Inoculação de maltose e/ou sacarose em ovos leves embrionados

Effect of maltose and sucrose supplementation on embryonic light eggs

Resumos

Foram estudados os parâmetros de incubação, maturidade gastrintestinal e desempenho até 14 dias de pintos de corte oriundos de ovos leves (55,82 ± 1,64g) inoculados com maltose e/ou sacarose, aos 16 dias de incubação. Os tratamentos compreenderam ovos íntegros e ovos suplementados com 0,6 mL de solução de maltose 68 g/L; com maltose 136 g/L; com maltose 204 g/L; com maltose e sacarose (68 g/L + 68 g/L). O delineamento utilizado foi em blocos casualizados com cinco tratamentos e 120 repetições, sendo um ovo a unidade experimental e para desempenho seis repetições e dez aves por parcela. Os dados foram submetidos ao proc glm do SAS e ao teste de Tukey (P<0,05). A inoculação de carboidratos aumentou os períodos requeridos para bicagem da membrana interna, da casca e para eclosão As suplementações com maltose ou maltose+sacarose não interferiram na eclodibilidade e no peso do neonato. O nível de 68g/L de maltose proporcionou maior altura de vilo no primeiro dia de vida, entretanto, esse efeito não foi observado com 10 dias de idade. O nível de 204g/L prejudicou o desenvolvimento gastrintestinal de pintos. Ovos leves inoculados com maltose combinada ou não com sacarose não resultam em pintos com maior desempenho na fase inicial.

alimentação in ovo; histomorfometria; incubação; matrizes jovens; pintos leves

Hatchery parameters, performance of chicks on initial phase (until 14 days) and intestinal maturity of birds from light eggs supplemented with maltose and sucrose were studied. The treatments were as follows: eggs without supplementation; eggs with 0.6 mL of maltose solution (68 g/L); eggs with 0.6mL of maltose solution (136 g/L); eggs with 0.6 mL of maltose solution (204 g/L); and eggs with 0.6 mL of maltose solution (68 g/L) and sucrose (68 g/mL). The supplementation took place on the 16th day of incubation. The experimental design used was randomized blocks with five treatments and 120 replicates and as for performance we used randomized blocks with four treatments and six replicates and ten birds in each experimental unit. The supplementation did not affect eclodibility, chick weight, and intestinal development of light chicks. Simple or combined maltose egg supplementation did not bring benefits to initial performance of birds.

