Open-access Caffeine mitigates tamoxifen-induced fatty liver in Wistar rats

ABSTRACT

Purpose:  Tamoxifen, a widely used drug for breast cancer treatment, is associated with adverse effects on the liver, including the development of fatty liver. This study aimed to investigate the potential protective effect of caffeine against tamoxifen-induced fatty liver in Wistar rats.

Methods:  Rats were divided into normal control, tamoxifen + saline, and tamoxifen + caffeine. Plasma samples were assessed for biochemical markers related to oxidative stress, inflammation, liver function, and cell damage. Additionally, liver histopathology was examined to quantify the extent of fatty infiltration.

Results:  In the tamoxifen + saline group, elevated levels of plasma malondialdehyde (MDA), tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-α), alanine aminotransferase (ALT), cytokeratin 18, and soluble ST2 were observed compared to the normal control group, indicating increased oxidative stress, inflammation, and liver injury (p < 0.01). Moreover, histopathological examination revealed a significant increase in fatty infiltration (p < 0.001). However, in the tamoxifen + caffeine group, these markers were markedly reduced (p < 0.05, p < 0.01), and fatty infiltration was significantly mitigated (p < 0.001).

Conclusions:  The findings suggest that caffeine administration attenuates tamoxifen-induced fatty liver in rats by ameliorating oxidative stress, inflammation, liver injury, and cell damage. Histopathological evidence further supports the protective role of caffeine. This study highlights the potential of caffeine as a therapeutic intervention to counter tamoxifen-induced hepatic complications, contributing to the optimization of breast cancer treatment strategies.

Key words Tamoxifen; Caffeine; Fatty Liver

Introduction

Among women, breast cancer is one the most prevalent form of cancer and ranks as the second leading cause of cancer-related fatalities. Around 70% of breast cancer patients have hormone receptor-positive tumors1. Hormonal therapies are advised for those with hormone receptor-positive breast cancer to reduce the risk of disease recurrence and enhance overall survival. Tamoxifen and aromatase inhibitors are the primary drugs utilized in hormonal therapy for breast cancer patients2.

Tamoxifen is a nonsteroidal estrogen receptor antagonist, is relatively cheaper, and has fewer side effects than aromatase inhibitors. Therefore, it is the first choice of adjuvant hormone therapy in premenopausal patients3.

The most common side effect of tamoxifen use is fatty liver4. Approximately 35% of breast cancer patients who have taken oral tamoxifen for 3–5 years may develop tamoxifen-induced fatty liver, which can be detected on yearly computed tomography scans4-6. While it is known that tamoxifen use can lead to liver cirrhosis if fatty liver disease is not controlled, it is one of the most severe rate-limiting steps in treatment maintenance7.

Fatty liver disease is the most common disease, which occurs in one out of every five people in the normal population7. Although its etiology is not known precisely, it is a condition that results in ballooning in hepatocytes, lobular inflammation, and ultimately fibrosis after fat oxidation disorder8. Oxidative stress and many inflammatory factors, including interleukin 1 (IL-1), tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-α), interleukin 6 (IL-6), suppression of tumorigenicity (ST2), nuclear factor kappa-B (NF-κB) are thought to be involved in the pathogenesis9-12.

There are many different opinions about the mechanism of tamoxifen-associated fatty liver disease. The most accepted of these views is the increase in lipogenesis. With this increased lipogenesis, oxidative stress occurs, which releases inflammatory cytokines. These inflammatory cytokines disrupt lipid oxidation in the liver and cause fat deposition in hepatocytes5,13-19.

TNF-α, cytokeratin 18, soluble suppression of tumorigenicity (sST2), and malondialdehyde (MDA) molecules, which we examined in our study, are cytokines with increased levels in fatty liver disease. TNF-α is a proinflammatory cytokine produced primarily by monocytes and macrophages and is the main cytokine with increased levels in acute liver disease and fatty liver disease19-22. Cytokeratin 18 is an essential intermediate filament protein in hepatocytes and increases in steatosis23. This increase is correlated with the level of adiposity in the liver, and the level of cytokeratin 18 increases as the level of steatosis increases23. MDA is one of the end products of the peroxidation of polyunsaturated fatty acids in cells. An increase in free radicals leads to excessive production of MDA. MDA level is a marker of oxidative stress and antioxidant status in patients with cancer24. Oxidative stress levels can be evaluated by measuring MDA levels in biological fluids such as blood, urine, or saliva. The other molecule we examined in our study was suppression of ST2. ST2 is a cytokine with two isoforms, sST2 and a transmembrane receptor (ST2 ligand, or ST2L). Its level increases in acute and chronic liver damage25.

