Open-access Functional dependency and oral health-related quality of life in a 15-year cohort of older adults: a case-control study

Abstract

Objective  to investigate the relationship between the increase in functional dependence and the deterioration of oral health-related quality of life (OHRQoL) in older people after 15 years.

Method  This is a case-control study nested in a cohort of elderly people followed for 15 years from the SABE Study (Health, Wellbeing and Aging). OHRQoL was measured using the Geriatric Oral Health Assessment Index (GOHAI) in the years 2000 and 2015. The outcome was determined by participants who began to report unsatisfactory OHRQOL, defined by a score ≤50, after 15 years. Exposures were sociodemographic conditions, general living conditions and clinical variables. Logistic regression was used in data analysis.

Results  Out of cohort participants who assessed their OHRQOL as satisfactory/regular in the year 2000, 53 individuals that assessed as unsatisfactory were considered cases and 194 that maintained their OHRQOL were controls in the year 2015. The average age of the cohort in 2015 was 82.6 years; 68.1% were women. Negative changes in functional dependence on instrumental activities (OR=2.50 CI95% 1.05-6.01; p=0.039), number of teeth (OR=3.96 CI95% 0.99-15.83; p=0.052) and insufficient income (OR=3.52 CI95% 0.94-13,18; p=0.061) showed an association with the outcome.

Conclusion  It was concluded that worsening of functional dependence on instrumental activities was an important risk indicator for deterioration of OHRQoL in elderly people even in the presence of increase of both lost teeth and insufficient income, showing the importance of considering other factors, in addition to clinical and socioeconomic variables, for a better understanding of OHRQoL.

Keywords Older adults; Oral health; Quality of life; Functional status; Income

Resumo

Objetivo  investigar a relação entre o aumento da dependência funcional e a deterioração da qualidade de vida relacionada à saúde bucal (QVRSB) em pessoas idosas decorridos 15 anos.

Método  Trata-se de um estudo caso-controle aninhado em uma coorte de pessoas idosas seguidas durante 15 anos proveniente do Estudo SABE (Saúde, Bem-estar e Envelhecimento). A QVRSB foi medida por meio do Geriatric Oral Health Assessment Index (GOHAI) nos anos 2000 e 2015. O desfecho foi determinado pelos participantes que passaram a relatar QVRSB insatisfatória, definida pelo escore ≤50, após 15 anos. As exposições foram condições sociodemográficas, condições gerais de vida e variáveis clínicas. Regressão Logística foi utilizada na análise dos dados.

Resultados  Dos indivíduos da coorte que avaliaram sua QVRSB como satisfatória/regular no ano 2000, foram identificados 53 casos que passaram a avaliar como insatisfatória e 194 controles que mantiveram sua qualidade de vida no ano 2015. A média de idade da coorte em 2015 foi 82,6 anos; 68,1% eram mulheres. Mudanças negativas na dependência funcional em atividades instrumentais (OR=2,50 IC95% 1,05-6,01; p=0,039), no número de dentes (OR=3,96 IC95% 0,99-15,83; p=0,052) e na renda insuficiente (OR=3,52 IC95% 0,94-13,18; p=0,061) mostraram associação com o desfecho.

Conclusão  Concluiu-se que a piora da dependência funcional em atividades instrumentais foi importante indicador de risco para a deterioração da QVRSB na população idosa mesmo na presença do aumento de dentes ausentes e da renda insuficiente, mostrando a importância de considerar outros fatores, além de variáveis clínicas e socioeconômicas, para o melhor entendimento da QVRSB.

Palavras-Chave: Idosos; Saúde bucal; Qualidade de vida; Dependência funcional; Renda

INTRODUCTION

With the increasing life expectancy of the population, it is essential to provide older adults with better health conditions to ensure they experience active, healthy, and functional aging1. This requires the formulation and implementation of public policies that adequately address the healthcare needs and subjective perspectives of quality of life. This scenario presents significant challenges in ensuring quality during the additional years of life and involves various sectors, including the Brazilian social protection system2,3.

