Coronary calcium score in patients with post-surgical hypoparathyroidism

ABSTRACT

Objective:

This study aimed to evaluate the cardiovascular risk of patients with post-surgical hypoparathyroidism through coronary calcium score (CACS) evaluation and cardiovascular risk calculators.

Subjects and methods:

Patients with post-surgical hypoparathyroidism (HG = 29) were compared to a control group (CG = 29), matched by sex and age. Demographic and clinical data were captured by a questionnaire or patient files. Both groups performed a thoracic-computed tomography to evaluate the CACS and the cardiovascular risk was calculated by two risk calculators.

Results:

In the HG, the supplementation of calcium varied between 500 to 2,000 mg/day and the mean calcitriol was 0.5 ± 0.29 mcg/day. The mean serum calcium and phosphorus were 8.32 ± 0.68 and 4.92 ± 0.87 mg/dL, respectively, and in the range recommended for hypoparathyroidism. The Brazilian Society of Cardiology's risk calculator showed a difference among groups, with no patient in the HG with low risk, but the CACS was similar. A positive CACS in the HG was associated with obesity and high BMI but not with calcium and/or vitamin D supplementation.

Conclusion:

In conclusion, patients with hypoparathyroidism did not show increased CACS, and it was not related to supplementation.

Keywords
Hypoparathyroidism; calcium supplementation; cardiovascular risk; coronary calcium score

INTRODUCTION

Hypoparathyroidism is a rare condition with a prevalence ranging from 6.4-37/100,000 population in different countries, with an incidence from 0.8-2.6/100,000/year (¹,²). Low serum calcium levels, high serum levels of phosphorus, and deficient production of parathyroid hormone (PTH) characterize it (¹,²). Post-surgical, after a total thyroidectomy or other anterior neck surgery, is the most common etiology, accounting for about 75% of the cases, followed by autoimmune disease (²,³).

Clinical manifestations of hypoparathyroidism are due to acute or chronic hypocalcemia and they include peripheral and central nervous symptoms, such as paresthesia, tetany, seizures, and intracerebral calcifications, mainly in the basal ganglia. Bone remodeling is reduced in hypoparathyroidism, with increased bone mineral density (⁴,⁵). Other long-term complications include renal dysfunction, nephrolithiasis, and cataracts (⁴,⁵).

The absence of PTH can reduce calcium coming from bone resorption and decrease 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D production. Furthermore, a lack of PTH reduces renal excretion of phosphate, causing hyperphosphatemia, and consequently an increased calcium-phosphorus product, which could cause vascular calcification and increase the cardiovascular risk (³,⁶,⁷).

Although effective, PTH replacement is still not a viable option for hypoparathyroidism therapy (⁸); therefore, replacing calcium and the active form of vitamin D (1,25-dihydroxyvitaminD) are necessary. In this sense, the clinical treatment of hypoparathyroidism aims to correct the hypocalcemia and its symptoms, maintaining the serum levels of calcium in the lower limit of normal and phosphate in the upper normal, along with avoiding associated complications (⁹).

A significant number of patients need high doses of these drugs to reach the therapeutic goal; others cannot control their calcium levels or even cannot consistently stand high-dose therapy, causing variability of calcium levels during treatment. Calcium variability occurs during periods of excessive medication and could lead to hypercalcemia, increased risk of kidney disease, hypercalciuria, nephrolithiasis and nephrocalcinosis, and cardiovascular disease, despite periodic monitoring (⁴,⁹).

A high dose of calcium supplementation has been associated with increased cardiovascular risk in patients with osteoporosis (¹⁰,¹¹). Extrapolating this data to patients with hypoparathyroidism who supplement with high doses of calcium, it becomes important to investigate these patients’ cardiovascular risk. In addition, a parallel between the levels of calcium and phosphorus in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) and their high cardiovascular risk, suggest that patients with hypoparathyroidism similarly could present an increased cardiovascular risk.

The coronary artery calcium score (CACS) is an important tool for analyzing subclinical atherosclerosis and thus, of cardiovascular risk because it identifies calcified plaques in the topography of coronary arteries. Furthermore, the CACS predicts, with diagnostic and prognostic value, risk stratification and cardiovascular disease, mainly in asymptomatic individuals (¹²).

Thus, this study aimed to evaluate the cardiovascular risk through the CACS and the cardiovascular risk calculators in patients with post-surgical hypoparathyroidism without known cardiovascular disease.

SUBJECTS AND METHODS

This was a transversal controlled study of patients with hypoparathyroidism in treatment at the Serviço de Endocrinologia e Metabologia do Hospital de Clínicas da Universidade Federal do Paraná (SEMPR). The Human Research Ethics Committee of the hospital approved the project under the number 4.909.923; Certificate of Ethical Appreciation 30077720.4.0000.0096.

