Open-access Hearing Health at School: analysis of knowledge, behaviors and attitudes of Southern-Brazilian children and adolescents on noise

ABSTRACT

Purpose  to analyze the knowledge, behaviors, and attitudes of students on noise.

Methods  We used an observational method study, in 32 Schools from Itajaí/Brazil, with a convenience sample, comprising 1,835 students, 45.7% females and 54.3% males, mean age of 11.53 ± 0.8 years, was conducted. The Portuguese version of Dangerous Decibels® questionnaire was applied. For the data analysis, descriptive and inferential statistics were used, significance level of 5%.

Results  A large part of the sample part of the sample had harmful hearing habits; 62.6% reported knowledge on the subject, but only 25.4% answered the questions on the theme correctly; 58.9% reported that they did not know how to protect hearing if necessary. Regarding sex and age: males have more hazardous hearing habits (p < 0.001) and tinnitus complaint (p<0.001) and females have more knowledge (p < 0.001) and the intent to wear hearing protection (p<0.001), greater intention to wear hearing protection among younger students (10 and 11 years old) (p < 0.001), and the older ones (12 to 16 years old) get more exposed to noise (p < 0.001), and there are more tinnitus complaints (p < 0.05) among them.

Conclusion  A large part of the students in the study has hazardous noisy habits and scarce knowledge on the theme, with males and older subjects showing the worst attitudes and behaviors in face of the potential hearing risk caused by exposure to high noise levels.

Keywords:  Noise; Health Risk Behaviors; Tinnitus; Noise-induced Hearing Loss; School Health Services

INTRODUCTION

The World Health Organization (WHO) reported that 60% of child hearing loss is preventable, and about 1.1 billion young people between 12 and 35 years old are at risk of noise-induced hearing loss (NIHL) due to entertainment environments, attendance to concerts, the use of earphones, games etc(1).

In modern society, the use of cell phones, tablets, and the like, in addition to powerful stereo equipment and earphones has astonishingly increased. The attendance to venues with loud music has been increasingly common. Options of leisure for the youth, with noise exposure, have become a habit and considered a socially accepted health hazard. Children, adolescents, and young adults are the most exposed to environmental noise and a trend for increasing noise-induced hearing loss (NIHL) has been observed among that group in several studies(2-6).

The lack of visibility and expansion of knowledge, little value, and knowledge on noise effects in entertainment activities are still factors contributing to the increasing risk and development of NIHL. As it is a preventable loss, its approach should start by the awareness of the younger population(1,7-10).

To consider further directions in the elaboration of educational interventions and hearing health promotion, there is the initial need of searching for information on knowledge, behaviors and hearing habits of children and adolescents in face of noise. Thus, the goal of this study was to analyze students’ behaviors, habits, knowledge, and attitudes on noise.

METHODS

A monocentric, observational, transversal study was conducted with 6th graders comprising all 32 Municipal Public Schools from Itajaí, Santa Catarina State, Southern Brazil, subdivided into 8 Educational Pools. In 2021 the city's population was 264,054 and the average monthly wage of workers was 3.0 minimum wages. The study was approved by the Ethics Board of Research, the Tuiuti do Paraná University, opinion number 2,551,067. All participants signed an informed consent form.

Sampling

The calculations for the sampling size were based on all 2,160 students enrolled in the 6th grade, considering an infinite population, the calculated minimum sample comprised 1,068 students, 95% confidence level and sampling error of 3% (α=0.03).

The sampling loss was 15% (325 students), that is, 12% (39 students) did not sign the Free Informed Assent Form for Minors and/or the Free Informed Consent Form for their legal guardians, and the other 88% (286 students) were not present in all the steps of the research (therefore, they did not respond the questionnaires). The final sample comprised 1,835 students, with 838 (45.7%) females and 997 (54.3%) males, mean age of 11.53 ± 0.8 years.

To assess the age-related data, the study group was divided into two categories(11): children at ages between 10 and 11 years and adolescents at ages between 12 and 18 years. This distribution was based on the Statute of the Child and Adolescent (ECA). According to this statute, children are those up to 12 years of age. Those aged between 12 and 18 are adolescents.