Caffeine, which we investigated its protective effect on tamoxifen-associated adiposity of the liver, is a potent antagonist of adenosine receptors in the central and peripheral nervous system and inhibits the release of excitatory neurotransmitters26. Caffeine has been shown to increase glutathione and S-transferase, which are protective enzymes against oxytocic stress, in in-vitro studies27. It is estimated that caffeine has a protective effect on the adiposity of the liver by decreasing oxidative stress28,29.

This study examined the oxidative stress associated with tamoxifen and the cytokines that increase with this stress. In addition, we tried to prove that caffeine decreases fat deposition in the liver by giving caffeine to a group that was given tamoxifen.

Methods

First, the Animal Ethics Committee of Demiroğlu Science University, Istanbul, Turkey, gave ethical approval (Science University, Ethical number: 1823082901/18.01.2023). The rats utilized in the experiment were acquired from the Experimental Animal Laboratory of Science University Gebze, Istanbul, Turkey.

Twenty-one adult female Wistar rats, with an average weight of 200–210 g, were utilized for the experiment. The animals were confined in enclosures and subjected to controlled environmental conditions, including a 12-hour alternation between light and darkness while being kept at a consistent room temperature of 22 ± 2 °C. Throughout the study, the subjects were provided with a standard pellet diet and had unrestricted access to tap water. All chemical substances were acquired from Sigma-Aldrich Inc., unless explicitly stated otherwise.

Experimental procedure

The experimental procedure involved 21 rats in the study. Seven rats were selected to serve as the normal control group. No medication was administered to this cohort.

Fourteen rats were administered tamoxifen orally via gavage at 8 mg per kilogram daily for six weeks. This was done to induce a model of tamoxifen-induced fatty liver. The rats that were administered tamoxifen were separated into two distinct groups. Seven rats were assigned to group 1, which received a daily intraperitoneal (i.p.) administration of 1 mL/kg/day % 0.9 NaCl saline for six weeks. Similarly, group 2, consisting of seven rats, received a daily i.p. administration of 25 mg/kg/day caffeine for six weeks.

Upon completing the study, the rats were euthanized using a high dose of anesthesia by applying the cervical dislocation procedure. Blood samples were obtained via cardiac puncture for biochemical analysis, while organs underwent histopathological examination.

Measurement of plasma lipid peroxidation

Plasma lipid peroxidation, specifically MDA levels, was quantified in plasma samples by assessing MDA concentrations as thiobarbituric acid reactive substances (TBARS). Concisely, the experimental procedure involved the addition of trichloroacetic acid and TBARS reagent to the plasma samples, followed by thorough mixing and subsequent incubation at the temperature of 100 °C for 60 min. After cooling on ice, the samples underwent centrifugation at the speed of 3,000 revolutions per min for 20 min. Subsequently, the absorbance of the resulting supernatant was measured at a wavelength of 535 nanometers. The MDA levels were quantified in nanomolar (nM) units, with tetraethoxypropane as the calibration standard.

Measurement of plasma TNF-α, alanine aminotransferase, cytokeratin 18, soluble ST2

TNF-α plasma levels, alanine aminotransferase (ALT), cytokeratin 18, and soluble ST2 were quantified by commercially available enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) kits.

Histopathological examination of liver

The histopathological examination of the liver involves the microscopic analysis of tissue samples obtained from the liver to assess and diagnose various pathological conditions affecting this organ. In order to conduct histological and immunohistochemical investigations, the animals were administered anesthesia through i.p. injection of ketamine (100 mg/kg) and xylazine (10 mg/kg). Subsequently, they were perfused with a solution of 4% formaldehyde in 0.1 M phosphate-buffered saline (PBS), with a total volume of 200 mL. Liver sections of 4-μm thickness fixed with formalin were subjected to staining using hematoxylin and eosin. The sections were captured using an Olympus C-5050 digital camera affixed to an Olympus BX51 microscope.

The morphological evaluation was conducted using a computerized image analysis system (Image-Pro Express 1.4.5, Media Cybernetics, Inc., United States of America). Ten microscopic fields per section were examined at a magnification of ×20. The observer conducting the evaluation was unaware of the study group. The fatty infiltration percentage of liver sections from all rats in each experimental group was assessed.

Statistical analysis

The statistical analysis was conducted using Statistical Package for the Social Sciences version 15.0 for Windows. The parametric variables were compared using statistical tests such as the Student’s t-test and analysis of variance. In addition, the comparison between groups of nonparametric variables was conducted using the Mann–Whitney’s U test. Furthermore, the Shapiro–Wilk’s test was employed to distinguish between parametric and nonparametric data. The findings are reported as mean plus standard error of the mean (SEM). A significance level of p < 0.05 was deemed acceptable for establishing statistical significance.

