, OK606110.1, OK606109.1, OK606108.1, OK606107.1,OK606106.1, OK606105.1, OK606104.1, OK606103.1, OK606102.1, OK606096.1, OK606095.1, OK606094.1 e OK606093.1.

Statistical analysis was based on absolute and relative frequency calculations applied to qualitative variables (urease, histopathology, and PCR). Association analysis was based on Fisher’s exact test. All analyses were carried out in SPSS software v.18.0 (Pasw…, 2009), at 5% significance level.

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

Two (2) of the 30 assessed cats belonged to the Persian breed (14 males and 16 females) and 28 of them did not have defined breed. Three (10%) of them were puppies up to 1 year old, 10 were young cats in the age group 1-5 years (33.3%), 6 were adult animals in the age group 5-7 years (20%) and 11 were elderly cats over 7 years old (36.7%). Animals presenting positive result in RUT applied to gastric body samples accounted for 66% (2/3) of puppies, 70% (7/10) of young cats, 50% (3/6) of adult cats and for 54.5% (6 /11) of elderly individuals. On the other hand, animals presenting positive urease results in pyloric antrum samples accounted for 40% (4/10) of young and 50% (3/6) of adult cats.

Patients presenting positive urease results in the gastric body accounted for 60% (18/30) of cases. On the other hand, based on histopathological analysis applied to the gastric body of these animals, 50% (9/18) of them did not show surface-epithelium injury, 61.1% (11/18) presented normal gastric fossa and 83.3% (15/18) did not show intraepithelial lymphocytes, or even lymphocytes and plasmocytes, in the lamina propria. In addition, despite being positive for urease, none of these patients presented mucosal atrophy, eosinophils and neutrophils in the lamina propria or follicular lymphoid hyperplasia. Lack of these cell populations is assumingly associated with lack of epithelium due to autolysis identified in certain samples or to surface epithelium without injury.

Based on analysis applied to pyloric antrum samples, 50% of patients (15/30) tested positive for urease (Fig. 1A) and 60% (9/15) of them did not show epithelial damage in the pyloric antrum. In addition, 87% (13/15) of these cats did not present intraepithelial lymphocytes, 80% (12/15) of them did not show lymphocytes or plasma cells in the lamina propria and 87% (13/15) did not present follicular lymphoid hyperplasia. No eosinophils or neutrophils were observed in the lamina propria. However, 10 of the 15 positive animals belonged to the male sex (70%), therefore, positive results observed for pyloric antrum were associated with the male sex (Fig. 1B) (p=0.033).

Figure 1
Examples of positive (pink +) and negative (yellow -) urease tests in feline-stomach samples (A). Histological image of the stomach showing multiple spirochete-shaped bacteria (Helicobacter sp.) in gastric glands’ lumen (arrows). HE, 40x.

Lack of changes and cell populations in gastric body and pyloric antrum samples was assumingly associated with lack of epithelium caused by the autolysis identified in certain samples. It is so, because these leukocyte subpopulations are part of the gastric mucosa’s surface region (Day et al., 2008DAY, J.M.; BILZER, T.; MANSELL, J et al. Histopathological standards for the diagnosis of gastrointestinal inflammation in endoscopic biopsy samples from the dog and cat: a report from the world small animal veterinary association gastrointestinal standardization group. J. Comp. Path., v. 138, S1-S43, 2008.).

Based on analysis applied to liver samples, 73.3% (11/15) of patients presenting positive results in urease test applied to the pyloric antrum have shown 5-10 inflammatory cells in the portal space (slight change). This assessment focuses on measuring inflammatory infiltrates’ severity in portal areas. Moreover, 60% (9/15) of these patients presented 2 ductulus per portal space (slight change) in the bile duct proliferation assessment, whereas 53% (8/15) of them did not show portal fibrosis. In addition, 66.6% (12/18) of animals who tested positive for urease in the gastric body presented 5-10 inflammatory cells in the portal space (slight change), 55.56% (10/18) of them presented 2 ductulus per portal space (slight change) and 50% (9/18) did not show portal fibrosis.

Furthermore, lymphoplasmacytic infiltrates were the most prevalent type (n=23). Their prevalence in the herein assessed animals was similar to that observed by Gagne et al. (1996GAGNE, J.M.; WEISS, D.J.; ARMSTRONG, P.J. Histopathologic evaluation of feline inflammatory liver disease. Vet. Pathol., v.33 p.521-526, 1996), according to whom, 27 of 45 assessed cats with inflammatory liver diseases presented lymphoplasmacytic infiltrates. According to them, inflammatory changes were limited to the portal space, and this finding was similar to that observed in the current study. However, difference in bile duct proliferation was herein observed. It was evident and severe in 96.2% (26/27) of cats and in 85.1% (23/27) of patients with portal fibrosis.

