ABSTRACT
Objective To learn about the scientific production on strategies adopted for hemodynamic maintenance of brain-dead patients.
Methods Integrative review with articles published between 2007 and 2019, in Scientific Electronic Library Online (SciELO), Latin American and Caribbean Health Sciences Literature (LILACS), PubMed® and ScienceDirect. The descriptors “ Hemodinâmica AND Morte Encefálica ” and “Hemodynamics AND Brain Death” were used. Exclusion criteria were non-human research and gray literature.
Results A total of 21 articles were listed. As strategies, the use of drugs – noradrenaline (n=8), vasopressin (n=7), dobutamine (n=6), hydrocortisone (n=4) and methylprednisolone (n=4); invasive (n=10) and noninvasive (n=13) cardiac monitoring; control of ventilatory parameters (n=12); and correction of fluid and electrolyte disturbances (n=17) were highlighted.
Conclusion The main strategies found in this integrative review were regulation of blood pressure and temperature, use of catecholamines and corticosteroids, in addition to the need for an early diagnosis of brain death. However, the lack of clearer protocols on the subject is notorious, making management with the potential donor difficult.
Brain death; Hemodynamics; Nursing care; Organ transplantation
RESUMO
Objetivo Conhecer a produção científica sobre estratégias adotadas para a manutenção hemodinâmica de pacientes com morte encefálica.
Métodos Revisão integrativa com artigos publicados entre 2007 e 2019, nas bases Scientific Electronic Library Online (SciELO), Literatura Latino-Americana e do Caribe em Ciências da Saúde (LILACS), PubMed®e ScienceDirect . Utilizaram-se os termos “Hemodinâmica AND Morte Encefálica” e “Hemodynamics AND Brain Death .” Os critérios de exclusão foram pesquisas não realizadas com seres humanos e literatura cinzenta.
Resultados Listaram-se 21 artigos. Como estratégias, destacaram-se uso de medicamentos – noradrenalina (n=8), vasopressina (n=7), dobutamina (n=6), hidrocortisona (n=4) e metilprednisolona (n=4); monitorização cardíaca invasiva (n=10) e não invasiva (n=13); controle dos parâmetros ventilatórios (n=12); e correção de distúrbios hidroeletrolíticos (n=17).
Conclusão As principais estratégias encontradas nesta revisão integrativa foram regulação da pressão arterial e temperatura, uso de catecolaminas e corticosteroides, além da necessidade de um diagnóstico precoce de morte encefálica. Entretanto, é notória a escassez de protocolos mais esclarecidos sobre a temática, dificultando o manejo com o potencial doador.
Morte encefálica; Hemodinâmica; Cuidados de enfermagem; Transplante de órgãos
INTRODUCTION
Organ transplantation is the most effective therapeutic alternative for many patients with end-stage diseases, and the waiting list for transplants has increased year after year. Ethical conflicts and family perception have been studied, noting a gradual increase in research related to this topic since 2010, demonstrating the need for a thoughtful analysis so that the organ donation process can be elucidated.( 1 )
Therefore, health education is reinforced as a relevant aspect for the dissemination of information on organ donation and brain death (BD), which highlights the importance of the participation of the multidisciplinary health team.( 2 ) But the lack of more comprehensive evidence on the subject denotes the need for clearer guidelines to provide uniform management of individuals requiring this care. Hence, it is important to consider the clinical and bioethical aspects.( 3 )
Brazil ranks second in number of transplants, behind the United States.( 4 )There was an increase of only 2.4% in effective donors in 2018, from 16.6 per million population (pmp), in 2017, to 17.0 pmp, in 2018. This rise was due to higher notification rate of potential donors by 2.2% of the donation attainment rate. The family refusal rate remained at 43%, lower in Paraná (27%) and higher in Mato Grosso (80%). In 2019, the number of effective donors was 18.1 pmp, with 40% of family refusal.( 4 )
In spite of this, the lack of Brazilian research on the subject is notorious. The systematized and detailed production and publication of information would contribute to the occurrence of transplants, and would help in the process of diagnosing BD, in the protection of potential donors, and with subsidies in education for professionals and family members.( 5 )
BD is characterized by the complete and irreversible loss of brain functions, defined by the cessation of cortical and brainstem activities.( 6 , 7 )In its protocol, the Conselho Federal de Medicina (CFM), established by Resolution 2,173 of 2017, provides that to undergo diagnostic procedures to determine BD, the patient must present all of the following requirements: presence of brain damage of known and irreversible cause; absence of treatable factors that would hinder the diagnosis; treatment and observation at hospital for a minimum of 6 hours; body temperature above 35oC, and arterial saturation according to criteria established by the Resolution.( 6 )
Brain death and organ and tissue transplantation are linked, since with BD patients can become potential multiple organ donors, which depends on their general condition.( 8 ) Thus, ensuring the functional maintenance of organ systems in the period between diagnosis and family interview is the main objective of the health team, to prevent organ impairment and making donation impossible.