Sample selection

An active search for patients with hypoparathyroidism was conducted in the SEMPR database. After selecting patients with post-surgical hypoparathyroidism, they were recruited during their routine visits to the clinic. Patients with post-surgical hypoparathyroidism (hypoparathyroidism group: HG) with at least 5 years of diagnosis were included. Those with established cardiovascular disease (coronary, cerebrovascular, or peripheral arterial disease); with comorbidities associated with high cardiovascular risk, such as uncontrolled arterial hypertension (blood pressure ≥ 140/90 mmHg) (¹³) and chronic kidney disease with a glomerular filtration rate lower than 45 mL/min/1.73 m³; systemic rheumatic disease; advanced stage cancer or in chemotherapy and/or radiotherapy in the last five years; chronic use of corticosteroids; pregnant women; and individuals younger than 18 years old were excluded. The selected patients who agreed to participate signed an informed consent form, answered a standardized questionnaire, and were referred to undergo a thoracic computer tomography exam on a previously scheduled day in a maximum period of 30 days.

The control group (CG) consisted of individuals followed in the same service who underwent total thyroidectomy and who did not have post-surgical hypoparathyroidism, matched by age and sex. The CG followed the same exclusion criteria and performed the same evaluations as the HG did.

Study procedures

The standardized questionnaire included information on gender, age, ethnicity, current and previous smoking, and alcohol consumption. Participants’ current and past medical history, including comorbidities (presence of dyspnea and chest pain when exercising, presence of daily cough, orthopnea, paroxysmal nocturnal dyspnea, history of acute myocardial infarction, history of stroke, arrhythmia, heart surgery or angioplasty, osteoporosis, nephrolithiasis, chronic kidney disease or history of other kidney diseases, diabetes, hypertension, dyslipidemia); continuous medications in use (vitamin D, calcitriol and calcium replacement, antihypertensive drugs, antiresorptive, diuretics, statins, antiplatelet agents, anticoagulants, corticosteroids, and antidepressants); family history of acute myocardial infarction, stroke, and sudden death were also investigated. Information not captured with the questionnaire was obtained from medical records, and the patients clarified discordant information from medical records.

The laboratory tests closest to the evaluation (maximum of 6 months) were captured from patients’ charts and included serum calcium (normal value [NV]: 8-10.5 mg/dL], serum inorganic phosphate (NV: 3-4.5 mg/dL), 25-hydroxyvitamin D (25OHD) (NV: 30-60 ng/mL), PTH (NV: 10-65 pg/mL), urinary calcium (NV: <4 mg/kg/24 hours), total cholesterol (NV: <200 mg/dL), HDL-cholesterol (NV: >60 mg/dL), LDL-cholesterol (NV: <100 mg/dL), triglycerides (NV: <150 mg/dL), fasting glucose (NV: <100 mg/dL), glycated hemoglobin (NV: <6.4%), and creatinine (NV: 0.6-1 .2 mg/dL).

Coronary artery calcium score

The CACS was calculated using high-resolution computer tomography of the chest without contrast, with axial tomographic sections limited to the heart, coronary arteries, and proximal portion of the great vessels, with prospective electrocardiographic coupling in a 256-detector tomography scanner (iCT Elite, Philips Medical Systems, Eindhoven, Netherlands). Coronary calcification was quantified using a dedicated workstation. The calcium score was calculated using Agatston and cols.'s (¹⁴) suggested algorithm, which quantifies the calcification of the following arteries: anterior descending and circumflex, branches of the left coronary artery, and the right coronary artery. The calcium score was interpreted according to the patient's sex and age, placing it in a percentile, as McClelland and cols. (¹⁵) and the Brazilian Guideline on Dyslipidemia and Prevention of Atherosclerosis (¹⁶) recommendation. Calcification is defined as a signal intensity above 130 Hounsfield units (HU), calculated from the Agatson score, in which values between 0-10 indicate minimal calcification, 11-100 mild, 101-400 moderate, above 400 is considered severe calcification, and greater than 1,000 is considered very severe (¹⁴,¹⁷). A positive CACS is defined as an Agatson score above zero. These absolute values can be adjusted according to sex and age, represented by percentiles, with an aggravating risk factor being a positive CACS greater than the 75th percentile for age or sex (¹⁸).

Cardiovascular risk assessment

The cardiovascular risk was calculated using two tools: the calculator for cardiovascular risk stratification of the Brazilian Society of Cardiology (SBC) (¹⁸,¹⁹) and the American College of Cardiology Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Disease Plus calculator (ASCVD) (²⁰) as based on Lloyd-Jones and cols.'s (²¹) study.