If one takes into consideration that all it takes for a given animal to be positive is to have a reactive gastric body and/or pyloric antrum sample in the urease test, the current study had 66.6% (20/30) positive patients, in total. This rate was lower than that found in studies conducted with felines in Switzerland, which recorded 78% (45/58) positive cases (Neiger et al., 1998NEIGER, R.; DIETERICH, C.; BURNENS, A et al. Detection and prevalence of Helicobacter infection in pet cats. J. Clin. Microbiol., v.36, p.634-637, 1998.); in research conducted with felines in the United States, which recorded 86% positive patients (47/55) (Otto et al., 1994OTTO, G.; HAZELL, S.H.; FOX, J.G et al. Animal and public health implications of gastric colonization of cats by Helicobacter-like organisms. J. Clin. Microb., v.32, p.1043-1049, 1994.); in study conducted with felines in Niterói City-RJ, which recorded positive urease tests for 78.5% (44/56) of cases (Araujo et al., 2010ARAUJO, I.C.; MOTA, S.B.; AQUINO, M.H.C.; FERREIRA, A.M.R. Helicobacter species detection and histopathological changes in stray cats from Niterói, Brazil. J. Feline Med. Surg., v.12, p.509-511, 2010.), as well as in study carried out with dogs in Santa Maria City, Rio Grande do Sul State (Guerra Segundo et al., 2021), which evidenced that 88.5% (31/35) of the assessed dogs were positive for gastric samples in the urease test. Although this last study was not conducted with felines, it took place in the same herein investigated region. According to Macêdo et al. 2012MACÊDO, J.S; MENDONÇA, F.S.; DA SILVA, K.R.L., DE BARROS, M.E.G.; EVÊNCIO-NETO, J. Incidência e aspectos histopatológicos da infecção por helicobacter spp. em gatos da cidade de Recife, Pernambuco, Brasil. Arq. Inst. Biol., v.79, p.519-524, 2012.), in cats, studies have demonstrated a variation in the prevalence of gastric microorganisms such as Helicobacter, ranging from 76 to 100%. These authors, in their study with felines in the city of Recife, found 82.35% positivity in the urease test, unlike the 66.6% found in our study, a percentage that is not low either. We cannot fail to highlight that the urease test may show positive results in the presence of other urease-positive bacteria, thus explaining this variation in positivity among species and within the same species, depending on the study location.

Gastric samples subjected to PCR analysis (n = 28) replicated Helicobacter spp. material in 60.7% (17/28) of cases. These findings are in compliance with the prevalence found in studies whose rates ranged from 40% to 100% of the assessed cats (Papasouliotis et al., 1997PAPASOULIOTIS, K.; GRUFFYDD-JONES, T.J.; WERRETT, G.; BROWN, P.J.; PEARSON, G.R. Short Communications Occurrence of ‘gastric Helicobacter-like organisms’ in cats. Vet. Rec., v.140, p.369-370, 1997.). However, this rate was lower than that observed for gastric samples collected from dogs in Londrina City-PR, which comprised 90.9% (30/33) of samples (Takemura et al., 2019TAKEMURA, L.S.; MARCASSO, R.A.; LORENZETTI, E et al. Helicobacter infection in the hepatobiliary system and hepatic lesions: a possible association in dogs. Braz. J. Microbiol., v.50, p.297-305, 2019.). A study conducted with 8 human patients without gastritis has shown that 100% of them recorded positive results for PCR (Mapstone et al., 1993MAPSTONE, N.P.; LYNCH, D.A.; LEWIS, A.F et al. Identification of Helicobacter pylori DNA in the mouths and stomachs of patients with gastritis using PCR. J. Clin. Pathol., v.46, p.540-543, 1993.). In addition, 14.2% (4/28) of positive cases have also shown genetic material in liver tissues. We emphasize that in the present study, 28 samples were validated for PCR, as two of them did not have satisfactory DNA amplification for analysis and therefore were not sequenced.

On the other hand, 17.8% (5/28) of cases investigated in the current study recorded positive PCR results for liver samples. This rate was lower than the one observed for liver samples collected from a group of human patients affected by hepatocellular carcinoma, and from another group affected by other liver diseases, colon carcinoma and uterine myoma. Each group recorded positive results for 60.7% and 72% of cases, respectively (Xuan et al., 2006XUAN, S.Y.; LI, N.; ZHOU, R.R.; SHI, Y.X et al. Helicobacter infection in hepatocellular carcinoma tissue. World J. Gastroenterol., v.12, p.2335, 2006.).