The Intra-Hospital Organ and Tissue Donation for Transplant Committee (CIHDOTT) and the Organ Procurement Organization (ORO) are responsible for communicating the death to the State Transplant Center and for supporting the intensive care professionals in maintaining the potential donors.( 1 ) Thus, the importance of interdisciplinarity and teamwork is emphasized, so that the process is effective in the managing the pathophysiological repercussions of BD, hemodynamic monitoring, and provision of individualized care.
Having determined the importance of hemodynamic control in the maintenance of the potential organ donor in the occurrence of BD, the following question is posed: What are the strategies frequently adopted for hemodynamic maintenance in BD patients?
OBJECTIVE
To learn about the scientific production on strategies adopted for the hemodynamic maintenance of potential brain-dead donors.
METHODS
This is an integrative review, developed according to the following steps: identification of the theme and preparation of the research question; establishment of inclusion and exclusion criteria; search and categorization of studies; evaluation of included articles; interpretation of results; synthesis of knowledge; and presentation of the review.( 9 )
The search was conducted from November 2018 to February 2019, driven by the question: What are the strategies often adopted for hemodynamic maintenance in BD patients? The electronic databases chosen for searching articles were the Latin American and Caribbean Health Sciences Literature (LILACS), PubMed®, Scientific Electronic Library Online (SciELO), and ScienceDirect. The descriptors used were “ Hemodinâmica AND Morte Encefálica , from the Health Sciences Descriptors (DeCS), and “Hemodynamics AND Brain Death,” from the Medical Subject Headings (MeSH).
Articles made available by universities or free of charge, and in full text were included; in Portuguese, English, or Spanish, and published between 2007 and 2019. Studies that were not conducted with humans, were not scientific articles, and were repeated in the databases were excluded. The selection flow is described in figure 1 .
For analysis of the articles, we used our own instrument that extracted information related to authors, journal, year of publication, Impact Factor, objective, and conclusion. This information was presented on a summary table.
In a complementary way, a checklist was drawn up, organized in dichotomous answers (yes and no), based on the hemodynamic maintenance form made available to the CIHDOTT of Paraná, which includes some care procedures with BD patients: absence of sedation, prevention of hypothermia, correction of fluid and electrolyte disturbances, start/maintenance of enteral diet, eye protection, noninvasive or invasive cardiac monitoring, glycemic control, transesophageal echocardiography, control of ventilatory parameters, control of central venous pressure, control of level of consciousness, and protective mechanical ventilation. Furthermore, all items indicated by the articles as hemodynamic maintenance actions for the potential donor were included in the collection, even if not taken into consideration by the instrument initially prepared, such as medications and their respective dose indication.
The articles were listed in order of selection and, for the indicated care, the analysis of frequency and percentage was performed.
RESULTS
A summary of the 21 articles that make up this study, plus their country of origin and the journal’s Impact Factor, is presented on table 1 . Of the 21 articles listed, 95.2% (n=20) were published in foreign journals and only one in a Brazilian journal. Among the selected foreign articles, 23.8% (n=5) were from the United States; 14.2% (n=3) from France; and 9.5% (n=2) from Italy. Uruguay, Romania, Iran, United Kingdom, Turkey, South Korea, Belgium, Sweden, Lithuania, and the Netherlands totaled up 42.8%, with each country having one article.
The use of drugs as a strategy for hemodynamic maintenance was described in 71.4% (n=15) of articles selected for the integrative review. The main drugs presented are described in table 2 .