The ASCVD calculator estimates the 10-year risk into low (less than 5% risk), borderline (5% to 7.4%), intermediate (7.5% to 19.9%), and high (risk greater than 20%). It is limited to people between 40 and 79 years old, with systolic blood pressure between 90-200 mmHg, diastolic blood pressure between 60-130 mmHg, total cholesterol between 130-320 mg/dL, high-density lipoprotein (HDL) 20-100 mg/dL, and low-density lipoprotein (LDL) 30-300 mg/dL (²¹).

The SBC cardiovascular risk stratification calculator considers four stages, assesses the presence of atherosclerotic disease, diabetes, subclinical atherosclerosis, abdominal aortic aneurysm, chronic kidney disease, total cholesterol, LDL and HDL, sex, age, systolic blood pressure (treated or not), smoking, and statin use. The calculator stratifies patients into low, intermediate, high, and very high risk. It is limited to patients aged 30 years or more.

Cardiovascular risk was assessed for all patients and controls using all the required information and appreciation of the calculators’ limitations.

Statistical analysis

In the inferential statistical analysis for the comparison between groups, the following non-parametric tests were used: Mann-Whitney and Fisher's exact tests for nominal data and chi-square for ordinal data. For parametric variables with normal distribution, the t-student test was used. Comparisons between variables and altered calcium scores were performed using the Mann-Whitney and Fisher's exact tests. Qualitative results were expressed as absolute frequency and percentage, and quantitative variables as mean and standard deviation (SD). P values < 0.05 are considered significant. All analyses were performed using the statistical software R (R Core Team, 2021) version 4.1.2. (²²).

RESULTS

All patients with post-surgical hypoparathyroidism (HG) followed up at SEMPR were initially selected. A total of 100 patients were identified, 71 were excluded and 29 patients were studied.

A total of 94 patients who underwent cervical surgery and hypoparathyroidism were recruited as a control group (CG), 65 were excluded and 29 were included in the CG (Figure 1).

Figure 1
Selection of patients and controls.

The final sample consisted of 58 individuals, 29 in each group. The mean age was 56.48 ± 14.35 years with the majority female and white (79.31%) (Table 1). Time since surgery was greater in the HG (11 years) compared to CG (5-10 years) (p < 0.001). Thyroid cancer was the most frequent indication for surgery in both groups, with greater proportion in the CG (p = 0.008).

Table 1
Demographic characteristics of the sample

Variables n (%)		HG (n = 29)	CG (n = 29)	p-value
		Sex				1
	Female	25 (86.21%)	24 (82.76%)
	Male	4 (13.70%)	5 (17.24%)
Age (years), mean ± SD		57.90 ± 15.28	55.07 ± 13.35	0.200
Race, n (%)				0.004
	White	28 (96.55%)	18 (62.07%)
	Black	1 (3.45%)	11 (37.89%)
Smoking
	Current	3 (10.34%)	2 (6.89%)	0.224
	Past	9 (31.03%)	5 (17.24%)	0.643
BMI (kg/m²), mean ± SD		28.69 ± 6.51	28.70 ± 3.94	0.470
Obesity		7 (26.9%)	8 (27.5%)	0.415
Menopause		14	15	0.107
	Hormone therapy	2	1
Time since surgery				<0.001
	5-10 years	2 (8.69%)	18 (62.07%)
	11-20 years	10 (43.48%)	9 (31.03%)
	>20 years	11 (47.83%)	2 (6.9%)
Reason for surgery				0.008
	Cancer	13 (56.52%)	23 (85.2%)
	Graves disease	0	1 (3.7%)
	Multinodular goiter	8 (34.78%)	1 (3.7%)
	Functioning goiter	0	1 (3.7%)
	Adenoma	2 (8.7%)	1 (3.7%)
Family history
	Myocardial infarction	3 (10.34%)	10 (34.48%)	0.050
	Sudden death	2 (6.89 %)	1 (3.34%)	1
	Stroke	6 (20.68%)	6 (20.68%)	1
Comorbidities
	Hypertension	18 (62.06%)	19 (65.51%)	1
	Dyslipidemia	13 (44.82%)	15 (51.72%)	0.590
	Prediabetes/T2 DM	6 (20.68%)	11 (37.93%)	0.153
	Obesity	7 (24.10%)	8 (27.58%)	1
	Osteoporosis	5 (17.24%)	2 (6.89%)	0.420
	Nephrolithiasis	3 (10.34%)	2 (6.89%)	1
	Nephrocalcinosis	3 (10.34%)	0	0.230
	Arrhythmia	2 (6.89%)	1 (3.34%)	1
	Chronic kidney disease	2 (6.89%)	0	0.490
	Pulmonary disease	0	2 (6.89%)	0.490

• MI: myocardial infarction; BMI: body mass index; T2DM: type 2 diabetes.

