Acessibilidade / Reportar erro

SUSTAINABILITY AND KNOWLEDGE MANAGEMENT: AUTHORSHIP PROFILE AND THEMATIC ANALYSIS OF THE KM BRASIL PUBLICATIONS FROM 2002 TO 2016

ABSTRACT

The documents published in the electronic records of KM Brasil, corresponding to the thirteen editions of the event, from 2002 to 2016, are analyzed with a focus on sustainability. The objective is to identify the breadth of the sustainability theme, the authorship profile and the thematic diversity, within the framework of the discussions related to knowledge management, from the historical basis of KM Brazil, the biggest event of the theme in Latin America. The theoretical foundation presents a brief characterization about knowledge management and sustainability. The descriptive study is characterized by a quantitative-qualitative approach, using bibliometric techniques, mainly through descriptive statistics, complemented by a content analysis. The quantitative analysis initially covered 605 documents, focusing later on the 18 articles that presented the theme sustainability in the title and / or keywords, and the qualitative analysis is restricted to these 18 articles. Among the results, we highlight the occurrence of 54 authors who published on the subject of sustainability, with prevalence of authorship of the masculine gender, collective, with academic link and performance in the public sector; in addition to 42 subjects and 18 foci related to sustainability and knowledge management. It is concluded that, despite the large number of participants in the business market, there is a considerable predominance of the academy in the studies on sustainability, and that the number of 18 documents on sustainability is not very representative in relation to the total of the 605 publications that make part of the historical basis of KM Brazil.

KEYWORDS:
Bibliometry; Knowledge management; Sustainability; Scientific production

RESUMO

Analisam-se, com foco no tema sustentabilidade, os documentos publicados nos anais eletrônicos do KM Brasil, correspondente às treze edições do evento, no período de 2002 a 2016. Tem-se por objetivo identificar a amplitude do tema sustentabilidade, o perfil de autoria e a diversidade temática, no âmbito das discussões relacionadas à gestão do conhecimento, a partir da base histórica do KM Brasil, o maior evento do tema na América Latina. A fundamentação teórica apresenta breve caracterização sobre gestão do conhecimento e sustentabilidade. O estudo descritivo caracteriza-se por uma abordagem quanti-qualitativa, com utilização das técnicas da bibliometria, sobretudo, por meio de estatística descritiva, complementada por uma análise de conteúdo. A análise quantitativa abrangeu, inicialmente, 605 documentos, concentrando-se, posteriormente, nos 18 artigos que apresentaram o tema sustentabilidade no título e/ou nas palavras-chave, sendo a análise qualitativa restrita somente a estes 18 artigos. Dentre os resultados, destaca-se a ocorrência de 54 autores que publicaram sobre o tema sustentabilidade, com prevalência de autoria do gênero masculino, coletiva, com vínculo acadêmico e atuação no setor público; além de terem sido identificados 42 assuntos e 18 focos relacionados à sustentabilidade e à gestão do conhecimento. Conclui-se se evidenciando que, apesar do grande número de participantes atuantes no mercado empresarial, há uma considerável predominância da academia na realização dos estudos sobre sustentabilidade e que a quantidade de 18 documentos sobre sustentabilidade é pouco representativa diante do total das 605 publicações que fazem parte da base histórica do KM Brasil.

PALAVRAS-CHAVE:
Bibliometria; Gestão do Conhecimento; Sustentabilidade; Produção científica

1 Introduction

Discussions on sustainability have been gaining more and more reach in business and government, society, and academia.

Companies are improving their management models in order to improve its practices in all aspects of sustainability - environmental, social and economic, adopting mechanisms that demonstrate a high level of ethics and transparency in their business, is the awareness of entrepreneurs, market reasons, regulatory impositions or consumer requirements.

Governments around the world are called upon to formulate legislation, public policies and development models that allow for progress in the present without compromising the future of the planet.

The society here more represented by NGOs, directs his reflections on the social and environmental impacts of economic growth, above all, the exploitation of human labor and degradation of natural resources, putting into question the quality of life of mankind and their own survival.