A table 3 shows the care for hemodynamic maintenance identified in the studies.
DISCUSSION
The identification of 21 studies on hemodynamic maintenance in BD underlines the relevance of this research. This is because prior Brazilian investigations with nurses regarding the care of BD patients demonstrated the limited understanding of the theme, focusing on the technical and bioethical dimensions of care, despite identifying its complexity and need for professional improvement and emotional maturity.( 8 , 9 , 18 )
Increasing the dissemination and access of professionals to information about the identification and clinical management of BD patients may contribute to increased number of donors and, in turn, organ donations in health services. Early diagnosis of BD and hemodynamic maintenance contribute to rise in the number of deceased donors.( 12 ) Thus, the need for continuing education of professionals is reinforced, since hemodynamic instability and dysfunction are the main exclusion factors for potential organ donors.( 13 , 26 )
When reporting the management of potential BD organ donors and the main interventions to maintain hemodynamic stability of these patients, the investigations highlighted the need for well-defined protocols and hemodynamic standards, to guide the team and support the care of BD patients. As an example, one study stated the interval between the BD declaration and organ harvesting had little influence on organ quality, by applying an early aggressive protocol in the management of these potential donors, i.e., the fast and effective implementation of actions for the maintenance of organic functions.( 15 )
Clinical protocols and guidelines contribute to define and clarify the appropriate care for potential organ donors, to know the real situation of the patient (living or dead); pass on safe information; avoid useless therapy (treating a corpse); reduce costs; improve intensive care beds, and offer the family the option of helping other people through organ and tissue donation.( 1 ) Given these facts, the need to implement measures for the maintenance of the potential organ donor is reaffirmed. These measures are employed during the BD verification process, and while waiting for the interview with the family to confirm donation.
Regarding the use of drugs as a form of hemodynamic maintenance, the listed articles mentioned absence of sedation, which corroborates the Manual for Reporting, Diagnosis of Brain Death, and Maintenance of the Potential Organ and Tissue Donor( 1 ), which stresses the importance of discontinuing sedative drugs in potential donors, since they act on the central nervous system, depressing and possibly changing the neurological examination assessment in diagnosis of BD.( 1 ) It is noteworthy that the first neurological examination should be performed after a minimum interval of four to five half-lives after drug discontinuation.( 6 ) Given the natural waiting period for death determination, family approach, and organ harvesting, the use of vasoactive drugs is indicated to hemodynamically stabilize the patient and increase organ transplantation rates.( 1 )
Several physiological and systemic disorders develop after BD. For example, central diabetes insipidus may occur in 80% of cases with hypothalamic-pituitary dysfunction and deficiency in the production of the antidiuretic hormone. The absence of this hormone may result in progressive clinical manifestations, such as hypoosmolar polyuria, secondary hypovolemia, hypernatremia, and serum hyperosmolarity.( 12 )In view of this, some studies( 10 , 28 )showed the use of vasopressin in increasing the rate of organ recovery, besides improving the quality of the organs. This is justified by its excellent vasoconstrictor and antidiuretic effect acting on vascular smooth muscle V1 receptors, V2 receptors, present in the renal collecting system and that increase fluid reabsorption due to increased serum osmolarity, and V3 receptors, which regulate corticotrophin levels.( 10 )In addition, early vasopressin administration optimizes hemodynamic support to BD patients.( 28 )
The importance of managing endocrine-metabolic disorders should be emphasized, since they are directly related to hemodynamic stability of the potential donor, and their complications can lead to severe disorders and ineffective organ donation.( 12 ) Therefore, hypernatremia, characterized by high sodium concentrations (>145mEq/L) in the body, is associated as a risk factor for organ donation, since it presents inefficient results after transplantation, despite conflicting evidence. Therefore, a study proposing the in vitro analysis of pancreatic islets from donors who had hypernatremia, concluded there is functional impairment of the organ when transplanted to the recipient.( 31 )
Another study showed hypernatremia prior to liver transplantation is related to a significant post-transplantation mortality rate.( 32 )On the other hand, a study conducted with pediatric donors shows that there are no negative results when related to hypernatremia immediately prior to organ harvesting.( 33 ) Yet, another investigation associated increased catecholamine infusion with a favorable 4-year survival rate in patients who received kidney transplants;( 14 ) among the catecholamines found in this investigation, noradrenaline and dopamine stood out.
