Acessibilidade / Reportar erro

Study of ongoing registered clinical trials on COVID-19: a narrative review

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

The dangerous SARS-CoV-2 virus first emerged in China in December 2019 and has rapidly spread worldwide. Currently, it has affected more than 2,850,000 people. No vaccine or drug is available yet, and therefore researchers and scientists are striving to identify potential drugs or vaccines for combating this virus. We were unable to find any review of the literature or analysis on ongoing registered clinical trials that reported diagnostic tests, therapeutics, vaccines and devices for COVID-19 along with estimated enrollment, participants’ ages, study type, start and completion date, status, treatment/intervention and country.

OBJECTIVE:

To review ongoing trials relating to COVID-19.

METHODS:

A systematic search for clinical trials was conducted in the ClinicalTrials.gov database up to April 12, 2020. A total of 339 trials relating to COVID-19 were analyzed and key information on each trial was recorded.

RESULTS:

Most of the trials were being conducted in the United States and completion of most of them was expected by May 2020. They were mostly on drugs and treatment, while a minority were on diagnostic tests. The analysis showed that hydroxychloroquine was investigated in most of the trials. The trials identified were categorized into five classes: a) diagnostic tests; b) therapeutics; c) biologics and vaccines; d) devices and products; and e) others.

CONCLUSION:

The trials identified have potential against COVID-19 that can be applied in treatment processes after the necessary investigations and experiments. Additionally, the items identified were organized in a proper way, which can assist in current research activities.

KEY WORDS (MeSH terms):
SARS virus; Therapeutics; Vaccines; Records

AUTHORS’ KEY WORDS:
Novel coronavirus; Diagnostic test; Devices; Biological

INTRODUCTION

The novel coronavirus (SARS-CoV-2) originated from Wuhan, in Hubei Province, China, and it has spread across more than 28 countries with more than 25,000 confirmed cases and around 500 deaths from mid-December 2019 to early February 2020.11. World Health Organization. Novel coronavirus (2019-nCoV). Situation report - 15. Available from: Available from: https://www.who.int/docs/default-source/coronaviruse/situation-reports/20200204-sitrep-15-ncov.pdf?sfvrsn=88fe8ad6_4 . Accessed in 2020 (May 4).
https://www.who.int/docs/default-source/...
Within that period, the case-fatality rate was around 2% and over 90% of the deaths and cases were in China.11. World Health Organization. Novel coronavirus (2019-nCoV). Situation report - 15. Available from: Available from: https://www.who.int/docs/default-source/coronaviruse/situation-reports/20200204-sitrep-15-ncov.pdf?sfvrsn=88fe8ad6_4 . Accessed in 2020 (May 4).
https://www.who.int/docs/default-source/...
Moreover, the majority of them were males with an average age of 55 years, according to reports on the initial surge of cases in Wuhan, which were linked to the Huanan Seafood Wholesale Market.22. Chen N, Zhou M, Dong X, et al. Epidemiological and clinical characteristics of 99 cases of 2019 novel coronavirus pneumonia in Wuhan, China: a descriptive study. Lancet. 2020;395(10223):507-13. PMID: 32007143; doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30211-7.
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30...
Almost similar symptoms (i.e. coughing, fever, myalgia and fatigue) were reported in most of the cases.33. Huang C, Wang Y, Li X, et al. Clinical features of patients infected with 2019 novel coronavirus in Wuhan, China. Lancet. 2020;395(10223):497-506. PMID: 31986264; doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30183-5.
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30...
Pneumonia and some other serious and even fatal respiratory diseases (i.e. acute respiratory distress syndrome) were developed in the majority of the cases.33. Huang C, Wang Y, Li X, et al. Clinical features of patients infected with 2019 novel coronavirus in Wuhan, China. Lancet. 2020;395(10223):497-506. PMID: 31986264; doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30183-5.
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30...

The 2019 novel coronavirus (SARS-CoV-2) is a beta coronavirus and it forms a clade within the subgenus Sarbecovirus of the subfamily Orthocoronavirinae.44. Zhu N, Zhang D, Wang W, et al. A novel coronavirus from patients with pneumonia in China, 2019. N Engl J Med. 2020;382(8):727-33. PMID: 31978945; doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2001017.
https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa2001017...
Outbreaks of some other beta coronaviruses of zoonotic origin, i.e. Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus (MERS-CoV) and severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus (SARS-CoV) occurred previously, in 2012 and 2003 respectively, and were linked to potentially fatal illness.55. Zaki AM, van Boheemen S, Bestebroer TM, Osterhaus AD, Fouchier RA. Isolation of a novel coronavirus from a man with pneumonia in Saudi Arabia. N Engl J Med. 2012;367(19):1814-20. PMID: 23075143; doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1211721.
https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1211721...
,66. Zhong NS, Zheng BJ, Li YM, et al. Epidemiology and cause of severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS) in Guangdong, People’s Republic of China, in February, 2003. Lancet. 2003;362(9393):1353-8. PMID: 14585636; doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(03)14630-2.
https://doi.org/10.1016/s0140-6736(03)14...
Around 3% pathogenicity has been observed in relation to SARS-CoV-2 according to the current evidence and this is comparatively lower than the rates for MERS-CoV (40%) and SARS-CoV (10%).77. Chen J. Pathogenicity and transmissibility of 2019-nCoV − a quick overview and comparison with other emerging viruses. Microbes Infect. 2020;22(2):69-71. PMID: 32032682; doi: 10.1016/j.micinf.2020.01.004.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.micinf.2020.01...
However, potentially higher transmissibility (R0: 1.4-5.5) has been observed for SARS-CoV-2, whereas it was only (R0: < 1) and (R0: 2-5) for MERS-CoV and SARS-CoV respectively.77. Chen J. Pathogenicity and transmissibility of 2019-nCoV − a quick overview and comparison with other emerging viruses. Microbes Infect. 2020;22(2):69-71. PMID: 32032682; doi: 10.1016/j.micinf.2020.01.004.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.micinf.2020.01...

