Elderly people, labor market, ageism, and worker health: scope review

Pazos, Priscila de Freitas Bastos; Ferreira, Aldo Pacheco

doi:10.1590/1981-22562024027.240004.pt

Abstract

Objective To characterize the knowledge that relates aging, work, ageism, and actions in worker health through a scope review.

Method Based on a guiding question and search criteria, a selection of papers was conducted between April and June 2023 in the Scientific Electronic Library Online (SCIELO), Web of Science, Scopus, Latin American and Caribbean Health Sciences Literature (LILACS), and PUBMED databases. Out of a total of 1,745 productions found, 26 papers met the eligibility criteria, all of which were published in the last 10 years.

Results From the analysis, two categories emerged for discussion: the impacts of ageism on worker health and actions for the health of elderly people in work environments. The main measures found to reduce ageism in work environments include the presence of a health team in workplaces that lead to illness and the promotion of education in gerontology for workers.

Conclusion The incipiency of studies on the aging of the worker was observed, as well as the recognition of the most common diseases among elderly people who work and the professions in which they are most vulnerable to ageism. Further investigations may provide insights for the promotion of policies attentive to elderly people in the workforce and the development of a generational organizational culture.

Keywords Aging; Elderly People; Labor Market; Ageism; Public Policies

Resumo

Objetivo Caracterizar o conhecimento que relacione a velhice, trabalho, idadismo e ações na saúde do trabalhador a partir de uma revisão de escopo.

Método Baseado em uma pergunta norteadora e critérios de busca foi realizada uma seleção de artigos entre abril a junho de 2023 nas bases Scientific Eletrônico Library Online (SCIELO), Web of Science, Scopus, Literatura Latino-Americana e do Caribe em Ciências da Saúde (LILACS) e PUBMED. No total de 1.745 produções encontradas, 26 artigos corresponderam aos critérios de elegibilidade, sendo estes publicados nos últimos 10 anos.

Resultados Da análise, resultaram duas categorias a serem discutidas: impactos do idadismo na saúde do trabalhador e ações para a saúde da pessoa idosa nos ambientes de trabalho. As principais medidas encontradas para a redução do idadismo nos ambientes de trabalho incluem a presença de uma equipe de saúde nos ambientes de trabalho que levam ao adoecimento e incentivo à educação em gerontologia para os trabalhadores.

Conclusão Observou-se a incipiência de estudos sobre a velhice do trabalhador, o reconhecimento acerca das doenças mais frequentes entre pessoas idosas que trabalham e as profissões em que elas se encontram mais vulneráveis ao idadismo. Novas investigações poderão dar subsídios para que sejam promovidas políticas com atenção a pessoa idosa que trabalha e o desenvolvimento de uma cultura organizacional geracional.

Palavras-Chave: Envelhecimento; Pessoa Idosa; Mercado de Trabalho; Idadismo; Políticas Públicas

INTRODUCTION

In the context of population aging¹, elderly people gain prominence, as they are not only more present in the workforce but also their income is necessary for families²,³. In the study on the profile of elderly and income in Brazil⁴, it was pointed out that out of 71.3 million households, 33.9% are composed of older adults. This group contributes approximately 70% of the total income, with 34.8% coming from work occupation and 56.3% from retirement⁴. It is noteworthy that in the 21st century, this participation in the Brazilian labor market will increase due to the rise in the minimum retirement age with the new Social Security Reform⁴,⁵.

Among the challenges of aging, we encounter ageism, a term developed by Butler in 1969, which refers to any prejudice related to age⁶. This discrimination influences the formation of stereotypes, such as the representation of unproductivity⁷. Ageism has been highlighted by political organizations, and in 2022, the World Health Organization (WHO) established a campaign to combat discrimination through the Global Report on Ageism⁸. In it, ageism is recognized as detrimental to physical, mental, and economic health, being considered a barrier to healthy aging.

In the world of work, prejudice can occur throughout one's working life, including during retirement⁹. This represents a violation of human rights, with impacts on health¹⁰. There are physical illnesses, mental disorders, social isolation, decreased cognition, all of which lead to a reduction in longevity. It is worth noting that for the maintenance of elderly people in the economically active population (EAP), the heterogeneity of aging must be considered, due to socioeconomic and political differences that produce different trajectories of old age marked by difficulties in accessing basic rights, such as health, housing, employment, among others ¹¹-¹³.

Given the current significance of ageism and its association with the labor world, there is a quest to elucidate the relationship between old age, employment, and age discrimination in work environments, through outcomes presented in the international literature. Thus, it is expected to contribute to future national public policies in favor of the health of older working individuals.

METHOD

This is a scoping review following the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI)¹⁴ methodology, conducted in the following stages: formulation of a guiding question; development of a search strategy and definition of inclusion and exclusion criteria for articles; search and selection according to established criteria; extraction, analysis, and organization of the literature; and discussion of the results¹⁴. The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis - Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR) protocol was followed¹⁵. The review was registered on the Open Science Framework (OSF) platform under the following link: https://osf.io/4da3z/?view_only=174e5be60e834fa68ac75f0745104b77

For the guiding question, the Population/Participants, Concept, and Context (PCC)¹⁴ framework was utilized: "What has been discussed in the international scientific literature (context) regarding the relationship between ageism, work, and worker health (concept) in work environments with elderly people (population/participants)?"

The search was conducted from April to June 2023 in the following databases: Scientific Electronic Library Online (SCIELO), Web of Science, Lilacs, Scopus, and PubMed. The choice of databases was due to their extensive collection, enabling a broader retrieval of publications. The descriptors used in the search were identified based on the theme, using the Health Sciences Descriptors (DeSC/MeSH) portal. The adopted strategies are presented in chart 1.

Thumbnail

Chart 1
Search strategies in the databases in the scoping review on elderly people, labor market, ageism, and worker health, 2023.

Studies that addressed the theme of ageism/age discrimination related to the health of elderly people and worker health were included, encompassing scientific articles (quantitative, qualitative, or mixed methods), without language limitations, with a time frame of 10 years, and with free and full access. Those that did not meet the theme criteria and duplicates were excluded.

The selection process followed the stages of reading: title, abstracts, and full text. In each phase, two independent reviewers were responsible for screening, and any discrepancies were resolved through consensus, considering the inclusion criteria. The reviewers compiled a table with the information: study characteristics (authors, year of publication, country, study design, and conclusions), resulting in chart 2 for the description of papers.

Thumbnail

Chart 2
Characteristics of the studies included in the scoping review on elderly people, labor market, ageism, and worker health, 2023.

The results were inserted into the PRISMA flowchart (Figure 1). Finally, the information was discussed with the purpose of problematizing the literature findings.

The studies used are publicly available, requiring no submission to the Research Ethics Committee and repositories for research data deposition.

Figure 1
Flowchart of the selection process of the scoping review on elderly people, labor market, ageism, and worker health, 2023, adapted from PRISMA 2020.