Instruments

To analyze students' behaviors, habits, knowledge and attitudes towards noise, was used a questionnaire based on the validated questionnaire (12) from the Dangerous Decibels® Program (DD) (Chart 1). The original questionnaire (12) was translated and adapted into Portuguese but was not validated (13). In addition, other questions about classroom noise have been added in the Brazilian study (13). In the current study, these additional questions were not included.

Chart 1
Detailed questionnaire used in the study, according to its dimensions (habits, symptoms, behavior, attitudes, knowledge, opinion and general information)

The questionnaire used consisted of 18 structured questions, printed on a single page, including general data (age and gender), questions involving knowledge about sound, noise, hearing, and hearing protection strategies, as well as habits and symptoms, attitudes, and behaviors in relation to noise (Chart 2).

Chart 2
Questionnaire translated and adapted into Brazilian Portuguese by Knobel and Lima (2014)(13) used in this study

The questionnaire was applied by the teachers at the schools, always monitored by the researcher, in their respective classes, in the usual school shifts of the students. The teachers went under previous training to the application, conducted by the lead researcher, with detailed explanation of each question. The questionnaire was handed out to each student and read aloud to all the students, pausing for their responses to each question. In case of doubts, the teacher and/or the researcher would help the students. Average time to answer the questionnaires was 15 minutes.

Statistical analyses

For the analysis of the individual results, descriptive statistical methods were used (with absolute and relative frequency tables in percentage - %). For the comparisons of the questions regarding sex and age range, Chi-square Test were used, significance level of 0.05 (5%), considering only the affirmative responses (yes, always, true, agree) and negative ones (no, never, false, disagree) for the test application. Statistica 13.3 software was used for the analyses.

RESULTS

In the current study 96.9% of the participants reported that they had never participated in any educational campaign or hearing health promotion program in their schools (whether the current ones or the former ones when the research was carried out).

Regarding the risk habits, the descriptive analyses verified that 91% of students have the habit of using stereo headphones, but in other habits, the occurrence is less than 50%, such as rode in a motorcycle (47%), went to a noisy car show (45.40%), use fireworks (43.30%); went to a concert (42.20%), rode in a car with loud speakers (41.90%), went to a car or motorcycle race (18.10%), use a lawn mower (16.90%), playing in a band (10.10%) (Figure 1).

Figure 1
Risk hearing habits – percentage of participants exposed to common noisy sound sources

Concerning otological or hearing symptoms and signs, 47.6% of the adolescents reported otalgia or tinnitus when exposed to loud noise levels, and 72.2% of them had tinnitus complaint.

Regarding habits, knowledge, attitudes, behavior, and tinnitus complaint, part of the results is shown in Table 1.

Table 1
Percentage data and statistical differences (by sex / female and lower age group) of the answers, based on the results of the questionnaires, according to the scales of habits, knowledge, attitudes and behavior and tinnitus complaint

Concerning knowledge on the perceptions of the difficulties that hearing-impaired people may face, 83.1% stated that they would usually have difficulties in hearing alarms, doorbells or phone ringing; 65% thought that they would have difficulties in understanding what was said in a group (in a conversation); 43.1% in getting a job; 66.9% in understanding what would be said in a movie, play or on the television; 75.8% in understanding what would be said in a classroom, and 17.1% also associated hearing loss with difficulties in understanding traffic signs along the highways.

As for habits and knowledge on noise, 62.6% admitted that they did not have any knowledge on noise-related hearing loss, and 58.9% reported that they did not know how to protect their hearing if necessary, calling attention to the use of hearing protection devices as a protection strategy, reported by only 34.1% of the studied sample. Moreover, among the students who reported knowledge on what kind of noise could cause hearing loss (37.4%), only 25.4% answered the questions on the theme correctly. In addition, as for knowledge on how to protect hearing, the students who claimed that they had such knowledge (41.1%), only 23.1% responded the specific questions on the theme correctly.

Concerning attitudes and behaviors, 81.5% of the participants in the study consider that developing hearing loss is not a problem, and only 10.3% wear hearing protection devices when exposed to high sound levels, with approximately 18% reporting intention to wear them in case they were in a concert with high sound levels.

About tinnitus, the males and the students in ages 12 to 16 years report more tinnitus complaints.

The association of these factors with sex evidenced that males get exposed to noisier, hazardous hearing habits (Table 2), and females have more knowledge on the theme, as well as more positive attitudes regarding the use of hearing protection devices.