The aging process entails a group of changes at functional and structural levels, which can lead to motor impairment and difficulties of a psychological and social nature, resulting in negative influences on the individual's relationship with society4. In this multidimensional context, quality of life is an important construct for measuring perceived physical, mental, and social well-being by the individual. It gauges their expectations, subjective feelings of satisfaction, happiness, worry, and disillusionment with life5.

In older population, the occurrence of two or more chronic diseases simultaneously, defined as multimorbidity, is common. This elevates the risk of complications, the onset of disabilities, and the development of dependency, which compromise the quality of life for both older adults and their families. Additionally, it poses a challenge for public health policies6.

Regarding oral health, there is a projected trend of reduction in the proportion of edentulous individuals compared to dentate individuals, along with an increase in the number of retained teeth and those in need of treatment. The presence of multimorbidity is associated with severe tooth loss and a lower likelihood of having functional dentition7. However, the assessment of oral health through clinical indices and indicators, when considered in isolation, is limited to standards based on oral deficits and may be biased by tooth loss, thereby compromising the accuracy of these indices8,9. Subjective indicators of health, such as Oral Health-Related Quality of Life (OHRQoL), have been adopted to measure the extent of the impact of oral health problems on the physical and psychological functioning, as well as the social well-being of older population10.

In addition to oral clinical characteristics, other conditions such as low educational level, marital status, depression, and smoking have been associated with unsatisfactory OHRQoL in older adults11.

Understanding changes in health conditions and behaviors of older adults is of fundamental importance for comprehending the aging process. There is a scarcity of longitudinal studies on OHRQoL capable of detecting these changes and contributing to the implementation of actions, policies, and guidelines in this age group of the population. A six-year longitudinal study showed that improvement in OHRQoL was related to having 16 or more teeth and eight or more years of education, while worsening OHRQoL was associated with the presence of multimorbidity at the beginning of the follow-up. However, eventual changes in exposures were not controlled12. Therefore, the objective of this study was to investigate the relationship between increased functional dependency and deterioration of Oral Health-Related Quality of Life (OHRQoL) in older adults over a period of 15 years.

METHOD

A nested case-control study was conducted within a cohort using data from the Health, Well-being, and Aging (SABE) survey, a multicenter population-based study planned and organized by the Pan American Health Organization (PAHO) in seven major cities across Latin America and the Caribbean in the year 200013. The cohort in São Paulo (Brazil) was further followed through a longitudinal study involving multiple cohorts. Thus, in the years 2006, 2010, and 2015, observation instruments were applied to participants from the previous year, as well as to a random sample of the population aged 60 to 64 who became part of the study.

In the year 2000, 2,143 individuals were interviewed in the city of São Paulo (SP, Brazil). In 2015, a new cycle of observations was carried out. Among the individuals interviewed in the year 2000, 1,155 had passed away, 69 did not have information on OHRQoL, and 54 had unsatisfactory OHRQoL. The remaining individuals were not located (183), moved to other municipalities (119), left their residence and were institutionalized (29), or refused to participate (287). The study population consisted of 247 older adults who assessed their quality of life due to oral health conditions as satisfactory/regular in the year 2000, with cases being those who transitioned to an unsatisfactory assessment and controls being those who maintained their quality of life over a period of 15 years.

The outcome was determined by the Geriatric Oral Health Assessment Index (GOHAI), which measures quality of life related to oral health conditions through a standardized questionnaire composed of 12 items, assessing three dimensions: functional (eating, speaking, and swallowing), psychosocial (concerns, relational discomfort, and appearance), and pain and discomfort symptoms (medications, gum sensitivity, discomfort when chewing certain foods). This questionnaire employs a five-point Likert scale. For each question, a score ranging from 1 to 5 is assigned (always=1, frequently=2, sometimes=3, rarely=4, and never=5). Unlike the other items, items 3 and 7 address positive questions that required recoding of the values used in the original version of the questionnaire (always=5, frequently=4, sometimes=3, rarely=2, and never=1). The maximum score varies from 12 to 60, and the values were categorized according to the standards established by Atchison and Dolan14: 12 to 50 corresponds to low/unsatisfactory OHRQoL; 51 to 56 moderate; and 57 to 60 equates to high OHRQoL values.