On the other hand, the academy acts in the development of studies of theoretical, technical and behavioral nature, related to the economic, environmental and social aspects of sustainability. It is proper for the academic environment to be a link between discussions of business and governmental interest and those of social interest. It is in this context that we sought to understand "How has the sustainability theme been addressed throughout the 13 editions of the Brazilian Congress of Knowledge Management (KM Brazil), considered the biggest event in Latin America?".

The event itself is presented as a locus conducive to the discussion of sustainability, since it is organized by the Brazilian Society of Knowledge Management (SBGC), a Civil Society Organization of Public Interest (OSCIP) engaged in the practice promotion and the development of knowledge management (KM), through the integration of private and public organizations, the third sector and academia.

It is based on the premise that there is a synergy between sustainability and knowledge management, since both deal with aspects related to the strategy of value creation and the development of organizations. The objective of this study is to identify the breadth of the theme of sustainability, the profile of authorship and thematic diversity, within the framework of the discussions related to knowledge management, based on the historical basis of KM Brazil, a brief theoretical knowledge management and sustainability, a description of the method, results and conclusions.

2 Theoretical Reference

2.1 Knowledge Management

Knowledge management can be considered from different perspectives: focus on knowledge (tacit or explicit), capital (human, organizational, relationship), practices or strategy.

As this study seeks to understand the relationship between knowledge management and sustainability, the conceptual approach on knowledge management will also follow this relationship, focusing on strategy and, for this, using the resource-based view of the company (RBV, from the English resource-based view) and more specifically from the knowledgebased view (KBV).

The concept of knowledge management with a focus on resource management addresses the organization's ability to productively employ the resources it possesses in order to generate wealth and ensure its sustainability.

This capacity can be understood as "organizational competence," defined by Fernandes, Fleury and Mills (2006FERNANDES, Bruno Henrique Rocha; FLEURY, Maria Tereza Leme; MILLS, John. Construindo o diálogo entre competência, recursos e desempenho organizacional. Revista de Administração de Empresas, São Paulo, v. 46, n. 4, p. 1-18, out./dez. 2006., p.49) as "a set of coordinated resources that generate value to the organization, are difficult to imitate, can be transferred to other areas, products or services of the organization, and impact organizational performance as a key factor to their success."

For Bierly and Chakrabarty (1996BIERLY, P.; CHAKRABARTY, A. Generic knowledge strategies in the U.S. pharmaceutical industry. Strategic Management Journal, v. 17, p.123-35, Winter 1996.) the different performances between companies result from different bases of their knowledge and different capacities in the development and unfolding of this knowledge.

According to Sveiby (2001SVEIBY, K.E. A Knowledge-based theory of the firm to guide in strategy formulation. Journal of Intellectual Capital, v. 2, n. 4, p. 344-58, 2001.) a knowledge-based strategy formulation must begin with the competence of the people, understood by it as the primary intangible resource.

Knowledge is a primary resource for building the essential capabilities for generating sustainable competitive advantage. Organizations have already realized the need to manage knowledge to stay competitive. Numerous benefits can be gained by a company that has an effective knowledge management process: share best management practices, accelerate innovation, organize available information, map individual competencies, retain talent, and facilitate the individual contribution of employees. (ROSA, 2012ROSA, Fabiana Pereira. Visão baseada em recursos: a gestão do conhecimento como estratégia competitiva sustentável. Revista Trajetória, Multicursos, Faculdade Cenecista de Osório, v. 5, n. 6, p. 118-136, jul. 2012., p. 132).

Thus, the understanding of knowledge management is adopted from the concept of the APQC (2018), which defines it as "a systematic effort to allow information and knowledge to grow, flow and create value" that knowledge management "deals with the creation and management of processes to get the right knowledge, to the right people at the right time, and to help people share and act on information in order to improve organizational performance."

In this context, it reinforces the understanding that there is an interface between knowledge management and sustainability and that its study can contribute to the development of both themes.