RESULTS

A total of 1,745 articles were found, and after applying the eligibility criteria, 26 papers comprised the synthesis and discussion (Figure 1).

Regarding the characteristics of the productions, a prevalence of qualitative studies in the English language is noted. In the research that employed interviews, there is a predominance of the use of questionnaires and scales in assessing age prejudice in work environments. The themes found in the articles were divided into categories discussed in the following section.

DISCUSSION

Ageism and its impacts on worker health

Longevity represents a social gain, and from this perspective, there is a need for elderly people to remain active as a means of enhancing quality of life. Work is identified as a means of inclusion and skill development¹⁶. As the working life extends, the challenges for the worker also increase, with rights guarantees threatened by a series of factors, among them ageism¹⁷.

Research in the field of psychology reveals that stereotypes promote a negative perception of old age. Consequently, the image of elderly people, associated with illness and unproductiveness, contributes to the devaluation of these workers¹⁸,¹⁹. According to international guidelines, the elderly should have access to employment free from discrimination²⁰,²¹. Therefore, the advancement of ageism in the workplace is identified as a violation of the right to work⁸. Due to age prejudice, the WHO¹⁰ presents proposals to structure actions for an aging society. These recommendations include intergenerationality, which refers to the interaction among people of different generations. Environments that foster generational relationships contribute to new learnings, experiences, diversity, and respect for all ages⁸,²².

In countries with a significant aging population, elderly people are economically crucial, with the utilization of this workforce being a strategic measure for the economy²³. By emphasizing ageism-free employability, we must consider contributions to the health of elderly related to personal valorization and social interaction, which promote health, longevity, and well-being²³. The inadequacy of work contributes to health vulnerabilities, increasing government social expenditures, which becomes problematic in the economic and aging fields²⁴.

In Brazil, the Statute of the Elderly²⁵ includes a chapter dedicated to the work of elderly people. In it, professional activities should take place in a healthy and safe environment, with attention to their physical, intellectual, and psychological specificities, with age discrimination being prohibited²⁶. The implications of prejudice were identified through the ageism scale in the organizational context, applied to 600 elderly people in work activities in Brazil²⁶. In this investigation, insecurity was more relevant for older individuals, and ageist attitudes were associated with a decline in social skills. This study indicates that actions to minimize perceptions of exclusion should be included in work policies²⁶.

Research has been devoted to this topic, such as a study based on the context of the National Survey of Healthy Aging with Americans, identifying that about 93.4% of subjects aged 50 to 80 have experienced some form of age-related aggression²⁷. In this study, older individuals appeared vulnerable, leading to mental and physical health deterioration²⁷.

Daily discrimination was investigated with 2,152 American workers focusing on presenteeism²⁸. The term refers to the subject's staying at work even if there are limitations in their ability to perform their activities. Self-identified behaviors by workers included fatigue, anxiety, turnover, service quality, discriminatory acts, and labor conflicts, which were impactful on health perception and productivity²⁸.

Worker aging in Australia²⁹, as part of the Australian National Survey of Social Attitudes (AuSSA), utilized a questionnaire with 1,124 participants. This investigation contained questions about age discrimination from personal and social perspectives, daily experiences, and perceptions of discrimination in the workplace²⁹. Participants were divided into groups: 18-34 years; 35-49 years; 50-64 years; and 65 years or older. About 46% of participants of various ages indicated that ageism is common, becoming evident from the age of 50²⁹. Furthermore, historical prejudiced constructions in the workplace are a barrier to employment opportunities and impact economic security.

In a study with 1,000 Polish participants aged 45 to 65, through a survey, ageism was classified into hard and soft forms³⁰. Hard prejudice was present in negative behaviors and in the difficulty of career development. Soft prejudice, on the other hand, was linked to personal and family contexts. In both environments, it was more frequent among women and urban residents. This article understands the demand for awareness of the role of elderly people and their potential contribution to society³¹.

Donizzetti³² explores in his studies the relationships between knowledge, age, and anxiety in Italy. The sample, defined by convenience sampling and snowball method, included 886 Italians with a mean age of 35.8 years (Standard Deviation, SD = 14.2 years), predominantly female (64.8%). The age of the participants ranged from 18 to 65 years, with the following distribution among age groups: 18-25 (39.8%); 26–35 (8.1%); 36–55 (42.6%); 56–65 (9.4%). The Anxiety about Aging Scale (AAS), Fraboni Ageism Scale (FSA), Aging Semantic Differential (ASD), and Facts on Aging Quiz were used. It is concluded that negative stereotypes are formed throughout life³². A similar conclusion was found in research on stereotypes among higher education teachers³³, where ignorance about aging was presented as a negative implication for the old age stage. These results reinforce the guideline of gerontology education in promoting positive attitudes towards the older population in the workplace³³.

The daily lives of workers were analyzed using an anxiety and aging questionnaire, with 647 employees aged 24 to 62³⁴. From this investigation, it emerged that prejudice is a detrimental factor to the quality of work and activities performed in groups³⁴. This condition also appears to be associated with a reduction in work life expectancy, even in countries with more advanced aging indices, as it is a decisive factor in the hiring of these professionals³⁵.

Remunerations and the reduction in career prospects are reasons associated with ageism, which not only elevate the level of workplace stress but also increase socio-economic and health risks, reduce opportunities for training, lead to morbidities, and create socio-psychological barriers among elderly people³⁶.

Regarding the differentiation in worker selection by age, a correspondence test study investigated age bias predominance in the hiring phase in the United Kingdom³⁷. It was observed that workers were penalized in terms of both quality and access to job opportunities. This situation is also noted by Harris³⁸, whose analysis indicates that elderly people do not receive remuneration commensurate with their professional experience.

Concerning the hiring of elderly people and age prejudice³⁹,⁴⁰, the need for a more structured and inclusive employment policy is evident as important measures for a workforce with an aging economically active population³⁹,⁴⁰.

Of the 26 studies in this review, 25 focus on understanding the impacts of prejudice in the workplace from the perspective of workers. However, there is a body of literature that integrates the viewpoint of employers³⁸. For this group, the negative image of elderly people implies lower organizational commitment and group satisfaction, as well as an increase in counterproductive work behaviors³⁸. Thus, the employability of older generations was mapped with workers aged 50 and above in Slovakia³⁹. An attempt was made to identify the reasons why employers resist hiring older individuals, concluding that this condition is due to the inadequacy of the state's employment incentive policy³⁹.

Actions for the health of elderly people in work environments

The continued presence of elderly in the workforce is not only due to the increasing older population but also to the scarcity of younger labor⁴⁰. As aging occurs in different ways in developed and developing countries, some nations are better prepared to absorb older labor force. Therefore, unsafe working conditions threaten the health of older workers, as the work may not be suitable for them⁴¹.

A study, based on the experience of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention with elderly people in the United States⁴², considers the presence of a health team in work environments to be positive, as it facilitates the recognition of contemporary work-related issues. Furthermore, this understanding includes the impacts of discrimination on the relationship with chronic diseases and work activities⁴²,⁴³.

