Acessibilidade / Reportar erro

Brazilian growth charts for Williams–Beuren Syndrome at ages 2 to 18 years

Abstract

Objective:

To develop growth charts for weight-for-age, height-for-age, and body mass index (BMI)-for-age for both genders aged 2 to 18 years for Brazilian patients with Williams-Beuren Syndrome (WBS).

Methods:

This is a multicenter, retrospective, and longitudinal study, data were collected from the medical records of boys and girls with a confirmed diagnosis of WBS in three large university centers in the state of Sao Paulo, Brazil. Growth charts stratified by gender and age in years were developed using LMSchartmaker Pro software. The LMS (Lambda Mu Sigma) method was used to model the charts. The quality of the settings was checked by worm plots.

Results:

The first Brazilian growth charts for weight-for-age, height-for-age, and BMI-for-age stratified by gender were constructed for WBS patients aged 2 to 18 years.

Conclusion:

The growth charts developed in this study can help to guide family members and to improve the health care offered by health professionals.

KEYWORDS
Williams syndrome; Growth charts; Body weight; Body height; Body mass index

Introduction

Williams-Beuren syndrome (WBS) (OMIM#194050)11 Online Mendelian Inheritance in Man (OMIM). [Cited 2023 Mar 19]. Available from: http://omim.org.
http://omim.org...
is a rare genetic disorder with an incidence of around 1:7,500 to 1:10,000 live births.22 Pober BR. Williams-Beuren syndrome. N Engl J Med. 2010;362:239–52. Erratum in: N Engl J Med. 2010;362:2142.,33 Morris CA, Braddock SR. Council on Genetics. Health care supervision for children with Williams syndrome. Pediatrics. 2020;145:e20193761. It was first described in 1961 by the New Zealand study led by Williams et al.,44 Williams JC, Barratt-Boyes BG, Lowe JB. Supravalvular aortic stenosis. Circulation. 1961;24:1311–8. and in 1962, in Germany, Beuren et al.55 Beuren AJ, Apitz J, Harmjanz D. Supravalvular aortic stenosis in association with mental retardation and a certain facial appearance. Circulation. 1962;26:1235–40. independently described the same syndrome. The most frequent clinical features in WBS are typical facies;22 Pober BR. Williams-Beuren syndrome. N Engl J Med. 2010;362:239–52. Erratum in: N Engl J Med. 2010;362:2142.,33 Morris CA, Braddock SR. Council on Genetics. Health care supervision for children with Williams syndrome. Pediatrics. 2020;145:e20193761. heart disease (supravalvular aortic stenosis is the most frequent);22 Pober BR. Williams-Beuren syndrome. N Engl J Med. 2010;362:239–52. Erratum in: N Engl J Med. 2010;362:2142.,33 Morris CA, Braddock SR. Council on Genetics. Health care supervision for children with Williams syndrome. Pediatrics. 2020;145:e20193761. short stature;66 Stanley TL, Leong A, Pober BR. Growth, body composition, and endocrine issues in Williams syndrome. Curr Opin Endocrinol Diabetes Obes. 2021;28:64–74.,77 Partsch CJ, Dreyer G, Gosch A, Winter M, Schneppenheim R, Wessel A, et al. Longitudinal evaluation of growth, puberty, and bone maturation in children with Williams syndrome. J Pediatr. 1999;134:82–9. endocrine disorders (idiopathic hypercalcemia,22 Pober BR. Williams-Beuren syndrome. N Engl J Med. 2010;362:239–52. Erratum in: N Engl J Med. 2010;362:2142.,66 Stanley TL, Leong A, Pober BR. Growth, body composition, and endocrine issues in Williams syndrome. Curr Opin Endocrinol Diabetes Obes. 2021;28:64–74. subclinical hypothyroidism22 Pober BR. Williams-Beuren syndrome. N Engl J Med. 2010;362:239–52. Erratum in: N Engl J Med. 2010;362:2142.,66 Stanley TL, Leong A, Pober BR. Growth, body composition, and endocrine issues in Williams syndrome. Curr Opin Endocrinol Diabetes Obes. 2021;28:64–74. and early puberty,22 Pober BR. Williams-Beuren syndrome. N Engl J Med. 2010;362:239–52. Erratum in: N Engl J Med. 2010;362:2142.,77 Partsch CJ, Dreyer G, Gosch A, Winter M, Schneppenheim R, Wessel A, et al. Longitudinal evaluation of growth, puberty, and bone maturation in children with Williams syndrome. J Pediatr. 1999;134:82–9. but not precocious, are the most frequent); mental disability;22 Pober BR. Williams-Beuren syndrome. N Engl J Med. 2010;362:239–52. Erratum in: N Engl J Med. 2010;362:2142.,33 Morris CA, Braddock SR. Council on Genetics. Health care supervision for children with Williams syndrome. Pediatrics. 2020;145:e20193761. and a highly sociable behavior.22 Pober BR. Williams-Beuren syndrome. N Engl J Med. 2010;362:239–52. Erratum in: N Engl J Med. 2010;362:2142. In 1993, a study by Ewart et al.88 Ewart AK, Morris CA, Atkinson D, Jin W, Sternes K, Spallone P, et al. Hemizygosity at the elastin locus in a developmental disorder, Williams syndrome. Nat Genet. 1993;5:11–6. identified that the genetic alterations that determine WBS are microdeletion of 1.5-1.8 million base pairs and the loss of one of the copies of 26 to 28 contiguous genes in the chromosomal region at 7q11.23.88 Ewart AK, Morris CA, Atkinson D, Jin W, Sternes K, Spallone P, et al. Hemizygosity at the elastin locus in a developmental disorder, Williams syndrome. Nat Genet. 1993;5:11–6. WBS can be inherited; however, it most often occurs de novo, with no predilection for gender or ethnicity.66 Stanley TL, Leong A, Pober BR. Growth, body composition, and endocrine issues in Williams syndrome. Curr Opin Endocrinol Diabetes Obes. 2021;28:64–74. In general, the diagnosis is late66 Stanley TL, Leong A, Pober BR. Growth, body composition, and endocrine issues in Williams syndrome. Curr Opin Endocrinol Diabetes Obes. 2021;28:64–74.,99 Yao D, Ji C, Chen W, Li M, Zhao ZY. Physical growth and development characteristics of children with Williams syndrome aged 0-24 months in Zhejiang Province. J Pediatr Endocrinol Metab. 2019;32:233–7. and the symptoms that usually trigger investigation are typical facies, heart disease, and hypercalcemia, although growth retardation is the earliest symptom.99 Yao D, Ji C, Chen W, Li M, Zhao ZY. Physical growth and development characteristics of children with Williams syndrome aged 0-24 months in Zhejiang Province. J Pediatr Endocrinol Metab. 2019;32:233–7. The tests currently used to confirm WBS are FISH (fluorescence in situ hybridization), MLPA (multiplex-ligating probe amplification), CMA (chromosomal microarray analysis), and microsatellite DNA markers.22 Pober BR. Williams-Beuren syndrome. N Engl J Med. 2010;362:239–52. Erratum in: N Engl J Med. 2010;362:2142.