The demographic characteristics of sex and age, along with the variable education which remained unchanged during the follow-up, were used to describe and compare the cases and controls of the study population. For the analysis, exposures related to changes in variables such as income, marital status, multimorbidity, functional capacity, self-rated health, health-related behaviors, edentulism, and prosthetic use were included.

Income was assessed through a question in which the respondent declared whether their income was sufficient for expenses (yes or no). Marital status was classified into two categories: with conjugal life (married/cohabiting/common-law marriage) or without conjugal life (single/divorced/separated or widowed).

The presence of multimorbidity was assessed through self-reporting of two or more of the following conditions: hypertension, diabetes, cancer, pulmonary disease, heart disease, joint disease, embolism, and osteoporosis.

The main independent variable was functional capacity, measured through the performance of Activities of Daily Living (ADLs) and Instrumental Activities of Daily Living (IADLs). The ADLs were assessed using the Katz Scale15, which includes self-care activities such as feeding, bathing, dressing, grooming, mobilizing, walking, and controlling physiological needs. The IADLs were assessed using the Lawton Scale16, which includes activities necessary for an individual to manage their living environment, such as: shopping, meal preparation, household chores, laundry, handling money, using the telephone, taking medications, and using transportation. Due to the low proportion of older adults with one or more disabilities in the study population at the beginning of the follow-up, both variables were categorized into absence of disabilities or presence of one or more disabilities.

Self-rated health was measured through the question "how does the older adult consider their current health status?" Responses were divided into two categories: excellent/good/very good or fair/poor/very poor. Cognition was assessed using the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE), a modified and validated version in Chile by Icaza and Albala17, due to the low level of education among the Brazilian older population. This version comprises 13 items that do not depend on education level. The maximum score is 19 points. Participants with a score of 12 points or less are considered to have cognitive impairment, while those with 13 points or more are considered to have good cognition.

Health-related behaviors included smoking and alcohol consumption. Smoking was classified into two categories: currently smokes or no longer smokes/never smoked. Alcohol consumption in the last 3 months, by days per week, was also separated into two categories: no days per week or one day or more.

Variables related to edentulism and the use of dental prostheses were obtained through oral examinations performed by trained and calibrated dentists, according to the standards outlined in the World Health Organization (WHO) manual. It's worth noting that the oral clinical examinations were conducted in the years 2006 and 2015. Edentulism was assessed based on the number of teeth present, categorized into two groups: 0 to 15 teeth; 16 or more teeth. The variable "use of dental prosthesis" was evaluated across three categories: 1- Use of two complete prosthesis (CP) (upper and lower); 2- Use of any removable partial prosthesis (RPP); 3- No use of prosthesis /Use of any fixed prosthesis (FP)/Use of one CP.

The exposures were categorized into three groups, adopting the most favorable category for OHRQoL according to the scientific literature as a reference. For instance, concerning marital status, those who were married in the year 2000 and remained so 15 years later were included in the reference category; those who were not married either in 2000 or in both years were placed in the intermediate category; and those who were married in 2000 but had started living alone were included in the category representing negative change (from a favorable to an unfavorable condition). An exception was made for smoking, which was divided into two categories. The reference category comprised non-smokers in both years, compared to those who smoked in 2000 or started smoking fifteen years later (negative change). This was done due to the small number (n=2) of non-smokers who started smoking.

Data analysis included tabulation of GOHAI index categories at baseline and after 15 years, description of exposures in cases and controls, utilization of the McNemar test18 to assess differences between the two time points, and logistic regression to investigate whether increased functional dependence was associated with cases compared to controls, even in the presence of worsening insufficient income and the number of missing teeth. For multiple logistic regression, independent variables were incorporated into the model based on their statistical significance obtained in the simple analysis (p<0.20). The significance level in the final model was set at 5% (p<0.05). As the main variable of interest was functional capacity, independent variables that modified its effect on the outcome were removed from the final model. Thus, association measures (Odds Ratio) above 1.0 indicated the effect on cases due to unfavorable change in exposure. The number of observations varied in the simple analyses.