Table 2
Association of sex with risky noisy hearing habits (Question: ‘During the last year, I’)

Regarding age, dividing the group of students in ages 10 to 11 years and 12 to 16 years, students in the older age range also tend to get more exposed to noisier, hazardous hearing habits (Table 3), On the other hand, younger students demonstrated more positive attitudes in relation to the use of hearing protection devices (Table 1). The analysis of general habits and knowledge on the theme did not find any statistically significant differences between the groups concerning the age ranges (Table 1).

Table 3
Comparison of age group with risky hearing habits (Question: ‘During the last year, I’)

DISCUSSION

Noise has been part of individuals’ daily life and has negative impact on hearing health as well as on extra-auditory health, apart from the deleterious consequences for the general well-being and communication(14). There has been increasing exposure of children and adolescents to high noise levels, reporting an increase in risk hearing habits with the noise exposure of that population(1,15,16).

Concerning the risk of hearing habits to NIHL (Figure 1), the data found in the current study corroborate other studies that also used DD questionnaires. Martin et al.(17) reported that about 94.5% of 1,120 American fourth graders were exposed to some kind of hazardous noise for hearing loss (ranging from 9% - those who play in a band – to 73% among those who use earphones). Study by Knobel and Lima(13) conducted with a group of 220 Brazilian 4th and 5th graders, ages ranging from 8 to 11 years, observed ranges from 5.1% (play in a band), 61.9% (use of earphones) to 77.5% (attendance to noisy parties). Welch(8) reported over 90% of general exposure to potentially hazardous noise sources, specially amplified music via earphones among 44 students, 14 to 17 years of age, from Auckland, New Zealand.

Some authors consider that the basic source for high incidence of hearing loss among the youth lies in the habit of listening to music using earphones at loud volume with inappropriate environmental noise levels(18-24).

Study(23) showed that the most important hearing-related symptoms after noise exposure were tinnitus and noise sensitivity. Regarding leisure noise exposure, listening to personal stereos/earphones was most frequently reported. The use of HPDs during most noisy activities was limited.

In addition to the attendance to concerts, use of personal stereos/ earphones, with prevalence of amplified electronic music, there are several other examples of situations and venues where the young are exposed to noise in their free, leisure time, as it was verified in this study. Additionally, other young individuals equip their cars with powerful amplifiers, reaching up to 140 decibels (dB A), while others are exposed to noise from popular Brazilian celebrations, such as the Carnival (trio elétrico – a popular sound truck with a band playing on top of it) and June parties. There are also the worldwide celebrations, such as the New Year’s Eve with fireworks that may cause hearing loss and tinnitus(24).

Despite the evidence of hazardous noise exposure among the young, there are no regulations for the non-occupational or entertainment-noise exposure. The WHO, along with the International Telecommunication Union, recommends safe sound levels of 75 dB for 40 hours a week to children, and 80 dB for 40 hours to adults(25).

Another factor considered relevant in cases of NIHL is the lack of knowledge on the theme (Table 1). Considering that this kind of hearing loss is irreversible, but its basic cause is preventable, its approach should start by the increase of the population awareness since childhood and adolescence by means of hearing health promotion and educational programs(10).

In the current study, the participants admitted that they did not have knowledge on noise-related hearing loss (Table 1). Such results are worrying and raise questions on the probable reasons for this lack of knowledge on the theme. Would it be only the absence of educational campaigns at school. The adoption of specific preventive NIHL methods among children and adolescents needs to be surveyed, developed, and applied. In Brazil, a study by Knobel and Lima(26) observed that 68.5% were aware that high sound levels could impair their hearing, 25% thought that children and young people were not affected by any type of hearing loss, and 20.8% of them did not believe that children could develop hearing loss. Still about this theme, when it was mentioned that children could develop hearing loss by exposure to loud sound, 5.5% of them did not believe it, and 7.4% reported that they would not do anything about that.

In the current study, only 10% of them wear or wore hearing protection when exposed to high sound levels, with about 18% reporting their intention of wearing them in case of being at a concert with high noise levels (Table 1). On the other hand, in the study(26) 87.2% showed interest in learning how to protect hearing, but only 21.8% were familiar with the use of hearing protection devices. Studies that investigated the use of hearing protection by the young during noisy activities corroborated the findings that less than 10% of the adolescents wear or intend to wear them(13,17,23,26,27).