Results

Table 1 shows the levels of plasma markers associated with oxidative stress, inflammation, liver function, and cell damage. In the tamoxifen + saline group, there was a significant increase in plasma MDA level (57.2 ± 3.3 nM) compared to the normal control group (36.1 ± 2.1 nM), indicating elevated oxidative stress (p < 0.01). Similarly, plasma TNF-α level was significantly elevated in the tamoxifen + saline group (35.1 ± 1.06 pg/mL) compared to the normal control group (16.5 ± 0.3 pg/mL), indicating increased inflammation (p < 0.01). Plasma ALT level, a marker of liver injury, was also significantly higher in the tamoxifen + saline group (63.2 ± 2.6 IU/L) compared to the normal control group (41.5 ± 1.8 IU/L) (p < 0.01). The plasma levels of cytokeratin 18 and sST2, markers of cell damage, were elevated in the tamoxifen + saline group (p < 0.01).

Table 1
The levels of plasma markers associated with oxidative stress, inflammation, liver function, and cell damage@ @ results were presented as mean ± standard error of the mean. Statistical analyses were performed by one-way analysis of variance test; .

However, in the tamoxifen + caffeine group, the levels of these markers were notably lower than those in the tamoxifen + saline group. Plasma MDA, TNF-α, ALT, cytokeratin 18, and soluble ST2 levels in the tamoxifen + caffeine group were 39.5 ± 0.6 nM, 23.8 ± 2.5 pg/mL, 44.9 ± 3.7 IU/L, 0.98 ± 0.1 pg/mL, and 1.15 ± 0.1 pg/mL, respectively. These values were significantly different from those in the tamoxifen + saline group, indicating that caffeine administration mitigated oxidative stress, inflammation, and cell damage induced by tamoxifen (p < 0.05, p < 0.01) (Table 1).

Furthermore, liver histopathological examination revealed a substantial increase in fatty infiltration in the tamoxifen + saline group (69.5 ± 5.6%) compared to the normal control group (1.2 ± 0.1%) (p < 0.001). In contrast, the tamoxifen + caffeine group showed a significant reduction in fatty infiltration (8.3 ± 1.5%) compared to the tamoxifen + saline group (p < 0.001) (Table 1, Fig. 1).

Figure 1 displays representative liver histopathology images supporting the biochemical findings. Normal control rats exhibited normal liver histology, while rats in the tamoxifen + saline group showed lipid droplets in hepatocytes, indicating fatty liver development. Rats in the tamoxifen + caffeine group demonstrated decreased lipid droplets in hepatocytes, suggesting the protective effect of caffeine against tamoxifen-induced fatty liver (Fig. 1).

Figure 1
Liver histolopathology hematoxylin and eosin stain (x20 and x40 magnification). (a and b) Normal group rats have normal liver; (c and d) tamoxifen and saline group rats have lipid droplets in hepatocytes (arrow); (e and f) tamoxifen + caffeine group rats have decreased have lipid droplets in hepatocytes.

Discussion

Tamoxifen is an effective drug for treating hormone receptor-positive breast cancer30. Although generally well tolerated, fatty liver disease commonly occurs in patients receiving tamoxifen31,32. In a meta-analysis examining fatty liver in breast cancer patients with and without tamoxifen use, statistically significantly more fatty liver in patients taking tamoxifen was observed14. The rate of tamoxifen-associated adiposity of the liver was higher in obese individuals33. In a study by Yan et al.16, it was found that tamoxifen-associated adiposity of the liver was more frequent in patients with a body mass index higher than 22 kg/m2.

The mechanism of how tamoxifen causes fatty liver disease is not yet fully understood. The most widely accepted hypothesis is that oxidative stress caused by increased lipogenesis is the triggering factor. Oxytadic stress releases inflammatory cytokines. These inflammatory cytokines disrupt lipid oxidation in the liver and lead to fat deposition in hepatocytes5,12-16.

In a study by Lv et al.34, they describe how caffeine has the potential to shield against liver damage caused by alcohol by decreasing oxidative stress and inflammation, providing a new and unique method of protection.

TNF-α is the first cytokine increased in Kuppfer cell adiposity35. Many pieces of evidence have shown a positive correlation between TNF-α and adiposity in the liver36. In addition, studies have also shown that TNF-α can be used as a predictive factor for the development of adiposity37. Moreover, Horrigan et al.38 found that human blood exposed to caffeine at concentrations commonly found in human consumption consistently inhibits the production of TNF-α, a cytokine, through the action of cyclic AMP/protein kinase, a route or course that allows for passage or progress. In this study, the TNF-α level was 35.1 ± 1.06 in the tamoxifen + saline group and was statistically significantly higher than the control group. This statistical significance was consistent with the literature.