Regarding workforce qualification, there is discussion⁴⁴ about including gerontological knowledge for professionals to enable understanding of life stages with their health gains and losses. The relationship between work, aging, and worker health is considered insufficient for both gerontology and Public Health fields. Therefore, it is important to rethink concepts and policies of worker health in work contexts⁴⁵.

The perception of elderly people regarding the effectiveness of actions to enhance work capacity was highlighted through a study with employees in Germany⁴⁶. Highlighted were the exhaustive workloads, age stereotypes, deficiencies in work management, and persistent occupational insecurity, even in the face of health team interventions⁴⁶. It is considered that the protagonism of workers in the organization of health interventions may favor more effective actions for the health of professionals⁴⁶. This corroborates Brazilian legislation, as every action in the field of worker health, according to the Unified Health System (SUS), must be based on the participation of the workers themselves⁴⁷,⁴⁸.

Finally, there is a need to observe the individual competencies of workers and their work demands (work environment, work organization, management) in seeking improvements for elderly people workers⁴⁹. This research considers it central to understand the differences regarding the individual capacities of older workers and their means of work as a way to enhance their participation in the labor market⁴⁹. As highlighted in the Global Report on Ageism, legislation is a structuring factor in combating prejudice. It is suggested to conduct studies to identify the effectiveness of existing national public policies in addressing prejudice in the workplace and to understand the strategies adopted by workers who deal with ageist work environments. This review may present as a limitation the temporal scope of the last 10 years and the exclusion of grey literature such as theses and dissertations that could address the topic.

CONCLUSION

In the face of a society with greater longevity and its impacts on the labor market, this review has discussed the relationship between aging, work, ageism, and the health of the worker, positioning it as a novel challenge for labor policies targeting elderly people. In this trajectory, ageism has emerged as one of the factors leading to workplace conflict, exclusion, and both mental and physical health issues, thus representing a problem still largely unaddressed within work environments.

The findings indicate that even international scientific research on this topic is scarce, despite its significant social and economic relevance. Knowledge gaps can be addressed by incorporating social perspectives, variables such as race and gender, and educational background, considering the disparities in access to work and the prejudice faced by socially diverse individuals.

Through analysis, it is essential to consider the involvement of elderly in the labor market from an economic perspective, as well as understanding the types of work-related illnesses and the age groups most vulnerable to them, the impacts of ageism on health, and the professions that predominantly employ elderly people.

In summary, the research revealed data highlighting the importance of corporate and public practices in promoting intergenerationality in the labor market, including training programs and professional recognition initiatives. Future research endeavors are suggested to explore the correlation between occupational health policies and the health of elderly people, aiming to rethink the landscape in this field and develop public policies that specifically address the elderly who remains in the workforce.

There was no funding for the execution of this work.
AVAILABLE DATA
The entire dataset supporting the results of this study has been made available on the Figshare data repository and can be accessed at DOI: https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.25560492.v1

