AVALIAÇÃO DO USO DE UMA "ESPÁTULA PUPILÔMETRO" (E.P.)

Sousa, Regina Mareia Cardoso de; Koizumi, María Sumie

doi:10.1590/0080-6234199002400200251

Resumos

Estudo avaliativo do uso de um instrumento para verificar diâmetro pupilar, o qual foi elaborado com uma escala de 9 circuios pretos, progressivamente maiores, com diâmetro mínimo de 1 mm e máximo de 9mm, adaptada à uma espátula de madeira.

Enfermagem neurológica; Pupila-Avaliação; Exame neurológico

Evaluating study of the use of an advice for crecking the pupillary diameter, which was up of a 9 black printed circles, progressively larger, with a minimun diameter of 1 mm and a maximun of 9 mm, affixed to a wooden tongue depressor.

Neurological nursing; Pupil - Evaluation; Neurologic examination

Texto disponível apenas em PDF

REFERÊNCIAS BIBLIOGRÁFICAS

¹
ANDERSON, M.S. Assessment under pressure: when your patient says, any head hurts. Nursing, Springhouse, 14(9):34-43, Sept. 1984.
²
ASSIS, J.L. de Sistema motor ocular. In: CANELAS, H.M. et alii. Fisiopatologia do sistema nervoso. São Paulo, Sarvier, 1983. Cap. 13. p.195-243.
³
BORREGO, R.L. & GARDNER, R.M. Classical conditioning of pupilary constriction. Percept. Mot. Skills, Missoula, 62(1):315-22, Feb. 1986.
⁴
GONÇALVES, P. A pupila e suas alterações estáticas e dinâmicas. In: GONÇALVES, P. . Oftalmologia. 4.ed. Rio de Janeiro, Atheneu, 1975. p.387-401.
⁵
HICKET, J.V. The neurological physical examination. In: HICKET, J.V. The clinical practice of neurological and neurosurgical nursing. 2.ed. Philadelphia, Lippincott, 1986. cap. 3. p. 59-89.
⁶
HINKLE, J. Nursing care of patients with minor head injury. J. Neurosci. Nurs., Park Ridge, 20(1):8-16, Feb. 1988.
⁷
JOHNSON, L.K. If your patient has increased intracranial pressure, your goal should be: no surprises. Nursing, Springhouse, 18(6):58-63, June 1983.
⁸
JONES, D.P. & DEVERE, T.K. A simple objective pupillometer. J. Phys. (E), London, 11(8):736-6, Aug. 1978.
⁹
KOIZUMI, M.S. Avaliação do nível de consciência em pacientes com traumatismo craniano-encefálico. São Paulo, 1977. 56p. (Dissertação de mestrado-Escola de Enfermagem da USP).
¹⁰
LORD-FEROLI, K. & MAGUIRE-McGINTY, M. Toward a more objective approach to pupil assessment. J. Neurosurg. Nurs., Chicago, 17(5):309-12, Oct. 1965.
¹¹
MANCALL, E.L. Exame do sistema nervoso. In: MANCALL, E.L. O exame neurológico. 2.ed. Rio de Janeiro, Colina, 1986. cap. 1. p. 15-51.
¹²
METALIS, S.A. & HESS, E.H. Pupillometric assessment of the readability of two video screen fonts. Percept. Mot. Skills, Missoula, 62(1):279-82, Feb. 1986.
¹³
MILLER, M. Emergency management of the unconscious patient Nurs. Clin. North Am., Philadelphia, 16(1):59-73, Mar. 1981.
¹⁴
NAKAMAE. D.D. & KOIZUMI, M.S. Exame clínico de enfermagem: condições físicas — parte III. Enf. Novas Dimens., São Paulo, 5(2):10-6, mar./abr. 1979.
¹⁵
NEUROLOGIC care. Pensylvania. Springhouse, 1986. 183 p.
¹⁶
PASCOE, D.A. A pupil gauge. Anaesthesia, London, 35(10):1021, Oct. 1980.
¹⁷
PATTEN, J. As pupilas e suas reações. In: PATTEN, J. Diagnóstico diferencial em neurologia. São Paulo, Roca, 1986. cap. 2. p.3-10.
¹⁸
PLUM, F. & POSNER, J.B. Diagnóstico de estupor e coma. 2.ed. Rio de Janeiro, Guanabara Koogan, 1977. p.43-51.
¹⁹
PRESSMAN, M.R. et alii. Senile miosis: the possible contribution of disordered sleep and daytime sleepiness. J. Gerontol., Washington, 41(5):629-34, Sept. 1986.
²⁰
PRICE, M.B. & DeVROOM, H.L. A quick and easy guide to neurological assessment. J. Neurosurg. Nurs.. Chicago, 17(5):313-20, Oct. 1985.
²¹
RICHER, F. et alii. Response selection and initiation in speeded reactions: a pupillo-metric analysis. J. Exp. Psychol., Washington, 9(3):360-70, June 1983.
²²
ROPPER, A.H. et alii. Computer-guided neurologic assessment in the neurologic intensive care unit. Heart Lung, Saint Louis, 10(1):54-60, Jan./Feb. 1981.
²³
RUDY, E.B. Assessment of the neurological patient. In: RUDY, E.B. Advanced neurological and neurosurgical nursing. Saint Louis, Mosby, 1984. cap. 2. p.70-114.
²⁴
SAVOY, S.M. The craniotomy patient: identifying the patient's neurological status. AORN J., Denver, 40(5):716-24, Nov. 1964.
²⁵
SCHLUROFF, M. Pupil responses to grammatical complexity of sentences. Brain Lang, New York, 17(1):133-45, Sept. 1982.
²⁶
UNIVERSIDADE DE São Paulo. Instituto de Física. Elementos da teoria de erros. São Paulo, 1987. 44p.
²⁷
WHITNEY, F.W. Guidelines for neurological consultation. Nurse Pract., Trenton, 7(7): 13-8, July/Aug. 1982.