MDA is one of the end products of the peroxidation of polyunsaturated fatty acids in cells and known as a marker of oxidative stress and antioxidant status24. The relation between caffeine and MDA is described in a study by Amat et al.39. They claim that consuming robust coffee can elevate MDA levels in individuals in good health, potentially suggesting the presence of oxidative stress in the body. On the other hand, the antioxidant component called caffeic acid phenethyl ester CAPE, found in propolis extract, can potentially safeguard the spinal cord from ischemia-reperfusion injury in rabbits without causing any additional harm to the tissue40. In this study, the MDA molecule we used as a lipid peroxidation product was significantly higher in the tamoxifen + saline group than in the control group. This elevation is similar to a previous study41.

The soluble ST2 molecule is a cytokine belonging to the IL-1 group, which has been used in recent years. Its level increases in fatty liver disease, toxic hepatitis, autoimmune hepatitis, and fibrosis of the liver41-43. When we analyzed the level of this new molecule soluble ST2 in tamoxifen-associated adiposity of the liver, the level of soluble ST2 was 0.94 ± 0.09 pg/mL in the control group and 2.24 ± 0.1 pg/mL in the tamoxifen + saline group, which was statistically significantly higher. We found that soluble ST2, which we measured at a significantly high value, is a marker that can be used in tamoxifen-associated fatty liver tumors, just as in other types of liver damage.

Another molecule we measured in our study was cytokeratin 18. Cytokeratin 18 is an intermediate filament in hepatocytes and is increased in hepatosteatosis. Data from two meta-analyses in which this molecule was analyzed showed that it could be used in fatty liver disease with a mean sensitivity and specificity of 66–78% and 82–87%, respectively20,44. Moreover, measuring the CK-18 concentration can be used as a biomarker to evaluate the effectiveness of treatment and enhance the management of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease in individuals with type-2 diabetes mellitus45. This study showed a significant elevation of cytokeratin 18 in the tamoxifen + saline group compared to the control group.

ALT is the most commonly used biochemical marker for diagnosing and following up liver lipidaemia during tamoxifen treatment46,47. An increase of ALT ≥ 1.5 times the upper limit of normal in tamoxifen-treated patients is suggestive of lipidaemia of the liver. Our study showed an average 1,5 times increase in the tamoxifen + saline group compared to the control group. It is one of the most straightforward, but most significant signs of the healing effect of caffeine.

There are very few therapeutic options to reduce fatty liver disease. Clinical studies and meta-analyses show that caffeine protects fatty liver, fibrosis, cirrhosis, and hepatocellular carcinoma48-51. Experimental studies have shown that caffeine inhibits hepatic stellate cell activity by blocking A2A receptors. The same study showed caffeine might also positively affect angiogenesis and liver hemodynamics52. The favorable effects of caffeine on hepatic steatosis have been demonstrated in experimental and observational studies52. Considering these studies, we tried to show the positive effect of caffeine on tamoxifen-associated lipidosis of the liver with biochemical and histopathological evidence.

The rising prevalence of hepatosteatosis and its strong correlation with metabolic disorders such as obesity, diabetes, and hyperlipidemia have made it a significant area of research53. In this study, a histopathological examination of the liver showed marked lipidosis in the tamoxifen + saline group. In the tamoxifen + saline group, 69.5 ± 5.6% of KC steatosis was observed, whereas it was 8.3 ± 1.5% in the tamoxifen + caffeine group. Caffeine significantly decreased tamoxifen-induced fatty liver tumors. Compared to the tamoxifen + saline group, plasma MDA, TNF-alpha, ALT, cytokeratin 18, and soluble ST2 levels were significantly lower in the tamoxifen + caffeine group. In conclusion, we found that caffeine alleviated histopathological and biochemical tamoxifen-induced lipidosis of the liver.

Conclusion

No study to our knowledge shows that caffeine attenuates tamoxifen-induced fatty liver inflammation. In this respect, this study, in which we have shown that caffeine attenuates tamoxifen-induced fatty liver inflammation, is valuable.

Acknowledgements

Not applicable.

  • Research performed at Experimental Animals Laboratory, Demiroglu Bilim University, Gebze, Istanbul, Türkiye.