In multiple analysis, only observations with no missing data for the included variables were considered. The calculation of study power was performed post hoc. For this calculation, the proportion of incident cases of unsatisfactory quality of life and the sample size used in the final model (n=214) were employed. Exposure frequencies ranging from 10% to 50% were employed, and the minimum values necessary to detect differences between the groups were calculated, with a power of 80% and a significance level of 95%. With exposure frequencies ranging from 10% to 50%, the minimum odds ratio values to detect differences ranged from 1.5 to 1.9. The Hosmer and Lemeshow test was conducted to assess the model fit, and a Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) curve was obtained to examine sensitivity versus specificity values using a cutoff point of 0.519.

The participants signed an Informed Consent Form, and the SABE Study was approved by the Research Ethics Committee of the School of Public Health of the University of São Paulo (Research Protocol number 118) and by the National Committee of Ethics in Research (CONEP) under substantiated opinion number 315/99 and opinion number 3,600,782, with the process initiated in 2015 and finalized in 2019. The research is in accordance with Resolution number 466/2012 and Resolution number 510/2016, both issued by the National Health Council of the Ministry of Health.

RESULTS

Among the individuals in the cohort who rated their quality of life due to oral health conditions as satisfactory/regular in the year 2000, 53 (21.5%) cases were identified as having shifted to unsatisfactory evaluation, while 194 (78.5%) controls maintained their quality of life after 15 years. The mean age of the cohort was 82.8 years (standard deviation=0.3), with the majority being female (67.2%), and 40.9% having 0 to 3 years of education.

Table 1 presents the sociodemographic characteristics of cases and controls. No statistically significant differences were observed between the groups regarding sex, age, and education (p>0.05).

Table 1
Description of the sociodemographic characteristics of cases and controls nested within the cohort of older adults between 2000 and 2015. São Paulo, SP, 2000-2015.

Table 2 presents the percentages of participants according to exposure characteristics. The proportion of older adults without marital life increased from 37.3% to 68.0%. The presence of multimorbidity had the highest proportional increase, from 38.8 to 97.1%. Regarding functional dependence, there was an increase of 30 percentage points (pp.) in basic activities and 34.3 pp. in instrumental activities. Regarding other general life conditions, there was an increase in cognitive impairment, from 2.4% to 23.1%; negative self-rated general health, from 41.3% to 53.3%; and the number of missing teeth, from 71.2% to 78.3%.

Table 2
Description of exposure characteristics of older adults in the years 2000 and 2015. São Paulo, SP, 2000-2015.

In the analysis through simple regression, the odds ratio for unsatisfactory OHRQoL was significant (p<0.05) for older adults who experienced, over 15 years, negative changes in instrumental activities of daily living (OR=2.46), missing teeth (OR=4.10), insufficient income (OR=3.44), and cognitive capacity (OR=1.99) (Table 3). Negative change in self-rated health and in basic activities of daily living dependence were non-significant risk factors (p<0.20). Initiating alcohol consumption was a non-significant protective factor (OR=0.17, p<0.20) for satisfactory OHRQoL (Table 3).

Table 3
Unadjusted Odds Ratio values and respective 95% confidence intervals for unsatisfactory OHRQoL between nested cases and controls in a cohort of older adults. São Paulo, SP, 2000-2015.

In Table 4, the results of the multiple analysis are indicated, confirming the study's hypothesis. Negative change in instrumental activities of daily living dependence (OR=2.51, 95% CI 1.05-6.01; p=0.039) had a higher chance of developing unsatisfactory OHRQoL adjusted for the increase in the number of missing teeth (OR=3.96, 95% CI 0.99-15.83; p=0.052) and the increase in insufficient income (OR=3.52, 95% CI 0.94-13.18; p=0.061), which lost significance in the presence of functional dependence. The exposures related to cognitive capacity, alcohol consumption, self-rated health, and cognitive status modified the effects of increased functional dependence and insufficient income on the outcome. The Hosmer and Lemeshow test to assess model fit yielded a χ2 value of 14.27 with a p-value of 0.6481, indicating a good model fit. The area under the ROC curve (AUC) had a value of 0.6567, which is compatible with an acceptable value.