References

¹ Instituto Brasileiro de Geografia e Estatística (IBGE). Censo 2022: número de pessoas com 65 anos ou mais de idade cresceu 57,4% em 12 anos. Agência de Notícias IBGE. 2023 Nov 11. Disponível em: https://agenciadenoticias.ibge.gov.br/agencia-noticias/2012-agencia-de-noticias/noticias/38186-censo-2022-numero-de-pessoas-com-65-anos-ou-mais-de-idade-cresceu-57-4-em-12-anos
» https://agenciadenoticias.ibge.gov.br/agencia-noticias/2012-agencia-de-noticias/noticias/38186-censo-2022-numero-de-pessoas-com-65-anos-ou-mais-de-idade-cresceu-57-4-em-12-anos
² Pazos P de FB. Velhice e trabalho: um estudo sobre o trabalhador idoso [dissertação]. Rio de Janeiro (RJ): Fundação Oswaldo Cruz. Escola Nacional de Saúde Pública Sergio Arouca; 2020.
³ Sato AT, Lancman S. Políticas públicas e a inserção da pessoa idosa no mercado de trabalho no Brasil. Rev bras geriatr gerontol. 2020;23(6):e200170. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.1590/1981-22562020023.200170
» https://doi.org/10.1590/1981-22562020023.200170
⁴ Camarano AA. (2020). Os dependentes da renda dos idosos e o coronavírus: órfãos ou novos pobres?. Cien Saude Colet. 2020;25(suppl 2): 4169–76. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.1590/1413-812320202510.2.30042020
» https://doi.org/10.1590/1413-812320202510.2.30042020
⁵ Camarano AA, Fernandes D. Condições de empregabilidade do trabalhador mais velho. In: Negri JA, Araújo BC, Bacelette R, organizadores. Desafios da nação: artigos de apoio. Brasília: Ipea; 2018. v. 2. p. 193-229.
⁶ Butler RN. Age-ism: another form of bigotry. Gerontologist. 1969;9(4):243-6. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.1093/geront/9.4_Part_1.243
» https://doi.org/10.1093/geront/9.4_Part_1.243
⁷ Teixeira SM de O, Souza LEC de, Maia LM. Ageísmo institucionalizado: uma revisão teórica. Kairós-Gerontologia. 2018;21(3):129–49. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.23925/2176-901X.2018v21i3p129-149
» https://doi.org/10.23925/2176-901X.2018v21i3p129-149
⁸ Organização Pan-Americana da Saúde (OPAS). Relatório mundial sobre o idadismo. Washington: OPAS, 2022; Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.37774/9789275724453
» https://doi.org/10.37774/9789275724453
⁹ Santos GT dos, Salcedo GM, Guimarães LHV, Baêta PVL, Braga JO. A intergeracionalidade no mercado de trabalho: desafios e potencialidades. REASE. 2022;8(12):505-28. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.51891/rease.v8i12.7998
» https://doi.org/10.51891/rease.v8i12.7998
¹⁰ Organização Pan-Americana da Saúde (OPAS). Discriminação por idade é um desafio global, afirma relatório da Organização das Nações Unidas. OPAS; 2021 Mar 18. Disponível em: https://www.paho.org/pt/noticias/18-3-2021-discriminacao-por-idade-e-um-desafio-global-afirma-relatorio-da-organizacao-das
» https://www.paho.org/pt/noticias/18-3-2021-discriminacao-por-idade-e-um-desafio-global-afirma-relatorio-da-organizacao-das
¹¹ Pochmann M. Tendências estruturais do mundo do trabalho no Brasil. Cien Saude Colet. 2020;25(1):89–99. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.1590/1413-81232020251.29562019
» https://doi.org/10.1590/1413-81232020251.29562019
¹² Pazos P de FB, Ferreira AP. Aspects of occupational aging according to elderly workers: old age, work, and worker health. Research, Society and Development. 2022;11(10):e507111032960. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.33448/rsd-v11i10.32960
» https://doi.org/10.33448/rsd-v11i10.32960
¹³ Nepomuceno Furtado K. Desafios e oportunidades encontrados na atividade laborativa desempenhada por idosos. EASN. 2021;1:89-107.
¹⁴ Peters MDJ, Godfrey C, McInerney P, Munn Z, Tricco AC, Khalil H. Chapter 11: Scoping Reviews. In: Aromataris E, Munn Z, editores. JBI Manual for Evidence Synthesis. JBI, 2020. p. 407-451. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.46658/JBIMES-20-12
» https://doi.org/10.46658/JBIMES-20-12
¹⁵ Page MJ, McKenzie JE, Bossuyt PM, Boutron I, Hoffmann TC, Mulrow CD, et al. The PRISMA 2020 statement: an Updated Guideline for Reporting Systematic Reviews. BMJ. 2021;372(71). Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n71
» https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n71
¹⁶ Parker M, Bucknall M, Jagger C, Wilkie R. Population-based estimates of healthy working life expectancy in England at age 50 years: analysis of data from the English Longitudinal Study of Ageing. Lancet Public Health. 2020;5(7):e395–403. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.1016/S2468-2667(20)30114-6
» https://doi.org/10.1016/S2468-2667(20)30114-6
¹⁷ Paolini KS. Desafios da inclusão do idoso no mercado de trabalho. Rev Bras Med Trab. 2016;14(2):177–82. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.5327/Z1679-443520162915
» https://doi.org/10.5327/Z1679-443520162915
¹⁸ Pinquart M. Creating and maintaining purpose in life in old age: a meta-analysis. Ageing Int. 2002;27(2):90–114. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12126-002-1004-2
» https://doi.org/10.1007/s12126-002-1004-2
¹⁹ Rothermund K, Klusmann V, Zacher H. Age Discrimination in the Context of Motivation and Healthy Aging. J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci. 2021;76(Suppl2):S167–80. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.1093/geronb/gbab081
» https://doi.org/10.1093/geronb/gbab081
²⁰ Organização Pan-Americana da Saúde (OPAS). Década do Envelhecimento Saudável nas Américas (2021-2030). OPAS. Disponível em: https://www.paho.org/pt/decada-do-envelhecimento-saudavel-nas-americas-2021-2030
» https://www.paho.org/pt/decada-do-envelhecimento-saudavel-nas-americas-2021-2030
²¹ Dell'Isola C. A organização internacional do trabalho (OIT): proteção e uma perspectiva do futuro trabalhador idoso. In: Campilongo CF, Gonzaga A de A, Freire AL, coordenadores. Enciclopédia jurídica da PUC-SP. Tomo: Direito do Trabalho e Processo do Trabalho. Manus PPT, Gitelman S, coordenadores do tomo. 1 ed. São Paulo: Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo, 2017.
²² Burgos F. Idosos na Agenda Governamental. Sociedade e gestão. FGV Executivo. 2020;19(1):36-38. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.12660/gvexec.v19n1.2020.81437
» https://doi.org/10.12660/gvexec.v19n1.2020.81437
²³ Lanchimba C, Quisnancela J, Salazar Mendez Y. The choice of elderly labor: Evidence from Ecuador. RAE. 2020; 35(1), 75-97. Disponível em: http://dx.doi.org/10.4067/S0718-88702020000100075
» https://doi.org/10.4067/S0718-88702020000100075
²⁴ Batista RL, Teixeira KMD. O cenário do mercado de trabalho para idosos e a violência sofrida. Rev bras geriatr gerontol. 2021;24(6): e210022. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.1590/1981-22562020024.210022
» https://doi.org/10.1590/1981-22562020024.210022
²⁵ Brasil. Lei nº 10.741, de 1º de outubro de 2003. Dispõe sobre o Estatuto da Pessoa Idosa e dá outras providências. (Redação dada pela Lei nº 14.423, de 2022). Diário Oficial da União. Brasília, 2003; 1 Out. Disponível em: https://www.planalto.gov.br/ccivil_03/leis/2003/l10.741.htm
²⁶ França LH de FP, Siqueira-Brito A da R, Valentini F, Vasques-Menezes I, Torres CV. Ageism in the organizational context - the perception of Brazilian workers. Rev bras geriatr gerontol. 2017;20(6):762–72. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.1590/1981-22562017020.170052
» https://doi.org/10.1590/1981-22562017020.170052
²⁷ Allen JO, Solway E, Kirch M, Singer D, Kullgren JT, Moïse V, et al. Experiences of Everyday Ageism and the Health of Older US Adults. JAMA Netw Open. 2022;5(6):e2217240. Disponível em: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.17240
²⁸ Deng J, Guo Y, Shi H, Gao Y, Jin X, Liu Y, et al. Effect of Discrimination on Presenteeism among Aging Workers in the United States: Moderated Mediation Effect of Positive and Negative Affect. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020;17(4):1425. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17041425
» https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17041425
²⁹ Kendig H, O’Loughlin K, Hussain R, Cannon L. Attitudes towards intergenerational equity: Preliminary Australian evidence. Australas J Ageing. 2017;36(2):107–11. Disponível em: 10.1111/ajag.12430
³⁰ Stypinska, J., Turek, K. Hard and soft age discrimination: the dual nature of workplace discrimination. 2017; Eur J Ageing 14:49-61. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10433-016-0407-y
» https://doi.org/10.1007/s10433-016-0407-y
³¹ Coutinho MLP. Discriminação no Trabalho: Mecanismos de Combate à Discriminação e Promoção de Igualdade de Oportunidades. OIT Igualdade Racial.Disponível em: http://www.oitbrasil.org.br/sites/default/files/topic/discrimination/pub/oit_igualdade_racial_05_234.pd
» http://www.oitbrasil.org.br/sites/default/files/topic/discrimination/pub/oit_igualdade_racial_05_234.pd
³² Shippee TP, Wilkinson LR, Schafer MH, Shippee ND. Long-Term Effects of Age Discrimination on Mental Health: The Role of Perceived Financial Strain. J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci. 2019;74(4):664-674. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.1093/geronb/gbx017
» https://doi.org/10.1093/geronb/gbx017
³³ Donizzetti AR. Ageism in an Aging Society: The Role of Knowledge, Anxiety about Aging, and Stereotypes in Young People and Adults. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019;16(8):1329. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph16081329
» https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph16081329
³⁴ Viana LO, Helal DH. Ageísmo na Carreira Acadêmica: um estudo com professores universitários. Educ. Real. 2023;48:e121896. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.1590/2175-6236121896vs01
» https://doi.org/10.1590/2175-6236121896vs01
³⁵ Paleari FG, Brambilla M, Fincham FD. When prejudice against you hurts others and me: The case of ageism at work. J Appl Soc Psycho. 2019; 49(3):1–17. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.1111/jasp.12628
» https://doi.org/10.1111/jasp.12628
³⁶ National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine; Division of Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education; Committee on National Statistics;Committee on Population; Committee on Understanding the Aging Workforce and Employment at Older Ages at Becker T, Fiske ST, editors. Understanding the Aging Workforce: Defining a Research Agenda. Washington (DC): National Academies Press (US); 2022.
³⁷ Lagacé M, Donizzetti AR, Van de Beeck L, Bergeron CD, Rodrigues-Rouleau P, St-Amour A. Testing the Shielding Effect of Intergenerational Contact against Ageism in the Workplace: A Canadian Study. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022;19(8):4866. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19084866
» https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19084866
³⁸ Drydakis N, MacDonald P, Chiotis V, Somers L. Age discrimination in the UK labour market. Does race moderate ageism? An experimental investigation. Appl Econ Lett. 2017;25(1):1–4. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.1080/13504851.2017.1290763
» https://doi.org/10.1080/13504851.2017.1290763
³⁹ Harris K, Krygsman S, Waschenko J, Laliberte Rudman D. Ageism and the Older Worker: A Scoping Review. Gerontologist. 2017;58(2):e1–e14. Disponível em https://doi.org/10.1093/geront/gnw194
» https://doi.org/10.1093/geront/gnw194
⁴⁰ Krajňáková E, Vojtovič S. Struggles of Older Workers at the Labour Market, Economics and Sociology. 2017;10(1):319-333. Disponível em: https://doi.org/ 10.14254/2071-789X.2017/10-1/23
» https://doi.org/ 10.14254/2071-789X.2017/10-1/23
⁴¹ Stutzer K. Generational Differences and Multigenerational Teamwork. Crit Care Nurse. 2019;39(1):78–81. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.4037/ccn2019163
» https://doi.org/10.4037/ccn2019163
⁴², Helal DH. Ageismo nas Organizações: Questões para Debate. Rev Adm IMED. 2019;9(1):187–197. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.18256/2237-7956.2019.v9i1.3167
» https://doi.org/10.18256/2237-7956.2019.v9i1.3167
³⁹ White MS, Burns C, Conlon HA. The Impact of an Aging Population in the Workplace. Workplace Health Saf. 2018;66(10):493–8. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.1177/2165079917752191
» https://doi.org/10.1177/2165079917752191
⁴⁴ Naegele L, Tavernier WD, Hess M. Work Environment and the Origin of Ageism. In Ayalon L, Tesch-Römer C, editores. Contemporary Perspectives on Ageism. Springer, 2018. p. 73-90. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-73820-8
» https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-73820-8
⁴⁵ ML do CC, Silva JV, Terra F de S, Moreira MASP, Alves M do SCF, Sousa WCM, et al. O envelhecer contemporâneo: ônus ou bônus? A questão da “melhor idade”. RIASE. 2022;8(1):141–57. Disponível em: http://dx.doi.org/10.24902/r.riase.2022.8(1).539.141-157
» https://doi.org/10.24902/r.riase.2022.8(1).539.141-157
⁴⁶ Pazos P de FB, Bonfatti RJ. Velhice, trabalho e saúde do trabalhador no Brasil: uma revisão integrativa. Rev bras geriatr gerontol. 2020;23(6):e200198. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.1590/1981-22562020023.200198
» https://doi.org/10.1590/1981-22562020023.200198
⁴⁷ Sippli K, Schmalzried P, Rieger MA, Voelter-Mahlknecht S. Challenges arising for older workers from participating in a workplace intervention addressing work ability: a qualitative study from Germany. Int Arch Occup Environ Health. 2021;94(5):919–33. Disponível em: https://doi.org/ 10.1007/s00420-020-01639-x
» https://doi.org/ 10.1007/s00420-020-01639-x
⁴⁸ Brasil. Lei nº 8080, de 19 de Setembro de 1990. Dispõe sobre as condições para a promoção, proteção e recuperação da saúde, a organização e o funcionamento dos serviços correspondentes e dá outras providências. Diário Oficial da União. Brasília, 1990; 19 Set. Disponível em: https://www.planalto.gov.br/ccivil_03/leis/l8080.htm
⁴⁹ Brasil. Portaria nº 1.823, de 23 de agosto de 2012. Institui a Política Nacional de Saúde do Trabalhador e da Trabalhadora. Diário Oficial da União. Brasília, 2012; 23 Ago. Disponível em: https://bvsms.saude.gov.br/bvs/saudelegis/gm/2012/prt1823_23_08_2012.html
⁵⁰ Fischer FM, Martinez MC, Alfredo CH, Silva-Junior JS, Oakman J, Cotrim T, et al. Aging and the Future of Decent Work. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021;18(17):8898. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18178898
» https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18178898