The family history of cardiovascular disease was also similar between groups, with a tendency to have a higher history of myocardial infarction in the CG (HG, 10.34% vs. CG, 34.48%, p = 0 .05), other comorbidities were comparable between them.

As expected, the laboratory profile of bone metabolism as serum levels of calcium, phosphorus, and PTH differed between HG and GC (p < 0.05). The other tests were similar (Table 2).

Table 2
Laboratory test and medication in use

Variables		HG (n = 29)	Controls (n = 29)	p-value
Laboratory (mean ± SD)
Calcium (mg/dL)		8.32 ± 0.68	9.21 ± 0.50	<0.001
Phosphorus (mg/dL)		4.92 ± 0.87	3.53 ± 0.74	<0.001
25OHD (ng/mL)		39.36 ± 9.14	33.10 ± 14.10	0.010
PTH (pg/mL)		7.13 ± 3.71	55.05 ± 19.99	<0.001
Urinary calcium (mg/kg/d)		2.51 ± 1.00	3.99 ± 2.14	0.500
Total cholesterol (mg/dL)		191.31 ± 37.81	192.79 ± 39.31	0.880
LDL-cholesterol (mg/dL)		115.50 ± 32.19	120.97 ± 32.65	0.520
HDL-cholesterol (mg/dL)		49.21 ± 11.05	48.07 ± 9.34	0.670
Triglycerides (mg/dL)		123.62 ± 53.33	128.48 ± 68.31	0.810
Fasting glucose (mg/dL)		92.62 ± 8.12	104.59 ± 24.81	0.010
Glycated haemoglobin (%)		5.47 ± 0.42	5.96 ± 1.07	0.170
Creatinin (mg/dL)		0.89 ± 0.16	0.85 ± 0.17	0.350
Calcium-phosphate product		40.5 ± 5.80	33.36 ± 7.56	0.0001
Medications, n (%)
Calcitriol (n %)		27 (93.1%)	-
Calcitriol (mcg/day)		0.5 ± 0.29	-
Calcium				<0.001
	0	3 (10.34%)	22 (75.86%)
	≤500 mg	9 (31.03%)	5 (17.24%)
	501-1,000 mg	8 (27.59%)	2 (6.9%)
	1,001-2,000 mg	8 (27.59%)	0
	>2,000 mg	1 (3.45%)	0
Vitamin D		15 (51.72%)	12 (41.37%)	0.59
Antiresorptives		5 (17.24%)	2 (6.89%)	0.61
Antihypertensives		18 (62.06%)	19 (65.51%)	0.59
Diuretics		11 (37.93%)	9 (31.03%)	0.78
Statins		11 (37.93%)	12 (41.37%)	1

• PTH: parathohormone; 25OHD: 25-hydroxivitamin D.

The HG took a median daily dosage of 750 mg (0-4,000 mg/day) of a calcium supplement and the majority (89.66%) took between 500 to 2,000 mg of calcium per day, which is higher than the median daily supplementation in the CG 0 (0-1,000 mg/day), where the majority (75.86%) did not supplement calcium (p < 0.001). In the HG, 93.1% took calcitriol, an average of 0.5 mcg/day (0 to 1.25 mcg/day) and none in the CG. The other medications in use did not differ between groups, as shown in Table 2.

Due to the calculators’ limitations, not all patients had the cardiovascular risk assessment performed. The ASCVD risk was performed in 21 patients of HG and 18 patients of CG, with a similar risk calculated between them. The SBC risk was calculated in 24 patients of HG and 21 of CG; there was a difference in risk distribution between HG and CG with no patients in the HG classified as low risk compared to 20% of the CG (p = 0.03). The HG had more patients at intermediate and high risk and no patients at low risk, while the high risk was similar between the groups.

Although the mean CACS and the percentage of positive CACS were higher in the HG, there was no difference between groups (p > 0.05) (Table 3).