Table 4
Adjusted Odds Ratio values and respective 95% confidence intervals for unsatisfactory OHRQoL between nested cases and controls in a cohort of older adults (n=214). São Paulo, SP, 2000-2015.

DISCUSSION

In this longitudinal study, among the participants followed for 15 years, 21.5% transitioned to evaluating their quality of life as unsatisfactory, while the remainder maintained their quality of life. The main finding was to verify the positive association between worsening functional dependency in instrumental activities and the deterioration of OHRQoL in older individuals, adjusted for the increase in missing teeth and worsening insufficient income. The main contribution was to demonstrate that functional limitation related to the performance of instrumental activities, regardless of income and clinical variables, was an important risk indicator for unsatisfactory OHRQoL.

The studied sample revealed a predominance of females (67.2%), which can be explained by the higher life expectancy in women compared to men, even in the presence of multimorbidity20. This phenomenon is complex and multifaceted because, when compared to men, women may expect to live longer with poor health, regardless of the indicator used to measure health21. The increase in unsatisfactory OHRQoL did not differ between women and men. The same result was observed in a six-year follow-up using a cohort obtained from the same reference population12.

Despite the importance of following cohorts of older adults, there are few longitudinal studies that have analyzed OHRQoL. Most studies have compared the results of clinical interventions involving the installation of dentures and dental implants.

The association between functional disability and health-related quality of life (HRQOL) is widely consolidated in the literature, indicating that higher numbers of disabilities correlate with poorer quality of life scores22,23. However, its relationship with OHRQoL has not been thoroughly explored. Although they often appear as covariates, few studies have directly linked these factors. Two cross-sectional studies with older individuals— one involving 238 Brazilians24 and the other 1600 Taiwanese25 —showed contrasting results. While the former demonstrated that higher values of functional disability had a lesser impact on OHRQoL, the latter found a positive correlation between disability in IADLs and indicators of poor OHRQoL. The findings of the present study, derived from a 15-year follow-up, revealed that the increase in functional dependency in instrumental activities occurred earlier, was more frequent than in ADLs, and elevated the chance of transitioning to unsatisfactory OHRQoL by two and a half times. As the worsening of functional dependency is related to the deterioration of HRQOL22,23, the results reflect the connection between the latter and OHRQoL26, showing that the increase in functional dependency in instrumental activities is an important risk indicator for worsening OHRQoL.

Among the conditions studied, the number of teeth is the oral condition most consistently associated with OHRQoL, as reported in the literature. A systematic review demonstrated that tooth loss was associated with unfavorable OHRQoL scores, regardless of the study location or instrument used27. Similarly to the present study, edentulous individuals have shown poor OHRQoL compared to those with a greater number of teeth28,29.

The literature shows an association between socioeconomic conditions and OHRQoL, mainly linked to education and income. In the present study, education was used for sample characterization, and changes in marital status showed no association with the outcome, contrary to previous findings in cross-sectional studies30,31. Nonetheless, a negative change in self-reported insufficient income was associated with unsatisfactory OHRQoL, consistent with another study that also correlated low income with poor OHRQoL32. This result differs from the six-year follow-up mentioned earlier, which found no association between insufficient income and changes in OHRQoL12.

In the simple analysis, the findings showed that participants who experienced cognitive impairment reported a deterioration in OHRQoL. Some cross-sectional studies have shown that older adults' perception of their OHRQoL is affected by cognitive function decline33. In a six-year follow-up study using cases and controls obtained from the same reference population as the present study, cognitive decline was an important risk indicator for reduced chewing capacity34.

This study has some limitations due to the fact that cohorts of older adults are commonly affected by losses due to deaths. Thus, the reduced number of individuals remaining from the beginning of the cohort reduces the ability to detect effects. Variables related to cognitive capacity, alcohol consumption, self-rated health, and cognitive status modified the effects of increased functional dependence, and more robust studies could explore these relationships. Despite this, it is important to highlight the long-term follow-up of the study and the fact that it is a sample obtained from a population-based study comprising individuals who survived fifteen years of follow-up. There was no strict temporal control, so it was not possible to establish the exact moment when changes in exposures occurred, as only data collected at two time points (2000 and 2015) were used. Another limitation of the study was that changes in oral conditions regarding edentulism and prosthesis use could have been slightly higher if the follow-up time spanned 15 years instead of 2/3 of the period used for other variables. Considering the scarcity of information on changes in the living and health conditions of older adults, this study is relevant for expanding understanding of the impacts on OHRQoL beyond income and known dental clinical conditions, showing the need to consider the context in which the older population is inserted, as well as functional, cognitive, and behavioral aspects. Encouraging and providing means for older adults to maintain their functional capacity may have positive consequences not only for HRQOL but also for OHRQoL.