Regarding growth, several studies have already shown that WBS patients have a typical growth profile that is different from the growth patterns used as reference66 Stanley TL, Leong A, Pober BR. Growth, body composition, and endocrine issues in Williams syndrome. Curr Opin Endocrinol Diabetes Obes. 2021;28:64–74.,1010 de Sousa Lima Strafacci A, Fernandes Camargo J, Bertapelli F, Guerra Júnior G. Growth assessment in children with Williams-Beuren syndrome: a systematic review. J Appl Genet. 2020;61:205–12. and it is characterized by intrauterine growth restriction,99 Yao D, Ji C, Chen W, Li M, Zhao ZY. Physical growth and development characteristics of children with Williams syndrome aged 0-24 months in Zhejiang Province. J Pediatr Endocrinol Metab. 2019;32:233–7.,1010 de Sousa Lima Strafacci A, Fernandes Camargo J, Bertapelli F, Guerra Júnior G. Growth assessment in children with Williams-Beuren syndrome: a systematic review. J Appl Genet. 2020;61:205–12., low weight, length, and head circumference (HC) at birth,66 Stanley TL, Leong A, Pober BR. Growth, body composition, and endocrine issues in Williams syndrome. Curr Opin Endocrinol Diabetes Obes. 2021;28:64–74.,99 Yao D, Ji C, Chen W, Li M, Zhao ZY. Physical growth and development characteristics of children with Williams syndrome aged 0-24 months in Zhejiang Province. J Pediatr Endocrinol Metab. 2019;32:233–7. followed by global growth retardation in height in childhood and adolescence, determining final height below the average of the reference population.77 Partsch CJ, Dreyer G, Gosch A, Winter M, Schneppenheim R, Wessel A, et al. Longitudinal evaluation of growth, puberty, and bone maturation in children with Williams syndrome. J Pediatr. 1999;134:82–9.,1010 de Sousa Lima Strafacci A, Fernandes Camargo J, Bertapelli F, Guerra Júnior G. Growth assessment in children with Williams-Beuren syndrome: a systematic review. J Appl Genet. 2020;61:205–12.,1111 Nogueira RJ, Zimmerman LF, Moreno YM, Comparini CR, Viana DV, Vieira TA, et al. Anthropometric and body-mass composition suggests an intrinsic feature in Williams-Beuren syndrome. Rev Assoc Med Bras. 2011;57:681–5. (1992). In 1988, Morris et al.1212 Morris CA, Demsey SA, Leonard CO, Dilts C, Blackburn BL. Natural history of Williams syndrome: physical characteristics. J Pediatr. 1988;113:318–26. published one of the first studies that evaluated the growth of WBS patients with only a clinical diagnosis; later, in 2007, the Martin et al. study1313 Martin ND, Smith WR, Cole TJ, Preece MA. New height, weight ew head circumference charts for British children with Williams syndrome. Arch Dis Child. 2007;92:598–601. developed the British growth charts stratified by gender and age for WBS using the LMS (Lambda Mu Sigma) method and it was the first study to include only patients with molecular diagnostic confirmation.1313 Martin ND, Smith WR, Cole TJ, Preece MA. New height, weight ew head circumference charts for British children with Williams syndrome. Arch Dis Child. 2007;92:598–601. Martin et al.1313 Martin ND, Smith WR, Cole TJ, Preece MA. New height, weight ew head circumference charts for British children with Williams syndrome. Arch Dis Child. 2007;92:598–601. compared their study with the study by Morris et al.1212 Morris CA, Demsey SA, Leonard CO, Dilts C, Blackburn BL. Natural history of Williams syndrome: physical characteristics. J Pediatr. 1988;113:318–26. and observed that average final heights for adult men and women with WBS were similar in both studies and were on average 18 and 12 cm shorter than reference adult men and women.1212 Morris CA, Demsey SA, Leonard CO, Dilts C, Blackburn BL. Natural history of Williams syndrome: physical characteristics. J Pediatr. 1988;113:318–26.,1313 Martin ND, Smith WR, Cole TJ, Preece MA. New height, weight ew head circumference charts for British children with Williams syndrome. Arch Dis Child. 2007;92:598–601.