SARS-CoV-2 has the possibility of expansion globally and the World Health Organization has already declared it to be a Public Health Emergency of International Concern.88. Wu JT, Leung K, Leung GM. Nowcasting and forecasting the potential domestic and international spread of the 2019-nCoV outbreak originating in Wuhan, China: a modelling study. Lancet. 2020;395(10225):689-97. PMID: 32014114; doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30260-9.
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30...
In this situation, rapid diagnostics, drugs and vaccines have become urgent necessities for promptly detecting, preventing and containing SARS-CoV-2. Potential quick diagnostics, drugs and vaccines for SARS-CoV-2 have been described and assessed in systematic reviews. A few studies on clinical trials relating to COVID-19 (the disease that the novel coronavirus causes) are already in the literature, but these are not enough, given the current situation. These trials only focused on drugs and were also limited to specific regions.99. Pang J, Wang MX, Ang IYH, et al. Potential rapid diagnostics, vaccine and therapeutics for 2019 novel coronavirus (2019-nCoV): a systematic review. J Clin Med. 2020;9(3):623. PMID: 32110875; doi: 10.3390/jcm9030623.
https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm9030623...
,1010. Hançer AT, Yilmaz P, Yilmaz M. New Coronavirus (2019-nCoV/COVID-19) and Vitamin C. Turkiye Klinikleri J Med Sci. 2020;40(2):260-4. doi: 10.5336/medsci.2020-76024.
https://doi.org/10.5336/medsci.2020-7602...
,1111. Rosa SGV, Santos WC. Clinical trials on drug repositioning for COVID-19 treatment. Rev Panam Salud Publica. 2020;44:e40. PMID: 32256547; doi: 10.26633/RPSP.2020.40.
https://doi.org/10.26633/RPSP.2020.40...
,1212. Tu YF, Chien CS, Yarmishyn AA, et al. A review of SARS-CoV-2 and the ongoing clinical trials. Int J Mol Sci. 2020;21(7):2657. PMID: 32290293; doi: 10.3390/ijms21072657.
https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms21072657...
No clinical trials on diagnostic tests, devices, vaccines, biologics, behavior and other matters have yet been reported in the literature. The present study identified and discussed all potential categories of registered clinical trials on COVID-19 in ClinicalTrials.gov database up to April 12, 2020. Additionally, statistical analysis based on the findings was also conducted.

OBJECTIVE

To create a complete study focusing on all categories of clinical trials relating to COVID-19, which is a necessity for assisting the current COVID-19 research activities.

METHODS

The necessary data were collected by searching ClinicalTrials.gov database up to April 12, 2020, using the descriptor [coronavirus] in the simple search field “conditions or disease”, without restrictions on languages, disease conditions, results or locations. The details of the search strategy are shown in Table 1. Our search also included trials that were shown with the status “recruiting” and “not yet recruiting”. On the other hand, trials for which the status was shown as “enrolling by invitation”, “active, not recruiting”, “suspended”, “terminated”, “completed”, “withdrawn” or “unknown” were not included in this study.

Table 1.
Search strategy

Thus, every trial was defined in terms of its specific identification number, estimated enrollment, participants’ ages, study type, start and completion date, status, treatment/intervention and country. From the information available in the database, we recorded and compared the continents of the clinical trials, total numbers of trials in various countries, expected completion time of the trials, phase of the trials, trial status, study type of the trials, estimated enrollment of participants in the trials, participants’ ages and types of intervention or treatment used in the trial. We also analyzed the registered diagnostic tests, drugs, biologics and vaccines, devices and products, and behavioral and other clinical trials relating to COVID-19.

RESULTS

Currently, there are no specific remedies or vaccines for COVID-19 infection. Therefore, over the past few months, a huge number of clinical trials have been registered in the ClinicalTrials.gov database with the aim of identifying the most effective treatment and vaccine for COVID-19. This number is increasing continuously.

Our search in ClinicalTrials.gov identified 339 clinical trials on COVID-19. Figure 1 shows the continents on which these trials were conducted. From this, it was observed that the largest proportion of the clinical trials (37%) were registered in Europe, while a minority (2%) were registered in Australia.