CONCLUSION

The worsening of functional dependence in instrumental activities was an important risk indicator for the deterioration of OHRQoL in older population, even in the presence of increased missing teeth and insufficient income. This shows that factors other than clinical and socioeconomic variables are important for a better understanding of OHRQoL. Future longitudinal studies capable of detecting points of change over time may help elucidate other aspects associated with the worsening of OHRQoL.

  • Research funding: Amazonas State Research Support Foundation (FAPEAM). Process number: 53783.850.73954.06092021. PhD Scholarship.
  • DATA AVAILABILITY
    The entire anonymized dataset supporting the findings of this study has been made available on the Figshare repository and can be accessed at: https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.25517536.v1

References

  • 1 Aguiar BM, Silva PO, Vieira MA, Costa FM, Carneiro, JA. Avaliação da incapacidade funcional e fatores associados em idosos. Rev Bras Geriatr Gerontol 2019;22(2):e180163. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.1590/1981-22562020023.200061
    » https://doi.org/10.1590/1981-22562020023.200061
  • 2 Maia LC, Colares TFB, Moraes EM, Costa SM, Caldeira AP. Idosos robustos na atenção primária: fatores associados ao envelhecimento bem-sucedido. Rev Saúde Pública. 2020;54:1-10. Disponível em: http://doi.org/10.11606/s1518-8787.2020054001735
    » https://doi.org/10.11606/s1518-8787.2020054001735
  • 3 Veras RP. O modelo assistencial contemporâneo e inovador para os idosos. Rev Bras Geriatr Gerontol 2020;23(1):e200061. Disponível em: http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1981-22562020023.200061
    » https://doi.org/10.1590/1981-22562020023.200061
  • 4 Santos PA, Heidemann ITSB, Marçal CCB, Arakawa-Belaunde AM. A percepção do idoso sobre a comunicação no processo de envelhecimento. Audiol Commun Res 2019;24:e2058. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.1590/2317-6431-2018-2058
    » https://doi.org/10.1590/2317-6431-2018-2058
  • 5 Souza Júnior EV de, Viana ER, Cruz DP, Silva CS, Rosa RS, Siqueira LR, et al. Relationship between family functionality and the quality of life of the elderly. Rev Bras Enferm. 2022;75(2):e20210106. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.1590/0034-7167-2021-0106
    » https://doi.org/10.1590/0034-7167-2021-0106
  • 6 Schmidt TP, Wagner KJP, Schneider IJC, Danielewicz AL. Padrões de multimorbidade e incapacidade funcional em idosos brasileiros: estudo transversal com dados da Pesquisa Nacional de Saúde. Cad Saúde Pública. 2020;36(11):e00241619. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.1590/0102-311X00241619.
    » https://doi.org/10.1590/0102-311X00241619
  • 7 Bonfim RA, Cascaes AM, Oliveira C. Multimorbidity and tooth loss: the Brazilian National Health Survey, 2019. BMC Public Health. 2021;21(1):2311. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-021-12392-2
    » https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-021-12392-2
  • 8 Ortíz-Barrios LB, Granados-García V, Cruz-Hervert P, Moreno-Tamayo K, Heredia-Ponce E, Sánchez-García S. The impact of poor oral health-related quality of life (OHRQol) in older adults: the oral health status through a latent class analysis. BMC Oral Health. 2019;19:141. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12903-019-0840-3
    » https://doi.org/10.1186/s12903-019-0840-3
  • 9 Birman D, Rebelo MAB, Freitas YNL, Cardoso EM, Vieira, JMR. Construção de um indicador multidimensional de saúde bucal para a população idosa da cidade Manaus, AM. Rev Bras Geriatr Gerontol. 2021;24(5):e220012. Disponível em: http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1981-22562021024.220012.pt
    » https://doi.org/10.1590/1981-22562021024.220012.pt