incubation; in ovo feeding; intestinal biometry; light chicks; young breeders

• ¹
  Christensen, VL, Donaldson, WE, Nestor, KE. Effect of maternal dietary triiodothyronine on embryonic physiology of turkeys. Poultry Science. 1993 dec; 72 (12): 2316-2327.
• ²
  Moran Júnior ET. Digestion and absorption in fowl and events through prenatal development. Journal of Nutrition. 1985 may; 115(5): 665-674.
• ³
  Tako E, Ferket PR, Uni Z. Effects of in ovo feeding of carbohydrates and β-hidroxy-β-methylbutyrate on the development of chicken intestine. Poultry Science. 2004 dec; 83(12): 2023-2028.
• ⁴
  Uni Z, Ferket RP, inventors; North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC; and Yissum Research Development Company of Hebrew University of Jerusalem, assignee. Enhancement of oviparous species by in ovo feeding. US Patent 6.592.878. 2003 Jul 15.
• ⁵
  Foye OT, Uni Z, Ferket PR. Effect of in ovo feeding egg white protein, beta-hydroxy-beta-methylbutyrate, and carbohydrates on glycogen status and neonatal growth of turkeys. Poultry Science. 2006. jul 85 (7):1185-1192.
• ⁶
  Tarachai P, Yamauchi K. Effects of luminal nutrient absorption, intraluminal physical stimulation, and intravenous parenteral alimentation on the recovery responses of duodenal villus morphology following feed withdrawal in chickens. Poultry Science.2000 nov;79(11): 1578-1585.
• ⁷
  Foye OT, Ferket PR, Uni Z. The effects of in ovo feeding arginine, β-hydroxy-β-methyl-butyrate, and protein on jejunal digestive and absorptive activity in embryonic and neonatal turkey poults. Poultry Science. 2007 dec; 86 (12):2343-2349.
• ⁸
  Ipek A, Sahan U, Yilmaz B. The effect of in ovo ascorbic acid and glucose injection in broiler breeder eggs on hatchability and chick weight. Archiv für Gerflügelkunde. 2004 mar; 68(3):132-135.
• ⁹
  Uni Z, Ferket RP, Tako E, Kedar O. In ovo feeding improves energy status of late-term chicken embryos. Poultry Science. 2005 may; 84(5): 764-770.
• ¹⁰
  Smirnov A, Tako E, Ferket PR, Uni Z. Mucin gene expression and mucin content in the chicken intestinal goblet cells are affected by in ovo feeding of carbohydrates. Poultry Science. 2006 apr; 85(4): 669 - 673.
• ¹¹
  Bruzual JJ, Peak SD, Brake J, Peebles ED. Effects of relative humidity during incubation on hatchability and body weight of broiler chicks from young breeder flocks. Poutry Science. 2000 jun;79 (6): 827-830
• ¹²
  Noble RC, Lonsdale F, Conner K, Brown, D. Changes in lipid metabolism of the chick embryo with parent age. Poultry Science. 1986 mar; 65(3):409-416.
• ¹³
  Shanawany MM. Inter-relationship between egg weight, parental age and embryonic development. British Poutry Science. 1984 mar; 25(3): 449-455.
• ¹⁴
  Hearn, PJ. Making use of small hatching eggs in an integrated broiler company. British Poultry Science. 1986 mar; 27(3) 498-501.
• ¹⁵
  Vieira SL, Moran Júnior ET. Eggs and chicks from broiler breeders of extremely different age. Journal of Applied Poultry Research. 1998 apr;7(4): 372-376.
• ¹⁶
  Vieira SL, Moran Júnior ET. Effect of egg origin and chick post-hatch nutrition on broiler live performance and meat yields. World's Poultry Science Journal. 1999 may; 55(2): 125-142.
• ¹⁷
  Leitão RA, Leandro NSM, Stringhini JH, Café MB, Pedroso AA, Chaves LS. Inoculação de glicose em ovos embrionados de frango de corte: parâmetros de incubação e desempenho inicial. Ciência Animal Brasileira. 2008 dec; 9(4): 847-855.
• ¹⁸
  Rostagno HS, Silva DS, Costa PMA, Fonseca JB, Soares PR, Pereira JAA, Silva MA. Tabelas brasileiras para aves e suínos: Composição de alimentos e exigências nutricionais. 2. ed. Viçosa: UFV, 2005. 141 p.
• ¹⁹
  Uni Z, Ganot S, Skland D. Posthatch development of mucosal function in the broiler small intestine. Poultry Science. 1998 jan; 77(1):75-82.
• ²⁰
  STATISTICAL ANALYSES SYSTEM - SAS. User´s Guide. Version 6.11. Cary: 1998. 634p.
• ²¹
  Sampaio IBM. Estatística aplicada à experimentação animal. 2. ed. Belo Horizonte: FEPMVZ, 1998. 221 p.
• ²²
  Ohta Y, Kidd MP, Ishihashi T. Embryo growth and aminoacid concentration profiles of broiler breeder eggs, embryos and chicks after in ovo administration of amino acids. Poultry Science. 2001 oct; 80 (10):1430-1436.
• ²³
  Pedroso AA, Chaves LS, Lopes KLAM, Café MB, Leandro NSM, Stringhini JH. Inoculação de nutrientes em ovos de matrizes pesadas. Revista Brasileira de Zootecnia. 2006 oct; 35(5): 218-226.
• ²⁴
  Leitão RA, Leandro NSM, Stringhini JH, Café MB, Andrade MA. Inoculação de maltose, sacarose ou glicose em ovos embrionados de baixo peso. Acta Scientiarum. Animal Sciences. 2010 jan; 32(1): 93-100.

Datas de Publicação

• Publicação nesta coleção
  14 Abr 2014
• Data do Fascículo
  Mar 2014

Histórico

• Recebido
  24 Ago 2008
• Aceito
  10 Set 2013