Figure 1.
Continents of the clinical trials on COVID-19.

Figures 2A and B exhibit the range of the total numbers of trials among different countries. From these figures, it can be seen that the highest number of clinical trials (76) was registered in the United States and the second highest number (66) was registered in China. Meanwhile, only one trial was registered from Pakistan, Saudi Arabia, Jordan, Poland, Vietnam, Singapore, Romania, Guyana, Thailand, South Africa, Monaco, Argentina, Czech Republic, Hungary and Cyprus.

Figure 2.
A. Total number of trials in various countries; B. Total number of trials in various countries (Continuation).

Figures 3A, B, C and D show the expected completion dates of the trials. The data show that the completion dates for these trials ranged from April 2020 to approximately the year 2030. It was observed that the largest proportion of these trials (36) were expected to be completed by May 2020. However, most of these trials were expected to finish by December 2021 and more than 200 trials were expected to finish by December 2020. Some trials were expected to finish in 2025 or 2026, and there was one trial that was supposed to be completed by March 2030, relating to “observation of behavior and COVID-19 infection”. Therefore, the world still needs to wait for a certain time period, for effective results to be reached from these registered trials.

Figure 3.
A. Expected completion dates of trials in 2020; B. Expected completion dates of trials in 2021; C. Expected completion dates of trials in 2022 and 2023; D. Expected completion dates of trials from 2024 to 2030.

It was observed regarding the trial phase that the largest proportion of them (33%) related to phase 2, while a minority (4%) related to early phase 1. It was found from the trial status that most of them (56%) were not yet recruiting, while a minority (44%) were already recruiting. It was observed regarding the study type that most of the trials (73%) were interventional, while a minority (27%) were observational. It was found from the estimated enrollment of participants in the trial that most of the trials (46%) were planned to have enrollment of less than 500, but greater than or equal to 100. On the other hand, a minority (11%) were planned to have enrollment greater than or equal to 1000. It was observed from the participants’ ages that most of the participants (85%) were within the ‘18 years and older’ category whereas a minority (1%) were within the ‘up to 18 years old’ category. Using categories of intervention or treatment, the trials could be categorized into five classes: a) diagnostic tests; b) therapeutics; c) biologics and vaccines; d) devices and products; and e) others. In addition, it was observed from the categories of intervention or treatment that most of the trials (56%) were related to therapeutics (drugs and treatment), while a minority of the trials (7%) were related to diagnostic tests.

Diagnostic tests

According to the United States Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, specimens should be collected by healthcare professionals not only from the lower respiratory tract (through either bronchoalveolar lavage or an endotracheal tube) but also from the upper respiratory tract (either oropharyngeal or nasopharyngeal). The diagnosis of COVID-19 pneumonia is mainly dependent on RT-PCR investigation on specimens. Serological tests can be considered if RT-PCR is unavailable.

A commercial qualitative testing system for SARS-CoV-2 using the cobas® system (Roche, Basel, Switzerland) has now been approved by the United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The test needs samples from oropharyngeal or nasopharyngeal swabs, and the result can be obtained within 3.5 hours. The cobas® SARS-CoV-2 test is a kind of double target assessment test depending upon the RT-PCR methodology. It can detect not only the particular SARS-CoV-2 ribonucleic acid but also the extremely conserved part of the invariant E gene in every member of the Sarbecovirus subgenus. To ensure accuracy and specificity, the assay comprises a comprehensive process with internal control, positive control and negative control.

Moreover, permission for urgent use of the Xpert Xpress SARS-CoV-2 test (Cepheid Inc, California, United States) was granted by the United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) on March 21, 2020. This is another qualitative test, from which results can be obtained within 45 minutes. Whenever more than one targeted gene is detected, the results should be treated as positive. At present, the screening methods depend upon appearance of plenty of viral genomes at the sample collection site. Studies have revealed that high levels of immunoglobulin M antibodies were present in both subclinical and symptomatic patients, five days after the onset of illness. Therefore, to enhance the sensitivity of detection, combination of the polymerase chain reaction and the immunoglobulin M enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay has been proposed.1313. Guo L, Ren L, Yang S, et al. Profiling early humoral response to diagnose novel coronavirus disease (COVID-19). Clin Infect Dis. 2020;ciaa310. PMID: 32198501; doi: 10.1093/cid/ciaa310.
https://doi.org/10.1093/cid/ciaa310...

However, to facilitate the diagnostic process relating to COVID-19, 25 clinical trials have been registered in the ClinicalTrials.gov database as diagnostic tests, and these are shown in Table 2.1414. Information on Clinical Trials and Human Research Studies. Available from: Available from: https://clinicaltrials.gov . Accessed in 2020 (May 4).
https://clinicaltrials.gov...
These trials described diagnostic tests focusing on an immunoglobulin G antibody testing kit to detect the virus, lung ultrasound to diagnose the etiology of respiratory failure in a pediatric intensive care unit and nasopharyngeal swabs to identify associated risk factors. Apart from these tests, breath tests, blood tests, computed tomography scans, serological tests, ultrasonography, radiological detection, electrocardiogram and transthoracic echocardiography, cell phone-based auto-diagnosis systems, scanning chest X-rays and use of artificial intelligence algorithms on images, etc., were registered in clinical trials focusing on several diagnostic tests to detect the virus, determine patients’ health status and make risk assessments.