  • 10 Rebelo MAB, Cardoso EM, Robinson PG, Vettore MV. Demographics, social position, dental status and oral health-related quality of life in community-dwelling older adults. Qual Life Res. 2016;25:1735-42. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-015-1209-y
    » https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-015-1209-y
  • 11 Baniasadi K, Armoon B, Higgs P et al. The association of oral health status and socio-economic determinants with oral health-related quality of life among the elderly: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Dent Hygiene. 2021; 19(2):153-65. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.1111/idh.12489
    » https://doi.org/10.1111/idh.12489
  • 12 Andrade FB, Lebrão ML, Santos JLF, Duarte YAO. Correlates of change in self-perceived oral health among older adults in Brazil: findings from the Health, Well-Being and Aging Study. J Am Dent Assoc. 2012; 143(5): 488-95. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.14219/jada.archive.2012.0209
    » https://doi.org/10.14219/jada.archive.2012.0209
  • 13 Albala C, Lebrão ML, Díaz EML et al. Encuesta Salud, Bienestar y Envejecimiento (SABE): metología de la encuesta y perfil de la poblacíon estudiada. Rev Panam Salud Publica. 2005; 17(5/6):307-22. Disponível em: https://www.scielosp.org/pdf/rpsp/v17n5-6/26268.pdf
  • 14 Atchison KA, Dolan TA. Development of Geriatric Oral Health Assessment Index. J Dent Educ. 1990; 54(11):680-7. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.1002/j.0022-0337.1990.54.11.tb02481.x
    » https://doi.org/10.1002/j.0022-0337.1990.54.11.tb02481.x
  • 15 Katz S, Ford AB, Moskowitz RW, Jackson BA, Jaffe MW. Studies of illness in the aged. The index of ADL: a standardized measure of biological and psychosocial function. JAMA. 1963;185(12):914-9. Disponível em: https://doi.10.1001/jama.1963.03060120024016
  • 16 Lawton MP, Brody EM. Assessment of older people: self-maintaining and instrumental activities of daily living. Gerontologist. 1969; 9(3): 179-86. Disponível em: http://www.eurohex.eu/bibliography/pdf/Lawton_Gerontol_19691502121986/Lawton_Gerontol_1969.pdf
  • 17 Icaza MC, Albala C. Projeto SABE. Minimental state examination (MMSE) del studio de dementia em Chile: análisis estatístico. OPAS. 1999; p.1-18.
  • 18 Pembury Smith MQR, Ruxton GD. Effective use of the McNemar test. Behav Ecol Sociobiol. 2020;74:133. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00265-020-02916-y
    » https://doi.org/10.1007/s00265-020-02916-y
  • 19 Hosmer DW, Lemeshow S. Applied Logistic Regression. 2000. 2 ed. New York: Wiley.
  • 20 Guimarães RM, Andrade FCD. Expectativa de vida com e sem multimorbidade entre idosos brasileiros: Pesquisa Nacional de Saúde 2013. Rev Bras Est Pop. 2020; 37:1-15. Disponível em: http://dx.doi.org/10.20947/S0102-3098a0117
    » https://doi.org/10.20947/S0102-3098a0117
  • 21 Cepellos VM. Feminização do envelhecimento: um fenômeno multifacetado além dos números. Rev Adm Empres. 2021;61(2):1-7. Disponível em: http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0034-759020210208
    » https://doi.org/10.1590/S0034-759020210208
  • 22 Chan SWC, Chiu HF, Chien WT, Goggins W, Thompson D, Hong B. Predictors of change in oral health-related quality of life among older people with depression: a longitudinal study. Int Psychogeriatr. 2009; 21(6):1171-9. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.1017/S1041610209990950
    » https://doi.org/10.1017/S1041610209990950
  • 23 Andersson LB, Marcusson J, Wressle E. Health-related quality of life and activities of daily livin in 85 years-olds in Sweden. Health Soc. Care. Community. 2014; 22(4):368-74. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.1111/hsc.12088
    » https://doi.org/10.1111/hsc.12088
  • 24 Foger D, Sá LM, Velasco SRM, Santos PSS, Bastos RS. Functional capacity and oral health-related quality of life in elderly. Int J Clin Dent. 2019; 12(4):317-26.