2.2 Sustainability

Sustainability is a term that expresses concern about the quality of the system that integrates man and nature and evaluates its properties and characteristics, covering the environmental, social and economic aspects (FEIL; SCHREIBER, 2017FEIL, Alexandre André; SCHREIBER, Dusan. Sustentabilidade e desenvolvimento sustentável: desvendando as sobreposições e alcances de seus significados. Cad. EBAPE.BR, v. 14, n. 3, Artigo 7, Rio de Janeiro, jul./set.2017. Disponível em: http://www.scielo.br/pdf/cebape/v15n3/1679-3951-cebape-15-03-00667.pdf. Acesso em: 3 maio 2018.
http://www.scielo.br/pdf/cebape/v15n3/16...
). Although this theme has been echoed in recent decades, we can say that it is not a recent movement, but an idea that has been maturing for at least three centuries (GROBER, 2007GROBER, U. Deep Roots: A Conceptual History of “sustain¬able Development” (Nachhaltigkeit). Discussion papers, Wissenschaftszentrum Berlin für Sozialforschung. Berlin: WZB, 2007. Disponível em: https://bibliothek.wzb.eu/pdf/2007/p07-002.pdf. Acesso em: 3 maio 2018.
https://bibliothek.wzb.eu/pdf/2007/p07-0...
).

It relates to a long-standing issue in society: the scarcity of natural resources and their uncer- tain use. Around 1700, in Saxony, the mining industry kept thousands of people who were threatened, not by the exhaustion of the mines, but by the scarcity of wood. The ores smelter had consumed the surrounding forests and there was no effort to restore them. Wood prices have risen, leading to bankruptcy part of the mining industry.

Later on, as the progress of Western civilization reached its peak and the harmful effects of the Industrial Revolution emerged, the debate gained momentum in the face of the abusive use of natural resources and the growing perception that the pattern of production and consumption in the world could not last (NASCIMENTO, 2012NASCIMENTO, Elimar Pinheiro do. Trajetória da sustentabilidade: do ambiental ao social, do social ao econômico. Estudos Avançados, v. 26, n. 74, 2012. Disponível em: http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?pid=S0103-0142012000100005&script=sci_abstract&tlng=pt. Acesso em: 3 maio 2018.
http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?pid=S010...
). From 1713 to 1987, the idea of sustainability appears in several publications and discussions, although lacking consistent conceptualization.

There is no consensus in the literature about the origin and concept of sustainability in the context of development. According to Kidd (1992KIDD, Charles V. The evolution of sustainability. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics, v. 5, n. 1, p. 1-26, 1992. Disponível em: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/227128571_The_evolution_of_sustainability. Acesso em: 3 maio 2018.
https://www.researchgate.net/publication...
), the term sustainability was used associated with the development, for the first time, in 1974, in conferences on forest issues. For Barbosa, Drach and Corbella (2014BARBOSA, Gisele Silva; DRACH, Patrícia Regina; CORBELLA, Oscar Daniel. A conceptual review of the terms sustainable development and sustainability. International Journal of Social Sciences, v. 3, n. 2, 2014. Disponível em: http://www.iises.net/download/Soubory/soubory-puvodni/pp-01-15_ijossV3N2.pdf. Acesso em: 3 maio 2018.
http://www.iises.net/download/Soubory/so...
) the origin and the concept of sustainability in this context are unknown. However, they point out that one of the first definitions emerged in World War I, as described by Lester Brown in the mid-1980s.

Shrivastava and Hart (1994SHRIVASTAVA, Paul; HART, Stuart. Greening Organisations - 2000. International Journal of Public Administration, v. 17, n. 3-4, p. 607-35, 1994. Disponível em: https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/01900699408524910. Acesso em: 3 maio 2018.
https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1...
) argue that the concept of sustainable development originates from Carson's 1962 Silent Spring. Officially, the most widespread version of the concept that integrates sustainability and development was inaugurated in the Brundtland Report in 1987: sustainable development is one that meets the needs of the present without compromising the possibilities of future generations to meet their own needs (CMMAD 1991).