Table 2.
Diagnostic tests for COVID-19 registered in clinical trials

One trial is using the Cambridge Validated Viral Detection Method, which is a modified polymerase chain reaction (PCR) test method that makes it possible to diagnose infection within four hours, which is much faster than the current tests. Another trial that has been registered is working to compare three tests that are currently available: PCR, antigenic rapid diagnostic orientation test and serological rapid tests for diagnostic orientation. Most of these registered trials will be finished by the end of 2020 and the successful trials will be able to facilitate the diagnostic process for COVID-19 patients.

Therapeutics (drugs and treatment)

At present, COVID-19 pneumonia has no specific treatment. Therefore, the need for supportive care and preclusion of complications and nosocomial transmission has been emphasized by clinical managements. Oxygen should be provided as soon as possible to patients who experience respiratory distress. However, fluid replacement should be comparatively conservative unless there is any sign of hypoperfusion of tissue, since this can result in edema of the lungs and worsen the oxygen status. In addition, fluid replacement is an important concept within treatments for severe acute respiratory infections because of its ability to shorten the duration of ventilation. Systemic corticosteroids have the potential to delay clearance of viruses and so they are not generally recommended.

However, most of the drugs investigated in the present COVID-19 trials and treatments were basically designed for another bacterium. Several trials were started in order to test particular antibodies and vaccines, mainly targeting SARS-CoV-2. Here, these ongoing therapeutic options have been summarized.

Up to April 12, 2020, 188 clinical trials relating to for SARS-CoV-2 therapeutics had been registered in the clinical trials registry (ClinicalTrials.gov). These are reported in Table 3.1414. Information on Clinical Trials and Human Research Studies. Available from: Available from: https://clinicaltrials.gov . Accessed in 2020 (May 4).
https://clinicaltrials.gov...
Among these trials, 57 investigated antivirals, 57 antimalarials, 87 anti-inflammatories, 6 antiretrovirals, 13 dietary supplements, 21 standard treatment care, 9 traditional Chinese medicine, 6 oxygen and nitric acid therapy, 3 plasma, 11 antibodies, 26 antibiotics and several other therapeutics. Among these, some drugs, especially antiviral and antimalarial drugs, have shown effective results in ongoing treatment processes for COVID-19, and several patients have been successfully cured.1515. Xinhua. Antimalarial drug confirmed effective on COVID-19. Available from: Available from: http://www.xinhuanet.com/english/2020-02/17/c_138792545.htm . Accessed in 2020 (May 4).
http://www.xinhuanet.com/english/2020-02...
On the other hand, in some cases, these drugs have also shown negative results.1616. Servick K. Antimalarials widely used against COVID-19 heighten risk of cardiac arrest. How can doctors minimize the danger? Available from: Available from: https://www.sciencemag.org/news/2020/04/antimalarials-widely-used-against-covid-19-heighten-risk-cardiac-arrest-how-can-doctors . Accessed in 2020 (May 4).
https://www.sciencemag.org/news/2020/04/...
Thus, without proper results from successful clinical trials, specific therapeutics cannot be identified. However, most of these trials are expected to finish by the end of 2020, whereupon successful results from these trials will be able to assist in developing specific therapeutics for COVID-19 infection.

Table 3.
Drugs for treating COVID-19 identified in registered clinical trials

Vaccine and biological trials

With the rise of SARS-CoV-2, around 30 potential ongoing trials on vaccines have been classified in the registers of ClinicalTrials.gov (Table 4). A variety of technologies, including use of deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA)-based techniques, messenger ribonucleic acid (RNA)-based techniques, synthetic particles, nanoparticles and modified virus-like particles have been used. It will most probably take around a year for phase 1 clinical trials to begin in relation to a large proportion of the candidate vaccines, unless funded by the Coalition for Epidemic Preparedness Innovations (CEPI). However, a kit that was developed by Beijing Genomics Institute (BGI) passed the emergency approval process of the National Medical Products Administration of China and so it is currently being used in clinical and surveillance centers in China.1717. BGI develops real-time fluorescent RT-PCR kit for detecting the 2019 novel coronavirus. Available from: Available from: https://www.bgi.com/global/company/news/bgi-develops-real-time-dna-based-kit-for-detecting-the-2019-novel-coronavirus/ . Accessed in 2020 (May 5).
https://www.bgi.com/global/company/news/...
All of these trials are testing the immunogenicity and safety of their corresponding vaccine candidates relating to MERS-CoV, but have been excluded because of the unavailability of results so far. These trials are projected to be finished by December 2020 (two studies in Russia) and by December 2021 (in Germany).1818. Study of safety and immunogenicity of BVRS-GamVac-Combi. Available from: Available from: https://clinicaltrials.gov/show/NCT04128059 . Accessed in 2020 (May 5).
https://clinicaltrials.gov/show/NCT04128...
,1919. Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase Ib study to assess the safety and immunogenicity of MVA-MERS-S_DF-1. Available from: Available from: https://clinicaltrials.gov/show/NCT04119440 . Accessed in 2020 (May 5).
https://clinicaltrials.gov/show/NCT04119...