Genetic material was found in the bile sample of 3.5% (1/28) of cases. Although this patient recorded Helicobacter spp. positive results for the gastric sample, its liver sample recorded negative PCR results. This finding exemplifies the theory of infection ascending from the duodenum to the bile duct and, subsequently, to the bile (Ménard and Smet, 2019MÉNARD, A.; SMET, A. Review: other helicobacter species. Helicobacter, v.24, p.1-8, 2019.). Unlike dogs assessed in Londrina City-PR, this finding was different from that of the study that did not find any replicated bile sample (Takemura et al., 2019TAKEMURA, L.S.; MARCASSO, R.A.; LORENZETTI, E et al. Helicobacter infection in the hepatobiliary system and hepatic lesions: a possible association in dogs. Braz. J. Microbiol., v.50, p.297-305, 2019.). However, a study focused on assessing a group of felines affected by lymphocytic cholangitis, and another group of animals affected by another liver disease, observed genetic material replication in bile samples in 26.6% (4/15) and 15.6% (8 /51) of cases, respectively (Boomkens et al., 2004BOOMKENS, S. Detection of Helicobacter pylori in bile of cats. FEMS Immunol. Med. Microbiol., v.42, p.307-311, 2004.). However, this eventual difference was associated with the selection of patients with specific diseases, a fact that increased the likelihood of identifying genetic material deriving from Helicobacter spp. in these patients.

There was significant association of qualitative variables between the PCR and urease tests applied to pyloric antrum (p=0.001), at 5% significance level (Table 1). Similarly, a significant association was observed between the PCR and urease tests applied to the gastric body (p=0.014).

Table 1
Association between results recorded for PCR applied to stomach sample and for urease test applied to pyloric antrum* and gastric body** samples

Nucleotides’ identity among the herein obtained sequences ranged from 97.89% to 100%. Likewise, they recorded identity rates in comparison to that of sequences deriving from H. heilmannii (HE984298.2; 98.97% to 99.23%), H. bizzozeronii (FR871757.1; 98.39% to 99.73%), H. felis (AY686607.1; 98.71% to 99.47%) and H. salomonis (NR_026065.1; 99.47% to 99.73%). Nucleotides’ identity ranged from 91.9% to 93.48% in comparison to the sequence obtained from H. pylori samples (AY155586) (Fig. 2). Phylogenetic analysis did not determine the Helicobacter species detected in the analyzed samples, in separate. However, based on the closeness between the herein analyzed samples and Helicobacter strains, such as H. heilmannii, H. bizzozeronii, H. felis and H. salomonis, it was possible implying similarity between the herein investigated samples and these HNHP species.

Figure 2
Phylogenetic tree based on the nucleotide sequence of the 16s ribosomal RNA gene specific to Helicobacter spp. Values higher than 60% were displayed. The herein obtained sequences are highlighted by a black circle; n.E or n.F, number of the animal/stomach or liver sample.

It is essential to emphasize the current public-health relevance of this disease. Chronic gastritis associated with Helicobacter has the potential to cause gastric neoplasms in humans; therefore, our research group is encouraged to carry out further studies like the present one to warn both the scientific community and the overall society about such a risk. Humans’ relationship with animals, mainly with dogs and cats, is getting increasingly close; therefore, hygiene care must be taken to avoid and/or control the multiplication of this agent type, mainly in individuals with weak immune systems.

CONCLUSIONS

Results in the current study have evidenced high Helicobacter spp. incidence rate through RUT and PCR applied to gastric samples. Positive result in RUT applied to pyloric antrum samples was associated with the male sex. Slight histopathological changes were observed in most gastric and liver samples, and it enabled qualitative definition of the most common changes. Although the rates of liver and bile samples testing positive in the PCR test were lower than those observed in several studies, they were observed, nevertheless. Phylogenetic analysis has determined significant genetic proximity to NHPHs, since these species show close evolutionary relationship with, and genomic similarity to H. pylori.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENT

The current study was funded by the following Brazilian federal agencies: “Coordination for the Improvement of Higher Education Personnel” (CAPES) - Financial Code 001; and “National Council for Scientific and Technological Development” (CNPq).