Table 3
Cardiovascular risk score and coronary arterial calcification score

Variable		HG	CG	p-value
ASCVD (mean ± SD)
Risk %		10.86 ± 9.45	10.19 ± 12.81	0.400
ASCVD, n (%)				0.970
	Low	6 (28.57%)	8 (36.36%)
	Borderline	6 (28.57%)	5 (22.73%)
	Intermediate	6 (28.57%)	6 (27.27%)
	High	6 (28.57%)	3 (13.64%)
SBC risk calculator, n (%)
	Low	0	5 (20%)	0.030
	Intermediate	7 (30.43%)	3 (12%)
	High	16 (69.57%)	17 (68%)
	Very high	_	_
CACS (mean ± SD)		32.55 ± 41.53	23.59 ± 36.92	0.390
Positive CACS, n (%)		7 (24.14%)	5 (17.24%)	0.580

• ASCVD: atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease calculator; SBC: Brazilian Society of Cardiology calculator; CACS: coronary arterial calcification score.

An association of positive CACS with higher BMI and the diagnosis of obesity (p = 0.04 and p = 0.05, respectively) in the HG were observed. The univariate analysis considering the association of positive CACS and all other variables (serum calcium, 25OHD, PTH, 24 hours urinary calcium, calcium and vitamin D supplementation, use of antihypertensives, diuretics, and statins) did not show any difference in HG (p > 0.05).

The cardiovascular risk calculators ASCVD and SBC did not differentiate between HG patients with positive or negative CACS (p = 0.52 and p = 0.36, respectively) (Table 4).

Table 4
Association of the coronary arterial calcification score with cardiovascular risk calculators in the hypoparathyroidism group

Variable		Positive CACS (n = 7)	Negative CACS (n = 22)	p-value
ASCVD risk%, mean ± SD		11.27 ± 10.05	10.40 ± 9.25	0.430
ASCVD risk score, n (%)				0.520
	Low	3 (42.86%)	3 (21.43%)
	Borderline	1 (14.28%)	4 (28.57%)
	Intermediate	3 (42.86%)	4 (28.57%)
	High	0	3 (21.43%)
SBC risk score, n (%)				0.360
	Low	0	0
	Intermediate	1 (14.28%)	6 (37.5%)
	High	6 (85.72%)	10 (62.5%)

• CACS: Coronary artery calcium score; ASCVD: Atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease; SBC: Brazilian Society of Cardiology.

DISCUSSION

This study showed that patients with hypoparathyroidism under conventional therapy had the same CACS as controls did, despite the higher supplementation of calcium and vitamin D. Laboratory tests were compatible with the diagnosis of hypoparathyroidism without an association between serum calcium and vitamin D levels and a high calcium score in patients with hypoparathyroidism.

Patients with hypoparathyroidism are recommended to keep calcium levels slightly below or at the lower limit of normal (8.0-8.5 mg/dL) and calcium-phosphorus product less than 55 to prevent ectopic calcification in the brain, kidney, and cardiovascular system (²³). Thus, a possible explanation for low indices of altered calcium score in the HG could be due to an adequate mean serum calcium level of 8.32 ± 0.68, which is within the limits to prevent cardiovascular complications. According to Underbjerg and cols.'s study, extreme variations in serum calcium can affect the cardiovascular system; frequent episodes of hypercalcemia were associated with increased cardiovascular risk (⁶). This finding corroborates the orientation of keeping calcium levels within the lower normal limit.

Time after thyroidectomy was associated with higher cardiovascular risk (⁶), which we did not confirm in this study.

Evaluating a different population of 74,245 women using oral calcium supplementation (more than 1,000 mg) without a history of cardiovascular disease, cancer, or hypoparathyroidism in a 24-year prospective study, no increase in cardiovascular risk was observed, including coronary heart disease or stroke, agreeing with our study, which did not find significant association between oral calcium and/or vitamin D supplementation and altered calcium score (²⁴).

Although rare, cardiac arrhythmias may be present in these patients, with QT interval prolongation on the electrocardiogram, in addition to a prominent U wave and T wave abnormalities (³). However, in this study, only two patients (6.89%) with hypoparathyroidism had a previous diagnosis of arrhythmia. The cardiac effects of this condition probably result from hypocalcemia through the reduction of cardiac contractility, but it remains a poorly understood mechanism (²⁵). PTH exerts direct effects on the cardiovascular system through the PTH-1 receptor, which is expressed in endothelial and vascular smooth cells, cardiomyocytes, and the cardiac conduction system (²⁶). As expected, we found low levels of PTH in the HG, and a slightly higher mean in the CG, without difference in presence of arrythmia. In contrast to this result, Underbjerg and cols. (²⁶) compared 30 patients with hypoparathyroidism of non-surgical etiology with a group with pseudohypoparathyroidism, characterized by high levels of phosphate and PTH, and low levels of calcium, and found a higher pulse velocity in the hypoparathyroid group (p = 0.02) even after correcting for confounding factors, reinforcing the arterial stiffness of the first group, associated with a higher cardiovascular risk.