Table 4.
Biologics and vaccines for use against COVID-19 identified in registered clinical trials

At present, vaccines for SARS-CoV-2 are still at the development stage and none are at the testing stage. On January 23, 2020, an announcement was made by the Coalition for Epidemic Preparedness Innovations (CEPI) that vaccine development programs will be funded by them in partnership with Moderna, University of Queensland and Inovio, with the aim of clinically testing the experimental vaccines within 16 weeks. The vaccine candidates will be developed using the DNA, recombinant and mRNA vaccine platforms of these organizations.2020. CEPI to fund three programmes to develop vaccines against the novel coronavirus, nCoV-2019. Available from: Available from: https://cepi.net/news_cepi/cepi-to-fund-three-programmes-to-develop-vaccines-against-the-novel-coronavirus-ncov-2019/ . Accessed in 2020 (May 5).
https://cepi.net/news_cepi/cepi-to-fund-...

Among the trials identified, vaccines based on the following are expected to show high potential as effective vaccines against COVID-19: natural killer (NK) cell group; mesenchymal stromal cell (MSC) group; bacille Calmette-Guérin (BCG); LV-SMENP-DC; CAStem; chimpanzee adenovirus Oxford 1 (ChAdOx1); aAPC; mRNA-1273; bacTRL-Spike; etc. However, convalescent plasma, high-titer anti-SARS-CoV-2 plasma, SARS-CoV-2 non-immune plasma and high-titer anti-SARS-CoV-2 plasma are bio-pharmaceutical products that have also been identified in clinical trial as vaccine candidates and are expected to have high potentiality to act against COVID-19. It would then be possible to successfully apply these vaccines if positive results are obtained from these registered trials.

Devices and products

To facilitate the treatment process relating to COVID-19 infection, several trials to develop device and products have been registered. In total, 31 trials relating to devices and products for COVID-19 had been registered up to April 12, 2020, which is more than the numbers of diagnostic test trials and vaccine trials. Most of the devices in these trials related to oxygen supply and monitoring, sensors, image processing, high-flow nasal cannulas, inspiratory and expiratory training devices, MAGEC spine rods (NuVasive, California, United States), echocardiography devices, transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) or surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR) and apps for COVID-19 patients. All these devices are expected to be highly effective for treating COVID-19 patients. Therefore, before applying these devices rapidly, the medical world needs to wait until positive finished results are received, in order to avoid any kind of negative effects on patients (Table 5).

Table 5.
Devices and products for use against COVID-19 identified in registered clinical trials

Behavioral and other clinical trials

In order to facilitate the treatment process for COVID-19 infection, 65 behavioral and other trials were registered up to April 12, 2020. Most of these behavioral and other trials relate to guidelines, management, healthcare, surveys on anxiety, mood and quality of life and human biological samples, which are very necessary in relation to COVID-19 patients. Standard public health measures have been used to isolate patients and do contact tracing as per national guidelines.1414. Information on Clinical Trials and Human Research Studies. Available from: Available from: https://clinicaltrials.gov . Accessed in 2020 (May 4).
https://clinicaltrials.gov...
Video-based aerobic exercises have been used to increase physical activity levels, psychological condition and physical wellbeing.1414. Information on Clinical Trials and Human Research Studies. Available from: Available from: https://clinicaltrials.gov . Accessed in 2020 (May 4).
https://clinicaltrials.gov...
Blood sampling is necessary in order to detect COVID-19 seroconversion among medical and paramedical staff. Retrospective analysis is used in order to clearly understand the impact factors of clinical outcomes among hospitalized patients.1414. Information on Clinical Trials and Human Research Studies. Available from: Available from: https://clinicaltrials.gov . Accessed in 2020 (May 4).
https://clinicaltrials.gov...
Pulmonary ultrasound is used to assess the risk of severe clinical outcomes in patients with suspected or diagnosed COVID-19.1414. Information on Clinical Trials and Human Research Studies. Available from: Available from: https://clinicaltrials.gov . Accessed in 2020 (May 4).
https://clinicaltrials.gov...
The SPIN-CHAT software is used to evaluate videoconference-based interventions that are designed to improve the symptoms of anxiety and other mental health outcomes.1414. Information on Clinical Trials and Human Research Studies. Available from: Available from: https://clinicaltrials.gov . Accessed in 2020 (May 4).
https://clinicaltrials.gov...
Moreover, all the trials are expected to be highly effective if the results are positive with regard to treating COVID-19 patients. Additionally, before applying the results in practice, further experiments and studies should be done, to avoid any harmful effects or adverse events in relation to patients.

DISCUSSION

This study was based on the database of ClinicalTrials.gov up to April 12, 2020. Most of the trials are being conducted in the United States and China. Since COVID-19 has spread all over the world, there is a growing need to also conduct investigations in other countries that have been affected. Moreover, most of the trials are in phase 2 and some trials have longer expected completion times.