Even though there have been questions addressing the lack of knowledge, some interventions have been developed to call attention to the problem and search for some changes in those behaviors and attitudes, informing about noise and its potential hazards to hearing and accessibility to hearing protection devices. Exemplifying, we have Sweden, Germany, Denmark, among other European countries. In those countries, the free supply and distribution of hearing protection devices at reduced costs are common during concerts and music festivals. Moreover, in such events, there are “hearing recovery areas”, with silent places to ‘rest your ears’, apart from several recommendations, information on the sites of the festival and at the venue, messages, signs, warnings, boxes full of hearing protection devices (with instructions on the package on how to use them), etc.(28,29).

In that sense, we should advance in our country regarding the access to hearing protection (there are scarce options of proper hearing protection devices for children and adolescents), as well as the lack of knowledge or inadequate information on the use and effectiveness of such devices. That highlights even more the importance and need of implementing educational programs to raise the awareness on the theme. NIHL prevention has been recommended, but it is still far from a real inclusion in the educational planning of Brazilian schools for a number of reasons: lack of knowledge on hearing loss and the effects of high sound levels (on the part of students, teachers, parents, community in general and public authorities/ health and education managers), prioritization of other health campaigns considered more relevant and appealing (alcohol abuse, smoking, drug abuse, etc.), and the scarcity of qualified, adequately educated professionals to perform in the area(30,31).

In Brazil, some health education policies(32) (such as the propositions by the School Health Program/ SHP) and interventions, such as the national campaigns on the ‘International Day of Awareness on Noise/Brazil’(33) objectifying the awareness of the Brazilian population on noise and its effects on health, quality of life and environment. In addition, the awareness of everyone for reducing noise from daily activities, which has been gaining visibility and supporters every year. However, according to literature, detailed, updated data unveiling the magnitude of the problem and its demand in the different regions are still missing. Studies of population profile in relation to noise are necessary and important, as such information may affect and foster greater appreciation of the theme by health and education managers, in a way that expands preventive and educational actions in the area.

Concepts of risk attitudes and behaviors are the theme of several discussions and a complex subject, as they comprise issues beyond Biology, depending on cultural, social, psychological factors and society values. Education has been demonstrated one of the effective ways to promote the change of risk behaviors, and for such, health communication theories claim that individuals must be exposed to information early in their childhood, on several occasions and by several ways(34) Regarding the comparisons by sex and age ranges (Tables 1, 2 and 3), the current study found greater exposure to risk habits, with noise exposure and hearing complaints (tinnitus) among the males and older adolescents, with more positive attitudes on the use of hearing protection among younger students (Table 1), and concerning the intention of using hearing protection devices, that was verified among females and younger students as well (Table 1).

Research with an American sample and another with a Swedish sample investigated differences among the youth on their noise-related attitudes and use of hearing protection at concerts(35), observing that such attitudes differed by sex and country, with American males featuring more positive attitudes in face of noise and Swedish females featuring more negative attitudes.

Contrastingly, a Brazilian study(26) did not observe significant differences, regarding sex, between the same analyzed variables (risk perception/ attitudes in face of noise and strategies of hearing protection/ use of hearing protection devices).

Such differences may evolve by innumerable issues, from biological ones (higher levels of testosterone and cortisol in males, for example) to environmental and sociocultural factors(6). Concerning the sociocultural scope(36) study concluded that family socialization tends to stimulate a superior performance among the girls, with positive significance in their studies and at school, tougher and earlier responsibility, based on the discipline, and differing constraints between the sex as well.

The data found in that study show the dimensions of the problem beyond the lack of knowledge in the area, and open perspectives and themes for reflections to be considered on the constructions and directions of further hearing health programs to children and adolescents.

As limitations of the study, we can consider scarce depth or detailing of some topics assessed in the questionnaires, once it is a cross-sectional study with convenience sampling. Furthermore, the instrument chosen can be considered a limitation. The original English version was proposed and validated by Griest et al.(12), and was translated and adapted into Brazilian Portuguese by Knobel and Lima(13), but the Brazilian version has not been validated, requiring a validation study.

CONCLUSION

The study verified that the greatest part of the children and adolescents in the assessed group evidence noise-related risk habits, reporting high percentage of hearing complaints (such as tinnitus), more evident among males, scarce knowledge on the theme or on the proper attitudes in face of the noise problem, poor intention of changing these risk behaviors, also prevalent among males and older age ranges.