According to the Manual for Notification, Diagnosis of Brain Death and Maintenance of Potential Organ and Tissue Donor,( 1 ) if the patient presents hypotension, norepinephrine is the first choice of vasoactive drug to reach adequate blood pressure levels, where the ideal is to maintain mean arterial pressure >65mmHg or systolic >90mmHg.( 34 ) The noradrenaline dose recommended by the manual is 0.05 to 2mcg/kg/minute1 ; in the articles searched, it ranged from 0.4μg/kg/minute to 0.10μg/kg/minute, demonstrating the need for a higher dose than that indicated to maintain stability in the patients studied. Revision of the manual may be required.
The articles point to the beneficial effects of norepinephrine and attest to the significant effect on hemodynamic stability of potential BD donors,( 1 ) and on reducing organ rejection rates.( 14 ) In addition, the infusion of catecholamines, such as norepinephrine, can be adjusted, with the purpose of maintaining mean arterial pressure above 65mmHg, and making organs viable for donation.( 30 , 35 ) However, in cases of mixed neurogenic and hypovolemic shock, dopamine infusion up to 10µg/kg/minute is indicated, avoiding dobutamine with increased oxygen consumption and noradrenaline, because it causes vasoconstriction,( 36 ) thus requiring a detailed evaluation by the healthcare professional to identify the basic causes and determine the assertive management.
The administration of corticosteroids, such as hydrocortisone, also enhances hemodynamic stability and can reduce the accumulated volume in cases of BD with circulatory failure, since it acts as an adrenergic blocker in patients with some adrenal deficiency.( 19 , 21 ) Methylprednisolone is recommended for its anti-inflammatory action in liver grafts, associated with reduction in post-transplant liver inflammation.( 12 ) A comparative study between high dose (methylprednisolone) and low dose (hydrocortisone) corticosteroids identified the use of low doses corticosteroids did not result in worsening of the lung or heart condition, with transplanted organs compared to the traditional use of methylprednisolone.( 11 )
The use of corticosteroids is based on common findings, and their combination with vasoactive drugs has resulted in significant improvement in organ procurement.( 11 , 34 )A multicenter prospective controlled study showed that the administration of low-dose steroids provides weaning from vasopressors, and also reduces the amount of vasopressors needed to control circulatory failure by more than 20%, allowing a significant reduction in the need for inotropic support,( 21 ) which reinforces the use of the drug as an ally to hemodynamic management in BD.
Regarding the care and control essential to maintain the potential donor, a protocol of guidelines for care considers some actions as essential, such as body temperature limits, blood pressure limits, and control of biochemical markers. According to the protocol, BD paralyzes hypothalamic thermoregulatory functions, leading to progressive hypothermia, which demonstrates the importance of body temperature regulation, since it provides thermal homeostasis. It is recommended to maintain body temperature above 35oC (ideally between 36Co and 37.5Co) with use of thermal blankets, mechanical ventilation, and warmed intravenous fluid infusion.( 12 )
The main challenge in the management of potential donors is hemodynamic instability, which points to the need for comprehensive knowledge about the organic processes involving BD, and the procedures indicated to mitigate such changes. This is due to the fact that many patients have prolonged hypoperfusion, i.e., after BD there is adrenergic hyperactivity, leading to tachycardia, increased systemic vascular resistance, increased myocardial oxygen consumption, and systolic reflex of hypertension.( 12 )
The first event, prolonged hypoperfusion, classified by the author as “sympathetic storm,” lasts from 20 to 30 minutes, and is followed by hypotension. Subsequently, the second phase, characterized as “adrenergic storm,” produces hypertension, causing hypoperfusion due to transient vasoconstriction.( 12 ) Noninvasive hemodynamic monitoring to measure cardiac output and tissue perfusion allows the identification of these phases,( 27 ) and thus, early intervention, aiming at organ preservation.