Edited by

Edited by: Letícia Sampaio Figueiredo

Data availability

The entire dataset supporting the results of this study has been made available on the Figshare data repository and can be accessed at DOI: https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.25560492.v1

Publication Dates

Publication in this collection
21 June 2024
Date of issue
2024

History

Received
07 Jan 2024
Accepted
17 Apr 2024

The entire content of the journal, except where indicated, is licensed under an attribution CC-BY type Creative Commons License

[1] ¹ Instituto Brasileiro de Geografia e Estatística (IBGE). Censo 2022: número de pessoas com 65 anos ou mais de idade cresceu 57,4% em 12 anos. Agência de Notícias IBGE. 2023 Nov 11. Disponível em: https://agenciadenoticias.ibge.gov.br/agencia-noticias/2012-agencia-de-noticias/noticias/38186-censo-2022-numero-de-pessoas-com-65-anos-ou-mais-de-idade-cresceu-57-4-em-12-anos
» https://agenciadenoticias.ibge.gov.br/agencia-noticias/2012-agencia-de-noticias/noticias/38186-censo-2022-numero-de-pessoas-com-65-anos-ou-mais-de-idade-cresceu-57-4-em-12-anos

[2] ² Pazos P de FB. Velhice e trabalho: um estudo sobre o trabalhador idoso [dissertação]. Rio de Janeiro (RJ): Fundação Oswaldo Cruz. Escola Nacional de Saúde Pública Sergio Arouca; 2020.

[3] ³ Sato AT, Lancman S. Políticas públicas e a inserção da pessoa idosa no mercado de trabalho no Brasil. Rev bras geriatr gerontol. 2020;23(6):e200170. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.1590/1981-22562020023.200170
» https://doi.org/10.1590/1981-22562020023.200170

[4] ⁴ Camarano AA. (2020). Os dependentes da renda dos idosos e o coronavírus: órfãos ou novos pobres?. Cien Saude Colet. 2020;25(suppl 2): 4169–76. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.1590/1413-812320202510.2.30042020
» https://doi.org/10.1590/1413-812320202510.2.30042020

[5] ⁵ Camarano AA, Fernandes D. Condições de empregabilidade do trabalhador mais velho. In: Negri JA, Araújo BC, Bacelette R, organizadores. Desafios da nação: artigos de apoio. Brasília: Ipea; 2018. v. 2. p. 193-229.