In pediatrics, growth correlates well with the health prognosis of children and, therefore, it is widely used as a health surveillance tool.99 Yao D, Ji C, Chen W, Li M, Zhao ZY. Physical growth and development characteristics of children with Williams syndrome aged 0-24 months in Zhejiang Province. J Pediatr Endocrinol Metab. 2019;32:233–7.,1414 WHO Working Group. Use and interpretation of anthropometric indicators of nutritional status. WHO Working Group. Bull World Health Organ. 1986;64:929–41. Growth charts using weight, height, head circumference, and body mass index (BMI) are the most commonly used instruments for this purpose because they are easy to use, low cost, and highly accurate.1414 WHO Working Group. Use and interpretation of anthropometric indicators of nutritional status. WHO Working Group. Bull World Health Organ. 1986;64:929–41. However, these charts were constructed using growth data from reference populations not carrying specific genetic syndromes or clinical conditions.1414 WHO Working Group. Use and interpretation of anthropometric indicators of nutritional status. WHO Working Group. Bull World Health Organ. 1986;64:929–41.,1515 WHO Multicentre Growth Reference Study Group. WHO Child Growth Standards based on length/height, weight and age. Acta Paediatr Suppl. 2006;450:76–85. In many situations, patients do not have the same growth profile as the reference population and often have their growth underestimated as is the case with WBS.1010 de Sousa Lima Strafacci A, Fernandes Camargo J, Bertapelli F, Guerra Júnior G. Growth assessment in children with Williams-Beuren syndrome: a systematic review. J Appl Genet. 2020;61:205–12.,1616 Bertapelli F, Barros-Filho Ade A, Antonio MÂ, Barbeta CJ, de Lemos-Marini SH, Guerra-Junior G. Growth curves for girls with Turner syndrome. Biomed Res Int. 2014;2014:687978.,1717 Bertapelli F, Agiovlasitis S, Machado MR, do Val Roso R, Guerra-Junior G. Growth charts for Brazilian children with down syndrome: Birth to 20 years of age. J Epidemiol. 2017;27:265–73.,1818 Villar J, Giuliani F, Bhutta ZA, Bertino E, Ohuma EO, Ismail LC, et al. Postnatal growth standards for preterm infants: the preterm postnatal follow-up study of the INTERGROWTH-21(st) project. Lancet Glob Health. 2015;3:e681–91. Correct growth assessment allows for the early detection of deviations in the growth pattern, enabling the best intervention in reversible or non-reversible pathological conditions that may affect the overall development of children and adolescents.1515 WHO Multicentre Growth Reference Study Group. WHO Child Growth Standards based on length/height, weight and age. Acta Paediatr Suppl. 2006;450:76–85. CDC (Centers for Disease Control and Prevention) and WHO (World Health Organization) indicate there is a need for the development of specific growth charts to track populations with clinical conditions that deviate from the growth pattern currently used.1414 WHO Working Group. Use and interpretation of anthropometric indicators of nutritional status. WHO Working Group. Bull World Health Organ. 1986;64:929–41. The WHO growth charts,1515 WHO Multicentre Growth Reference Study Group. WHO Child Growth Standards based on length/height, weight and age. Acta Paediatr Suppl. 2006;450:76–85. currently taken as a reference, are not compatible with the expected growth targets for the WBS population. Thus, it is necessary to construct growth charts for WBS patients in order to improve the assistance to this population.33 Morris CA, Braddock SR. Council on Genetics. Health care supervision for children with Williams syndrome. Pediatrics. 2020;145:e20193761.,1010 de Sousa Lima Strafacci A, Fernandes Camargo J, Bertapelli F, Guerra Júnior G. Growth assessment in children with Williams-Beuren syndrome: a systematic review. J Appl Genet. 2020;61:205–12.,1313 Martin ND, Smith WR, Cole TJ, Preece MA. New height, weight ew head circumference charts for British children with Williams syndrome. Arch Dis Child. 2007;92:598–601. The aim of this study was to construct female and male charts of weight-for-age, height-for-age, and BMI-for-age for WBS patients in the age range of 2 to 18 years.