SARS-CoV-2 is a very dangerous virus that is rapidly spreading all over the world. For effective solutions to be obtained quickly, trials should be completed within a short time. However, regulatory authorities need to carefully maintain proper recruitment protocols for clinical trials.

Observational studies account for slightly more than one-fourth of the total number of studies. This proportion needs to be increased somewhat, because observational studies directly focus on treatment protocols for COVID-19 patients. More studies should be conducted with numbers of participants above 1000, in order to find more accurate results. Since every person is important for proper investigation, more people with ages below 18 should be included.

The largest proportion of the trials relates to drugs. However, there need to be greater numbers of trials relating to other categories. Although antiviral drugs (remdesivir and lopinavir/ritonavir) and antimalarial drugs (especially hydroxychloroquine), plasma therapy, anti-inflammatory drugs and azithromycin have been investigated in the highest proportion of the trials, no accurate results that can be completed early have yet been found with regard to combating COVID-19. Moreover, some of the drugs investigated may have serious adverse events. Therefore, adequate precautions should be taken before applying a drug, to avoid any negative impacts. Successful conclusions from these trials are important and the results are expected to be received mostly at the end of 2020.

Since COVID-19 has a very high transmission rate, diagnostic tests are very important. Through these tests, people with the virus can be isolated. Otherwise, the virus may spread very quickly.

Polymerase chain reaction (PCR) tests, immunoglobulin G antibody testing kits and serological tests have been registered for trials in high numbers. However, more clinical trials are still needed in order to identify more efficient testing processes that have low cost and high detection rates within a short time, to control the transmission rate. Vaccines can be very effective to protect people from COVID-19, so more importance should be given to finding at least one effective vaccine as soon as possible. Overall, use of convalescent plasma, high-titer anti-SARS-CoV-2 plasma and SARS-CoV-2 non-immune plasma may show potential in relation to vaccines for treating COVID-19.

Moreover, to facilitate the treatment process, more effective devices, especially for oxygen therapy and patient monitoring systems, are important. Additionally, behavioral and other trials are also needed in order to understand and analyze healthcare management for COVID-19 and its impact on society, patients and medical science.

The world is now counting the days, in the hope of receiving positive successful results from the ongoing clinical trials as soon as possible, to combat COVID-19.

CONCLUSIONS

This review found 339 clinical trials that evaluated interventions for preventing or treating coronavirus. Overall, use of antiviral drugs (remdesivir and lopinavir/ritonavir) and antimalarial drugs (especially hydroxychloroquine), plasma therapy, anti-inflammatory drugs and azithromycin may present some benefits for treating COVID-19 infection. Polymerase chain reaction (PCR) tests, immunoglobulin G antibody testing kits and serological tests are the diagnostic tests that are involved in the highest numbers of trials registered for detecting COVID-19. Moreover, several kinds of plasma and bio-pharmaceutical products identified in trials may present potential as candidate vaccines against COVID-19. Additionally, trials on devices (oxyhydrogen devices, patient monitoring devices, etc.) and other clinical trials (surveys, behavioral trials and observational trials) may also have potential to facilitate the treatment process for COVID-19. However, completion results from the trials described in the present study are needed before any diagnostic test, therapeutics, vaccines, devices or other objects relating to clinical management processes for COVID-19 can be properly recommended. More randomized controlled trials are still necessary, in order to reduce the uncertainties regarding most clinical questions that surround COVID-19.

LIMITATIONS

This study had some limitations. It was conducted within time limits and details of some trials were not properly available.