  • Study conducted at Universidade Tuiuti do Paraná – UTP – Curitiba (PR), Brasil.
  • Financial support: nothing to declare.

REFERENCES

  • 1 WHO: World Health Organization‎. World report on hearing [Internet]‎. Geneva: WHO; ‎2021 [cited 2023 May 26]. Available from https://apps.who.int/iris/handle/10665/339913
    » https://apps.who.int/iris/handle/10665/339913
  • 2 Beach E, Willians W, Gilliver M. Estimating Young Australian adults´ risk of hearing damage from selected leisure activities. Ear Hear. 2013;34(1):75-82. http://doi.org/10.1097/AUD.0b013e318262ac6c PMid:22976343.
    » http://doi.org/10.1097/AUD.0b013e318262ac6c
  • 3 Twardella D, Perez-Alvarez C, Steffens T, Bolte G, Fromme H, Verdugo-Raab U. The prevalence of audiometric notches in adolescents in Germany: the Ohrkan-study. Noise Health. 2013;15(67):412-9. http://doi.org/10.4103/1463-1741.121241 PMid:24231420.
    » http://doi.org/10.4103/1463-1741.121241
  • 4 WHO: World Health Organization. Addressing the rising prevalence of hearing loss [Internet]‎. Geneva: WHO; 2018 [cited 2020 Nov 10]. Available from https://apps.who.int/iris/handle/10665/260336?locale=ru
    » https://apps.who.int/iris/handle/10665/260336?locale=ru
  • 5 Martin WH, Sobel JL, Griest SE SE, Howarth LC, Becker TM. Program sustainability: hearing loss and tinnitus prevention in American Indian Communities. Am J Prev Med. 2017;52(3, Suppl 3):S268-70. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.amepre.2016.10.031 PMid:28215378.
    » http://doi.org/10.1016/j.amepre.2016.10.031
  • 6 NIDCD. Quick Statistics About Hearing, Balance, & Dizziness [Internet]‎. 2017 [cited 2023 May 26]. Available from https://www.nidcd.nih.gov/health/statistics/quick-statistics-hearing
    » https://www.nidcd.nih.gov/health/statistics/quick-statistics-hearing
  • 7 Meinke DK, Martin WH. Development of health communications for promotion of safe listening: a review [Internet]‎. Geneva: WHO; 2017 [cited 2023 May 26]. Available from www.who.int/pbd/deafness/Monograph_on_Development_of_Health_Communications_for_Promotion_of_Safe_Listening.pdf
    » www.who.int/pbd/deafness/Monograph_on_Development_of_Health_Communications_for_Promotion_of_Safe_Listening.pdf
  • 8 Welch D, Reddy R, Hand J, Devine IM. Educating teenagers about hearing health by training them to educate children. Int J Audiol. 2016;55(9):499-506. http://doi.org/10.1080/14992027.2016.1178859 PMid:27196113.
    » http://doi.org/10.1080/14992027.2016.1178859
  • 9 Welch D, Fremaux G. Why do people like loud sound? A qualitative study. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2017;14(8):908. http://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph14080908 PMid:28800097.
    » http://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph14080908
  • 10 Shaw G. Noise-induced hearing loss: what your patients don’t know can hurt them. Hear J. 2017;70(5):26-8. http://doi.org/10.1097/01.HJ.0000516772.30916.b8
    » http://doi.org/10.1097/01.HJ.0000516772.30916.b8
  • 11 Unicef Brasil. Estatuto da Criança e do Adolescente [Internet]‎. 1990 [cited 2023 May 26]. Available from https://www.unicef.org/brazil/estatuto-da-crianca-e-do-adolescente
    » https://www.unicef.org/brazil/estatuto-da-crianca-e-do-adolescente
  • 12 Griest SE, Folmer RL, Martin WH. Effectiveness of “Dangerous Decibels®,” a school-based hearing loss prevention program. Am J Audiol. 2007;16(2):S165-81. http://doi.org/10.1044/1059-0889(2007/021) PMid:18056870.
    » http://doi.org/10.1044/1059-0889(2007/021)
  • 13 Knobel KA, Lima MC. Effectiveness of the Brazilian version of the Dangerous Decibels(®) educational program. Int J Audiol. 2014;53(Suppl 2):S35-42. http://doi.org/10.3109/14992027.2013.857794 PMid:24564691.
