Acessibilidade / Reportar erro

The matryoshka of urban instruments in Urban Intervention Projects in São Paulo1 1 Preliminary versions of this article were presented at the 26th World Congress of Political Science (IPSA, 2021) and at the XIX National Meeting of the National Association of Postgraduate Studies and Research in Urban and Regional Planning (ANPUR, 2022). GUERESI, S. A Governança Urbana e os Projetos de Intervenção Urbana em Territórios Populares na Cidade de São Paulo [Urban Governance and Urban Intervention Projects on Low-Income Territories in the City of São Paulo]. WORLD CONGRESS OF POLITICAL SCIENCE, 26. 2021 [virtual]. [S. l.]: International Political Science Association, July 10-15, 2021. Theme: New Nationalisms in an Open World. GUERESI, S. A matrioska de instrumentos urbanísticos nos projetos de intervenção urbana em São Paulo [The matryoshka of urban instruments in urban intervention projects in São Paulo]. National Meeting of the National Association of Postgraduate Studies and Research in Urban and Regional Planning, 19, 2022, Blumenau. Annals [...]. Blumenau: Anpur, May 22 to 26, 2022 [online]. Theme: Urban and Regional Planning - Organizing Hope.

Abstract

The aim of this article is to analyze the arrangements for the governance and social participation in the Arco Jurubatuba Urban Intervention Project (UIP), an urban instrument provided for in the 2014 São Paulo (SP) Master Plan, and its impacts on low-income territories. The article presents a case study of two Special Zones of Social Interest (ZEIS) located within the area of the project, in the south zone of the city. Two questions guided the investigation: (i) To what extent did the communities participate in the discussions regarding the proposal?; and (ii) What were the governance arrangements that resulted from the proposal, considering the overlap of instruments within the UIP. It is highlighted that the institutional arrangements and the instruments selected for formulating and implementing the UIP increased the complexity of the project, the fragmentation of the process and the superficiality of the procedures for participating and legitimizing the intervention. Choices made during the UIP design and its “matryoshka” of instruments made it difficult for people to identify when and where crucial decisions were made regarding the intervention that affected low-income territories, thereby impairing social participation and postponing (even preventing) any resistance.

Keywords:
Institutional Arrangements; Urban Instruments; Urban Governance; Social Participation; Urban Planning; Urban Intervention Projects; São Paulo (city)

Associação Nacional de Pós-graduação e Pesquisa em Planejamento Urbano e Regional - ANPUR FAU Cidade Universitária, Rua do Lago, 876, CEP: 05508-080, São Paulo, SP - Brasil, Tel: (31) 3409-7157 - São Paulo - SP - Brazil
E-mail: revista@anpur.org.br