Casuistic and methods

The study was conducted according to the ethical principles of the Declaration of Helsinki and theolution no. 466/12 of the Brazilian National Health Council, and it was approved by the State University of Campinas (UNICAMP) Human Research Ethics Committee (CAAE: 42981421.0.0000.5404) and it was also authorized by the heads of each Service of each Institution.

Casuistic

This is a multicenter, retrospective, and longitudinal study. The data were collected by reviewing medical records from the Clinics Genetics Service of the Clinical Hospital of the School of Medical Sciences of the State University of Campinas (UNICAMP), Campinas, Sao Paulo, Brazil; from the Outpatient Clinic of the Genetics Unit of the Institute of Child Health of Clinical Hospital of the School of Medicine of the University of Sao Paulo (USP), Sao Paulo, Sao Paulo, Brazil; and from the Genetic Counseling Service of the Genetics Department of the Biosciences Institute of the State University of Sao Paulo (UNESP), Botucatu, Sao Paulo, Brazil.

All patients aged 0 to 20 years with a diagnosis of WBS with laboratory confirmation by at least one of the following methods were included: FISH and/or MLPA and/or CMA and/or microsatellite markers.

It was excluded: 1. data where it was not possible to retrieve the age at the time of evaluation; 2. duplicate data for having been seen at different institutions or at the same institution with a time difference of less than one month for the calculation of the measures from 0 to 23 months, and less than 12 months for the calculation of the measures from 2 to 20 years; 3. data between 0 and 2 years in which the individual had a history of prematurity or in which the history of prematurity could not be recovered; 4. data from individuals with untreated hypothyroidism, or whose treatment information was not available; 5. data from individuals with other hormonal disorders or treatments that could interfere with growth (precocious puberty, growth hormone use, chronic corticotherapy); 6. data from individuals with other non-hormonal disorders that could interfere with growth; 7. data from individuals with congenital heart disease and requiring treatment who were not treated, or whose treatment information was not available; 8. data from individuals who were recorded as having lost height with advancing age; 9. anthropometric data with more than five standard deviations (plus or minus) for age and gender.

Data collection

The data collected was: 1. gender (male or female); 2. date of birth and date of consultation, with subsequent calculation of age at consultation in years and months; 3. weight (kg); 4. height (cm); 5. head circumference (cm). BMI (kg/m22 Pober BR. Williams-Beuren syndrome. N Engl J Med. 2010;362:239–52. Erratum in: N Engl J Med. 2010;362:2142.) was calculated from the data collected on weight and height. A data collection form was prepared to include the serial data mentioned above and to fill in the other relevant data for the research: test or tetestsperformed to confirm WBS, history of prematurity, birth data, hypothyroidism, congenital heart disease, other diseases, and drugs of continuous use.