As in the present article, a case-controlled study evaluating 688 patients with hypoparathyroidism, showed there was no increase in cardiovascular risk in patients with post-surgical hypoparathyroidism (²⁷). In contrast, others had demonstrated increased cardiovascular risk in patients with non-surgical hypoparathyroidism (²⁸,²⁹). Thus, it would be interesting to investigate the CACS in patients with hypoparathyroidism of other etiologies and longer disease progression to verify the correlation with cardiovascular risk. A possible hypothesis to justify this difference between the groups would be that the group with low PTH levels may have greater variation in calcium levels due to oral supplementation; therefore, transient hypercalcemia may increase the calcium–phosphorus product and promote vascular calcification (⁷).

In the literature, only one study investigated the CACS in patients with hypoparathyroidism, although it was performed in patients with idiopathic etiology. They found three (10%) altered scores, but no control patient had calcification on examination (p = 0.07), and the altered CACS associated only to lower calcium levels (³⁰). Their results were similar to ours, except we did not find an association between laboratory data and positive CACS. The only significant association found in our study was in the HG, a positive CACS with high BMI and obesity, which were factors already associated with positive CACS in non-hypoparathyroid patients (³¹). A possible reason for the absence of difference between the CACS of patients and controls may be the presence of a non-significant higher number of patients with diabetes in the CG. However, this group had more patients classified with low cardiovascular risk per the SBC risk calculator.

Other studies described in patients with idiopathic hypoparathyroidism an increase in the intima thickness of the carotid artery (⁷) and carotid, aortic and renal arteries (³⁰,³²), thus reinforcing the difference among the etiologies of hypoparathyroidism. One possible explanation could be the shorter time for the diagnosis of post-surgical hypoparathyroidism compared to other etiologies that expose patients to a longer duration of hypocalcemia and hyperphosphatemia as well as the complications. Even though in this study we found a difference in the calcium product between groups, it was below the cut point of 55 in both, which could explain the lack of difference in the CACS score.

Limitations of this study include a lack of data on dietary calcium intake, physical activity, and time since menopause, in addition to the limited information obtained from the medical records. The cardiovascular risk calculators had limitations, adding to possible confounding factors that may have restricted the results. The study's strengths are the small sample size concerning the general population, but significant for hypoparathyroidism, a rare disease; the assessment of the CACS, an important tool to estimate the cardiovascular risk of all patients; and the inclusion of a control group that performed the same surgery as the HG.

In conclusion, this study did not find a difference in the CACS of patients with post-surgical hypoparathyroidism compared to controls or the two cardiovascular risk calculators. Using the SBC calculator, we showed there were more low-risk patients in the CG compared to the HG, although there was no between-group difference on the CACS or on the ASCVD calculator. Thus, further studies may be conducted in the future, with large-scale prospective follow-up to verify broadly the possible cardiovascular outcomes in patients with hypoparathyroidism, involving all etiologies, based on the CACS.

Acknowledgments:

the authors would like to thank Quanta Diagnóstico por Imagem, Curitiba, PR, Brazil, for providing the thoracic computer tomography.

