Erratum to "Frequencies of polymorphisms of Rh, Kell, Kidd, Duffy and Diego systems of Santa Catarina, southern Brazil" [Rev Bras Hematol Hemoter. 2016;38(3):199-205]

Daiane Cobianchi Costa^a, Alessandra Arruda Schinaider^a, Thais Mattos Santos^a, Everaldo José Schörner^b, Daniel Simon^c, Sharbel Weidner Maluf^a, Ana Carolina Rabello de Moraes^a Maria Claudia Silva Silva^a,*

^aUniversidade Federal de Santa Catarina, Florianópolis, SC, Brazil

^bHemocentro de Santa Catarina, Florianópolis, SC, Brazil

^cUniversidade Luterana do Brasil, Canoas, RS, Brazil

^*Corresponding author at: Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina, Centro de Ciências da Saúde, Pós-Graduação em Farmácia, Campus Trindade, 88040-900 Florianópolis, SC, Brazil.

E-mail address: [e-mail] (M.C. Silva).

Please consider the following correction:

Results

Page 201 - "Statistical differences were observed in the comparison with Brazilian populations. The genotypes RHCE*Ee, KEL*01.1/KEL*02, FY*01/FY*01, JK*01/JK*01, and JK*02/02 were more prevalent in the population from the state of Santa Catarina in comparison with the state of São Paulo. In addition, RHCE*Cc, RHCE*cc, RHCE*ee, FY*01/FY*02, FY*01/FY*02.N01, FY*02/FY*02, FY*02/FY*02.N01, FY*02.N01/FY*02.N01, and JK*01/JK*02 genotypes were more common in the population from the state of São Paulo" should read as "Statistical differences were observed in the comparison with Brazilian populations. The genotypes RHCE*Ee, KEL*01.1/KEL*02, FY*01/FY*02 , JK*01/JK*01, and JK*02/02 were more prevalent in the population from the state of Santa Catarina in comparison with the state of São Paulo. In addition, RHCE*Cc, RHCE*cc, RHCE*ee, FY*01/FY*02.N01, FY*02/FY*02, FY*02/FY*02.N01, FY*02.N01/FY*02.N01, and JK*01/JK*02 genotypes were more common in the population from the state of São Paulo."

Page 201 - "When the data were compared with European populations, only the genotypes RHCE*Cc, RHCE*EE, RHCE*ee, KEL*01.1/KEL*01.1, KEL*01.1/KEL*02, KEL*02/KEL*02 JK*01/JK*01, and DI*01/DI*01 did not differ statistically (Table 4)" should read as "When the data were compared with European populations, only the genotypes RHCE*Cc, RHCE*EE, RHCE*ee, KEL*01.1/KEL*01.1, KEL*01.1/KEL*02, KEL*02/KEL*02, FY*01/FY*01 , JK*01/JK*01, and DI*01/DI*01 did not differ statistically (Table 4)".

Tables

Table 1 should read as:

System Genotype Frequency (n(%)) 373 donors 31 patients Duffy FY*01/FY*01 57 (15.3) 3 (9.7) FY*01/FY*02 176 (47.2) 11 (35.5)

System	Genotype	Frequency (n(%))
		373 donors	31 patients
Duffy	FY*01/FY*01	57 (15.3)	3 (9.7)
	FY*01/FY*02	176 (47.2)	11 (35.5)

Table 2 should read as:

Genotype JOAN33 Rh System RHCE*Ee 0.12 (4) RHCE*ee 0.82 (27) RHCE*E 0.12 RHCE*e 0.88

Genotype	JOA N33
Rh System
RHCE*Ee	0.12 (4)
RHCE*ee	0.82 (27)
RHCE*E	0.12
RHCE*e	0.88

Table 3 should read as:

Genotype SCN373 PRN400 SP-POP1N948 SP-POP2N250 SP-POP3N308 Duffy System FY*01/FY*01 0.15 (57) 0.12 (50) 0.12 (114) 0.14 (34) 0.12 (36) FY*01/FY*02 0.47 (176) 0.40 (157)* 0.45 (426) 0.27 (68)* 0.34 (105)*

Genotype	SC N373	PR N400	SP-POP1 N948	SP-POP2 N250	SP-POP3 N308
Duffy System
FY*01/FY*01	0.15 (57)	0.12 (50)	0.12 (114)	0.14 (34)	0.12 (36)
FY*01/FY*02	0.47 (176)	0.40 (157)*	0.45 (426)	0.27 (68)*	0.34 (105)*

Table 4 should read as:

Genotype SCN373 Austria27N200 Naples28N225 Zurich29N4000 Duffy System FY*01/FY*01 0.15 (57) 0.20 (40) 0.18 (40) 0.18 (703) FY*01/FY*02 0.47 (176) 0.36 (72)* 0.43 (98) 0.47 (1862)

Genotype	SC N373	Austria27 N200	Naples28 N225	Zurich29 N4000
Duffy System
FY*01/FY*01	0.15 (57)	0.20 (40)	0.18 (40)	0.18 (703)
FY*01/FY*02	0.47 (176)	0.36 (72)*	0.43 (98)	0.47 (1862)

Publication Dates

• Publication in this collection
  Oct-Dec 2016