Statistical analysis

Growth charts stratified by gender and age in years were developed using LMSchartmaker Pro software. The LMS (Lambda Mu Sigma) method was used to model the charts.1919 Cole TJ, Green PJ. Smoothing reference centile curves: the LMS method and penalized likelihood. Stat Med. 1992;11:1305–19. The fitting quality was checked by worm plots.2020 Rigby RA, Stasinopoulos DM. Automatic smoothing parameter selection in GAMLSS with an application to centile estimation. Stat Methods Med Res. 2014;23:318–32. The 3rd, 10th, 25th, 50th, 75th, 90th, and 97th percentiles were generated to construct the weight-for-age, height-for-age, and BMI-for-age charts.

Results

From October 2021 to May 2022, 341 medical records were analyzed. Then, 302 patients were included, and 6,809 growth measurements were collected (weight: 3,465; height: 3,344). In the next step, exclusion criteria 1 to 8 were applied, with subsequent preliminary statistical analysis. At this stage, 3,660 growth measurements (weight: 1,876; height: 1,784) and 29 patients were excluded. 3,149 growth measurements (weight: 1,589; height: 1,560) and 273 patients remained for preliminary statistical analysis. After preliminary statistical analysis, data were removed by criterion 9 and the construction of growth charts for the age group 2 to 18 years was defined, since there was not enough data in the age groups from 0 to 23 months and from 19 to 20 years that would allow building accurate growth charts. Thus, birth data, data from 1 to 23 months, and data from 19 to 20 years were also excluded. At this stage, 788 growth measurements (weight: 405 measurements; height: 383) and 28 patients were excluded (Supplement – Table 1).

Finally, 2,361 anthropometric measurements (weight = 1,184 measurements; height = 1,177 measurements) and 245 patients born from 1981 to 2015 remained for the construction of the charts. Out of 245 participants, 112 were female (provided a minimum of 1 and a maximum of 16 measurements per participant) and 133 were male (provided a minimum of 1 and a maximum of 17 measurements per participant) (Supplement – Table 2).

In the evaluation of comorbidities, the most prevalent alterations were neuropsychiatric disorders in which all participants presented some cognitive alteration, followed by cardiovascular diseases (176/245; 71.8%), with congenital heart diseases being the most frequent (166/245; 67.7%), and among them the most frequent was supra valvular aortic stenosis either isolated or associated (72/245; 29.4%). Changes in the gastrointestinal tract were present in 48.2% of cases (118/245), with constipation (62/245; 25.3%) and gastroesophageal reflux (48/245; 19.6%) being the most frequent ones. Hypothyroidism and hypercalcemia were present in 10.6% (26/245) and 3.7% (9/245) of cases, respectively (Supplement – Tables 3 and 4).

Weight-for-age, height-for-age, and BMI-for-age growth charts for boys and girls aged 2 to 18 years were constructed according to the proposed statistical modeling. Weight-for-age and height-for-age growth charts for boys and girls are presented in Figs. 1,2,3,4 (BMI-for-age growth charts for boys and girls are presented in the supplement section – Figures 5 and 6). The quality of the settings was checked, and statistical diagnoses were performed with the Q-statistic and worm plots method, and they comply with the references (Q-statistic between + 2 and - 2 and linear worm plots), therefore free of bias (Supplement – Tables 5-10).

Figure 1
Weight chart for female WBS in the age group of 2 to 18 years.

Figure 2
Height chart for female WBS in the age group of 2 to 18 years.

Figure 3
Weight chart for male WBS in the age group of 2 to 18 years.

Figure 4
Height chart for male WBS in the age group of 2 to 18 years.