REFERENCES

  • ARAUJO, I.C.; MOTA, S.B.; AQUINO, M.H.C.; FERREIRA, A.M.R. Helicobacter species detection and histopathological changes in stray cats from Niterói, Brazil. J. Feline Med. Surg., v.12, p.509-511, 2010.
  • BOOMKENS, S. Detection of Helicobacter pylori in bile of cats. FEMS Immunol. Med. Microbiol., v.42, p.307-311, 2004.
  • DAY, J.M.; BILZER, T.; MANSELL, J et al. Histopathological standards for the diagnosis of gastrointestinal inflammation in endoscopic biopsy samples from the dog and cat: a report from the world small animal veterinary association gastrointestinal standardization group. J. Comp. Path., v. 138, S1-S43, 2008.
  • DENT, J.C.; MCNULTY, C.A.; UFF, J.C.; WILKINSON, S.P.; GEAR, M.W. Spiral organisms in the gastric antrum. Lancet, v.2, p.96, 1987.
  • ESTEVES, M.I.; SCHRENZEL, M.D.; MARINI, R.P et al. Helicobacter pylory Gastritis in cats with long-term natural infection as a model of human disease. Am. J. Path., v. 156, n. 2, 2000
  • GAGNE, J.M.; WEISS, D.J.; ARMSTRONG, P.J. Histopathologic evaluation of feline inflammatory liver disease. Vet. Pathol., v.33 p.521-526, 1996
  • GERMANI, Y.; DAUGA, C.; DUVAL, P et al. Strategy for the detection of Helicobacter species by amplification of 16S rRNA genes and identification of H. felis in a human gastric biopsy. Res. Microbiol., v.148, p.315-326, 1997.
  • GREITER-WILKE, A.; SCANZIANI, E.; SOLDATI, S et al. Association of Helicobacter with cholangiohepatitis in cats. J. Vet. Intern. Med., v.20, p.822-827, 2006.
  • GUERRA SEGUNDO, D.D.; MELLO, C.B.E.; CARGNELUTTI, J.F et al. Evidence of helicobacter spp. in saliva and gastric mucosa of domestic dogs in the central region of Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil. Vet. Med. Int., v.2021, p.1-11, 2021.
  • HAESEBROUCK, F.; PASMANS, F.; FLAHOU, B et al. Gastric helicobacters in domestic animals and nonhuman primates and their significance for human health. Clin. Microbiol. Rev., v.22, p.202-223, 2009.
  • HALL, T.A. BioEdit: a user-friendly biological sequence alignment editor and analysis program for windows 95/98/NT. Nucl. Acids Symp. Ser., v.41, p.95-99, 1999.
  • HONG, S.; CHUNG, Y.; KANG, W.G.; KIM, O et al. Detection of Helicobacter felis in a cat with gastric disease in laboratory animal facility. Lab. Anim. Res., v.32, p.122, 2016.
  • KUBOTA-AIZAWA, S.; OHNO, K.; KANEMOTO, H et al. Epidemiological study on feline gastric Helicobacter spp. in Japan. J. Vet. Med. Sci., v.79, p.876-880, 2017.
  • KUMAR, S.; STECHER, G.; LI, M et al. MEGA X: molecular evolutionary genetics analysis across computing platforms. Mol. Biol. Evol., v.35, p.1547-1549, 2018.
  • KUSTERS, J.G.; VLIET, A.H.M. VAN KUIPERS, E.J. Pathogenesis of helicobacter pylori infection. Clin. Microbiol. Rev., v.19, p.449-490, 2006.
  • MACÊDO, J.S; MENDONÇA, F.S.; DA SILVA, K.R.L., DE BARROS, M.E.G.; EVÊNCIO-NETO, J. Incidência e aspectos histopatológicos da infecção por helicobacter spp. em gatos da cidade de Recife, Pernambuco, Brasil. Arq. Inst. Biol., v.79, p.519-524, 2012.
  • MAPSTONE, N.P.; LYNCH, D.A.; LEWIS, A.F et al. Identification of Helicobacter pylori DNA in the mouths and stomachs of patients with gastritis using PCR. J. Clin. Pathol., v.46, p.540-543, 1993.
  • MARSHALL, B.; WARREN, J.R. Unidentified curved bacilli in the stomach of patients with gastritis and peptic ulceration. Lancet, v.323, p.1311-1315, 1984.
  • McNULTY, C.A.; Dent, J.C.; Curry, A et al. New spiral bacterium in the gastric mucosa. J. Clin. Pathol., v.42, p.585-592, 1989.
  • MÉNARD, A.; SMET, A. Review: other helicobacter species. Helicobacter, v.24, p.1-8, 2019.