[6] ⁶ Butler RN. Age-ism: another form of bigotry. Gerontologist. 1969;9(4):243-6. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.1093/geront/9.4_Part_1.243
» https://doi.org/10.1093/geront/9.4_Part_1.243

[7] ⁷ Teixeira SM de O, Souza LEC de, Maia LM. Ageísmo institucionalizado: uma revisão teórica. Kairós-Gerontologia. 2018;21(3):129–49. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.23925/2176-901X.2018v21i3p129-149
» https://doi.org/10.23925/2176-901X.2018v21i3p129-149

[8] ⁸ Organização Pan-Americana da Saúde (OPAS). Relatório mundial sobre o idadismo. Washington: OPAS, 2022; Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.37774/9789275724453
» https://doi.org/10.37774/9789275724453

[9] ⁹ Santos GT dos, Salcedo GM, Guimarães LHV, Baêta PVL, Braga JO. A intergeracionalidade no mercado de trabalho: desafios e potencialidades. REASE. 2022;8(12):505-28. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.51891/rease.v8i12.7998
» https://doi.org/10.51891/rease.v8i12.7998

[10] ¹⁰ Organização Pan-Americana da Saúde (OPAS). Discriminação por idade é um desafio global, afirma relatório da Organização das Nações Unidas. OPAS; 2021 Mar 18. Disponível em: https://www.paho.org/pt/noticias/18-3-2021-discriminacao-por-idade-e-um-desafio-global-afirma-relatorio-da-organizacao-das
» https://www.paho.org/pt/noticias/18-3-2021-discriminacao-por-idade-e-um-desafio-global-afirma-relatorio-da-organizacao-das

[11] ¹¹ Pochmann M. Tendências estruturais do mundo do trabalho no Brasil. Cien Saude Colet. 2020;25(1):89–99. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.1590/1413-81232020251.29562019
» https://doi.org/10.1590/1413-81232020251.29562019

[12] ¹² Pazos P de FB, Ferreira AP. Aspects of occupational aging according to elderly workers: old age, work, and worker health. Research, Society and Development. 2022;11(10):e507111032960. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.33448/rsd-v11i10.32960
» https://doi.org/10.33448/rsd-v11i10.32960

[13] ¹³ Nepomuceno Furtado K. Desafios e oportunidades encontrados na atividade laborativa desempenhada por idosos. EASN. 2021;1:89-107.

[14] ¹⁴ Peters MDJ, Godfrey C, McInerney P, Munn Z, Tricco AC, Khalil H. Chapter 11: Scoping Reviews. In: Aromataris E, Munn Z, editores. JBI Manual for Evidence Synthesis. JBI, 2020. p. 407-451. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.46658/JBIMES-20-12
» https://doi.org/10.46658/JBIMES-20-12

[15] ¹⁵ Page MJ, McKenzie JE, Bossuyt PM, Boutron I, Hoffmann TC, Mulrow CD, et al. The PRISMA 2020 statement: an Updated Guideline for Reporting Systematic Reviews. BMJ. 2021;372(71). Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n71
» https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n71

[16] ¹⁶ Parker M, Bucknall M, Jagger C, Wilkie R. Population-based estimates of healthy working life expectancy in England at age 50 years: analysis of data from the English Longitudinal Study of Ageing. Lancet Public Health. 2020;5(7):e395–403. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.1016/S2468-2667(20)30114-6
» https://doi.org/10.1016/S2468-2667(20)30114-6

[17] ¹⁷ Paolini KS. Desafios da inclusão do idoso no mercado de trabalho. Rev Bras Med Trab. 2016;14(2):177–82. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.5327/Z1679-443520162915
» https://doi.org/10.5327/Z1679-443520162915

[18] ¹⁸ Pinquart M. Creating and maintaining purpose in life in old age: a meta-analysis. Ageing Int. 2002;27(2):90–114. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12126-002-1004-2
» https://doi.org/10.1007/s12126-002-1004-2

[19] ¹⁹ Rothermund K, Klusmann V, Zacher H. Age Discrimination in the Context of Motivation and Healthy Aging. J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci. 2021;76(Suppl2):S167–80. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.1093/geronb/gbab081
» https://doi.org/10.1093/geronb/gbab081

[20] ²⁰ Organização Pan-Americana da Saúde (OPAS). Década do Envelhecimento Saudável nas Américas (2021-2030). OPAS. Disponível em: https://www.paho.org/pt/decada-do-envelhecimento-saudavel-nas-americas-2021-2030
» https://www.paho.org/pt/decada-do-envelhecimento-saudavel-nas-americas-2021-2030

[21] ²¹ Dell'Isola C. A organização internacional do trabalho (OIT): proteção e uma perspectiva do futuro trabalhador idoso. In: Campilongo CF, Gonzaga A de A, Freire AL, coordenadores. Enciclopédia jurídica da PUC-SP. Tomo: Direito do Trabalho e Processo do Trabalho. Manus PPT, Gitelman S, coordenadores do tomo. 1 ed. São Paulo: Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo, 2017.

[22] ²² Burgos F. Idosos na Agenda Governamental. Sociedade e gestão. FGV Executivo. 2020;19(1):36-38. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.12660/gvexec.v19n1.2020.81437
» https://doi.org/10.12660/gvexec.v19n1.2020.81437

[23] ²³ Lanchimba C, Quisnancela J, Salazar Mendez Y. The choice of elderly labor: Evidence from Ecuador. RAE. 2020; 35(1), 75-97. Disponível em: http://dx.doi.org/10.4067/S0718-88702020000100075
» https://doi.org/10.4067/S0718-88702020000100075

[24] ²⁴ Batista RL, Teixeira KMD. O cenário do mercado de trabalho para idosos e a violência sofrida. Rev bras geriatr gerontol. 2021;24(6): e210022. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.1590/1981-22562020024.210022
» https://doi.org/10.1590/1981-22562020024.210022

[25] ²⁵ Brasil. Lei nº 10.741, de 1º de outubro de 2003. Dispõe sobre o Estatuto da Pessoa Idosa e dá outras providências. (Redação dada pela Lei nº 14.423, de 2022). Diário Oficial da União. Brasília, 2003; 1 Out. Disponível em: https://www.planalto.gov.br/ccivil_03/leis/2003/l10.741.htm

[26] ²⁶ França LH de FP, Siqueira-Brito A da R, Valentini F, Vasques-Menezes I, Torres CV. Ageism in the organizational context - the perception of Brazilian workers. Rev bras geriatr gerontol. 2017;20(6):762–72. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.1590/1981-22562017020.170052
» https://doi.org/10.1590/1981-22562017020.170052

[27] ²⁷ Allen JO, Solway E, Kirch M, Singer D, Kullgren JT, Moïse V, et al. Experiences of Everyday Ageism and the Health of Older US Adults. JAMA Netw Open. 2022;5(6):e2217240. Disponível em: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.17240

[28] ²⁸ Deng J, Guo Y, Shi H, Gao Y, Jin X, Liu Y, et al. Effect of Discrimination on Presenteeism among Aging Workers in the United States: Moderated Mediation Effect of Positive and Negative Affect. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020;17(4):1425. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17041425
» https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17041425