Discussion

This study constructed the first weight, height, and BMI charts stratified by gender and age from 2 to 18 years for the

Brazilian population with WBS. The participant selection process and the strict exclusion criteria contributed to constructing charts that represent a growth profile more suitable for the usual health profile of this population and it was compatible with current literature data.22 Pober BR. Williams-Beuren syndrome. N Engl J Med. 2010;362:239–52. Erratum in: N Engl J Med. 2010;362:2142.,33 Morris CA, Braddock SR. Council on Genetics. Health care supervision for children with Williams syndrome. Pediatrics. 2020;145:e20193761.,1010 de Sousa Lima Strafacci A, Fernandes Camargo J, Bertapelli F, Guerra Júnior G. Growth assessment in children with Williams-Beuren syndrome: a systematic review. J Appl Genet. 2020;61:205–12. The average final height for girls was 149 cm, 3 cm less than the average female final height published in the study by Martin et al.1313 Martin ND, Smith WR, Cole TJ, Preece MA. New height, weight ew head circumference charts for British children with Williams syndrome. Arch Dis Child. 2007;92:598–601. – which was 152 cm – and 14 cm less than the average WHO reference female population1515 WHO Multicentre Growth Reference Study Group. WHO Child Growth Standards based on length/height, weight and age. Acta Paediatr Suppl. 2006;450:76–85. – which was 163 cm. The average final height for boys was 159 cm, the same as the average male final height published in the study by Martin et al.1313 Martin ND, Smith WR, Cole TJ, Preece MA. New height, weight ew head circumference charts for British children with Williams syndrome. Arch Dis Child. 2007;92:598–601. and 17 cm less than the average WHO reference male population1515 WHO Multicentre Growth Reference Study Group. WHO Child Growth Standards based on length/height, weight and age. Acta Paediatr Suppl. 2006;450:76–85. – which was 176 cm.

The mechanisms that determine this growth pattern are still unclear. Many authors argue that it is related to the intrinsic changes of the microdeletion, the multisystemic changes secondary to it, and the pattern of pubertal development, which is typical of these patients.22 Pober BR. Williams-Beuren syndrome. N Engl J Med. 2010;362:239–52. Erratum in: N Engl J Med. 2010;362:2142.,66 Stanley TL, Leong A, Pober BR. Growth, body composition, and endocrine issues in Williams syndrome. Curr Opin Endocrinol Diabetes Obes. 2021;28:64–74.,1010 de Sousa Lima Strafacci A, Fernandes Camargo J, Bertapelli F, Guerra Júnior G. Growth assessment in children with Williams-Beuren syndrome: a systematic review. J Appl Genet. 2020;61:205–12. The highest proportion of loss of height occurs in early childhood, markedly up to the age of 4, when the growth rate is lower.77 Partsch CJ, Dreyer G, Gosch A, Winter M, Schneppenheim R, Wessel A, et al. Longitudinal evaluation of growth, puberty, and bone maturation in children with Williams syndrome. J Pediatr. 1999;134:82–9.,1111 Nogueira RJ, Zimmerman LF, Moreno YM, Comparini CR, Viana DV, Vieira TA, et al. Anthropometric and body-mass composition suggests an intrinsic feature in Williams-Beuren syndrome. Rev Assoc Med Bras. 2011;57:681–5. (1992).,2121 Pankau R, Partsch CJ, Gosch A, Oppermann HC, Wessel A. Statural growth in Williams-Beuren syndrome. Eur J Pediatr. 1992;151:751–5.

Gastrointestinal symptoms such as gastroesophageal reflux, recurrent cramps, constipation, and vomiting are the conditions most often related to difficulty in gaining weight in the first years of life, probably because they lead to insufficient caloric intake.77 Partsch CJ, Dreyer G, Gosch A, Winter M, Schneppenheim R, Wessel A, et al. Longitudinal evaluation of growth, puberty, and bone maturation in children with Williams syndrome. J Pediatr. 1999;134:82–9.,1111 Nogueira RJ, Zimmerman LF, Moreno YM, Comparini CR, Viana DV, Vieira TA, et al. Anthropometric and body-mass composition suggests an intrinsic feature in Williams-Beuren syndrome. Rev Assoc Med Bras. 2011;57:681–5. (1992).,2121 Pankau R, Partsch CJ, Gosch A, Oppermann HC, Wessel A. Statural growth in Williams-Beuren syndrome. Eur J Pediatr. 1992;151:751–5.

The assessment of the role of heart disease on growth has been limited in the studies and does not seem to be a determining factor in growth impairment.22 Pober BR. Williams-Beuren syndrome. N Engl J Med. 2010;362:239–52. Erratum in: N Engl J Med. 2010;362:2142.,1010 de Sousa Lima Strafacci A, Fernandes Camargo J, Bertapelli F, Guerra Júnior G. Growth assessment in children with Williams-Beuren syndrome: a systematic review. J Appl Genet. 2020;61:205–12.,2121 Pankau R, Partsch CJ, Gosch A, Oppermann HC, Wessel A. Statural growth in Williams-Beuren syndrome. Eur J Pediatr. 1992;151:751–5. In the study by Pankau et al.,2121 Pankau R, Partsch CJ, Gosch A, Oppermann HC, Wessel A. Statural growth in Williams-Beuren syndrome. Eur J Pediatr. 1992;151:751–5. no significant difference was observed in the growth of WBS individuals with and without heart disease, and there was no catch-up in the group of patients with treated heart disease.2121 Pankau R, Partsch CJ, Gosch A, Oppermann HC, Wessel A. Statural growth in Williams-Beuren syndrome. Eur J Pediatr. 1992;151:751–5.