There are significant differences between invasive and noninvasive monitoring, especially when exacerbated vasoconstriction occurs. In this case, invasive measures for blood pressure maintenance are recommended, since they are safer and easier for collecting samples, through an arterial blood gas test, as well as blood pressure determination.( 12 )Moreover, due to hemodynamic instability and possible complications, ECMO may be used as a strategy to prevent cardiac arrest and preserve organs.( 16 )
Some procedures rarely mentioned, such as the start or maintenance of an enteral diet and eye protection with moist gauze, may be justified by the fact that most articles addressed drug issues and other specific care for hemodynamic stability. However, the manual recommends maintaining the diet to supply 15% to 30% of daily needs, but discontinuing its infusion if there are increased doses of vasoactive drugs and signs of tissue hypoperfusion.( 1 ) This is a crucial care for maintenance of tissue nutrition.
Although the search was limited to articles with free access in the databases and through the listed descriptors, it was observed that ensuring hemodynamic maintenance in BD is essential for the viability of the transplant. To this end, it is necessary that the team of healthcare professionals who participate in this process be aware of the clinical conditions, and all aspects that involve care and management in BD. Therefore, complying with and always updating the protocols based on findings of the literature are of utmost importance for better outcomes on this topic.
CONCLUSION
The main strategies for hemodynamic maintenance of the potential organ donor are based on the control of cardiovascular and respiratory parameters, as well as drug interventions.
REFERENCES
-
1 Paraná. Secretaria de Estado da Saúde do Paraná (SESA). Sistema Estadual de Transplantes. Manual para notificação, diagnóstico de morte encefálica e manutenção do potencial doador de órgãos e tecido. 2a ed. Curitiba: SESA; 2016. 52 p. [citado 2020 Abr 4]. Disponível em: http://www.ebserh.gov.br/documents/1948338/2446271/Manual+de+notifica%C3%A7%C3%A3o+e+diagn%C3%B3stico+de+ME+e+manuten%C3%A7%C3%A3o+do+potencial+doador+-+2016.pdf.pdf/bf1fd53c-3ebd-4b39-b706-37fdb9cef571
» http://www.ebserh.gov.br/documents/1948338/2446271/Manual+de+notifica%C3%A7%C3%A3o+e+diagn%C3%B3stico+de+ME+e+manuten%C3%A7%C3%A3o+do+potencial+doador+-+2016.pdf.pdf/bf1fd53c-3ebd-4b39-b706-37fdb9cef571 - 2 Santos TD, Souza SS, Oliveira E, Paula A, Migliorini O, Dill P. Capacitação e educação em saúde abordando doação de órgãos. Braz J Surg Clin Res. 2016;15(4):212-3.
- 3 Westphal GA, Garcia VD, Souza RL, Franke CA, Vieira KD, Birckholz VR, Machado MC, Almeida ER, Machado FO, Sardinha LA, Wanzuita R, Silvado CE, Costa G, Braatz V, Caldeira Filho M, Furtado R, Tannous LA, Albuquerque AG, Abdala E; Associação de Medicina Intensiva Brasileira; Associação Brasileira de Transplante de Órgãos. Guidelines for the assessment and acceptance of potential brain-dead organ donors. Rev Bras Ter Intensiva. 2016;28(3):220-55.
-
4 Associação Brasileira de Transplante de Órgãos (ABTO). Registro Brasileiro de Transplantes (RBT). Dados numéricos da doação de órgãos e transplantes realizados por estado e instituição no período: janeiro/setembro de 2019. Ano XXV nº 3. São Paulo: ABTO; 2019 [citado 2020 Abr 4]. Disponível em: http://www.abto.org.br/abtov03/Upload/file/RBT/2019/RBT-2019-jan-set-leitura.pdf
» http://www.abto.org.br/abtov03/Upload/file/RBT/2019/RBT-2019-jan-set-leitura.pdf - 5 Tessmer MG, Mielke GI, Barcellos FC, Moraes BP, Gatto CS. Doação de orgãos: opinião e entendimento sobre morte encefálica de estudantes universitários. JBT J Bras Transpl. 2011;14(1):1466-71.