REFERENCES

  • 1
    World Health Organization. Novel coronavirus (2019-nCoV). Situation report - 15. Available from: Available from: https://www.who.int/docs/default-source/coronaviruse/situation-reports/20200204-sitrep-15-ncov.pdf?sfvrsn=88fe8ad6_4 Accessed in 2020 (May 4).
    » https://www.who.int/docs/default-source/coronaviruse/situation-reports/20200204-sitrep-15-ncov.pdf?sfvrsn=88fe8ad6_4
  • 2
    Chen N, Zhou M, Dong X, et al. Epidemiological and clinical characteristics of 99 cases of 2019 novel coronavirus pneumonia in Wuhan, China: a descriptive study. Lancet. 2020;395(10223):507-13. PMID: 32007143; doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30211-7.
    » https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30211-7
  • 3
    Huang C, Wang Y, Li X, et al. Clinical features of patients infected with 2019 novel coronavirus in Wuhan, China. Lancet. 2020;395(10223):497-506. PMID: 31986264; doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30183-5.
    » https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30183-5
  • 4
    Zhu N, Zhang D, Wang W, et al. A novel coronavirus from patients with pneumonia in China, 2019. N Engl J Med. 2020;382(8):727-33. PMID: 31978945; doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2001017.
    » https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa2001017
  • 5
    Zaki AM, van Boheemen S, Bestebroer TM, Osterhaus AD, Fouchier RA. Isolation of a novel coronavirus from a man with pneumonia in Saudi Arabia. N Engl J Med. 2012;367(19):1814-20. PMID: 23075143; doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1211721.
    » https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1211721
  • 6
    Zhong NS, Zheng BJ, Li YM, et al. Epidemiology and cause of severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS) in Guangdong, People’s Republic of China, in February, 2003. Lancet. 2003;362(9393):1353-8. PMID: 14585636; doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(03)14630-2.
    » https://doi.org/10.1016/s0140-6736(03)14630-2
  • 7
    Chen J. Pathogenicity and transmissibility of 2019-nCoV − a quick overview and comparison with other emerging viruses. Microbes Infect. 2020;22(2):69-71. PMID: 32032682; doi: 10.1016/j.micinf.2020.01.004.
    » https://doi.org/10.1016/j.micinf.2020.01.004
  • 8
    Wu JT, Leung K, Leung GM. Nowcasting and forecasting the potential domestic and international spread of the 2019-nCoV outbreak originating in Wuhan, China: a modelling study. Lancet. 2020;395(10225):689-97. PMID: 32014114; doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30260-9.
    » https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30260-9
  • 9
    Pang J, Wang MX, Ang IYH, et al. Potential rapid diagnostics, vaccine and therapeutics for 2019 novel coronavirus (2019-nCoV): a systematic review. J Clin Med. 2020;9(3):623. PMID: 32110875; doi: 10.3390/jcm9030623.
    » https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm9030623
  • 10
    Hançer AT, Yilmaz P, Yilmaz M. New Coronavirus (2019-nCoV/COVID-19) and Vitamin C. Turkiye Klinikleri J Med Sci. 2020;40(2):260-4. doi: 10.5336/medsci.2020-76024.
    » https://doi.org/10.5336/medsci.2020-76024
  • 11
    Rosa SGV, Santos WC. Clinical trials on drug repositioning for COVID-19 treatment. Rev Panam Salud Publica. 2020;44:e40. PMID: 32256547; doi: 10.26633/RPSP.2020.40.
    » https://doi.org/10.26633/RPSP.2020.40
  • 12
    Tu YF, Chien CS, Yarmishyn AA, et al. A review of SARS-CoV-2 and the ongoing clinical trials. Int J Mol Sci. 2020;21(7):2657. PMID: 32290293; doi: 10.3390/ijms21072657.
    » https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms21072657
  • 13
    Guo L, Ren L, Yang S, et al. Profiling early humoral response to diagnose novel coronavirus disease (COVID-19). Clin Infect Dis. 2020;ciaa310. PMID: 32198501; doi: 10.1093/cid/ciaa310.
    » https://doi.org/10.1093/cid/ciaa310
  • 14
    Information on Clinical Trials and Human Research Studies. Available from: Available from: https://clinicaltrials.gov Accessed in 2020 (May 4).
    » https://clinicaltrials.gov
  • 15
    Xinhua. Antimalarial drug confirmed effective on COVID-19. Available from: Available from: http://www.xinhuanet.com/english/2020-02/17/c_138792545.htm Accessed in 2020 (May 4).
    » http://www.xinhuanet.com/english/2020-02/17/c_138792545.htm
  • 16
    Servick K. Antimalarials widely used against COVID-19 heighten risk of cardiac arrest. How can doctors minimize the danger? Available from: Available from: https://www.sciencemag.org/news/2020/04/antimalarials-widely-used-against-covid-19-heighten-risk-cardiac-arrest-how-can-doctors Accessed in 2020 (May 4).
    » https://www.sciencemag.org/news/2020/04/antimalarials-widely-used-against-covid-19-heighten-risk-cardiac-arrest-how-can-doctors
  • 17
    BGI develops real-time fluorescent RT-PCR kit for detecting the 2019 novel coronavirus. Available from: Available from: https://www.bgi.com/global/company/news/bgi-develops-real-time-dna-based-kit-for-detecting-the-2019-novel-coronavirus/ Accessed in 2020 (May 5).
    » https://www.bgi.com/global/company/news/bgi-develops-real-time-dna-based-kit-for-detecting-the-2019-novel-coronavirus/