[29] ²⁹ Kendig H, O’Loughlin K, Hussain R, Cannon L. Attitudes towards intergenerational equity: Preliminary Australian evidence. Australas J Ageing. 2017;36(2):107–11. Disponível em: 10.1111/ajag.12430

[30] ³⁰ Stypinska, J., Turek, K. Hard and soft age discrimination: the dual nature of workplace discrimination. 2017; Eur J Ageing 14:49-61. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10433-016-0407-y
» https://doi.org/10.1007/s10433-016-0407-y

[31] ³¹ Coutinho MLP. Discriminação no Trabalho: Mecanismos de Combate à Discriminação e Promoção de Igualdade de Oportunidades. OIT Igualdade Racial.Disponível em: http://www.oitbrasil.org.br/sites/default/files/topic/discrimination/pub/oit_igualdade_racial_05_234.pd
» http://www.oitbrasil.org.br/sites/default/files/topic/discrimination/pub/oit_igualdade_racial_05_234.pd

[32] ³² Shippee TP, Wilkinson LR, Schafer MH, Shippee ND. Long-Term Effects of Age Discrimination on Mental Health: The Role of Perceived Financial Strain. J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci. 2019;74(4):664-674. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.1093/geronb/gbx017
» https://doi.org/10.1093/geronb/gbx017

[33] ³³ Donizzetti AR. Ageism in an Aging Society: The Role of Knowledge, Anxiety about Aging, and Stereotypes in Young People and Adults. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019;16(8):1329. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph16081329
» https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph16081329

[34] ³⁴ Viana LO, Helal DH. Ageísmo na Carreira Acadêmica: um estudo com professores universitários. Educ. Real. 2023;48:e121896. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.1590/2175-6236121896vs01
» https://doi.org/10.1590/2175-6236121896vs01

[35] ³⁵ Paleari FG, Brambilla M, Fincham FD. When prejudice against you hurts others and me: The case of ageism at work. J Appl Soc Psycho. 2019; 49(3):1–17. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.1111/jasp.12628
» https://doi.org/10.1111/jasp.12628

[36] ³⁶ National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine; Division of Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education; Committee on National Statistics;Committee on Population; Committee on Understanding the Aging Workforce and Employment at Older Ages at Becker T, Fiske ST, editors. Understanding the Aging Workforce: Defining a Research Agenda. Washington (DC): National Academies Press (US); 2022.

[37] ³⁷ Lagacé M, Donizzetti AR, Van de Beeck L, Bergeron CD, Rodrigues-Rouleau P, St-Amour A. Testing the Shielding Effect of Intergenerational Contact against Ageism in the Workplace: A Canadian Study. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022;19(8):4866. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19084866
» https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19084866

[38] ³⁸ Drydakis N, MacDonald P, Chiotis V, Somers L. Age discrimination in the UK labour market. Does race moderate ageism? An experimental investigation. Appl Econ Lett. 2017;25(1):1–4. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.1080/13504851.2017.1290763
» https://doi.org/10.1080/13504851.2017.1290763

[39] ³⁹ Harris K, Krygsman S, Waschenko J, Laliberte Rudman D. Ageism and the Older Worker: A Scoping Review. Gerontologist. 2017;58(2):e1–e14. Disponível em https://doi.org/10.1093/geront/gnw194
» https://doi.org/10.1093/geront/gnw194

[40] ⁴⁰ Krajňáková E, Vojtovič S. Struggles of Older Workers at the Labour Market, Economics and Sociology. 2017;10(1):319-333. Disponível em: https://doi.org/ 10.14254/2071-789X.2017/10-1/23
» https://doi.org/ 10.14254/2071-789X.2017/10-1/23

[41] ⁴¹ Stutzer K. Generational Differences and Multigenerational Teamwork. Crit Care Nurse. 2019;39(1):78–81. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.4037/ccn2019163
» https://doi.org/10.4037/ccn2019163

[42] ⁴², Helal DH. Ageismo nas Organizações: Questões para Debate. Rev Adm IMED. 2019;9(1):187–197. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.18256/2237-7956.2019.v9i1.3167
» https://doi.org/10.18256/2237-7956.2019.v9i1.3167

[43] ³⁹ White MS, Burns C, Conlon HA. The Impact of an Aging Population in the Workplace. Workplace Health Saf. 2018;66(10):493–8. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.1177/2165079917752191
» https://doi.org/10.1177/2165079917752191

[44] ⁴⁴ Naegele L, Tavernier WD, Hess M. Work Environment and the Origin of Ageism. In Ayalon L, Tesch-Römer C, editores. Contemporary Perspectives on Ageism. Springer, 2018. p. 73-90. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-73820-8
» https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-73820-8

[45] ⁴⁵ ML do CC, Silva JV, Terra F de S, Moreira MASP, Alves M do SCF, Sousa WCM, et al. O envelhecer contemporâneo: ônus ou bônus? A questão da “melhor idade”. RIASE. 2022;8(1):141–57. Disponível em: http://dx.doi.org/10.24902/r.riase.2022.8(1).539.141-157
» https://doi.org/10.24902/r.riase.2022.8(1).539.141-157

[46] ⁴⁶ Pazos P de FB, Bonfatti RJ. Velhice, trabalho e saúde do trabalhador no Brasil: uma revisão integrativa. Rev bras geriatr gerontol. 2020;23(6):e200198. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.1590/1981-22562020023.200198
» https://doi.org/10.1590/1981-22562020023.200198

[47] ⁴⁷ Sippli K, Schmalzried P, Rieger MA, Voelter-Mahlknecht S. Challenges arising for older workers from participating in a workplace intervention addressing work ability: a qualitative study from Germany. Int Arch Occup Environ Health. 2021;94(5):919–33. Disponível em: https://doi.org/ 10.1007/s00420-020-01639-x
» https://doi.org/ 10.1007/s00420-020-01639-x

[48] ⁴⁸ Brasil. Lei nº 8080, de 19 de Setembro de 1990. Dispõe sobre as condições para a promoção, proteção e recuperação da saúde, a organização e o funcionamento dos serviços correspondentes e dá outras providências. Diário Oficial da União. Brasília, 1990; 19 Set. Disponível em: https://www.planalto.gov.br/ccivil_03/leis/l8080.htm

[49] ⁴⁹ Brasil. Portaria nº 1.823, de 23 de agosto de 2012. Institui a Política Nacional de Saúde do Trabalhador e da Trabalhadora. Diário Oficial da União. Brasília, 2012; 23 Ago. Disponível em: https://bvsms.saude.gov.br/bvs/saudelegis/gm/2012/prt1823_23_08_2012.html

[50] ⁵⁰ Fischer FM, Martinez MC, Alfredo CH, Silva-Junior JS, Oakman J, Cotrim T, et al. Aging and the Future of Decent Work. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021;18(17):8898. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18178898
» https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18178898