But Feil and Schreiber (2017FEIL, Alexandre André; SCHREIBER, Dusan. Sustentabilidade e desenvolvimento sustentável: desvendando as sobreposições e alcances de seus significados. Cad. EBAPE.BR, v. 14, n. 3, Artigo 7, Rio de Janeiro, jul./set.2017. Disponível em: http://www.scielo.br/pdf/cebape/v15n3/1679-3951-cebape-15-03-00667.pdf. Acesso em: 3 maio 2018.
http://www.scielo.br/pdf/cebape/v15n3/16...
) warn that although this concept is the most cited in literature and has been credited to the World Commission on Environment and Development, the original idea is Evelyn (1664), who had the same essence, but with more emphasis on natural resources. They start from the term sustainable, as a kind of "umbrella", which shelters the idea of sustainability and sustainable development, based on the concern with the future existence of natural resources to enable the continuation of human life on the planet. However, they explain that the terms are not synonymous, since their attributes have different meanings and each one is related to a specific praxis. However, they converge towards the same goal and cannot be considered as isolated practices. "The attainment of the attributes of sustainability is a combination of the attributes of sustainability and sustainable development" (FEEL; SCHREIBER, 2017, p. 681). Hove (2004HOVE, Hilary. Critiquing sustainable development: a meaningful way of mediating the development impasse? Undercurrent, v. 1, n. 1, p. 48-54, 2004. Disponível em: http://connection.ebscohost.com/c/articles/18428191/critiquing-sustainable-developmentmeaningful-way-mediating-development-impasse. Acesso em: 3 maio 2018.
http://connection.ebscohost.com/c/articl...
) clarifies the difference between the two concepts: sustainable development is access to achieve sustainability, which is the long-term goal.

It should be noted that sustainability is not a recent phenomenon and has its concept in constant reformulation, having derived or is related to several other concepts (BACHA, SANTOS; SCHAUN, 2010BACHA, Maria de Lourdes; SANTOS, Jorgina; SCHAUN, Angela. Considerações teóricas sobre o conceito de sustentabilidade. In.: Simpósio de Excelência em Gestão e Tecnologia, 7., 2010. Anais eletrônicos. Disponível em: https://www.aedb.br/seget/arquivos/artigos10/31_cons%20teor%20bacha.pdf. Acesso em: 3 maio 2018.
https://www.aedb.br/seget/arquivos/artig...
).

In addition to lack of consensus, there is a diversity of concepts, currents of thought, approaches and approaches in the literature. But there is also convergence, especially with regard to the quest to integrate economic viability, ecological prudence and social justice into the three dimensions of the Tripple Bottom Line, designed by Elkington (1999ELKINGTON, John. Cannibals with Forks - The Tipple Bottom Line of 21st Century Business. Capstone,1999.). The sustainability tripod, as it is also known, brings the idea that the three dimensions (economic, social and environmental) must interact, holistically, so that the results of the organizations' actions are indeed sustainable (ALMEIDA, 2002ALMEIDA, Fernando. O bom negócio da sustentabilidade. Rio de Janeiro: Nova Fronteira, 2002.).

Thus, this is an effort that must be made by the union of all stakeholders - society, market, academia, public power among others - locally, regionally, nationally and internationally.

3 Method

This is a descriptive study with a quantitative-qualitative approach. Quantitative research is characterized by bibliometric analysis, based on the documents published in the electronic records of KM Brazil, available on the SBGC website, except for the year 2006, whose documents were not available, and were obtained from the CD -ROM of the corresponding year. The analysis base was generated from February 2017 to May 2018.

We tried to identify the occurrence of a certain event and its frequency (considering the repetitions), adopting the data analysis analysis using descriptive statistics.

The general analysis consisted of the evaluation of all the documents published in the electronic records in the period from 2002 to 2016 and the specific analysis only of those related to the sustainability theme. Although the sustainability section is part of the KM Brasil programming grid structure, the specific analysis adopted the criterion of relevance, thus considering the documents that presented the term sustainability in the title or in the keywords, regardless of the section in which they were framed in the programming.

To analyze the documents, the following analysis model was adopted:

Table 1
Model of bibliometric analysis of Publications in KM Brazil (2002 - 2016)

Each document, included in the Electronic Proceedings of KM Brazil, from 2002 to 2016, was analyzed according to the categories in Figure 1. In cases in which it was not possible to identify the information, it was adopted "Not identified". As for the consistency of the data, the content divergence between the electronic records of the SBGC website and the CD-ROMs stands out.