REFERENCES

• ¹
  Vadiveloo T, Donnan PT, Leese GP. A Population-Based Study of the Epidemiology of Chronic Hypoparathyroidism. J Bone Miner Res. 2018 Mar;33(3):478-85. doi: 10.1002/jbmr.3329.
  » https://doi.org/10.1002/jbmr.3329
• ²
  Bjornsdottir S, Ing S, Mitchell DM, Sikjaer T, Underbjerg L, Hassan-Smith Z, et al. Epidemiology and Financial Burden of Adult Chronic Hypoparathyroidism. J Bone Miner Res. 2022 Dec;37(12):2602-14. doi: 10.1002/jbmr.4675.
  » https://doi.org/10.1002/jbmr.4675
• ³
  Bilezikian JP. Hypoparathyroidism. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2020 Jun 1;105(6):1722-36. doi: 10.1210/clinem/dgaa113.
  » https://doi.org/10.1210/clinem/dgaa113
• ⁴
  Clarke BL. Epidemiology and Complications of Hypoparathyroidism. Endocrinol Metab Clin North Am. 2018 Dec;47(4):771-82. doi: 10.1016/j.ecl.2018.07.004.
  » https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecl.2018.07.004
• ⁵
  Maeda SS, Moreira CA, Borba VZC, Bandeira F, Farias MLF, Borges JLC, et al. Diagnosis and treatment of hypoparathyroidism: a position statement from the Brazilian Society of Endocrinology and Metabolism. Arch Endocrinol Metab. 2018 Feb;62(1):106-24. doi: 10.20945/2359-3997000000015.
  » https://doi.org/10.20945/2359-3997000000015
• ⁶
  Underbjerg L, Sikjaer T, Rejnmark L. Long-Term Complications in Patients with Hypoparathyroidism Evaluated by Biochemical Findings: A Case-Control Study. J Bone Miner Res. 2018 May;33(5):822-31. doi: 10.1002/jbmr.3368. Epub 2018 Feb 14.
  » https://doi.org/10.1002/jbmr.3368
• ⁷
  Gupta Y, Bhadada SK, Shah VN, Upreti V, Bhansali A, Jain S, et al. Carotid intima media thickness in patients with sporadic idiopathic hypoparathyroidism: a pilot study. Endocr J. 2012;59(7):555-9. doi: 10.1507/endocrj.ej11-0400.
  » https://doi.org/10.1507/endocrj.ej11-0400
• ⁸
  Tabacco G, Bilezikian JP. New Directions in Treatment of Hypoparathyroidism. Endocrinol Metab Clin North Am. 2018 Dec;47(4):901-15. doi: 10.1016/j.ecl.2018.07.013.
  » https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecl.2018.07.013
• ⁹
  Tecilazich F, Formenti AM, Frara S, Giubbini R, Giustina A. Treatment of hypoparathyroidism. Best Pract Res Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2018 Dec;32(6):955-64. doi: 10.1016/j.beem.2018.12.002..
  » https://doi.org/10.1016/j.beem.2018.12.002.
• ¹⁰
  Bolland MJ, Grey A, Avenell A, Gamble GD, Reid IR. Calcium supplements with or without vitamin D and risk of cardiovascular events: reanalysis of the Women's Health Initiative limited access dataset and meta-analysis. BMJ. 2011 Apr 19;342:d2040. doi: 10.1136/bmj.d2040.
  » https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.d2040
• ¹¹
  Bolland MJ, Avenell A, Baron JA, Grey A, MacLennan GS, Gamble GD, et al. Effect of calcium supplements on risk of myocardial infarction and cardiovascular events: meta-analysis. BMJ. 2010 Jul 29;341:c3691. doi: 10.1136/bmj.c3691.
  » https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.c3691
• ¹²
  Fernandes JL, Bittencourt MS. Escore de cálcio coronariano: onde e quando faz a diferença na prática clínica. Rev Soc Cardiol Estado de São Paulo. 2017;27(2):88-95.
• ¹³
  Barroso WKS, Rodrigues CIS, Bortolotto LA, Mota-Gomes MA, Brandão AA, Feitosa ADM, et al. Diretrizes Brasileiras de Hipertensão Arterial – 2020. Arq Bras Cardiol. 2021;116(3):516-658.
• ¹⁴
  Agatston AS, Janowitz WR, Hildner FJ, Zusmer NR, Viamonte M Jr, Detrano R. Quantification of coronary artery calcium using ultrafast computed tomography. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1990 Mar 15;15(4):827-32. doi: 10.1016/0735-1097(90)90282-t.
  » https://doi.org/10.1016/0735-1097(90)90282-t
• ¹⁵
  McClelland RL, Chung H, Detrano R, Post W, Kronmal RA. Distribution of coronary artery calcium by race, gender, and age: results from the Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis (MESA). Circulation. 2006 Jan 3;113(1):30-7. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.105.580696.
  » https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.105.580696
• ¹⁶
  Faludi AA, Izar MCO, Saraiva JFK, Chacra APM, Bianco HT, Afiune Neto A, et al. Atualização da Diretriz Brasileira de Dislipidemias e Prevenção da Aterosclerose – 2017. Arq Bras Cardiol. 2017;109(2 Suppl 1):1-76.
• ¹⁷
  Azevedo CF, Rochitte CE, Lima JAC. Coronary artery calcium score and coronary computed tomographic angiography for cardiovascular risk stratification. Arq Bras Cardiol. 2012 Jun;98(6):559-68.
• ¹⁸