-
6 Conselho Federal de Medicina (CFM). Resolução CFM nº 2.173, de 23 de novembro de 2017. Define o conceito de morte encefálica. Brasília (DF): Diário Oficial da União; 2017 Nov 23; Seção 1: 50-275 [citado 2020 Abr 7]. Disponível em: https://saude.rs.gov.br/upload/arquivos/carga20171205/19140504-resolucao-do-conselho-federal-de-medicina-2173-2017.pdf
» https://saude.rs.gov.br/upload/arquivos/carga20171205/19140504-resolucao-do-conselho-federal-de-medicina-2173-2017.pdf - 7 Westphal GA, Veiga VC, Franke CA. Determinação de morte encefálica no Brasil. Rev Bras Ter Intensiva. 2019;31(3):403-9.
- 8 Freire IL, Mendonça AE, Pontes VO, Vasconcelos QL, Torres GV. Morte encefálica e cuidados na manutenção do potencial doador de órgãos e tecidos para transplante. Rev Eletrônica Enferm. 2012;14(4):903-12.
- 9 Mendes KD, Silveira RC, Galvão CM. Revisão integrativa: método de pesquisa para a incorporação de evidências na saúde e na enfermagem. Texto Contexto Enferm. 2008;17(4):758-64.
- 10 Plurad DS, Bricker S, Neville A, Bongard F, Putnam B. Arginine vasopressin significantly increases the rate of successful organ procurement in potential donors. Am J Surg. 2012;204(6):856-61; discussion 860-1.
- 11 Dhar R, Cotton C, Coleman J, Brockmeier D, Kappel D, Marklin G, et al. Comparison of high- and low-dose corticosteroid regimens for organ donor management. J Crit Care. 2013;28(1):111.e1-7.
- 12 Westphal GA, Caldeira Filho M, Fiorelli A, Vieira KD, Zaclikevis V, Bartz M, Wanzuita R, Teixeira C, Franke C, Machado FO, Friedman G, Andrade J, Matos JD, Lamgaro DM, Silva E, Costa G, Coelho ME, Oliveira MC, Youssef NC, Akamine N, Duarte P, Lisboa R, Mazzali M, Ferraz Neto BH; Task Force of the Brazilian Association of Intensive Medicine, Brazilian Association of Organs Transplantation, Transplantation Center of Santa Catarina. Guidelines for maintenance of adult patients with brain death and potential for multiple organ donations: the task force of the Brazilian Association of Intensive Medicine the Brazilian Association of Organs Transplantation, and the Transplantation Center of Santa Catarina. Transplant Proc. 2012;44(8):2260-7. Review.
- 13 Godino M, Lander M, Cacciotore A, Perez-Protto S, Mizraji R. Ventricular dysfunction associated with brain trauma is cause for exclusion of young heart donors. Transplant Proc. 2010;42(5):1507-9.
- 14 Birtan D, Arslantas MK, Altun GT, Dincer PC, Gecegormez S, Demirel A, et al. Effect of vasoactive therapy used for brain-dead donors on graft survival after kidney transplantation. Transplant Proc. 2018;50(5):1289-91.
- 15 Grigoras I, Blaj M, Chelarescu O, Craus C, Florin G. Functional improvement between brain death declaration and organ harvesting. Transplant Proc. 2010;42(1):147-9.
- 16 Isnardi DI, Olivero F, Lerda R, Guermani A, Cornara G. Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation as a bridge to organ donation: a case report. Transplant Proc. 2013;45(7):2619-20.
- 17 Jeong JC, Kim MG, Ro H, Kim YJ, Park HC, Kwon HY, et al. Outcomes of management for potential deceased donors. Transplant Proc. 2012;44(4):843-7.
- 18 Cavalcante LP, Ramos IC, Araújo MA, Alves MD, Braga VA. Cuidados de enfermagem ao paciente em morte encefálica e potencial doador de órgãos. Acta Paul Enferm. 2014;27(6):567-72.
- 19 Nicolas-Robin A, Barouk JD, Amour J, Coriat P, Riou B, Langeron O. Hydrocortisone supplementation enhances hemodynamic stability in brain-dead patients. Anesthesiology. 2010;112(5):1204-10.
- 20 Mojtabaee M, Sadegh Beigee F, Ghorbani F. Deceased organ donation from pediatric donors: does the literature really help us? Implication for more powerful guidelines. Transplant Proc. 2017;49(8):1708-11.