Data availability statement

The datasets generated and analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

References

  • 1 Siegel RL, Miller KD, Jemal A. Cancer statistics, 2019. CA Cancer J Clin. 2018;69(1):7–34. https://doi.org/10.3322/caac.21551
    » https://doi.org/10.3322/caac.21551
  • 2 Karaboyun K, Cavdar E, Irıagac Y, Celebı A, Kapagan T, Gulturk I, Demır O, Avcı O, Seber ES. Tamoxifen or aromatase inhibitors: Which one is the culprit of urinary incontinence in premenopausal breast cancer patients receiving adjuvant hormone therapy? Support Care Cancer. 2023;31(6):330. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-023-07791-7
    » https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-023-07791-7
  • 3 Yang Y, Pan W, Tang X, Wu S, Sun X. A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials comparing the efficacy and safety of anastrozole versus tamoxifen for breast cancer. Oncotarget. 2017;8(29):48362–74. https://doi.org/10.18632/oncotarget.16466
    » https://doi.org/10.18632/oncotarget.16466
  • 4 Farrell GC. Drugs and steatohepatitis. Semin Liver Dis. 2002;22(2):185–94. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-2002-30106
    » https://doi.org/10.1055/s-2002-30106
  • 5 Chang HT, Pan HJ, Lee CH. Prevention of tamoxifen-related nonalcoholic fatty liver disease in breast cancer patients. Clin Breast Cancer. 2018;18(4):e677–e685. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clbc.2017.11.010
    » https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clbc.2017.11.010
  • 6 Rosell J, Nordenskjöld B, Bengtsson NO, Fornander T, Hatschek T, Lindman H, Malmström PO, Wallgren A, Stål O, Carstensen J. Long-term effects on the incidence of second primary cancers in a randomized trial of two and five years of adjuvant tamoxifen. Acta Oncol. 2017;56(4):614–7. https://doi.org/10.1080/0284186X.2016.1273547
    » https://doi.org/10.1080/0284186X.2016.1273547
  • 7 Cole LK, Jacobs RL, Vance DE. Tamoxifen induces triacylglycerol accumulation in the mouse liver by activation of fatty acid synthesis. Hepatology. 2010;52(4):1258–65. https://doi.org/10.1002/hep.23813
    » https://doi.org/10.1002/hep.23813
  • 8 Boeckmans J, Natale A, Buyl K, Rogiers V, De Kock J, Vanhaecke T, Rodrigues RM. Human-based systems: Mechanistic NASH modelling just around the corner? Pharmacol Res. 2018;134:257–67. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.phrs.2018.06.029
    » https://doi.org/10.1016/j.phrs.2018.06.029
  • 9 Kleiner DE, Makhlouf HR. Histology of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease and nonalcoholic steatohepatitis in adults and children. Clin Liver Dis. 2016;20(2):293–312. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cld.2015.10.011
    » https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cld.2015.10.011
  • 10 Torisu T, Sato N, Yoshiga D, Kobayashi T, Yoshioka T, Mori H, Iida M, Yoshimura A. The dual function of hepatic SOCS3 in insulin resistance in vivo. Genes Cells. 2007;12(2):143–54. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2443.2007.01044.x
    » https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2443.2007.01044.x
  • 11 Tiniakos DG, Vos MB, Brunt EM. Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease: pathology and pathogenesis. Annu Rev Pathol. 2010;5:145–71. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-pathol-121808-102132
    » https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-pathol-121808-102132
  • 12 Arshad MI, Rauch M, L’helgoualc’h A, Julia V, Leite-de-Moraes MC, Lucas-Clerc C, Piquet-Pellorce C, Samson M. NKT cells are required to induce high IL-33 expression in hepatocytes during ConA-induced acute hepatitis. Eur J Immunol. 2011;41(8):2341–8. https://doi.org/10.1002/eji.201041332
    » https://doi.org/10.1002/eji.201041332
  • 13 Takaki A, Kawai D, Yamamoto K. Multiple hits, including oxidative stress, as pathogenesis and treatment target in non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH). Int J Mol Sci. 2013;14(10):20704–28. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms141020704
    » https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms141020704
  • 14 Hong N, Yoon HG, Seo DH, Park S, Kim SI, Sohn JH, Rhee Y. Different patterns in the risk of newly developed fatty liver and lipid changes with tamoxifen versus aromatase inhibitors in postmenopausal women with early breast cancer: A propensity score-matched cohort study. Eur J Cancer. 2017;82:103–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejca.2017.05.002
    » https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejca.2017.05.002