  Faludi A, Izar M, Saraiva J, Bianco H, Chacra A, Bertoluci M, et al. Diretriz brasileira baseada em evidências sobre prevenção de doenças cardiovasculares em pacientes com diabetes: posicionamento da Sociedade Brasileira de Diabetes (SBD), da Sociedade Brasileira de Cardiologia (SBC) e da Sociedade Brasileira de Endocrinologia e Metabologia (SBEM). Arq Bras Cardiol. 2017;109(6).
• ¹⁹
  Home – Calculadora de Risco Cardiovascular [Internet]. departamentos.cardiol.br. Disponível em: http://departamentos.cardiol.br/sbcda/2015/CALCULADORAER2017/index.html Accessed on: May 12, 2022.
  » http://departamentos.cardiol.br/sbcda/2015/CALCULADORAER2017/index.html
• ²⁰
  American College of Cardiology. ASCVD risk estimator + [Internet]. tools.acc.org. 2021. Disponível em: https://tools.acc.org/ascvd-risk-estimator-plus/# Accessed on: May 12, 2022.
  » https://tools.acc.org/ascvd-risk-estimator-plus/#
• ²¹
  Lloyd-Jones DM, Braun LT, Ndumele CE, Smith SC Jr, Sperling LS, Virani SS, et al. Use of Risk Assessment Tools to Guide Decision-Making in the Primary Prevention of Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Disease: A Special Report from the American Heart Association and American College of Cardiology. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2019 Jun 25;73(24):3153-67. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2018.11.005. Epub 2018 Nov 10. Erratum in: J Am Coll Cardiol. 2019 Jun 25;73(24):3234.
  » https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2018.11.005
• ²²
  R Core Team (2021) R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria.
• ²³
  Babey M, Brandi ML, Shoback D. Conventional Treatment of Hypoparathyroidism. Endocrinol Metab Clin North Am. 2018 Dec;47(4):889-900. doi: 10.1016/j.ecl.2018.07.012.
  » https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecl.2018.07.012
• ²⁴
  Paik JM, Curhan GC, Sun Q, Rexrode KM, Manson JE, Rimm EB, et al. Calcium supplement intake and risk of cardiovascular disease in women. Osteoporos Int. 2014 Aug;25(8):2047-56. doi: 10.1007/s00198-014-2732-3.
  » https://doi.org/10.1007/s00198-014-2732-3
• ²⁵
  Brown SJ, Ruppe MD, Tabatabai LS. The Parathyroid Gland and Heart Disease. Methodist Debakey Cardiovasc J. 2017 Apr-Jun;13(2):49-54. doi: 10.14797/mdcj-13-2-49.
  » https://doi.org/10.14797/mdcj-13-2-49
• ²⁶
  Underbjerg L, Sikjaer T, Rejnmark L. Cardiovascular findings in patients with nonsurgical hypoparathyroidism and pseudohypoparathyroidism: A cohort study. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf). 2019 Apr;90(4):592-600. doi: 10.1111/cen.13927.
  » https://doi.org/10.1111/cen.13927
• ²⁷
  Underbjerg L, Sikjaer T, Mosekilde L, Rejnmark L. Cardiovascular and renal complications to postsurgical hypoparathyroidism: a Danish nationwide controlled historic follow-up study. J Bone Miner Res. 2013 Nov;28(11):2277-85. doi: 10.1002/jbmr.1979.
  » https://doi.org/10.1002/jbmr.1979
• ²⁸
  Underbjerg L, Sikjaer T, Mosekilde L, Rejnmark L. The Epidemiology of Nonsurgical Hypoparathyroidism in Denmark: A Nationwide Case Finding Study. J Bone Miner Res. 2015 Sep;30(9):1738-44. doi: 10.1002/jbmr.2501.
  » https://doi.org/10.1002/jbmr.2501
• ²⁹
  Vadiveloo T, Donnan PT, Leese CJ, Abraham KJ, Leese GP. Increased mortality and morbidity in patients with chronic hypoparathyroidism: A population-based study. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf). 2019 Feb;90(2):285-92. doi: 10.1111/cen.13895.
  » https://doi.org/10.1111/cen.13895
• ³⁰
  Agarwal P, Prakash M, Singhal M, Bhadada SK, Gupta Y, Khandelwal N. To assess vascular calcification in the patients of hypoparathyroidism using multidetector computed tomography scan. Indian J Endocrinol Metab. 2015 Nov-Dec;19(6):785-90. doi: 10.4103/2230-8210.167545.
  » https://doi.org/10.4103/2230-8210.167545
• ³¹
  Wang MC, Lin CC, Chiang HY, Chen HL, Tsai HC, Lin WY, et al. Association between coronary artery calcium and all-cause mortality: A large single-center retrospective cohort study. PLoS One. 2022 Oct 26;17(10):e0276659. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0276659.
  » https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0276659
• ³²
  Meena D, Prakash M, Gupta Y, Bhadada S, Khandelwal N. Carotid, aorta and renal arteries intima-media thickness in patients with sporadic idiopathic hypoparathyroidism. Indian J Endocrinol Metab. 2015 Mar-Apr;19(2):262-6. doi: 10.4103/2230-8210.149320.
  » https://doi.org/10.4103/2230-8210.149320

Publication Dates

• Publication in this collection
  10 June 2024
• Date of issue
  2024

History

• Received
  21 Aug 2023
• Accepted
  02 Oct 2023