  • NEIGER, R.; DIETERICH, C.; BURNENS, A et al. Detection and prevalence of Helicobacter infection in pet cats. J. Clin. Microbiol., v.36, p.634-637, 1998.
  • O’ROURKE, J.L.; SOLNICK, J.V.; NEILAN, B.A et al. Description of ‘Candidatus Helicobacter heilmannii’ based on DNA sequence analysis of 16S rRNA and urease genes. IJSEM, 54, 2203-2211, 2004.
  • OTTO, G.; HAZELL, S.H.; FOX, J.G et al. Animal and public health implications of gastric colonization of cats by Helicobacter-like organisms. J. Clin. Microb., v.32, p.1043-1049, 1994.
  • PAPASOULIOTIS, K.; GRUFFYDD-JONES, T.J.; WERRETT, G.; BROWN, P.J.; PEARSON, G.R. Short Communications Occurrence of ‘gastric Helicobacter-like organisms’ in cats. Vet. Rec., v.140, p.369-370, 1997.
  • PRACHSILPCHAI, W.; NUANUALSUWAN, S.; CHATSUWAN, T et al. Diagnosis of Helicobacter spp. infection in canine stomach. J. Vet. Sci., 8(2), 139-145, 2007.
  • PASW statistics for Windows. Version 18.0. Chicago: SPSS Inc., 2009.
  • RECORDATI, C.; GUALDI, V.; TOSI, S. et al. Detection of helicobacter spp. DNA in the oral cavity of dogs. Vet. Microbiol,. v.119, p.346-351, 2007.
  • ROBIC, M.; ARTUKOVIC, B.; BECK, A. et al. Histopathological changes in stomachs of dogs with naturally acquired Helicobacter infection. Veterinarski Arhiv, v.77, p.103-111, 2007.
  • RODAN, I. Understanding the cat and feline-friendly handling. In: LITTLE, S.E. Cat: clinical medicine and management. Saint Louis: Elsevier Saunders, 2012. chap.1, p.2-19.
  • ROSSI, G.; GAMBI, R.; UNCINI, R. et al. Severe gastritis with double helicobacter spp. Infection associated with Barrett’s esophagus in a cheetah. Helicobacter, v.19, p.462-464, 2014.
  • SJÖDIN, S.; TROWALD-WIGH, G.; FREDRIKSSON, M. Identification of Helicobacter DNA in feline pancreas, liver, stomach, and duodenum: comparison between findings in fresh and formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tissue samples. Res. Vet. Sci., v.91, p.e28-e30, 2011.
  • SOLNICK, J.V.; GAMBI, R.; UNCINI, R. et al. An uncultured gastric spiral organism is a newly identified helicobacter in humans. J. Infect. Dis., v.168, p.379-385, 1993.
  • SOUSA, D.A.; SILVA, K.V.G.C.; CASCON, C.M. et al. Epidermal growth factor receptor 2 immunoexpression in gastric cells of domestic cats with H. heilmannii infection. Acta Histochem., v.121, p.413-418, 2019.
  • STADEN, R. The staden sequence analysis package. Mol. Biotechnol., v.5, p.233-241, 1996.
  • TABRIZI, A.S.; JAMSHIDI, S.H.; OGHALAEI, A. et al. Identification of helicobacter spp. in oral secretions vs. gastric mucosa of stray cats. Vet. Microbiol., v.140, p.142-146, 2010.
  • TABRIZI, A.S.; DERAKHSHANDEH, A.; ESFANDIARI, A.; ATASHI, Z.A. Identification of Helicobacter spp. in gastrointestinal tract, pancreas and hepatobiliary system of stray cats. Iran. J. Vet. Res., v.16, p.374-376, 2015.
  • TAKEMURA, L.S.; MARCASSO, R.A.; LORENZETTI, E et al. Helicobacter infection in the hepatobiliary system and hepatic lesions: a possible association in dogs. Braz. J. Microbiol., v.50, p.297-305, 2019.
  • XUAN, S.Y.; LI, N.; ZHOU, R.R.; SHI, Y.X et al. Helicobacter infection in hepatocellular carcinoma tissue. World J. Gastroenterol., v.12, p.2335, 2006.

Publication Dates

  • Publication in this collection
    30 Sept 2024
  • Date of issue
    Nov-Dec 2024

History

  • Received
    27 Nov 2023
  • Accepted
    22 Mar 2024
Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Escola de Veterinária Caixa Postal 567, 30123-970 Belo Horizonte MG - Brazil, Tel.: (55 31) 3409-2041, Tel.: (55 31) 3409-2042 - Belo Horizonte - MG - Brazil
E-mail: abmvz.artigo@gmail.com