Thus, we opted to analyze the documents made available from the SBGC website, institution responsible for the organization of KM Brazil. However, still in relation to the electronic records of the SBGC website, it is important to report other inconsistencies such as: variation in the identification of the same author, lack of identification of authorship, lack of identification of institutional link, lack of identification of schooling; identification of the authorship in the site other than the identification of the authorship in the document file, unavailability of files of documents listed on the site and absence of documents of the event of the year 2006.

Finally, in relation to the articles on sustainability, it was complemented by a qualitative research based on content analysis, in order to identify subjects related to sustainability and the specific focus of the documents, through thematic analysis, accompanied by a descriptive synthesis.

4 Results

4.1 General analysis

In the period from 2002 to 2016, 605 documents were published in the electronic records of KM Brazil: 574 articles, 17 posters, 7 technical reports and 7 unidentified articles, since the files are not available on the website. The highest point of publications occurred in 2003, when 160 articles were published.

Graph 1
Quantitative Evolution of Publications in KM Brazil (2002 - 2016)

The general profile of the authors, considering all the publications, corresponds to the occurrence of 1,136 authors and a frequency of 1,619 (counting the repetitions), with prevalence of authorship of the masculine gender, collective, with academic link and performance in the public sector. An attempt was made to analyze the schooling of the authors, in an aggregated way, but due to the rare availability of the information in the analyzed documents, it was not possible to carry out such an analysis.

Of the 25 authors who published the most in KM Brazil in the period from 2002 to 2016 (those who had 5 to 14 publications) six dealt with sustainability. The 25 published collectively, one of which published both collectively and individually.

All 25 authors are linked to academia, 20 linked to public institutions (UFSC, CEFETPR, UFPR, UTFPR, UNICENTRO-PR, UFES, UFRJ, UFCG, UFPB) and 5 linked to private institutions (UCB and PUC-PR and PUC-SP). The institutions that most published are predominantly from the Southern Region of Brazil.

The author who published the most in KM Brazil in the period from 2002 to 2016 was Faimara do Rocio Strauhs, with 14 publications, all collective, with a doctorate level of education and linked to CEFET-PR and UTFPR. None of its 14 publications addressed sustainability.

Of the 25 most published authors, 17 are male and 8 females; 17 have a doctoral degree, one doctorate incomplete and 7 have not had their education levels identified.

Table 2
Most published authors in KM Brasil from 2002 to 2016

4.1 Analysis of sustainability articles

Specifically, in relation to the theme of sustainability, 18 articles addressed the theme, with 54 authors and a frequency of 58 (considering the repetitions). At the end of the analyzes, the frequency data will be considered next.

Regarding gender, there is a predominance of male authors.

Graph 2
Gênero dos autores que publicaram sobre sustentabilidade no KM Brasil (2002 - 2016)

As for the type of authorship, the predominance is in relation to collective authorship

Graph 3
Type of authorship of sustainability articles in KM Brazil (2002 - 2016)

Most of the authors are linked to the Academy.

Graph 4
Link of the authors of sustainability articles in KM Brazil (2002 - 2016)

In relation to the sector of activity, there is the predominance of the public sector.

Graph 5
Sector of the authors of articles on sustainability in KM Brazil (2002 - 2016)

As in the case of the general analysis, it was not possible to make the analysis of schooling, since 56 authors did not have their education levels identified. With three articles, Paulo Mauricio Selig, with unidentified level of education and linked to UFSC, is the most published author on sustainability in the period (2002 to 2016). It should be noted that the articles he prepared on sustainability were presented in 2007, 2009 and 2010. In 2016, this author presented a poster in KM Brasil, not related to sustainability, and it is possible to identify the doctoral degree on this occasion.

Regarding the thematic universe, considering the keywords of the articles, 42 themes were identified, including the theme of sustainability.

Table 3
Issues related to sustainability articles in KM Brazil (2002 - 2016)
Table 4
Analysis of the articles on sustainability in KM Brazil (2002 - 2016)

Regarding the variation of terms related to sustainability, the following titles were identified in the titles and keywords of the publications: sustainability of service companies, sustainability of the banking sector, sustainability in buildings, environmental sustainability, sustainable competitiveness, sustainable growth, development sustainable development, sustainable development of land transport in Brazil, sustainable local development and sustainable development.