    » http://doi.org/10.3109/14992027.2013.857794
  • 14 WHO: World Health Organization. Hearing loss due to recreational exposure to loud sounds. A review [Internet]‎. Geneva: WHO; 2011 [cited 2019 May 2]. Available from http://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/10665/154589/1/9789241508513_eng.pdf?ua=1
    » http://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/10665/154589/1/9789241508513_eng.pdf?ua=1
  • 15 Niskar AS, Kieszak SM, Holmes AE, Esteban E, Rubin C, Brody DJ. Estimated prevalence of noise-induced hearing threshold shifts among children 6 to 19 years of age: the Third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, 1988-1994, United States. Pediatrics. 2001;108(1):40-3. http://doi.org/10.1542/peds.108.1.40 PMid:11433052.
    » http://doi.org/10.1542/peds.108.1.40
  • 16 Coelho CB, Sanchez TG, Tyler RS. Tinnitus in children and associated risk factors. Prog Brain Res. 2007;166:179-91. http://doi.org/10.1016/S0079-6123(07)66016-6 PMid:17956782.
    » http://doi.org/10.1016/S0079-6123(07)66016-6
  • 17 Martin WH, Griest SE, Sobel JL, Howarth LC. Randomized trial four noise-induced hearing loss and tinnitus prevention interventions for children. I J Audiol. 2013;52(Supp 1):S41-9. http://doi.org/10.3109/14992027.2012.743048.
  • 18 Kim MG, Hong SM, Shim HJ, Kim YD, Cha CI, Yeo SG. Hearing threshold of Korean adolescents associated with the use of personal music players. Yonsei Med J. 2009;50(6):771-6. http://doi.org/10.3349/ymj.2009.50.6.771 PMid:20046416.
    » http://doi.org/10.3349/ymj.2009.50.6.771
  • 19 Vogel I, Brug J, Van der Ploeg CP, Raat H. Adolescents risky MP3-player listening and its psychosocial correlates. Health Educ Res. 2011;26(2):254-64. http://doi.org/10.1093/her/cyq091 PMid:21321009.
    » http://doi.org/10.1093/her/cyq091
  • 20 Portnuff CD. Reducing the risk of music-induced hearing loss from overuse of portable listening devices: understanding the problems and establishing strategies for improving awareness in adolescents. Adolesc Health Med Ther. 2016;7:27-35. http://doi.org/10.2147/AHMT.S74103 PMid:26929674.
    » http://doi.org/10.2147/AHMT.S74103
  • 21 Nunes AD, Silva CR, Balen SA, Souza DLB, Barbosa IR. Prevalence of hearing impairment and associated factors in school-aged children and adolescents: a systematic review. Rev Bras Otorrinolaringol (Engl Ed). 2019;85(2):244-53. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.bjorl.2018.10.009 PMid:30555026.
    » http://doi.org/10.1016/j.bjorl.2018.10.009
  • 22 Nações Unidas no Brasil - ONUBR. Mais de 1 bilhão de adolescentes e jovens podem perder a audição, alerta OMS [Internet]‎. 2005 [cited 2015 Mar 2]. Available from http://nacoesunidas.org/mais-de-1-bilhao-de-adolescentes-e-jovens-podem-perder-a-audicao-por-exposicao-a-som-alto-alerta-oms/
    » http://nacoesunidas.org/mais-de-1-bilhao-de-adolescentes-e-jovens-podem-perder-a-audicao-por-exposicao-a-som-alto-alerta-oms/
  • 23 Degeest S, Keppler H, Vinck B. Leisure noise exposure and associated health-risk behavior in adolescents: an explanatory study among two different educational programs in flanders. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021;18(15):8033. http://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18158033 PMid:34360342.
    » http://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18158033
  • 24 Plontke SKR, Dietz K, Pfeffer C, Zenner HP. The incidence of acoustic trauma due to New Year’s firecrackers. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2002;259(5):247-52. http://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-002-0451-4 PMid:12107527.
    » http://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-002-0451-4