  • 15 Lee B, Jung EA, Yoo JJ, Kim SG, Lee CB, Kim YS, Jeong SW, Jang JY, Lee SH, Kim HS, Jun BG, Kim YD, Cheon GJ. Prevalence, incidence and risk factors of tamoxifen-related non-alcoholic fatty liver disease: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Liver Int. 2020;40(6):1344–55. https://doi.org/10.1111/liv.14434
    » https://doi.org/10.1111/liv.14434
  • 16 Yan M, Wang J, Xuan Q, Dong T, He J, Zhang Q. The relationship between tamoxifen-associated nonalcoholic fatty liver disease and the prognosis of patients with early-stage breast cancer. Clin Breast Cancer. 2017;17(3):195–203. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clbc.2016.12.004
    » https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clbc.2016.12.004
  • 17 Rodríguez-Calvo R, Samino S, Girona J, Martínez-Micaelo N, Ràfols P, García-Altares M, Guaita-Esteruelas S, Junza A, Heras M, Yanes O, Correig X, Masana L. Hepatic lipidomics and molecular imaging in a murine non-alcoholic fatty liver disease model: insights into molecular mechanisms. Biomolecules. 2020;10(9):1275. https://doi.org/10.3390/biom10091275
    » https://doi.org/10.3390/biom10091275
  • 18 Miyamura M, Yokota J, Saibara T. [Drug-induced nonalcoholic steatohepatitis]. Yakugaku Zasshi. 2016;136(4):579–82. https://doi.org/10.1248/yakushi.15-00264-3
    » https://doi.org/10.1248/yakushi.15-00264-3
  • 19 McGeehan GM, Becherer JD, Bast RC Jr., Boyer CM, Champion B, Connolly KM, Conway JG, Furdon P, Karp S, Kidao S, McElroy AB, Nichols, J., Pryzwansky KM, Schoenen F, Sekut L, Truesdale A, Verghese M, Warner J, Ways JP. Regulation of tumour necrosis factor-alpha processing by a metalloproteinase inhibitor. Nature. 1994;370(6490):558–61. https://doi.org/10.1038/370558a0
    » https://doi.org/10.1038/370558a0
  • 20 Nagai H, Matsumaru K, Feng G, Kaplowitz N. Reduced glutathione depletion causes necrosis and sensitization to tumor necrosis factor-alpha-induced apoptosis in cultured mouse hepatocytes. Hepatology. 2002;36(1):55–64. https://doi.org/10.1053/jhep.2002.33995
    » https://doi.org/10.1053/jhep.2002.33995
  • 21 Ahsan H, Islam SU, Ahmed MB, Lee YS. Role of Nrf2, STAT3, and Src as Molecular Targets for Cancer Chemoprevention. Pharmaceutics. 2022;14(9):1775. https://doi.org/10.3390/pharmaceutics14091775
    » https://doi.org/10.3390/pharmaceutics14091775
  • 22 Kwok R, Tse YK, Wong GL, Ha Y, Lee AU, Ngu MC, Chan HL, Wong VW. Systematic review with meta-analysis: non-invasive assessment of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease--the role of transient elastography and plasma cytokeratin-18 fragments. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2014;39(3):254–69. https://doi.org/10.1111/apt.12569
    » https://doi.org/10.1111/apt.12569
  • 23 Feldstein AE, Wieckowska A, Lopez AR, Liu YC, Zein NN, McCullough AJ. Cytokeratin-18 fragment levels as noninvasive biomarkers for nonalcoholic steatohepatitis: a multicenter validation study. Hepatology. 2009;50(4):1072–8. https://doi.org/10.1002/hep.23050
    » https://doi.org/10.1002/hep.23050
  • 24 Torun AN, Kulaksizoglu S, Kulaksizoglu M, Pamuk BO, Isbilen E, Tutuncu NB. Serum total antioxidant status and lipid peroxidation marker malondialdehyde levels in overt and subclinical hypothyroidism. Clin Endocrinol. 2009;70(3):469–74. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2265.2008.03348.x
    » https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2265.2008.03348.x
  • 25 Cavin C, Marin-Kuan M, Langouët S, Bezençon C, Guignard G, Verguet C, Piguet D, Holzhäuser D, Cornaz R, Schilter B. Induction of Nrf2-mediated cellular defenses and alteration of phase I activities as mechanisms of chemoprotective effects of coffee in the Liver. Food Chem Toxicol. 2008;46(4):1239–48. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fct.2007.09.099
    » https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fct.2007.09.099
  • 26 Poole R, Kennedy OJ, Roderick P, Fallowfield JA, Hayes PC, Parkes J. Coffee consumption and health: umbrella review of meta-analyses of multiple health outcomes. BMJ. 2017;359:j5024. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.j5024
    » https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.j5024
  • 27 Wijarnpreecha K, Thongprayoon C, Ungprasert P. Coffee consumption and risk of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2017;29(2):e8–e12. https://doi.org/10.1097/MEG.0000000000000776
    » https://doi.org/10.1097/MEG.0000000000000776