Datas de Publicação

Publicação nesta coleção
Ago 1990

This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

[1] ¹
ANDERSON, M.S. Assessment under pressure: when your patient says, any head hurts. Nursing, Springhouse, 14(9):34-43, Sept. 1984.

[2] ²
ASSIS, J.L. de Sistema motor ocular. In: CANELAS, H.M. et alii. Fisiopatologia do sistema nervoso. São Paulo, Sarvier, 1983. Cap. 13. p.195-243.

[3] ³
BORREGO, R.L. & GARDNER, R.M. Classical conditioning of pupilary constriction. Percept. Mot. Skills, Missoula, 62(1):315-22, Feb. 1986.

[4] ⁴
GONÇALVES, P. A pupila e suas alterações estáticas e dinâmicas. In: GONÇALVES, P. . Oftalmologia. 4.ed. Rio de Janeiro, Atheneu, 1975. p.387-401.

[5] ⁵
HICKET, J.V. The neurological physical examination. In: HICKET, J.V. The clinical practice of neurological and neurosurgical nursing. 2.ed. Philadelphia, Lippincott, 1986. cap. 3. p. 59-89.

[6] ⁶
HINKLE, J. Nursing care of patients with minor head injury. J. Neurosci. Nurs., Park Ridge, 20(1):8-16, Feb. 1988.

[7] ⁷
JOHNSON, L.K. If your patient has increased intracranial pressure, your goal should be: no surprises. Nursing, Springhouse, 18(6):58-63, June 1983.

[8] ⁸
JONES, D.P. & DEVERE, T.K. A simple objective pupillometer. J. Phys. (E), London, 11(8):736-6, Aug. 1978.