It should be noted that the sustainability category, in the electronic records of KM Brazil, emerged from 2007, among the thematic areas of the event. However, it should be noted that despite the existence of the thematic area, it is possible to find articles related to sustainability (considering the title and / or keywords) in other categories, such as: Intangible Assets, intellectual and human capital; IT and support tools applied to GC; Innovation and strategic aspects of KM; Social networks, teaching and learning focused on KM; and New knowledge and interdisciplinary approaches related to GC.

Finally, there are articles listed in the sustainability category that do not present the theme in their titles or keywords, which suggests that although the theme may be addressed throughout the text, it tends to have little relevance to the sustainability category.

5 Conclusions

The limitations of the study are:

  • a) Adoption of the criterion of relevance, restricting the analysis only to documents that presented the term sustainability in the title and / or keywords;

  • b) Difference of content of electronic records on the SBGC website for electronic records on CD;

  • c) Lack of standardization of information, above all, the absence of a large number of documents from schooling information; and multiple identifications of the name of the same author;

  • d) There were also cases of non-authoritative documents and names that can be used for the male or female gender, which interferes with the accuracy of the analysis.

In this context, the following recommendations are made to the SBGC and the academic public:

  • a) In order to make possible future studies on the scientific production of KM Brazil, define the reference source for such studies (whether the annals made available on the SBGC website or those published on CD-ROM);

  • b) Considering the great participation in KM Brasil of researchers of the academic environment, SBGC establishes a partnership with some academic institution with the objective of generating a database of KM Brazil's records, structured with metadata, that allows the search of the documents and export of the records of the base, for analysis. It is important for the SBGC to publicize the academic community in the event of adoption of this recommendation in order to avoid duplication of efforts;

  • c) In the guidelines for submitting documents for the event, the guidelines on the identification of the author (preferably, that such recommendation be the name in extenso, in order to facilitate the crossing of data), schooling and link institution. Such information is important for the characterization of the authors' profile; and

  • d) That complementary studies be carried out, expanding the fields of analysis for summary and full text, to define the documents related to sustainability.

It should be noted that KM Brasil is an event that has a large number of participants in the business market, but at the same time, there is a considerable predominance of the academy in carrying out sustainability studies, as well as other themes.

Finally, it is considered that the number of documents on sustainability is small compared to the total of 605 publications that are part of the historical basis of KM Brazil, which demonstrates great opportunity for the development of studies on the subject.