  • 28 Fisher B, Costantino JP, Wickerham DL, Redmond CK, Kavanah M, Cronin WM, Vogel V, Robidoux A, Dimitrov N, Atkins J, Daly M, Wieand S, Tan-Chiu E, Ford L, Wolmark N. Tamoxifen for prevention of breast cancer: report of the National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project P-1 Study. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1998;90(18):1371–88. https://doi.org/10.1093/jnci/90.18.1371
    » https://doi.org/10.1093/jnci/90.18.1371
  • 29 Nishino M, Hayakawa K, Nakamura Y, Morimoto T, Mukaihara S. Effects of tamoxifen on hepatic fat content and the development of hepatic steatosis in patients with breast cancer: high frequency of involvement and rapid reversal after completion of tamoxifen therapy. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2003;180(1):129–34. https://doi.org/10.2214/ajr.180.1.1800129
    » https://doi.org/10.2214/ajr.180.1.1800129
  • 30 Nguyen MC, Stewart RB, Banerji MA, Gordon DH, Kral JG. Relationships between tamoxifen use, liver fat and body fat distribution in women with breast cancer. Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord. 2001;25(2):296–8. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.ijo.0801488
    » https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.ijo.0801488
  • 31 Fernández-Suárez ME, Escolà-Gil JC, Pastor O, Dávalos A, Blanco-Vaca F, Lasunción MA, Martínez-Botas J, Gómez-Coronado D. Clinically used selective estrogen receptor modulators affect different steps of macrophage-specific reverse cholesterol transport. Sci Rep. 2016;6:32105. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep32105
    » https://doi.org/10.1038/srep32105
  • 32 Osman KA, Osman MM, Ahmed MH. Tamoxifen-induced non-alcoholic steatohepatitis: where are we now and where are we going? Expert Opin Drug Saf. 2007;6(1):1–4. https://doi.org/10.1517/14740338.6.1.1
    » https://doi.org/10.1517/14740338.6.1.1
  • 33 Loman BR, Hernández-Saavedra D, An R, Rector RS. Prebiotic and probiotic treatment of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Nutr Rev. 2018;76(11):822–39. https://doi.org/10.1093/nutrit/nuy031
    » https://doi.org/10.1093/nutrit/nuy031
  • 34 Lv X, Chen Z, Li J, Zhang L, Liu H, Huang C, Zhu P. Caffeine protects against alcoholic liver injury by attenuating inflammatory response and oxidative stress. Inflamm Res. 2010;59(8):635–45. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00011-010-0176-6
    » https://doi.org/10.1007/s00011-010-0176-6
  • 35 Seo YY, Cho YK, Bae JC, Seo MH, Park SE, Rhee EJ, Park CY, Oh KW, Park SW, Lee WY. Tumor necrosis factor-α as a predictor for the development of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease: a 4-year follow-up study. Endocrinol Metab. 2013;28(1):41–5. https://doi.org/10.3803/EnM.2013.28.1.41
    » https://doi.org/10.3803/EnM.2013.28.1.41
  • 36 Ajmal MR, Yaccha M, Malik MA, Rabbani MU, Ahmad I, Isalm N, Abdali N. Prevalence of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) in patients of cardiovascular diseases and its association with hs-CRP and TNF-α. Indian Heart J. 2014;66(6):574–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ihj.2014.08.006
    » https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ihj.2014.08.006
  • 37 Sun Z, Chang B, Gao M, Zhang J, Zou Z. IL-33-ST2 axis in liver disease: progression and challenge. Mediators Inflamm. 2017;2017:5314213. https://doi.org/10.1155/2017/5314213
    » https://doi.org/10.1155/2017/5314213
  • 38 Horrigan LA, Kelly JP, Connor TJ. Caffeine suppresses TNF-alpha production via activation of the cyclic AMP/protein kinase A pathway. Int Immunopharmacol. 2004;4(10-11):1409–17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intimp.2004.06.005
    » https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intimp.2004.06.005
  • 39 Amat A, Wungouw H, Pakan P. The effect of robust coffee towards the malondialdehyde level in healthy adults. J Med Pharm Allied Sci. 2023;12(4):5983–6. https://doi.org/10.55522/jmpas.v12i4.5562
    » https://doi.org/10.55522/jmpas.v12i4.5562
  • 40 Ilhan A, Koltuksuz U, Ozen S, Uz E, Ciralik H, Akyol O. The effects of caffeic acid phenethyl ester (CAPE) on spinal cord ischemia/reperfusion injury in rabbits. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 1999;16(4):458–63. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1010-7940(99)00246-8
    » https://doi.org/10.1016/s1010-7940(99)00246-8
  • 41 Wang Z, Kyo S, Maida Y, Takakura M, Tanaka M, Yatabe N, Kanaya T, Nakamura M, Koike K, Hisamoto K, Ohmichi M, Inoue M. Tamoxifen regulates human telomerase reverse transcriptase (hTERT) gene expression differently in breast and endometrial cancer cells. Oncogene. 2002;21(22):3517–24. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.onc.1205463