[9] ⁹
KOIZUMI, M.S. Avaliação do nível de consciência em pacientes com traumatismo craniano-encefálico. São Paulo, 1977. 56p. (Dissertação de mestrado-Escola de Enfermagem da USP).

[10] ¹⁰
LORD-FEROLI, K. & MAGUIRE-McGINTY, M. Toward a more objective approach to pupil assessment. J. Neurosurg. Nurs., Chicago, 17(5):309-12, Oct. 1965.

[11] ¹¹
MANCALL, E.L. Exame do sistema nervoso. In: MANCALL, E.L. O exame neurológico. 2.ed. Rio de Janeiro, Colina, 1986. cap. 1. p. 15-51.

[12] ¹²
METALIS, S.A. & HESS, E.H. Pupillometric assessment of the readability of two video screen fonts. Percept. Mot. Skills, Missoula, 62(1):279-82, Feb. 1986.

[13] ¹³
MILLER, M. Emergency management of the unconscious patient Nurs. Clin. North Am., Philadelphia, 16(1):59-73, Mar. 1981.

[14] ¹⁴
NAKAMAE. D.D. & KOIZUMI, M.S. Exame clínico de enfermagem: condições físicas — parte III. Enf. Novas Dimens., São Paulo, 5(2):10-6, mar./abr. 1979.

[15] ¹⁵
NEUROLOGIC care. Pensylvania. Springhouse, 1986. 183 p.

[16] ¹⁶
PASCOE, D.A. A pupil gauge. Anaesthesia, London, 35(10):1021, Oct. 1980.

[17] ¹⁷
PATTEN, J. As pupilas e suas reações. In: PATTEN, J. Diagnóstico diferencial em neurologia. São Paulo, Roca, 1986. cap. 2. p.3-10.

[18] ¹⁸
PLUM, F. & POSNER, J.B. Diagnóstico de estupor e coma. 2.ed. Rio de Janeiro, Guanabara Koogan, 1977. p.43-51.

[19] ¹⁹
PRESSMAN, M.R. et alii. Senile miosis: the possible contribution of disordered sleep and daytime sleepiness. J. Gerontol., Washington, 41(5):629-34, Sept. 1986.

[20] ²⁰
PRICE, M.B. & DeVROOM, H.L. A quick and easy guide to neurological assessment. J. Neurosurg. Nurs.. Chicago, 17(5):313-20, Oct. 1985.

[21] ²¹
RICHER, F. et alii. Response selection and initiation in speeded reactions: a pupillo-metric analysis. J. Exp. Psychol., Washington, 9(3):360-70, June 1983.

[22] ²²
ROPPER, A.H. et alii. Computer-guided neurologic assessment in the neurologic intensive care unit. Heart Lung, Saint Louis, 10(1):54-60, Jan./Feb. 1981.

[23] ²³
RUDY, E.B. Assessment of the neurological patient. In: RUDY, E.B. Advanced neurological and neurosurgical nursing. Saint Louis, Mosby, 1984. cap. 2. p.70-114.

[24] ²⁴
SAVOY, S.M. The craniotomy patient: identifying the patient's neurological status. AORN J., Denver, 40(5):716-24, Nov. 1964.

[25] ²⁵
SCHLUROFF, M. Pupil responses to grammatical complexity of sentences. Brain Lang, New York, 17(1):133-45, Sept. 1982.

[26] ²⁶
UNIVERSIDADE DE São Paulo. Instituto de Física. Elementos da teoria de erros. São Paulo, 1987. 44p.

[27] ²⁷
WHITNEY, F.W. Guidelines for neurological consultation. Nurse Pract., Trenton, 7(7): 13-8, July/Aug. 1982.

Brasil

Brasil

AVALIAÇÃO DO USO DE UMA "ESPÁTULA PUPILÔMETRO" (E.P.)

Evaluation of the "upillometer tongue depressor" use

Resumos

REFERÊNCIAS BIBLIOGRÁFICAS

Datas de Publicação