Regarding endocrine changes, the typical pubertal development pattern characterized by early (but not precocious) puberty and a shortened pubertal growth spurt by an average of one year also contribute to the final height deficit.66 Stanley TL, Leong A, Pober BR. Growth, body composition, and endocrine issues in Williams syndrome. Curr Opin Endocrinol Diabetes Obes. 2021;28:64–74.,77 Partsch CJ, Dreyer G, Gosch A, Winter M, Schneppenheim R, Wessel A, et al. Longitudinal evaluation of growth, puberty, and bone maturation in children with Williams syndrome. J Pediatr. 1999;134:82–9. Thyroid dysfunctions, meanwhile, do not seem to play a significant role in growth impairment, subclinical hypothyroidism is the most prevalent form (15-30%) and it generally occurs in early childhood, in most cases presenting with TSH levels lower than 10 mIU/L and requiring no treatment.66 Stanley TL, Leong A, Pober BR. Growth, body composition, and endocrine issues in Williams syndrome. Curr Opin Endocrinol Diabetes Obes. 2021;28:64–74.

The present work has limitations in obtaining data from medical records, and therefore rigorous data processing was performed to minimize such effect. The sample was restricted to three large teaching, research, and care centers in the state of São Paulo, which, although comprising a substantial and diverse population, does not represent the total population of children and adolescents with WBS in Brazil. In the age group from 0 to 23 months, it is recommended to draw time-interval charts in months, the shortage of data possibly occurred due to the rarity of the disease and the late diagnosis that leads to specialized follow-ups starting after the infant period. In the case of data from 19 to 20 years old, the lack of data was possibly due to loss of follow-up caused by stabilization of the condition, reinforcing the need to expand this study in order to include these age groups.

However, this work presents the Brazilian growth charts for WBS patients aged 2 to 18 years. In Brazil, the authors still do not have official health protocols to guide health professionals in the assistance to WBS patients, thus, the developed charts are important tools and can contribute to improving the attention to this population,33 Morris CA, Braddock SR. Council on Genetics. Health care supervision for children with Williams syndrome. Pediatrics. 2020;145:e20193761.,66 Stanley TL, Leong A, Pober BR. Growth, body composition, and endocrine issues in Williams syndrome. Curr Opin Endocrinol Diabetes Obes. 2021;28:64–74. as it is done in other countries, and resulting in good outcomes.33 Morris CA, Braddock SR. Council on Genetics. Health care supervision for children with Williams syndrome. Pediatrics. 2020;145:e20193761. The use of growth charts for WBS patients promotes more assertive treatment by adjusting it to the expected growth targets for this population. By doing so, they can reduce unnecessary investigations, or the delay in investigating growth deviations, improving the health care and quality of life of these patients.33 Morris CA, Braddock SR. Council on Genetics. Health care supervision for children with Williams syndrome. Pediatrics. 2020;145:e20193761.

In conclusion, this study presents the first Brazilian growth charts from 2 to 18 years for WBS patients, and it is the first Brazilian reference of weight-for-age, height-forage, and BMI-for-age for WBS boys and girls from 2 to 18 years. It is expected that these charts can guide parents and improve the assistance provided by health professionals in the caretaking of children and adolescents with WBS.

  • Funding

    This research did not receive any specific funding from public, commercial, or not-for-profit sector funding agencies.
  • Supplementary materials

    Supplementary material associated with this article can be found in the online version at doi:10.1016/j. jped.2023.11.009.