    » https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.onc.1205463
  • 42 Iannucci LF, Cioffi F, Senese R, Goglia F, Lanni A, Yen PM, Sinha RA. Metabolomic analysis shows differential hepatic effects of T2 and T3 in rats after short-term feeding with high fat diet. Sci Rep. 2017;7(1):2023. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-02205-1
    » https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-02205-1
  • 43 Bril F, Cusi K. Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease: the new complication of type 2 diabetes mellitus. Endocrinol Metab Clin North Am. 2016;45(4):765–81. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecl.2016.06.005
    » https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecl.2016.06.005
  • 44 Vos MB, Barve S, Joshi-Barve S, Carew JD, Whitington PF, McClain CJ. Cytokeratin 18, a marker of cell death, is increased in children with suspected nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 2008;47(4):481–5. https://doi.org/10.1097/MPG.0b013e31817e2bfb
    » https://doi.org/10.1097/MPG.0b013e31817e2bfb
  • 45 Miyasato M, Murase-Mishiba Y, Bessho M, Miyawaki M, Imbe H, Tsutsumi C, Tanimoto K, Imagawa A, Terasaki J, Hanafusa T. The cytokeratin-18 fragment level as a biomarker of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. Clin Chim Acta. 2014;433:184–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cca.2014.03.018
    » https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cca.2014.03.018
  • 46 Ruhl CE, Everhart JE. Coffee and caffeine consumption reduce the risk of elevated serum alanine aminotransferase activity in the United States. Gastroenterology. 2005;128(1):24–32. https://doi.org/10.1053/j.gastro.2004.09.075
    » https://doi.org/10.1053/j.gastro.2004.09.075
  • 47 Kayalı A, Bora ES, Acar H, Erbaş O. Evaluation of the reparative effect of sinomenine in an acetaminophen-induced liver injury model. Curr Issues Mol Biol. 2024;46(1):923–33. https://doi.org/10.3390/cimb46010059
    » https://doi.org/10.3390/cimb46010059
  • 48 Marvie P, Lisbonne M, L’helgoualc’h A, Rauch M, Turlin B, Preisser L, Bourd-Boittin K, Théret N, Gascan H, Piquet-Pellorce C, Samson M. Interleukin-33 overexpression is associated with liver fibrosis in mice and humans. J Cell Mol Med. 2010;14(6B):1726–39. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1582-4934.2009.00801.x
    » https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1582-4934.2009.00801.x
  • 49 Musso G, Gambino R, Cassader M, Pagano G. Meta-analysis: natural history of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) and diagnostic accuracy of non-invasive tests for liver disease severity. Ann Med. 2011;43(8):617–49. https://doi.org/10.3109/07853890.2010.518623
    » https://doi.org/10.3109/07853890.2010.518623
  • 50 Liu F, Wang X, Wu G, Chen L, Hu P, Ren H, Hu H. Coffee consumption decreases risks for hepatic fibrosis and cirrhosis: a meta-analysis. PLoS One. 2015;10(11):e0142457. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0142457
    » https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0142457
  • 51 Ruhl CE, Everhart JE. Coffee and tea consumption are associated with a lower incidence of chronic liver disease in the United States. Gastroenterology. 2005;129(6):1928–36. https://doi.org/10.1053/j.gastro.2005.08.056
    » https://doi.org/10.1053/j.gastro.2005.08.056
  • 52 Gressner OA, Lahme B, Rehbein K, Siluschek M, Weiskirchen R, Gressner AM. Pharmacological application of caffeine inhibits TGF-beta-stimulated connective tissue growth factor expression in hepatocytes via PPARgamma and SMAD2/3-dependent pathways. J Hepatol. 2008;49(5):758–67. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhep.2008.03.029
    » https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhep.2008.03.029
  • 53 Eskin F, Şenel E. Holistic analysis of hepatosteatosis literature: a scientometric study of global hepatosteatosis publications between 1980 and 2019. J Med Palliat Care. 2022;3(4):300–5. https://doi.org/10.47582/jompac.1172446
    » https://doi.org/10.47582/jompac.1172446

Edited by

Publication Dates

  • Publication in this collection
    30 Sept 2024
  • Date of issue
    2024

History

  • Received
    25 May 2024
  • Accepted
    19 Aug 2024
location_on
Sociedade Brasileira para o Desenvolvimento da Pesquisa em Cirurgia https://actacirbras.com.br/ - São Paulo - SP - Brazil
E-mail: actacirbras@gmail.com
rss_feed Acompanhe os números deste periódico no seu leitor de RSS
Acessibilidade / Reportar erro