  • 25 WHO: World Health Organization. Toolkit for safe listening devices and systems [Internet]‎. Geneva: WHO, International Telecommunication Union; 2019 [cited 2023 May 26]. Available from https://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/handle/10665/280086/9789241515283-eng.pdf
    » https://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/handle/10665/280086/9789241515283-eng.pdf
  • 26 Knobel KAB, Lima MCMP. Knowledge, habits, preferences, and protective behavior in relation to loud sound exposures among Brazilian children. Int J Audiol. 2012;51(Suppl 1):S12-9. http://doi.org/10.3109/14992027.2011.637307 PMid:22264059.
    » http://doi.org/10.3109/14992027.2011.637307
  • 27 Erlandsson SI, Holmes AE, Widén S, Bohlin MC. Cultural and social perspectives on attitudes, noise, and risk behavior in children and young adults. Semin Hear. 2008;29(1):29-41. http://doi.org/10.1055/s-2007-1021770
    » http://doi.org/10.1055/s-2007-1021770
  • 28 Olsen-Widén SE, Erlandsson SI. Self-reported tinnitus and noise sensitivity among adolescents in Sweden. Noise Health. 2004;7(25):29-40. PMid:15703147.
  • 29 Brito P. Você precisa usar earplugs em festivais [Internet]‎. 2014 [cited 2020 Nov 10]. Available from https://festivalando.com.br/ear-plugs-voce-ainda-vai-precisar-deles-ou-ja-precisa/
    » https://festivalando.com.br/ear-plugs-voce-ainda-vai-precisar-deles-ou-ja-precisa/
  • 30 Folmer RL. Hearing-loss prevention practices should be taught in schools. Semin Hear. 2008;29(1):67-80. http://doi.org/10.1055/s-2007-1021774
    » http://doi.org/10.1055/s-2007-1021774
  • 31 Folmer RL. The importance of hearing conservation instruction. J Sch Nurs. 2003;19(3):140-8. http://doi.org/10.1177/10598405030190030401 PMid:12755678.
    » http://doi.org/10.1177/10598405030190030401
  • 32 Brasil. Decreto nº. 6.286, de 5 de dezembro de 2007. Dispõe sobre o Programa de Saúde na Escola e dá outras providências [Internet]‎. Diário Oficial da República Federativa do Brasil; Brasília; 5 dez. 2007 [cited 2020 Nov 10]. Available from http://www.planalto.gov.br/ccivil_03/_ato2007-2010/2007/decreto/d6286.htm
    » http://www.planalto.gov.br/ccivil_03/_ato2007-2010/2007/decreto/d6286.htm
  • 33 Kuniyoshi IC, D’Andrea Fonseca I, Paul S. Dia Internacional de Conscientização Sobre o Ruído – INAD BRASIL. In: Lacerda ABM, França DVRF. Práticas educativas em saúde auditiva: nos contextos educacional, ambiental e ocupacional. São Paulo: Atena Editora; 2021. p. 138-52. http://doi.org/10.22533/at.ed.52221131012
    » http://doi.org/10.22533/at.ed.52221131012
  • 34 Sobel J, Meikle M. Applying health behavior theory to hearing-conservation interventions. Semin Hear. 2008;29(1):81-9. http://doi.org/10.1055/s-2007-1021775
    » http://doi.org/10.1055/s-2007-1021775
  • 35 Widén SE, Holmes AE, Erlandsson SI. Reported hearing protection use in young adults from Sweden and the USA: effects of attitude and gender. Int J Audiol. 2006;45(5):273-80. http://doi.org/10.1080/14992020500485676 PMid:16717017.
    » http://doi.org/10.1080/14992020500485676
  • 36 Senkevics AS, Carvalho MP. Casa, rua, escola: gênero e escolarização em setores populares urbanos. Cad Pesqui. 2015;45(158):944-68. http://doi.org/10.1590/198053143364
    » http://doi.org/10.1590/198053143364

Publication Dates

  • Publication in this collection
    02 Aug 2024
  • Date of issue
    2024

History

  • Received
    26 July 2023
  • Accepted
    01 Dec 2023
location_on
Sociedade Brasileira de Fonoaudiologia Al. Jaú, 684, 7º andar, 01420-002 São Paulo - SP Brasil, Tel./Fax 55 11 - 3873-4211 - São Paulo - SP - Brazil
E-mail: revista@codas.org.br
rss_feed Acompanhe os números deste periódico no seu leitor de RSS
Acessibilidade / Reportar erro