References

  • 1
    Online Mendelian Inheritance in Man (OMIM). [Cited 2023 Mar 19]. Available from: http://omim.org
    » http://omim.org
  • 2
    Pober BR. Williams-Beuren syndrome. N Engl J Med. 2010;362:239–52. Erratum in: N Engl J Med. 2010;362:2142.
  • 3
    Morris CA, Braddock SR. Council on Genetics. Health care supervision for children with Williams syndrome. Pediatrics. 2020;145:e20193761.
  • 4
    Williams JC, Barratt-Boyes BG, Lowe JB. Supravalvular aortic stenosis. Circulation. 1961;24:1311–8.
  • 5
    Beuren AJ, Apitz J, Harmjanz D. Supravalvular aortic stenosis in association with mental retardation and a certain facial appearance. Circulation. 1962;26:1235–40.
  • 6
    Stanley TL, Leong A, Pober BR. Growth, body composition, and endocrine issues in Williams syndrome. Curr Opin Endocrinol Diabetes Obes. 2021;28:64–74.
  • 7
    Partsch CJ, Dreyer G, Gosch A, Winter M, Schneppenheim R, Wessel A, et al. Longitudinal evaluation of growth, puberty, and bone maturation in children with Williams syndrome. J Pediatr. 1999;134:82–9.
  • 8
    Ewart AK, Morris CA, Atkinson D, Jin W, Sternes K, Spallone P, et al. Hemizygosity at the elastin locus in a developmental disorder, Williams syndrome. Nat Genet. 1993;5:11–6.
  • 9
    Yao D, Ji C, Chen W, Li M, Zhao ZY. Physical growth and development characteristics of children with Williams syndrome aged 0-24 months in Zhejiang Province. J Pediatr Endocrinol Metab. 2019;32:233–7.
  • 10
    de Sousa Lima Strafacci A, Fernandes Camargo J, Bertapelli F, Guerra Júnior G. Growth assessment in children with Williams-Beuren syndrome: a systematic review. J Appl Genet. 2020;61:205–12.
  • 11
    Nogueira RJ, Zimmerman LF, Moreno YM, Comparini CR, Viana DV, Vieira TA, et al. Anthropometric and body-mass composition suggests an intrinsic feature in Williams-Beuren syndrome. Rev Assoc Med Bras. 2011;57:681–5. (1992).
  • 12
    Morris CA, Demsey SA, Leonard CO, Dilts C, Blackburn BL. Natural history of Williams syndrome: physical characteristics. J Pediatr. 1988;113:318–26.
  • 13
    Martin ND, Smith WR, Cole TJ, Preece MA. New height, weight ew head circumference charts for British children with Williams syndrome. Arch Dis Child. 2007;92:598–601.
  • 14
    WHO Working Group. Use and interpretation of anthropometric indicators of nutritional status. WHO Working Group. Bull World Health Organ. 1986;64:929–41.
  • 15
    WHO Multicentre Growth Reference Study Group. WHO Child Growth Standards based on length/height, weight and age. Acta Paediatr Suppl. 2006;450:76–85.
  • 16
    Bertapelli F, Barros-Filho Ade A, Antonio MÂ, Barbeta CJ, de Lemos-Marini SH, Guerra-Junior G. Growth curves for girls with Turner syndrome. Biomed Res Int. 2014;2014:687978.
  • 17
    Bertapelli F, Agiovlasitis S, Machado MR, do Val Roso R, Guerra-Junior G. Growth charts for Brazilian children with down syndrome: Birth to 20 years of age. J Epidemiol. 2017;27:265–73.
  • 18
    Villar J, Giuliani F, Bhutta ZA, Bertino E, Ohuma EO, Ismail LC, et al. Postnatal growth standards for preterm infants: the preterm postnatal follow-up study of the INTERGROWTH-21(st) project. Lancet Glob Health. 2015;3:e681–91.
  • 19
    Cole TJ, Green PJ. Smoothing reference centile curves: the LMS method and penalized likelihood. Stat Med. 1992;11:1305–19.
  • 20
    Rigby RA, Stasinopoulos DM. Automatic smoothing parameter selection in GAMLSS with an application to centile estimation. Stat Methods Med Res. 2014;23:318–32.
  • 21
    Pankau R, Partsch CJ, Gosch A, Oppermann HC, Wessel A. Statural growth in Williams-Beuren syndrome. Eur J Pediatr. 1992;151:751–5.

Publication Dates

  • Publication in this collection
    07 June 2024
  • Date of issue
    May-Jun 2024

History

  • Received
    06 Aug 2023
  • Accepted
    17 Nov 2023
  • Published
    02 Jan 2024
Sociedade Brasileira de Pediatria Av. Carlos Gomes, 328 cj. 304, 90480-000 Porto Alegre RS Brazil, Tel.: +55 51 3328-9520 - Porto Alegre - RS - Brazil
E-mail: jped@jped.com.br