Databases	Search strategies
SCIELO	“ageism” AND "demographic aging" OR "labor market" OR "workers age" OR "worker health"
Web of Science	((((((ALL=(ageism)) OR ALL=(stereotyping)) OR ALL=(discriminating)) AND ALL=(labor market)) AND ALL=(work)) AND ALL=(public health)) OR ALL=(occupational health)
Lilacs	(ageismo) OR (discriminação) OR (idadismo) AND ("mercado de trabalho") OR ("ambiente de trabalho") OR (trabalho) AND ("saúde do trabalhador") OR ("saúde ocupacional")
Scopus	(TITLE-ABS-KEY ( "Elder work" OR "Older worker" OR " elderly health " OR "Force aging" ) AND TITLE-ABS-KEY ( "ageism" OR "stereotyping" OR "discriminating" )
Pubmed	((((ageism) AND (labor market)) OR (work market) AND (demographic aging)) OR (workers age)) AND (work health) OR (Occupational health) AND (Aging workforce)

Year and Country of Origin	Title	Journal	Objective
2020, England¹⁶,	Population-based estimates of healthy working life expectancy in England at age 50 years: analysis of data from the English Longitudinal Study of Ageing	The Lancet Public health	To understand the life expectancy of older professionals in England, based on the ELSA study, as well as their health capacity to continue working.
2016, Brazil ¹⁷,	Challenges of elderly participation in the labor market	Revista Brasileira de Medicina do Trabalho	A bibliographic and qualitative review assessing the participation of elderly people in the labor market in Brazil and public policies.
2021, Germany¹⁹,	Age discrimination in the context of motivation and healthy aging.	The Journals of Gerontology: Series B	A review discussing strategies for reducing discrimination and promoting healthy aging.
2020, Ecuador²³,	The choice of elderly labor: Evidence from Ecuador	RAE - Revista de análisis económico	To analyze the economic determinants of the decision to work among elderly people in Ecuador.
2021, Brazil ²⁴,	The labor market scenario for older people and the violence they suffer	Revista Brasileira de Geriatria e Gerontologia	Systematizing publications regarding the scenario of the labor market for elderly people and the situations of violence they face.
2017, Brazil ²⁶,	Ageism in the organizational context - the perception of Brazilian workers	Revista Brasileira de Geriatria e Gerontologia	Development and validation of an instrument to measure age prejudice in the organizational context. Its results carry practical implications, one of which is the necessity for organizations to outline actions to diminish the uncertainty and perception of insecurity surrounding age.
2022, United States ²⁷,	Experiences of Everyday Ageism and the Health of Older US Adults	JAMA Network Open	Examine the prevalence of age prejudice and indicators of poor physical and mental health.
2020, United States ²⁸,	Effect of Discrimination on Presenteeism among Aging Workers in the United States: Moderated Mediation Effect of Positive and Negative Affect	International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health	It indicates how perceived everyday discrimination influences presenteeism and the relationship between discrimination and positive affect among older workers.
2017, Australia²⁹,	Attitudes towards intergenerational equity: Preliminary Australian evidence	Australasian Journal on Ageing	A study based on data from national surveys, investigating the change and stability in Australian attitudes towards intergenerational equity from 2009-2010 to 2015-2017.
2017, Germany³⁰,	Hard and soft age discrimination: the dual nature of workplace discrimination	European Journal of Ageing	Survey on prejudice related to chronological and social age in workplace discrimination.
2019, United States³¹,	Long-term effects of age discrimination on mental health: The role of perceived financial strain.	The Journals of Gerontology: Series B	Understanding how discrimination increases financial strain and its influence on depressive symptoms in older women.
2019, Italy³²,	Ageism in an aging society: The role of knowledge, anxiety about aging, and stereotypes in young people and adults	International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health	To investigate the simultaneous relationships among knowledge, age, anxiety about aging, stereotypes regarding elderly people, as well as their relation to ageism.
2023, Brazil³³,	Ageism in the Academic Career: a study with professors	Educação & Realidade	The application of the Ageism Scale in the Organizational Context indicated the presence of ageism at the Universidade Federal do Piauí, with negative and positive factors being dimensioned by age group.
2019, United States³⁴,	When prejudice against you hurts others and me: The case of ageism at work	Journal of Applied Social Psychology	Through cross-sectional and longitudinal studies, age prejudice was examined regarding both young and old workers, and its relationship with intergroup contact, work behaviors, organizational identification, and well-being.
2022, United States³⁵,.	Understanding the aging workforce: defining a research agenda	National Academies Press (Book)	Shows evidence of discrimination against older workers at three levels: age-related interpersonal interactions in the workplace, age-aggregated performance profiles in the workplace, and manifestations in the labor market of productivity and age-related discrimination.
2022, Canada³⁶,	Testing the shielding effect of intergenerational contact against ageism in the workplace: A Canadian study.	International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health	Assessing how quality intergroup contacts between younger and older workers, as well as knowledge sharing practices, reduce discriminatory attitudes.
2017, England³⁷,	Age discrimination in the UK labour market. Does race moderate ageism? An experimental investigation	Applied Economics Letters	Matching test to investigate whether age prejudice is prevalent in the United Kingdom during the early stages of the hiring process.
2018, Canada³⁸,	Ageism and the older worker: a scoping review	The Gerontologist	Scope review of research on aging and its implications for the employment opportunities of older workers.
2016, Slovakia³⁹,	Struggles of older workers at the labour market.	Economics & Sociology	Empirical research to map the employability of older workers. The results suggest discrimination against older workers as well as the inadequacy of state employment policy in addressing older generations.
2019, United States⁴⁰,	Generational differences and multigenerational teamwork	Critical Care Nurse	Understanding the importance of the multigenerational environment and its challenges, while also identifying opportunities for creativity and mutual learning among generations.
2019, Brazil⁴¹,	Ageism in Organizations: Issues for Discussion	Revista de Administração IMED	Theoretical essay aiming to discuss the ageism phenomenon in the organizational environment and its influences on the aging process.
2018, United States⁴²,	The impact of an aging population in the workplace	Workplace Health & Safety	Identifying the role of occupational health nurses in implementing best practices in the workplace conducive to the aging of workers.
2018, United States⁴³,.	Work environment and the origin of ageism	Springer (Book)	Bibliographic research based on theories and findings in scientific literature about the role of organizations/companies in fostering, preserving, or reducing age prejudice within them.
2021, Brazil⁴⁵,	Elderly, work and worker health in Brazil: an integrative review	Revista Brasileira de Geriatria e Gerontologia	To discuss the relationship between old age, work, and worker health in Brazil, based on an integrative review.
2021, Germany⁴⁶,.	Challenges arising for older workers from participating in a workplace intervention addressing work ability: a qualitative study from Germany	International Archives of Occupational and Environmental Health	Describe the results of a study on the experiences and expectations of older workers regarding a workplace intervention.
2021, United States⁴⁹,	Aging and the future of decent work	International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health.	Analyze how aspects of aging and organizational factors affect lifelong work capacity.