  • 25 Lee IC, Yang YH, Ho PS, Lee IC. Exploring the quality of life in denture-wearing within elders in Kaohsiung. Gerodontology. 2012; 29(2):e1067-1077. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-2358.2012.00614.x
    » https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-2358.2012.00614.x
  • 26 Sekulić S, John MT, Davey C, Rener-Sitar K. Association between oral health-related and health-related quality of life. Zdr Varst. 2020; 59(2):65-74. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.2478/sjph-2020-0009
    » https://doi.org/10.2478/sjph-2020-0009
  • 27 Gerritsen AE, Allen PF, Witter DJ, Bronkhorst EM, Creugers NHJ. Tooth-loss and oral health-related quality of life: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2010; 8:126. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.1186/1477-7525-8-126
    » https://doi.org/10.1186/1477-7525-8-126
  • 28 Nayan K, Khan AA, Kusum P, Kumari L, Srivastav SK. Utilization of dental care, tooth loss, and oral health-related quality of life in older adults visiting dental care center in Indian settings. Cureus. 2022; 14(11): e31128. DOI: 10.7759/cureus.31128
  • 29 Zhi QH, Si Y, Wang X et al. Determining the factors associated with oral health-related quality of life in Chinese elders: findings from the fourth national survey. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol. 2022; 50(4): 311-20. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.1111/cdoe.12674
    » https://doi.org/10.1111/cdoe.12674
  • 30 Colaço J, Muniz FWMG, Peron D, et al. Oral health-related quality of life and associated factors in the elderly: a population-based cross-sectional study. Cien Saude Colet. 2020; 25(10):3901-12. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.1590/1413-812320202510.02202019
    » https://doi.org/10.1590/1413-812320202510.02202019
  • 31 Miranda LP, Oliveira TL, Fagundes LS, Queiroz PSF, Oliveira FPD, Rodrigues Neto JF. Autopercepção da saúde bucal e fatores associados em pessoas idosas quilombolas: um estudo de base populacional. Rev Bras Geriatr Gerontol. 2023;26:e220191. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.1590/1981-22562023026.220191.pt
    » https://doi.org/10.1590/1981-22562023026.220191.pt
  • 32 Hajek A, König HH, Kretzeler B et al. Does oral health-related quality of life differ by income group? Findings from a nationally representative survey. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022;19(17):10826. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph191710826
    » https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph191710826
  • 33 Lee KH, Wu B, Plassman BL. Cognitive function and oral health-related quality of life in older adults. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2013;61(9):1602-07. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.1111/jgs.12402
    » https://doi.org/10.1111/jgs.12402
  • 34 Gellacic AS, Teixeira DS, Antunes JL, Narvai PC, Lebrão ML, Frazão P. Factors associated with deterioration of self-rated chewing ability among adults aged 60 years and older over a 6-year period. Geriatr Gerontol Int. 2016; 16(1):46-54. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.1111/ggi.12435
    » https://doi.org/10.1111/ggi.12435

Edited by

  • Edited by: Camila Alves dos Santos

Data availability

The entire anonymized dataset supporting the findings of this study has been made available on the Figshare repository and can be accessed at: https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.25517536.v1

Publication Dates

  • Publication in this collection
    21 June 2024
  • Date of issue
    2024

History

  • Received
    29 Nov 2023
  • Accepted
    02 Apr 2024
location_on
Universidade do Estado do Rio Janeiro Rua São Francisco Xavier, 524 - Bloco F, 20559-900 Rio de Janeiro - RJ Brasil, Tel.: (55 21) 2334-0168 - Rio de Janeiro - RJ - Brazil
E-mail: revistabgg@gmail.com
rss_feed Acompanhe os números deste periódico no seu leitor de RSS
Acessibilidade / Reportar erro