- 21 Pinsard M, Ragot S, Mertes PM, Bleichner JP, Zitouni S, Cook F, et al. Interest of low-dose hydrocortisone therapy during brain-dead organ donor resuscitation: the CORTICOME study. Crit Care. 2014;18(4):R158.
- 22 Kawati R, Larsson A. Brain death due to fat embolism - could moderate hypercapnia and prone position be blamed for the tonsillar herniation? Ups J Med Sci. 2013;118(4):276-8.
- 23 Venkateswaran RV, Dronavalli V, Lambert PA, Steeds RP, Wilson IC, Thompson RD, et al. The proinflammatory environment in potential heart and lung donors: prevalence and impact of donor management and hormonal therapy. Transplantation. 2009;88(4):582-8.
- 24 Tamosuitis T, Pranskunas A, Balciuniere N, Pilvinis V, Boerma C. Conjunctival microcirculatory blood flow is altered but not abolished in brain dead patients: a prospective observational study. BMC Neurol. 2016;16:95.
- 25 Vorlat A, Conraads VM, Jorens PG, Aerts S, Van Gorp S, Vermeulen T, et al. Donor B-type natriuretic peptide predicts early cardiac performance after heart transplantation. J Heart Lung Transpl. 2012;31(6):579-84.
- 26 Fugate JE, Rabinstein AA, Wijdicks EF. Blood pressure patterns after brain death. Neurology. 2011;77(4):399-401.
- 27 Belzberg H, Shoemaker WC, Wo CC, Nicolls TP, Dang AB, Zelman V, et al. Hemodynamic and oxygen transport patterns after head trauma and brain death: implications for management of the organ donor. J Trauma. 2007;63(5):1032-42.
- 28 Nakawaga K, Tang JF. Physiologic response of human brain death and the use of vasopressin for successful organ transplantation. J Clin Anesth. 2011;23(2):145-8.
- 29 Giani M, Scaravilli V, Colombo SM, Confalonieri A, Leo R, Maggioni E, et al. Apnea test during brain death assessment in mechanically ventilated and ECMO patients. Intensive Care Med. 2016;42(1):72-81.
- 30 Robert R, Guilhot J, Pinsard H, Longeard PL, Jacob JP, Gissot V, et al. A pair analysis of the delayed graft function in kidney recipient: the critical role of the donor. J Critical Care. 2010;25(4):582-90.
- 31 Qi M, Luis V, Bilbao S, Omori K, Rawson J, McFadden B, et al. Sodium levels of human pancreatic donors are a critical factor for determination of islet efficacy and survival. Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab. 2015;308(5):E362-9.
- 32 Leise MD, Yuh BC, Larson JJ, Benson JT, Yang JD, Therneau TM, et al. Effect of the pretransplant serum sodium concentration on outcomes following liver transplatation. Liver Transpl. 2014;20(6):687-97.
- 33 Kaseje N, McLin V, Toso C, Poncet A, Wildhaber BE. Donor hypernatremia before procurement and early outcomes following pediatric liver transplantation. Liver Transpl. 2015;21(8):1076-81.
-
34 Rio Grande do Sul. Central Estadual de Transplantes (CET). Caruso R, Franke C, cordenadores. Morte encefálica: da identificação à manutenção do potencial doador de órgãos. Versão 5.1. Rio Grande do Sul (CET); 2017 [citado 2020 Abr 4]. Disponível em: https://saude.rs.gov.br/upload/arquivos/carga20180422/24132259-manual-sobre-morte-encefalica.pdf
» https://saude.rs.gov.br/upload/arquivos/carga20180422/24132259-manual-sobre-morte-encefalica.pdf - 35 Westphal GA, Caldeira Filho M, Vieira KD, Zaclikevis VR, Bartz MC, Wanzuita R, et al. Guidelines for potential multiple organ donors (adult): part I. Overview and hemodynamic support. Rev Bras Ter Intensiva. 2011;23(3):255-68.
- 36 Mello SL, Silva RM, Costa Filho LR. Cuidados com o paciente em morte encefálica ou suspeita de morte encefálica. Saúde Direta. 2008;22:309-20.
Publication Dates
-
Publication in this collection
25 June 2021 -
Date of issue
2021
History
-
Received
21 Feb 2020 -
Accepted
26 Oct 2020