Referências

  • ALMEIDA, Fernando. O bom negócio da sustentabilidade. Rio de Janeiro: Nova Fronteira, 2002.
  • APQC (AMERICAN PRODUCTIVITY & QUALITY CENTER). APQC Among 100 'Companies That Matter' in Knowledge Management. Houston, 2018. Disponível em: https://www.apqc.org/node/308096 Acesso em: 13 maio 2018.
    » https://www.apqc.org/node/308096
  • BACHA, Maria de Lourdes; SANTOS, Jorgina; SCHAUN, Angela. Considerações teóricas sobre o conceito de sustentabilidade. In.: Simpósio de Excelência em Gestão e Tecnologia, 7., 2010. Anais eletrônicos. Disponível em: https://www.aedb.br/seget/arquivos/artigos10/31_cons%20teor%20bacha.pdf Acesso em: 3 maio 2018.
    » https://www.aedb.br/seget/arquivos/artigos10/31_cons%20teor%20bacha.pdf
  • BARBOSA, Gisele Silva; DRACH, Patrícia Regina; CORBELLA, Oscar Daniel. A conceptual review of the terms sustainable development and sustainability. International Journal of Social Sciences, v. 3, n. 2, 2014. Disponível em: http://www.iises.net/download/Soubory/soubory-puvodni/pp-01-15_ijossV3N2.pdf Acesso em: 3 maio 2018.
    » http://www.iises.net/download/Soubory/soubory-puvodni/pp-01-15_ijossV3N2.pdf
  • BIERLY, P.; CHAKRABARTY, A. Generic knowledge strategies in the U.S. pharmaceutical industry. Strategic Management Journal, v. 17, p.123-35, Winter 1996.
  • CMMAD - Comissão Mundial sobre Meio Ambiente e Desenvolvimento. Nosso futuro comum. 2. ed. Rio de Janeiro: Editora da Fundação Getúlio Vargas, 1991.
  • ELKINGTON, John. Cannibals with Forks - The Tipple Bottom Line of 21st Century Business. Capstone,1999.
  • FEIL, Alexandre André; SCHREIBER, Dusan. Sustentabilidade e desenvolvimento sustentável: desvendando as sobreposições e alcances de seus significados. Cad. EBAPE.BR, v. 14, n. 3, Artigo 7, Rio de Janeiro, jul./set.2017. Disponível em: http://www.scielo.br/pdf/cebape/v15n3/1679-3951-cebape-15-03-00667.pdf Acesso em: 3 maio 2018.
    » http://www.scielo.br/pdf/cebape/v15n3/1679-3951-cebape-15-03-00667.pdf
  • FERNANDES, Bruno Henrique Rocha; FLEURY, Maria Tereza Leme; MILLS, John. Construindo o diálogo entre competência, recursos e desempenho organizacional. Revista de Administração de Empresas, São Paulo, v. 46, n. 4, p. 1-18, out./dez. 2006.
  • GROBER, U. Deep Roots: A Conceptual History of “sustain¬able Development” (Nachhaltigkeit). Discussion papers, Wissenschaftszentrum Berlin für Sozialforschung. Berlin: WZB, 2007. Disponível em: https://bibliothek.wzb.eu/pdf/2007/p07-002.pdf Acesso em: 3 maio 2018.
    » https://bibliothek.wzb.eu/pdf/2007/p07-002.pdf
  • HOVE, Hilary. Critiquing sustainable development: a meaningful way of mediating the development impasse? Undercurrent, v. 1, n. 1, p. 48-54, 2004. Disponível em: http://connection.ebscohost.com/c/articles/18428191/critiquing-sustainable-developmentmeaningful-way-mediating-development-impasse Acesso em: 3 maio 2018.
    » http://connection.ebscohost.com/c/articles/18428191/critiquing-sustainable-developmentmeaningful-way-mediating-development-impasse
  • KIDD, Charles V. The evolution of sustainability. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics, v. 5, n. 1, p. 1-26, 1992. Disponível em: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/227128571_The_evolution_of_sustainability Acesso em: 3 maio 2018.
    » https://www.researchgate.net/publication/227128571_The_evolution_of_sustainability
  • NASCIMENTO, Elimar Pinheiro do. Trajetória da sustentabilidade: do ambiental ao social, do social ao econômico. Estudos Avançados, v. 26, n. 74, 2012. Disponível em: http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?pid=S0103-0142012000100005&script=sci_abstract&tlng=pt Acesso em: 3 maio 2018.
    » http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?pid=S0103-0142012000100005&script=sci_abstract&tlng=pt
  • ROSA, Fabiana Pereira. Visão baseada em recursos: a gestão do conhecimento como estratégia competitiva sustentável. Revista Trajetória, Multicursos, Faculdade Cenecista de Osório, v. 5, n. 6, p. 118-136, jul. 2012.
  • SHRIVASTAVA, Paul; HART, Stuart. Greening Organisations - 2000. International Journal of Public Administration, v. 17, n. 3-4, p. 607-35, 1994. Disponível em: https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/01900699408524910 Acesso em: 3 maio 2018.
    » https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/01900699408524910
  • SVEIBY, K.E. A Knowledge-based theory of the firm to guide in strategy formulation. Journal of Intellectual Capital, v. 2, n. 4, p. 344-58, 2001.
  • Antiplagiarism
  • JITA:

    FJ. Knowledge management

Publication Dates

  • Publication in this collection
    22 Mar 2024
  • Date of issue
    2019

History

  • Received
    15 Sept 2018
  • Accepted
    26 May 2019
  • Published
    05 July 2019
Universidade Estadual de Campinas Rua Sérgio Buarque de Holanda, 421 - 1º andar Biblioteca Central César Lattes - Cidade Universitária Zeferino Vaz - CEP: 13083-859 , Tel: +55 19 3521-6729 - Campinas - SP - Brazil
E-mail: rdbci@unicamp.br