  • 18
    Study of safety and immunogenicity of BVRS-GamVac-Combi. Available from: Available from: https://clinicaltrials.gov/show/NCT04128059 Accessed in 2020 (May 5).
    » https://clinicaltrials.gov/show/NCT04128059
  • 19
    Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase Ib study to assess the safety and immunogenicity of MVA-MERS-S_DF-1. Available from: Available from: https://clinicaltrials.gov/show/NCT04119440 Accessed in 2020 (May 5).
    » https://clinicaltrials.gov/show/NCT04119440
  • 20
    CEPI to fund three programmes to develop vaccines against the novel coronavirus, nCoV-2019. Available from: Available from: https://cepi.net/news_cepi/cepi-to-fund-three-programmes-to-develop-vaccines-against-the-novel-coronavirus-ncov-2019/ Accessed in 2020 (May 5).
    » https://cepi.net/news_cepi/cepi-to-fund-three-programmes-to-develop-vaccines-against-the-novel-coronavirus-ncov-2019/
  • 21
    Weiner DE, Sarnak MJ. Cardiovascular disease in patients with chronic kidney disease. In: Himmelfarb J, Sayegh MH, editors. Chronic Kidney Disease, Dialysis, and Transplantation. Philadelphia: Saunders; 2010. p. 128-44.
  • 22
    Wang M, Cao R, Zhang L, et al. Remdesivir and chloroquine effectively inhibit the recently emerged novel coronavirus (2019-nCoV) in vitro. Cell Res. 2020;30(3):269-71. PMID: 32020029; doi: 10.1038/s41422-020-0282-0.
    » https://doi.org/10.1038/s41422-020-0282-0
  • 23
    Triana-Baltzer GB, Gubareva LV, Klimov AI, et al. Inhibition of neuraminidase inhibitor-resistant influenza virus by DAS181, a novel sialidase fusion protein. PloS One. 2009;4(11):e7838. PMID: 19893749; doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0007838.
    » https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0007838
  • 24
    Uyeki TM. Oseltamivir treatment of influenza in children. Clin Infect Dis. 2018;66(10):1501-3. PMID: 29315362; doi: 10.1093/cid/cix1150.
    » https://doi.org/10.1093/cid/cix1150
  • 25
    Rabby MII. Current drugs with potential for treatment of COVID-19: a literature review. J Pharm Pharm Sci. 2020;23(1):58-64. PMID: 32251618; doi: 10.18433/jpps31002.
    » https://doi.org/10.18433/jpps31002
  • 26
    Pharmacoeconomic Review Report: Sarilumab (Kevzara). Ottawa (ON): Canadian Agency for Drugs and Technologies in Health; 2017. PMID: 30489710; NBK534401.
  • 27
    Wang Y, Jiang Y, Zhao X, Weiqing HE, inventors; Shenyang Fuyang Pharmaceutical Technology Co Ltd, assignee. Use of carrimycin in mycobacterium tuberculosis infection resistance. United States patent application US 16/067,327. 2019.
  • 28
    Fredlund P, Hillson J, Gray T, et al. Peginterferon Lambda-1a (Lambda) is Associated With Less Autoimmune Thyroid Disease and Serious Autoimmune Disease Than Peginterferon Alfa-2a (Alfa) When Used in Combination With Ribavirin (RBV) for the Treatment of Chronic Hepatitis C Virus Infection: 781. Hepatology. 2012;56:571A. Available from: Available from: https://insights.ovid.com/crossref?an=01515467-201210001-00786&clickthrough=y Accessed in 2020 (May 6).
    » https://insights.ovid.com/crossref?an=01515467-201210001-00786&clickthrough=y
  • 29
    Tang TX. Application of Xiyanping in treatment of infantile rotavirus diarrhea. Journal of Hainan Medical University 2016;22(13):113-5. Available from: Available from: http://www.hnykdxxb.com/PDF/201613/30.pdf Accessed in 2020 (May 5).
    » http://www.hnykdxxb.com/PDF/201613/30.pdf
  • 30
    Carr EA. Systemic inflammatory response syndrome. In: Robinson’s Current Therapy in Equine Medicine. Philadelphia: Saunders ; 2015. p. 741-5.
  • 31
    Thanh Le T, Andreadakis Z, Kumar A, et al. The COVID-19 vaccine development landscape. Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2020;10.1938/d41573-020-00073-5. PMID: 32273591; doi: 10.1038/d41573-020-00073-5.
    » https://doi.org/10.1038/d41573-020-00073-5
  • 32
    Weiner P, Magadle R, Beckerman M, Weiner M, Berar-Yanay N. Specific expiratory muscle training in COPD. Chest. 2003;124(2):468-73. PMID: 12907530; doi: 10.1378/chest.124.2.468.
    » https://doi.org/10.1378/chest.124.2.468
  • 33
    Monnet X, Teboul JL. Transpulmonary thermodilution: advantages and limits. Crit Care. 2017;21(1):147. PMID: 28625165; doi: 10.1186/s13054-017-1739-5.
    » https://doi.org/10.1186/s13054-017-1739-5
  • 34
    Smart Patients. Therapeutic Vaccination in Treated HIV Disease. Available from: https://www.smartpatients.com/trials/NCT03606213 Accessed in 2020 (May 5).
    » https://www.smartpatients.com/trials/NCT03606213
  • 1
    Islamic University of Technology, Gazipur, Bangladesh, and Universiti Putra Malaysia, Seri Kembangan, Selangor, Malaysia
  • Sources of funding: None

Publication Dates

  • Publication in this collection
    14 Aug 2020
  • Date of issue
    Sep-Oct 2020

History

  • Reviewed
    07 May 2020
  • Received
    31 May 2020
  • Accepted
    15 June 2020
Associação Paulista de Medicina - APM APM / Publicações Científicas, Av. Brigadeiro Luís Antonio, 278 - 7º and., 01318-901 São Paulo SP - Brazil, Tel.: +55 11 3188-4310 / 3188-4311, Fax: +55 11 3188-4255 - São Paulo - SP - Brazil
E-mail: revistas@apm.org.br